Skip to main content


We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Static shift levelling using geomagnetic transfer functions


Galvanic distortion of magnetotelluric (MT) data is a common problem in the study of the Earth’s electrical properties. These distortions are local, they affect independently each MT site, and where restricted to distortion of the electric field are manifest as vertical shifts in the apparent resistivity curves (static shift). The removal of the static shift is necessary to avoid misinterpreting MT data. We present a method that allows us to partially retrieve the regional response of the TE-mode data in a 2D case. The method determines relative changes between distortion parameters along a profile, and is based in the Faraday’s law, and uses only magnetotelluric responses: measured impedance tensor and geomagnetic transfer function (tipper). The method is valid under the assumption that the variation of horizontal magnetic field can be neglected, and a test for checking this criterion has been developed. The mathematics involved in the procedure are straightforward, and can be stated as a linear regression. We present successful applications to both synthetic and real (COPROD data) datasets.


  1. Bahr, K., Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion, J. Geophys., 62, 119–127, 1988.

  2. Chave, A. D. and J. T. Smith, On electric and magnetic galvanic distortion tensor decomposition, J. Geophys. Res., 99, B3, 4669–4682, 1994.

  3. Chouteau, M., P. Zhang, and D. Chápellier, Computation of apparent resistivity profiles from VLF-EM data using linear filtering, Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 215–232, 1996.

  4. Garcia, X. and A. G. Jones, Extended decomposition of MT data, in The second international symposium on Three-dimensional Electromagnetics (3DEM-2), Salt Lake City (USA), 1999.

  5. Gharibi, M. and L. B. Pedersen, Transformation of VLF data into apparent resistivities and phases, Geophysics, 64, 1393–1402, 1999.

  6. Jiraceck, G., Near surface and topographic distortion in electromagnetic induction, Surveys in Geophysics, 11, 163–203, 1990.

  7. Jones, A. G., Static shift of magnetotelluric data and its removal in a sedimentary basin environment, Geophysics, 53, 967–978, 1988.

  8. Jones, A. G., The COPROD2 dataset: Tectonic setting, recorded MT data, and comparison of models, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 45, 933–955, 1993.

  9. Jones, A. G. and J. G. Savage, North American Central Plains conductivity anomaly goes east, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 685–688, 1986.

  10. Ledo, J., P. Queralt, and J. Pous, Galvanic Distortion on magnetotelluric data over a 3D regional structure, Geophys. J. Int., 132, 295–301, 1998.

  11. Ogawa, Y., Effective modeling of local and regional EM data. 15th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction on the Earth. Cabo Frio (Brasil) 2000. Invited Review Papers, pp. 259–265, 2000.

  12. Utada, H. and H. Munekane, On galvanic distortion of regional three-dimensional magnetotellurics impedances, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 385–398, 2000.

  13. Wannamaker, P. E., J. A. Stodt, and L. Rijo, A stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 88, 277–296, 1986.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanjo Ledo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ledo, J., Gabàs, A. & Marcuello, A. Static shift levelling using geomagnetic transfer functions. Earth Planet Sp 54, 493–498 (2002).

Download citation


  • Apparent Resistivity
  • Period Range
  • Static Shift
  • Distorted Data
  • Distortion Parameter