Skip to main content

Contributions of the external field to the observatory annual means and a proposal for their corrections


In this study we separate, interpret and explain magnetospheric and ionospheric signals present in the observatory annual means. The data from 46 European geomagnetic observatories collected over 42 years (1960–2001) are used. To characterise the various field components, we use predictions from latest magnetic field models. The core field and its secular variation are described by the CM4 model, and the magnetospheric contributions are successfully removed by parameterising the POMME model with the Dst index. We regard the remaining signal as being caused by ionospheric currents. The annual averages of the Sq variation estimated by the CM4 model are subtracted from the residuals. A remaining variation in anti-phase with the magnetic activity index Ap finally can be removed with a function properly scaled by Ap and Dst. We offer an objective procedure to suppress the external field contributions in the annual means to an uncertainty level of ±2 nT. Except for the ionospheric currents, this could be achieved by applying recent magnetic field models, which shows that the quality of present day models is sufficient to correct observatory data for average external field contributions. Understanding the signal contained in the annual means is a prerequisite for obtaining reliable and physically meaningful results when such data are used in studies of the core field and its secular variation.


  • Barraclough, D. R., J. M. Harwood, B. R. Leaton, and S. R. C. Malin, A definitive model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for 1965, i. derivation of model and comparison with the IGRF, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 55, 111–121, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikucki, T., H. Lühr, T. Kitamura, O. Saka, and K. Schlegel, Direct penetration of the polar electric field to the equator during a Dp2 event, as detected by the auroral and equatorial magnetometer chains and the EISCAT radar, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 17161–17173, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, M. and R. Holme, Regularization of spherical cap harmonics, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 253–262, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langel, R. A., D. J. Nerridge, D. R. Barraclough, and S. R. C. Malin, Geomagnetic temporal change: 1903–1982. A spline representation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 38, 573–597, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, S., S. Maus, T. Bondar, A. Chambodut, V. Golovkov, R. Holme, B. Langlais, V. Lesur, F. Lowes, H. Lühr, W. Mai, M. Mandea, N. Olsen, M. Rother, T. Sabaka, A. Thomson, and I. Wardinski, The 9th-generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 1051–1056, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maus, S. and H. Lühr, Signature of the quiet-time magnetospheric magnetic field and its electromagnetic induction in the rotating Earth, Geophys. J. International, 162(3), 755–763, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maus, S., H. Lühr, G. Balasis, M. Rother, and M. Mandea, Introducing POMME, The Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth, in Earth Observation with CHAMP, Results from Three Years in Space, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, pp. 293–298, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maus, S. and P. Weidelt, Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12614, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M., Signals and noise in magnetic observatory annual means: mantle conductivity and jerks, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 17261–17290, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaka, T., N. Olsen, and M. Purucker, Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Oersted and CHAMP data, Geophys. J. Int., 159, 521–547, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmucker, U., Solar cycle variations and corrected annual means for external effects at Fuerstenfeldbruck 1951–1968), Münchner Geo-physikalische Mitteilungen, 5, 217–248, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, M. and J. Meyer, Geomagnetic activity indices, in The Upper Atmosphere, edited by W. Dieminger, G.K. Hartmann, and R. Leitinger, pp. 887–911, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbanac, G., M. Korte, and M. Mandea, On long-term trends of the European geomagnetic observatory biases, Earth Planets Space, 2006a (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbanac, G., H. Lühr, and M. Rother, Evidence of the ring current effect in geomagnetic observatories annual means, Geofizika, 23, 13–20, 2006b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukutake, T. and J. Cain, Solar cycle variations in the annual mean values of the geomagnetic components of observatory data, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 39, 19–46, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuli Verbanac.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verbanac, G., Lühr, H., Rother, M. et al. Contributions of the external field to the observatory annual means and a proposal for their corrections. Earth Planet Sp 59, 251–257 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words