Skip to main content

Assessment of radar interferometry performance for ground subsidence monitoring due to underground mining

Abstract

This paper describes the results from the recently launched SAR satellites for the purpose of subsidence monitoring over underground coal mine sites in the state of New South Wales, Australia, using differential interferometric synthetic aperture radar (DInSAR) technique. The quality of the mine subsidence monitoring results is mainly constrained by noise due to the spatial and temporal decorrelation between the interferometric pair and the phase discontinuities in the interferogram. This paper reports on the analysis of the impact of these two factors on the performance of DInSAR for monitoring ground deformation. Simulations were carried out prior to real data analyses. SAR data acquired using different operating frequencies, for example, X-, C- and L-band, from the TerraSAR-X, ERS-1/2, ENVISAT, JERS-1 and ALOS satellite missions, were examined. The simulation results showed that the new satellites ALOS, TerraSAR-X and COSMO-SkyMed perform much better than the satellites launched before 2006. ALOS and ENVISAT satellite SAR images with similar temporal coverage were searched for the test site. The ALOS PALSAR DInSAR results have been compared to DInSAR results obtained from ENVISAT ASAR data to investigate the performance of both satellites for ground subsidence monitoring. Strong phase discontinuities and decorrelation have been observed in almost all ENVISAT interferograms and hence it is not possible to generate the displacement maps without errors. However these problems are minimal in ALOS PALSAR interferograms due to its spatial resolution and longer wavelength. Hence ALOS PALSAR is preferred for ground subsidence monitoring in areas covered by vegetation and where there is a high rate ground deformation.

References

  1. Carnec, C., D. Massonnet, and C. King, Two examples of the use of SAR interferometry on displacement fields of small spatial extent, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(24), 3579–3582, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, H. C., L. Ge, and C. Rizos, Radar interferometry for monitoring land subsidence due to underground water extraction, Spatial Sciences Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 736–743, CD-ROM procs, 12–16 September, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C. W. and H. A. Zebker, Phase unwrapping for large SAR interferograms: statistical segmentation and generalized network models, Geosci. Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans., 40(8), 1709–1719, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantini, M., A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming, Geosci. Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans., 36, 813–818, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ge, L., H. C. Chang, and C. Rizos, Satellite radar interferometry for mine subsidence monitoring, 22nd Australian Institute of Mine Surveyors Annual Seminar, Wollongong, Australia, paper 5, CD-ROM procs, 18–20 August, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ge, L., H. C. Chang, and C. Rizos, Mine subsidence monitoring using multi-source satellite SAR images, J. Photogrammetric Eng. & Remote Sensing, 73(3), 259–266, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GeoTerra Pty Ltd., Centennial Tahmoor Longwall panels 24 to 26, Surface water & Groundwater, subsidence management plan, Tahmoor, NSW, 80 pp., GeoTerra Pty Ltd., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, R. M., H. Engelhardt, B. Kamb, and R. M. Frolich, Satellite radar interferometry for monitoring ice sheet motion: Application to an Antarctic ice stream, Science, 262, 1525–1530, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanssen, R. F., Radar Interferometry—Data Interpretation and Error Analysis, 328 pp., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lanari, R., P. Lundgren, and E. Sansosti, Dynamic deformation of Etna volcano observed by satellite radar interferometry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1541–1544, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Massonnet, D. and K. L. Feigl, Satellite radar interferometric map of the coseismic deformation field of the M = 6.1 Eureka Valley, California, earthquake of May 17, 1993, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1541–1544, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nestbitt, A., Subsidence monitoring West Cliff Colliery longwall 5A4, APAS (Association of Public Authority Surveyors) 2003 Conference, Wollongong, Australia, 1–4 April, 133–139, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nolan, M. and D. R. Fatland, New DEMs may stimulate significant advancements in remote sensing of soil moisture, Eos Trans. AGU, 84(25), 233, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng, Syd. S., Coal Mine Ground Control, 2nd edition, 506 pp., John Wiley & Sons, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schofield, W., Engineering Surveying, 554 pp., Laxton’s, Oxford, UK, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon, S. C., V. R. Baker, J. Bloxham, J. Booth, A. Donnellan, C. Elachi, D. Evans, E. Rignot, D. Burbank, B. F. Chao, A. Chave, A. Gillespie, T. Herring, R. Jeanloz, J. LaBrecque, B. Minster, W. C. Pitman, III, M. Simons, D. L. Turcotte, and M. L. C. Zoback, Plan for living on a restless planet sets NASA’s solid Earth agenda, Eos Trans. AGU, 84(45), 485–491, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zebker, H. A., P. A. Rosen, R. M. Goldstein, A. Gabriel, and C. L. Werner, On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: The Landers earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 99(19), 19,617–19,643, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Hay-Man Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, A.H., Chang, H., Ge, L. et al. Assessment of radar interferometry performance for ground subsidence monitoring due to underground mining. Earth Planet Sp 61, 733–745 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353180

Download citation

Key words

  • DInSAR
  • mine subsidence
  • ENVISAT
  • ALOS
  • interferometry
  • mining