Skip to main content

Advertisement

Collisions between protoplanets: data analysis and classification

Article metrics

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

Collisions between protoplanets are common events in the later stage of the planetary formation process. Protoplanets grew into present-day planets through these collisional events. It is therefore necessary to obtain information about redistribution of mass and angular momentum between colliding two bodies in order to study the growth rates of planets and the origin of their spin. We have started a series of systematic studies on this theme, and this is our first report. Here, we concentrate on the impact between one protoplanet, which has one Earth mass, and another protoplanet with 0.06 Earth mass. The motion of two bodies are pursued numerically by the SPH simulation method. We change the minimum distance between the two bodies as the variable parameter to specify their orbital angular momentum. For each value of the parameter, we repeat the numerical simulations and obtain final states of bodies. Such various final states are examined by criteria developed to distinguish some clusters formed by many SPH particles. We determine instantaneous orbital elements for relative motion between central protoplanet and each cluster. From this information, we forecast the destiny of each cluster, for example, to be merged into the target body or trapped. Then we determine the initial conditions that result in final characteristic states. The 5 states are the merging state in which the impactor is absorbed to the target, the multiple impact state in which the impactor collides with the target again and again, the disruption escaping state in which the impactor is tidally disrupted and a large part of the impactor escapes from the target, the trapping state in which the impactor is trapped by the target, and the passing state in which the impactor passes through as it is.

References

  1. Agnor, C. and E. Asphaug, Accretion efficiency during planetary collisions, Astrophys. J. Lett., 613, L157–L160, 2004.

  2. Benz, W., W. L. Slattery, and A. G. W. Cameron, The origin of the moon and the single-impact hypothesis. I, Icarus, 66, 515–535, 1986.

  3. Benz, W., W. L. Slattery, and A. G. W. Cameron, The origin of the moon and the single-impact hypothesis. II, Icarus, 71, 30–45, 1987.

  4. Benz, W., A. G. W. Cameron, and H. J. Melosh, The origin of the moon and the single impact hypothesis. III, Icarus, 81, 113–131, 1989.

  5. Boss, A. P., A. G. W. Cameron, and W. Benz, Tidal disruption of inviscid planetesimals, Icarus, 92, 165–178, 1991.

  6. Cameron, A. G. W., The origin of the Moon and the single impact hypothesis V, Icarus, 126, 126–137, 1997.

  7. Cameron, A. G. W., Higher-resolution simulations of the giant impact, in Origin of the earth and moon, edited by R. M. Canup and K. Righter, 555 pp., University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, 2000.

  8. Cameron, A. G. W. and W. Benz, The origin of the moon and the single impact hypothesis. IV, Icarus, 92, 204–216, 1991.

  9. Cameron, A. G. W. and W. R. Ward, The origin of the Moon, in Lunar and Planetary Institute Conference Abstracts, 120–122, 1976.

  10. Canup, R. M., Dynamics of lunar formation, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 42, 441–475, 2004a.

  11. Canup, R. M., Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact, Icarus, 168, 433–456, 2004b.

  12. Canup, R. M. and E. Asphaug, Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth’s formation, Nature, 412, 708–712, 2001.

  13. Canup, R. M., W. R. Ward, and A. G. W. Cameron, A scaling relationship for satellite-forming impacts, Icarus, 150, 288–296, 2001.

  14. Chandrasekhar, S., An introduction to the study of stellar structure, 509 pp., Dover, New York, 1967.

  15. Gingold, R. A. and J. J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics—Theory and application to non-spherical stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 181, 375–389, 1977.

  16. Gingold, R. A. and J. J. Monaghan, Binary fission in damped rotating polytropes. II, Mon. Not. Roy. Atron. Soc., 188, 39–44, 1979.

  17. Hartmann, W. K. and D. R. Davis, Satellite-sized planetesimals and lunar origin, Icarus, 24, 504–514, 1975.

  18. Hayashi, C., K. Nakazawa, and Y. Nakagawa, Formation of the solar system, in Protostars and Planets II, edited by D. C. Black and M. S. Matthews, 1313 pp., University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1985.

  19. Hill, G. W., Researches in the lunar theory, Am. J. Math., 1, 5–26, 129–147, 245–261, 1878.

  20. Ida, S. and K. Nakazawa, Collisional probability of planetesimals revolving in the solar gravitational field. III, Astron. Astrophys., 224, 303–315, 1989.

  21. Ida, S. and J. Makino, N-body simulation of gravitational interaction between planetesimals and a protoplanet. I—Velocity distribution of planetesimals, Icarus, 96, 107–120, 1992a.

  22. Ida, S. and J. Makino, N-body simulation of gravitational interaction between planetesimals and a protoplanet. II—Dynamical friction, Icarus, 98, 28–37, 1992b.

  23. Ida, S., R. M. Canup, and G. R. Stewart, Lunar accretion from an impact-generated disk, Nature, 389, 353–357, 1997.

  24. Kokubo, E. and S. Ida, On runaway growth of planetesimals, Icarus, 123, 180–191, 1996.

  25. Kokubo, E. and S. Ida, Oligarchic growth of protoplanets, Icarus, 131, 171–178, 1998.

  26. Lissauer, J. J., A. F. Berman, Y. Greenzweig, and D. M. Kary, Accretion of mass and spin angular momentum by a planet on an eccentric orbit, Icarus, 127, 65–92, 1997.

  27. Lucy, L. B., A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis, Astron. J., 82, 1013–1024, 1977.

  28. Mizuno, H. and A. P. Boss, Tidal disruption of dissipative planetesimals, Icarus, 63, 109–133, 1985.

  29. Monaghan, J. J., Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 30, 543–574, 1992.

  30. Monaghan, J. J. and J. C. Lattanzio, A refined particle method for astrophysical problems, Astron. Astrophys., 149, 135–143, 1985.

  31. Nakazawa, K. and S. Ida, Hill’s approximation in the three-body problem, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 96, 167–174, 1988.

  32. Nakazawa, K., S. Ida, and Y. Nakagawa, Collisional probability of planetesimals revolving in the solar gravitational field. I—Basic formulation, Astron. Astrophys., 220, 293–300, 1989a.

  33. Nakazawa, K., S. Ida, and Y. Nakagawa, Collisional probability of planetesimals revolving in the solar gravitational field. II—The validity of the two-body approximation, Astron. Astrophys., 221, 342–347, 1989b.

  34. Safronov, V. S. and E. V. Zvjagina, Relative sizes of the largest bodies during the accumulation of planets, Icarus, 10, 109–115, 1969.

  35. Tillotson, J. H., Metallic equations of state for hypervelocity impact, Rep. GA-3216, July 18, Gen At., San Diego, CA, 1962.

  36. Wada, K., E. Kokubo, and J. Makino, High-resolution simulations of a Moon-forming impact and postimpact evolution, Astrophys. J., 638, 1180–1186, 2006.

  37. Watanabe, S.-I. and S. M. Miyama, Collision and tidal interaction between planetesimals, Astrophys. J., 391, 318–335, 1992.

  38. Wood, J. A., Moon over Mauna Loa—A review of hypotheses of formation of earth’s moon, in Origin of the Moon, edited by W. K. Hartmann, R. J. Phillips, and G. J. Taylor, 781 pp., Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 1986.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Akiyoshi Nouda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nouda, A., Emori, H. & Nakazawa, K. Collisions between protoplanets: data analysis and classification. Earth Planet Sp 61, 779–796 (2009) doi:10.1186/BF03353184

Download citation

Key words

  • Collisional product
  • planetary formation
  • giant impacts
  • collisional simulation
  • SPH