- Open Access
Global deformation from the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake observed by GPS: Implications for rupture process and global reference frame
Earth, Planets and Space volume 58, pages141–148(2006)
Static coseismic offsets > 1 mm are observed up to 7800 km away from the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 Dec. 2004 using global GPS network data. We investigate the rupture process based on far-field continuous GPS data. To reduce error in the coseismic offset estimates due to post-seismic deformation in the days following the main shock, we simultaneously fit a model of co- and postseismic offsets for nearby stations SAMP (500 km) and NTUS (900 km). The 3-month cumulative postseismic displacement for station SAMP amounts to 20% of the coseismic displacement, and can be well modeled by velocity-strengthening afterslip. We find that coseismic slip on the northern rupture segment is ∼3 m, which is consistent with seismic estimates. Our best estimate of the moment magnitude is M w = 9.13 if we take into account the expected increase of the shear modulus with depth (for uniform μ = 30 GPa, the moment-magnitude would only be 8.97). Our geodetic results, and thus our inferred rupture model, are different from a similar study using far-field data of Banerjee et al. (2005). These differences highlight the challenge in earthquake studies on a global scale in terms of the sensitivity of far-field offset estimates to the analysis strategy and reference frame treatment. Our predicted coseismic offsets from this event are at least 1 mm across almost the entire globe. This warrants a reconsideration of how to maintain the global terrestrial reference frame affected by earthquakes of M w > 9.0.
Ammon, C. J., C. Ji, H.-K. Thio, D. Robinson, S. Ni, V. Hjorleifsdottir, H. Kanamori, T. Lay, S. Das, D. Helmberger, G. Ichinose, J. Polet, and D. Wald, Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Science, 308, 1133–1139, 2005.
Banerjee, P., F. F. Pollitz, and R. Bürgmann, The size and duration of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from far-field static offsets, Science, 308, 1769–1772, 2005.
Bilek, S. L. and T. Lay, Rigidity variations with depth along interplate megathrust faults in subduction zones, Nature, 400, 443–446, 1999.
Bilham, R., R. Engdahl, N. Feldl, and S. P. Satyabala, Partial and complete rupture of the Indo-Andaman plate boundary 1847–2004, Seismological Research Letters, 76, 299–311, 2005.
Blewitt, G., Carrier phase ambiguity resolution for the Global Positioning System applied to geodetic baselines up to 2000 km, Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 10,187–10,283, 1989.
Bürgmann, R., M. G. Kogan, V. E. Levin, C. H. Scholz, R. W. King, and G. M. Steblov, Rapid aseismic moment release following the 5 December, 1997 Kronotsky, Kamchatka, earthquake, Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 1331–1334, 2001.
Dziewonski, A. M. and D. L. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25, 297–356, 1981.
Engdahl, E. R., R. van der Hilst, and R. Buland, Global teleseismic relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 722–743, 1998.
Heki, K., S. Miyazaki, and H. Tsuji, Silent fault slip following an interplate thrust earthquake at the Japan Trench, Nature, 386, 595–598, 1997.
Ishii, M., P. M. Shearer, H. Houston, and J. E. Vidale, Extent, duration and speed of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake imagined by the Hi-Net array, Nature, 435, 933–936, 2005.
Khan, S. A. and O. Gudmundsson, GPS analysis of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, EOS Transactions, 86, 89–94, 2005.
Krüger, F. and M. Orhnberger, Tracking the rupture of the Mw = 9.3 Sumatra earthquake over 1,150 km at teleseismic distance, Nature, 435, 937–939, 2005.
Lay, T., H. Kanamori, C. J. Ammon, M. Nettles, S. N. Ward, R. C. Aster, S. L. Beck, M. R. Brudzinski, R. Butler, H. R. DeShon, G. Ekström, K. Satake, and S. Sipkin, The Great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004, Science, 308, 1127–1133, 2005.
Marone, C. J., C. H. Scholz, and R. Bilham, On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 8441–8452, 1991.
Márquez Azúa, B., C. DeMets, and M. Masterlark, Strong interseismic coupling, fault afterslip, and viscoelastic flow before and after the Oct. 9, 1995 Colima-Jalisco earthquake: Continuous GPS measurements from Colima, Mexico, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 1281, doi:10.1029/2002GL014702, 2002.
Melbourne, T. I., F. H. Webb, J. M. Stock, and C. Reigber, Rapid post-seismic transients in subduction zones from continuous GPS, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 2241, doi:10.1029/2001JB000555, 2002.
Park, J., T. A. Song, J. Tromp, E. Okal, S. Stein, G. Roult, E. Clevede, G. Laske, H. Kanamori, P. Davis, J. Berger, C. Braitenberg, M. van Camp, X. Lei, H. Sun, H. Xu, and S. Rosat, Earth’s free oscillations excited by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Nature, 308, 1139–1144, 2005.
Pollitz, F. F., Coseismic deformation from earthquake faulting on a layered spherical Earth, Geophysical Journal International, 125, 1–14, 1996.
Stein, S. and E. Okal, Speed and size of the Sumatra earthquake, Nature, 434, 581–582, 2005.
Vigny, C., W J. F Simons, S. Abu, R. Bamphenyu, C. Satirapod, N. Choosakul, C. Subarya, A. Socquet, K. Omar, H. Z. Abidin, and B. A. C. Ambrosius, Insight into the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from GPS measurements in southeast Asia, Nature, 436, 201–206, 2005.
Zumberge, J. F, M. B. Heflin, D. C. Jefferson, and M. M. Watkins, Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 5005–5017, 1997.
About this article
Cite this article
Kreemer, C., Blewitt, G., Hammond, W.C. et al. Global deformation from the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake observed by GPS: Implications for rupture process and global reference frame. Earth Planet Sp 58, 141–148 (2006) doi:10.1186/BF03353370
- Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake
- earthquake rupture
- coseismic displacements
- postseismic deformation