Special Issue: Special section for IUGG workshop: Lithospheric Structure of a Supercontinent:Gondwana
- Article
- Published:
Three-dimensional inversion of static-shifted magnetotelluric data
Earth, Planets and Space volume 56, pages 239–248 (2004)
Abstract
A practical method for inverting static-shifted magnetotelluric (MT) data to produce a 3-D resistivity model is presented. Static-shift parameters are incorporated into an iterative, linearized inversion method, with a constraint added on the assumption that static shifts are due to a zero-mean, Gaussian process. A staggered finite-difference scheme is used to evaluate both the forward problem and the ‘pseudo-forward’ problem needed to construct the full sensitivity matrix. The linear system of equations is efficiently solved by alternating the incomplete Cholesky biconjugate gradient (ICBCG) solver with the static divergence correction procedure. Even with this efficiency in the forward modeling, generating the full sensitivity matrix at every iteration is still impractical on modern PCs. To reduce the computer time to a reasonable level, an efficient procedure for updating the sensitivities is implemented: (1) in the first few iterations, the sensitivities for the starting homogeneous half-space are used, (2) the full sensitivity matrix is computed only once (e.g. at the third iteration), and (3) for the subsequent iterations it is updated using Broyden’s algorithm. The synthetic and real data examples show that the method is robust in the presence of static shifts and can be used for 3-D problems of realistic size.
References
deGroot-Hedlin, C., Removal of static shift in two dimensions by regularized inversion, Geophysics, 56, 2102–2106, 1991.
Farquharson, C. G. and D. W. Oldenburg, Approximate sensitivities for the electromagnetic inverse problem, Geophys. J. Int., 126, 235–252, 1996.
Jones, A. G., Static shift of magnetotelluric data and its removal in a sedimentary basin environment, Geophysics, 53, 967–978, 1988.
Loke, M. H. and R. D. Barker, Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion, Geophys. Prosp., 44, 499–523, 1996.
Mackie, R. L. and T. R. Madden, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophys. J. Int., 115, 215–229, 1993.
Mackie, R. L., T. R. Madden, and P. E. Wannamaker, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling using difference equations: Theory and comparisons to integral equation solutions, Geophysics, 58, 215–226, 1993.
Mackie, R. L., J. T. Smith, and T. R. Madden, Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using finite difference equations: The magnetotelluric example, Radio Sci., 29, 923–935, 1994.
Marquardt, D. W., An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math., 2, 431–441, 1963.
McGillivray, P. R., D. W. Oldenburg, R. G. Ellis, and T. M. Habashy, Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 1–4, 1994.
Newman, G. A. and D. L. Alumbaugh, Frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences, Geophys. Prospec., 43, 1021–1042, 1995.
Newman, G. A. and D. L. Alumbaugh, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 410–424, 2000.
Ogawa, Y. and T. Uchida, A two-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion assuming Gaussian static shift, Geophys. J. Int., 126, 69–76, 1996.
Rodi, W. and R. L. Mackie, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion, Geophysics, 66, 174–187, 2001.
Sasaki, Y., 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method, Geophysics, 59, 1839–1848, 1994.
Siripunvaraporn, W. and G. Egbert, An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 65, 791–803, 2000.
Smith, J. T., Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part I: properties and error analysis, Geophysics, 61, 1308–1318, 1996a.
Smith, J. T., Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part II: Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator, Geophysics, 61, 1319–1324, 1996b.
Smith, J. T. and J. R. Booker, Rapid inversion of two- and three-dimensional magnetotelluric data, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 3905–3922, 1991.
Tarantola, A., Inverse Problem Theory: Method for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation, Elsevier, New York, 1987.
Torres-Verdin, C., V. L. Druskin, S. Fang, L. A. Knizhnerman, and A. Malinverno, A dual-grid nonlinear inversion technique with applications to the interpretation of dc resistivity data, Geophysics, 65, 1733–1745, 2000.
Uchida, T. and Y. Sasaki, Stable 3-D inversion of MT data and its application for geothermal exploration, in Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics III, edited by J. Macnae and G. Liu, ASEG, 12, 1–10, 2003.
Uchida, T., Y. Ogawa, S. Takakura, and Y. Mitsuhata, Three-dimensionality of magnetotelluric data in the Kakkonda geothermal field, northern Japan, edited by P. E. Wannamaker and M. S. Zhdanov, Proc. Second Internat. Symposium on Three-dimensional Electromagnetics (3DEM-2), Salt Lake City, 285–288, 1999.
Uchida, T., T. J. Lee, Y. Sasaki, M. Honda, Ashari, and A. Andan, 3-D interpretation of magnetotelluric data at the Bajawa geothermal field, Indonesia, Geothermal Resources Council Transaction, 25, 433–438, 2001.
Wannamaker, P. E., G. W. Hohmann, and S. H. Ward, Magnetotelluric responses of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths, Geophysics, 49, 1517–1533, 1984.
Weidelt, P., Inversion of two-dimensional conductivity structure, Phys. Earth Planet Inter., 10, 282–291, 1975.
Yamane, K., H. J. Kim, and Y. Ashida, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using a generalized RRI method and its applications, Butsuri-Tansa (Geophysical Exploration), 53, 234–244, 2000.
Zhdanov, M. S., S. Fang, and G. Hursan, Electromagnetic inversion using quasi-linear approximation, Geophysics, 65, 1501–1513, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sasaki, Y. Three-dimensional inversion of static-shifted magnetotelluric data. Earth Planet Sp 56, 239–248 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353406
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353406