Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated background seismicity rate μ by QN method (with 95% confidence intervals) and by DE method

From: Possible correlation between annual gravity change and shallow background seismicity rate at subduction zone by surface load

Long. (°)

Lati. (°)

μ (QN) (day−1)

95% (low) (day−1)

95% (up) (day−1)

μ (DE) (day−1)

EQ. number

Conv. rate (cm/year)

5

35

0.0095

0.0068

0.0133

0.0095

80

1

15

35

0.0029

0.0015

0.0054

0.0029

22

1

25

35

0.0282

0.0175

0.0455

0.0288

497

4

35

35

0.0166

0.0133

0.0208

0.0118

84

1

115

− 5

0.0114

0.0058

0.0224

0.0114

111

6

135

35

0.0132

0.0092

0.0189

0.0133

278

5

165

55

0.0121

0.0088

0.0167

0.0122

87

7

175

− 45

0.0126

0.0090

0.0176

0.0127

237

3

175

− 35

0.0072

0.0050

0.0103

0.0072

45

5

195 (− 165)

55

0.0030

0.0018

0.0050

0.0030

16

6

205 (− 155)

55

0.0070

0.0050

0.0099

0.0065

37

6

215 (− 145)

55

0.0004

0.0001

0.0017

0.0004

3

5

235 (− 125)

45

0.0114

0.0082

0.0157

0.0114

83

4

255 (− 105)

25

0.0098

0.0067

0.0143

0.0098

108

2

265 (− 95)

15

0.0337

0.0237

0.0479

0.0337

384

6

275 (− 85)

− 5

0.0049

0.0030

0.0079

0.0049

74

6

275 (− 85)

5

0.0212

0.0165

0.0271

0.0212

180

5

285 (− 75)

− 55

0.0019

0.0010

0.0037

0.0007

11

1

285 (− 75)

− 45

0.0056

0.0028

0.0108

0.0056

65

7

285 (− 75)

15

0.0076

0.0050

0.0116

0.0075

133

1

295 (− 65)

− 55

0.0004

0.0001

0.0017

0.0004

2

1

  1. The longitude and latitude indicate the center point of each area. We also show earthquake numbers and approximated plate convergence rates at each area referring to Bird (2003) and McClusky et al. (2003)