High-resolution shape models of Phobos and Deimos from stereophotoclinometry

Earth, Planets and Space

Table 4 Summary of SPC accuracy and precision assessments from previous efforts

Model	Notes	Accuracy^a	Precision^b	Reference
Eros	SPC vs shifted NLR tracks	n/a^c	0.5 ×	Roberts et al. 2014b
Eros	SPC vs NLR ranges to surface	2 ×	n/a	Barnouin personal communication
Test wall	SPC vs altimetry	n/a	1.5 ×	Craft et al. 2020
Bennu	SPC vs OLA; SPC-derived metrics	1.3–4.5 ×	6 ×	Al Asad et al. 2021
Test Bennu	SPC vs truth model	1–2.5 ×	n/a	Barnouin et al. 2020; Weirich et al. 2022
Ceres	Relative error analysis; modeling from independent sets of images	n/a	0.6 ×	Park et al. 2019
Rule of Thumb	Assuming ideal SPC image criteria are met	1–5 ×	0.5–6 ×	Range from values above

^aValues with respect to the representative mean pixel scale of the images used to make the SPC model that satisfy the sufficient SPC imaging criteria
^bValues with respect to the representative best pixel scale of the images used to make the SPC model
^cn/a indicates a value not discussed in the reference