Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of Phobos global shape models

From: High-resolution shape models of Phobos and Deimos from stereophotoclinometry

 

Ernst et al. (this study)

Gaskell 2011

Willner et al. 2014e

Image sources

Viking Orbiter, Phobos 2, MOC, HRSC, SRC, HiRISE

Viking Orbiter, Phobos 2

Viking Orbiter, HRSC, SRC

Image number

2382

232

not available

Global model GSD (m)

18

36a

100

Maplet DTM GSDb (m)

10

60

n/a

Average radiusc (km)

11.08 ± 0.04

11.12

11.12

Best-fit ellipsoid (semi-major axis)

12.95 ± 0.04 × 

11.30 ± 0.04 × 

9.16 ± 0.03

12.84 × 

11.19 × 

9.22

12.82 × 

11.17 × 

9.20

Volume (km3)

5695 ± 32

5760

5742 ± 35

Surface area (km2)

1640 ± 8

1650

1640

Bulk densityd (kg/m3)

1861 ± 11

1840

1846 ± 12

Comparison to MOLA

− 4.0 m median difference

20.1 m RMS

2.3 m median difference

29.4 m RMS

− 5.8 m median difference

21.7 m RMS

  1. aGlobal model oversamples the maplet data
  2. bBest maplet GSD used to construct global model
  3. cComputed from an equivalent volume sphere
  4. dCalculated assuming GM from Pätzold et al. (2014)
  5. eValues for GSD and volume from Willner et al. 2014; others measured from the shape model or derived in the same manner as the Ernst et al (this study) and Gaskell models to enable direct comparison