Skip to main content

Table 4 K–Ar age data

From: Reconstruction of the deformation history of an active fault: implications from the Atera Fault, Central Japan

Sample

Type

ID

K

Rad. 40Ar

Rad. 40Ar

Age

Error

Timescale

  

(µm)

(%)

(mol/g)

(%)

(Ma)

(Ma)

Period–epoch–stage

Atera 1

Welded tuff breccia

3369 < 0.1

3.56

2.5354E-10

78.9

40.6

1.0

Paleogene–Eocene–Bartonian

  

3369 < 2

4.44

3.9201E-10

93.7

50.2

1.2

Paleogene–Eocene–Ypresian

  

3369 2–6

4.00

4.1703E-10

94.9

59.1

1.4

Paleogene–Paleocene–Thanetian

  

3369 6–10

3.92

4.1464E-10

95.7

60.0

1.4

Paleogene–Paleocene–Selandian

Atera 2

Fault core

3370 < 0.1

2.74

2.0091E-10

89.5

41.8

1.0

Paleogene–Eocene–Lutetian

  

3370 < 2

2.80

2.1694E-10

88.3

44.1

1.0

Paleogene–Eocene–Lutetian

  

3370 2–6

3.18

2.9515E-10

92.6

52.7

1.2

Paleogene–Eocene–Ypresian

Kawaue 1

Granite cataclasite

3367 < 2

4.98

4.1180E-10

92.9

47.1

1.1

Paleogene–Eocene–Lutetian

Tsukechi River

1

Welded tuff host rock

3510 WR

1.57

1.5170E-10

81.6

54.9

1.3

Paleogene–Eocene–Ypresian

  1. WR whole rock, timescale Cohen et al. (2013)