Skip to main content

Table 5 Slip tendency (ST) for 2003 Miyagi and 2016 Oshika Peninsula earthquakes calculated using focal mechanism

From: Stress field in northeastern Japan and its relationship with faults of recent earthquakes

Events

Fault model

Dip direction

Stress field

\(Ts\) best

\(Ts\) error

Northern Miyagi earthquake mainshock

F-net

East

11–Area All–I

0.960

0.959 < \(Ts\)  < 0.962

West

1997–2011

0.717

0.717 < \(Ts\)  < 0.725

East

11–Area All–II

0.790

0.732 < \(Ts\)  < 0.888

West

2011–2019

0.380

0.352 < \(Ts\)  < 0.884

East

11–Area All–All

0.975

0.971 < \(Ts\)  < 0.980

West

1997–2019

0.672

0.672 < \(Ts\)  < 0.687

East

11–South

0.981

0.980 < \(Ts\)  < 0.986

West

1997–2011

0.639

0.638 < \(Ts\)  < 0.645

Largest foreshock

F-net

East

11–Middle

0.950

0.946 < \(Ts\)  < 0.964

West

1997–2011

0.673

0.673 < \(Ts\)  < 0.771

Largest aftershock

F-net

East

11–North

0.508

0.506 < \(Ts\)  < 0.869

West

1997–2011

0.981

0.981 < \(Ts\)  < 0.982

Oshika peninsula earthquake

F-net

SE

8–F + P

0.887

0.881 < \(Ts\)  < 0.895

NE

(F-net and P wave polarity)

0.824

0.824 < \(Ts\)  < 0.824

SE

8–P

0.877

0.863 < \(Ts\)  < 0.893

NE

(P wave polarity)

0.812

0.805 < \(Ts\)  < 0.819

  1. ST value (\(Ts)\) error is calculated using the uncertainty of each stress ratio. Bold numbers indicate ST best values \(Ts>0.7\). The number and letter codes in the stress field correspond to the subareas identified in Fig. 5