Skip to main content

Table 8 Slip tendency (ST) determined using stress field parameters estimated by the slip instability method

From: Stress field in northeastern Japan and its relationship with faults of recent earthquakes

Events

Fault model

Dip direction

Stress field

\(Ts\) best

\(Ts\) error

Northern Miyagi earthquake mainshock

F-net

East

11–Area All–I

0.876

0.876 < \(Ts\)  < 0.876

West

1997–2011

0.834

0.834 < \(Ts\)  < 0.835

East

11–Area All–II

0.759

0.745 < \(Ts\)  < 0.806

West

2011–2019

0.316

0. 272 < \(Ts\)  < 0.427

East

11–Area All–III

0.939

0.939 < \(Ts\)  < 0.939

West

1997–2019

0.756

0.755 < \(Ts\)  < 0.756

East

11–South

0.977

0.977 < \(Ts\)  < 0.977

West

1997–2011

0.677

0.677 < \(Ts\)  < 0.679

Largest foreshock

F-net

East

11–Middle

1997–2011

0.894

0.894 < \(Ts\)  < 0.895

West

0.777

0.767 < \(Ts\)  < 0.799

Largest aftershock

F-net

East

11–North

1997–2011

0.489

0.457 < \(Ts\)  < 0.500

West

0.984

0.983 < \(Ts\)  < 0.987

Oshika peninsula earthquake

F-net

SE

8–F + P

0.946

0.945 < \(Ts\)  < 0.950

NE

(F-net and P-wave polarity)

0.753

0.752 < \(Ts\)  < 0.758

SE

8–P

0.709

0.653 < \(Ts\)  < 0.814

NE

(P-wave polarity)

0.639

0.624 < \(Ts\)  < 0.664

  1. ST value (\(Ts)\) error is calculated using the uncertainty of each stress ratio. Bold numbers indicate ST best values of \(Ts>0.7\). The number and letter codes in the stress field correspond to the subareas identified in Figs. 5 and 11