 Full paper
 Open Access
 Published:
Mechanical and hydraulic behavior of a rock fracture under shear deformation
Earth, Planets and Space volume 66, Article number: 108 (2014)
Abstract
With regard to crystalline rock that constitutes deep geology, attempts have been made to explore its hydraulic characteristics by focusing on the network of numerous fractures within. As the hydraulic characteristics of a rock are the accumulation of hydraulic characteristics of each fracture, it is necessary to develop the hydraulic model of a single fracture to predict the largescale hydraulic behavior. To this end, a simultaneous permeability and shear test device is developed, and shearflow coupling tests are conducted on specimens having fractures with varied levels of surface roughness in the constant normal stiffness conditions. The results show that the permeability characteristics in the relation between shear displacement and transmissivity change greatly at the point where the stress path reaches the MohrCoulomb failure curve. It is also found that there exists a range in which transmissivity is not proportional to the cube of mechanical aperture width, which seems to be because of the occurrence of channeling phenomenon at small mechanical aperture widths. This channeling flow disappears with increasing shear and is transformed into a uniform flow. We develop a simulation technique to evaluate the macroscopic permeability characteristics by the lattice gas cellular automaton method, considering the microstructure of fracture, namely the fracture surface roughness. With this technique, it is shown that the formation of the HagenPoiseuille flow is affected by the fracture microstructure under shear, which as a result determines the relationship between the mechanical aperture width and transmissivity.
Background
In fractured rock such as granite in the Earth's crust, the hydraulic characteristics are dominated by the inherent fluid flows through fractures within the dense matrix. Research has been performed regarding the actual flow speed of groundwater inside such fractures, and regarding the hydraulic characteristics of rock by focusing on the network of fractures. As the hydraulic characteristics of rock are the accumulation of the hydraulic characteristics of each fracture, it is necessary to develop a hydraulic model of a single fracture to predict a largescale hydraulic behavior (e.g., Raven and Gale 1985; Yeo et al. 1998; Chen et al. 2000; Olsson and Barton 2001; Kim and Inoue 2003; Watanabe et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2009; Watanabe et al. 2009). When a shear displacement takes place in a rock fracture having rough surfaces, it may cause significant changes in the pore structure (e.g., Mitsui et al. 2012). In terms of an evaluation technique for permeability characteristics, research has been conducted in order to confirm that the permeability through the fracture increases in proportion to the cube of the mechanical aperture width, namely the cubic law flow model (e.g., Brown 1987; Oron and Berkowitz 1998; Brush and Thomson 2003; Konzuk and Kueper 2004; Qian et al. 2011a). Furthermore, research conducted so far has shown that noncubic law flows in complex fracture models may be caused by the heterogeneity of fractured media (e.g., Zimmerman et al. 1992; Qian et al. 2006; Qian et al. 2012). However, there has been no research that has dealt with how each fracture's permeability characteristics (such as the cubic law flow model) can be expressed in the presence of shear deformations. This study develops a hydraulic model to represent the permeability characteristics inside a single fracture under shear, through shearflow coupling experiments on fractured specimens. In general, the shearflow coupling testing on rock fractures is performed under either constant normal load conditions (CNL tests), or constant normal stiffness conditions (CNS tests) (e.g., Mourzenko et al. 1995; Brown et al. 1998; Nicholl and Detwiler 2001; Auradou 2009). We need to estimate strength parameters c and ϕ to understand the shear behavior of rock fractures. CNL tests are usually performed to calculate these strength parameters, at various levels of normal stress. Alternatively, when using CNS tests, it is possible to describe the failure curve of a specimen by obtaining the strength parameters c and ϕ with a single specimen, avoiding the need to prepare many specimens. In this study, we carried out CNS tests combined with permeability tests to show that the hydraulic model of each fracture (cubic or noncubic model) constituting a fracture network can be expressed to account for both the shear state and changes in the pore structure.
Furthermore, this study sheds light on the mechanism that explains the hydraulic model through simulation. For the simulation of groundwater behavior inside a fracture in particular, it is necessary to develop a methodology to directly incorporate the fracture's physical structure data such as the measured surface profiles and aperture status of the fracture. The lattice gas automaton (LGA) method, which is based on the cellular automata theory, is adopted here to serve this purpose (e.g., Frisch et al. 1987; Pot and Karapiperis 2000; Pot and Genty 2007). Using this technique, we develop a methodology for predicting the behavior of rock that is affected by changes in stress fields.
Methods
Outline of permeabilityshear tests
This section focuses on fracture surface profiles, in order to examine the relationship between the permeability behavior of a fracture under shear and its microstructure. We conducted shearflow coupling tests on specimens having a single fracture.
Specimens
The specimens are made of mortar, with uniaxial compressive strength of 29.98 MPa, cast with the surface roughness profiles of natural rock fractures. Cuboid specimens (80.0mm long × 120.0mm wide × 120.0mm high), with single fractures 60.0 mm from the bottom, were produced by placing cement mortar (mixture proportions of cement/silica sand #6/distilled water = 1:2:0.65) into a silicon rubber mold formed from a natural rock fracture (Park and Song 2013). The transmissivity of the cement mortar was 5.46 × 10^{−9} cm^{2}/s. The surface roughness profiles were measured for level differences on a 0.25mm grid, using a roughness measurement device with a noncontact laser displacement sensor (a spot diameter of 0.1 mm, featuring a 4.0μm highresolution semiconductor laser as the light source). Figure 1 shows the surface roughness profiles of the specimens used in this study. Fracture roughness is quantified as joint roughness coefficient (JRC), and JRC was determined by a visual comparison of fracture profile measured with standard roughness profile suggested by Barton and Choubey (1977). Using Z2, a parameter that characterizes the roughness profile of fractures proposed by Tse and Cruden (1979), the JRC values in the figure were obtained by applying the Z2 JRC conversion formula proposed by Yu and Vayssade (1991).
Outline of the shearflow coupling tests
In order to clarify the permeability characteristics of rock fractures under shear, this study incorporated permeability and cutoff mechanisms into the conventional shearflow coupling test device to enable the falling head permeability tests. The device was further modified to allow the inflow and measurement of tracers. The parts of the device used for shearflow coupling testing and for permeability testing are called the ‘Shearing device part’ and ‘Permeability mechanism part,’ respectively (Barla et al. 2010; Esaki et al. 1999; Jiang et al. 2004; Giger et al. 2011; Qian et al. 2011b).
Shearing device part
A schematic drawing of the shearing device part is given in Figure 2. A feedback control servo system allows the application of shear and vertical loads, maintaining a vertical stress while shearing the specimen at a constant speed of 0.1 mm/min. With these functions, the device is designed to perform CNS tests by reducing the normal loading level in accordance with the decreases in the specimen's planar dimensions to keep the normal stiffness constant. The vertical displacement is measured with differential displacement transducers, which are directly installed at two positions on the specimen. The average value of the measurements taken at the two positions is used for calculating the mechanical aperture width. Shear displacements are also directly measured at one position on the specimen.
Permeability mechanism part
The permeability mechanism part consists of a cutoff mechanism incorporated into the ‘cassette type’ shear box, and the permeability mechanism itself, which is provided by connecting the box shear test device to an upper stream tank, a tracer tank, and a lowerend burette for the falling head permeability tests. With this configuration, oneway flows can be created inside the fracture under shear. As shown in Figure 3, the shear box has a fluid cutoff structure, with an extremely soft and deformable polymer material called ‘gel sheets’ on the specimen sides. At the upper and lower ends of the fracture, storage areas are provided using cutoff rubbers specially shaped to withstand shear deformation. Fluid flowing down to the shear box is stored in the upperend storage area, infiltrated through the fracture, and then, it is stopped at the lowerend storage area to flow down to the lower tank or to the lowerend burette. Distilled water is used as the fluid. Because the viscosity of a fluid changes with a change in temperature, the water temperature is kept constant at 20°C throughout the tests.
Two electric conductivity cells are installed at the upper and lower ends of the shear box such that the sensor heads are at the upperend and lowerend storage areas, and the gaps between the box and cells is sealed with rubber. In the tracer tests, the concentration of the tracer discharge is obtained by measuring the electric conductivity R during the replacement of fluid inside the fracture. The electric conductivity cells used here have a measurement range and accuracy of 0.1 mS/m to 10.0 S/m and 0.1 mS/m, respectively, use platinized electrodes as sensors, and allow the detection of electric conductivity by the twoelectrode alternating current method. The tracer is a saline solution with an electric conductivity of 9.5 S/m that has the same viscosity as water, and is designed to measure the change of concentration with time at the upper and lowerend storage areas.
Test methods and conditions
Shearflow coupling tests were performed through shear displacement control at a shearing speed of 0.1 mm/min. Permeability tests were performed by pausing the shearing process in order to take measurements at a constant value of shear displacement u, then restarting the shearing process until the next measurement point, continuing in this manner up to a maximum of u = 3.0 mm. Before beginning the shearing process, a loading/unloading process (stiffness testing) was repeated up to three times, with a normal stress σ_{ v } value that would not damage the surface roughness of the fracture (from 0.25 up to 4.0 MPa at intervals of 1.0 MPa/min). The tests had originally been intended to be conducted at laboratories to obtain the fracture's normal stiffness k_{ n }. Here, however, the purpose of conducting these tests was to set the same initial conditions, and also to calculate the initial aperture width through the improvement of fracture interlocking.
First, in order to examine how the surface roughness of a fracture would affect its permeability characteristics, three types of specimens having different surface roughness profiles were prepared (Specimens J055, J107, and J200), which have JRC values of 5.5, 10.7, and 20.0, respectively. In the CNS tests, the hydraulic gradient I was set at a constant value of 12.5 and initial normal stress σ_{ v0 } and normal stiffness K_{ v } at 1.0 MPa and 10.0 GPa/m, respectively; the CNS and NL tests were conducted. ‘NL’ refers to the tests performed at constant normal load conditions, in order to examine the permeability characteristics as the mechanical fracture aperture width b_{ m } value becomes smaller.
Next, in order to examine how K_{ v } would affect the fracture permeability, the CNS tests were conducted on a specimen with the same roughness profile (Specimen J055, JRC = 5.5), using constant I and σ_{ v } values of 12.5 and 1.0 MPa, respectively, while setting the values of K_{ v } at 10.0, 30.0, and 50.0 GPa/m.
In general, the transmissivity T is used to represent fracture permeability characteristics when the flow inside fractures is assumed to follow Darcy's law. T is given by the following
where Q is the flow rate per unit time, I is hydraulic gradient, and w is the permeation width.
Before applying shear, the process of vertical stress loading and unloading is repeated (up to 4.0 MPa at 1.0 MPa/min) so as not to alter the surface roughness. When the vertical loadingdisplacemet curve starts to follow the same path, it is considered that the upper and lower surfaces of the specimen have interlocked well enough to be ready for the shear test. Assuming that at this stage any further application of stress will no longer affect the status of the aperture, the initial aperture width is defined as the fracture aperture width before commencing the shear test and is derived from the relation between the change in vertical stress and displacement. The mechanical aperture width b_{ m } is defined as the value obtained by adding the experimentally obtained vertical displacement to the initial aperture width (Bandis et al. 1983; Barton et al. 1985).
In the basic cubic law flow model, the fractures are modeled as parallel plates, and the flow is assumed to be laminar. The cubic law assumes that the average flow rate of a fracture is proportional to the cube of aperture width, which can be derived from the NavierStokes dynamic equation and is formulated as shown in Equations 2 and 3, based on the following three assumptions:

1)
The flow is constant and of the HagenPoiseuille type.

2)
As compared with the speed of flow in the direction parallel to the plate, the speed of flow in the direction orthogonal to the plate is negligible.

3)
The changes in the speed of flow in the direction parallel to the plate are negligibly small, as compared with those in the direction orthogonal to the plate.
where Q is the flow rate, ΔH is the head difference, b is the aperture width, g is the gravity acceleration, ν is the dynamic viscosity coefficient of the permeating fluid, w is the specimen width in the direction orthogonal to permeation direction, and l is the specimen length in the permeation direction.
With regard to the applicability of the cubic law model, numerous researches have been performed. In the case of smooth fractures, Witherspoon et al. (1980) proposed the following modified cubic law model considering the impacts of rock's surface roughness profile using a resistance coefficient f_{ c }, which is a deviation from the cubic law model that assumes parallel plates:
Here, f_{ c } represents how the flow inside fractures is affected by the roughness profile of the surface, modifying the cubic law assumption of parallel plates. The closer the f_{ c } value is to one, the smaller the extent of the flow being affected by the fracture, and the smaller the decrease in Q from the value for flow between parallel plates. In this study, the modified cubic law model given by Equation 4 is used for the flow in fractures when the cubic law model is discussed in terms of b_{ m } (Vilarrasa et al. 2011; Xiong et al. 2011).
Results and discussion
Influences of JRC of fracture on the mechanical and permeability characteristics
The mechanical characteristics of CNS tests are described, before going on to the permeability characteristics. Assuming that the shearing behavior of rock fractures follows the MohrCoulomb failure criterion, the following equation is given:
where τ is the shear strength, σ_{ v } is normal stress, c is apparent cohesion, and ϕ is the internal friction angle. Figure 4 shows the schematic diagram of the relation between the MohrCoulomb failure criterion and the τσ_{ v } relation in the CNS tests. By converting the failure criterion shown in Figure 4a using stress ratio η(=τ/σ_{ v }), the relation becomes a hyperbola, as shown in Equation 5 and Figure 4b:
Therefore, if the measured values are expressed by the τσ_{ v } relation, the values of c and ϕ can be predicted based on the hyperbola's curvature and asymptote, by extracting the BC hyperbola section, as shown in Figure 4b. The point at which the stress path reaches the failure curve (i.e., the maximum η value or η_{ p }) is denoted by the point ‘B’ in the figure, and the point ‘C’ can be specified by the critical normal stress σ_{ vc } and critical shear stress τ_{ pc }. Thus, it becomes possible to objectively define the BC section. The stresses σ_{ vc } and τ_{ pc } are the maximum values that the stress path can migrate to in the MohrCoulomb failure criterion.
Figure 5 shows the mechanical behavior observed in CNS tests. Figure 5a,b shows the mechanical characteristic that for a greater JRC value, there is a greater τ and a greater dilation. Figure 5c,d shows the results of applying Equation 6; the applicability of the hyperbola approximation described above is confirmed in Figure 5c, while Figure 5d shows that the stress path accurately represents the MohrCoulomb failure criterion, and that the greater the JRC values, the greater the c and ϕ values.
Next, with regard to the applicability of the cubic law model given by Equation 4, Figure 6 shows the b_{ m } T relation. The figure also shows the results of NL tests, i.e. the results of the permeability tests where the σ_{ v } value was set to 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, and 16.0 MPa (shown by the black mark in the figure). It is found that the T value rapidly increased near the shear displacement u_{ l } that corresponds to the proportional limit shown in Figure 5, and then after η_{ p } showed approximately a linear behavior on both logarithm axes. Thus, it is shown that the application boundary for the modified cubic law model given by Equation 4 is η_{ p }, and the permeability characteristics in the uT relationship change greatly before and after reaching the MohrCoulomb failure curve, regardless of the fracture surface profiles (Mourzenko et al. 1997; Yeo and Ge 2005).
Influents of normal stiffness on the mechanical and permeability characteristics
Described here are the influences of the K_{ v } values that are set in the CNS tests on the mechanical and permeability characteristics of rock fractures. With regard to the mechanical characteristics, Figure 7 shows the mechanical behavior observed in the CNS tests. The figure also shows the results of the NL tests. Because the value of σ_{ v } is constant in the conventional CNL tests, regardless of any changes in v, it possible to compare the results of the NL tests by assuming they are equivalent to a CNS test with a K_{ v } value of 0. Figure 7a shows the relation between u, τ, and b_{ m }. Figure 7b is an enlarged view of the uτ relation. Note that σ_{v 0} = 1.0 MPa. The uτb_{ m } relation in Figure 7a,b shows that the greater the value of K_{ v }, the greater the value of τ, and the ub_{ m } relation shows that the greater the value of K_{ v }, the lower the value of b_{ m }. Figure 7c shows the results of applying Equation 6, which confirms the applicability of the hyperbola approximation method. Figure 7d is the stress path. When the values of c and ϕ obtained by the hyperbola method are applied, it is shown that while c is highly dependent on the K_{ v } value, ϕ is approximately independent.
With regard to the permeability characteristics, Figure 8a shows the uT relation. It is also shown here that the T value rapidly increased near u_{ l } in Figure 7, and after, η_{ p } showed a linear behavior on both logarithm axes. Figure 8b shows the relation between b_{ m } and T. The figure also shows the results of the NL tests, which are the permeability tests where σ_{ v } values were set at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 MPa (denoted by the black marks in the figure). The figure confirms that the smaller the b_{ m } value, the larger the deviation from the cubic law model and that the value η_{ p } shown in Figure 7 is the boundary where the modified cubic law model given by Equation 4 is found to be accurate in all specimens. It is also observed that where the fracture profiles are the same, similar permeability characteristics are observed at large and small b_{ m } values, regardless of any changes in the normal stiffness.
Results in the tracer tests
In the previous section, η_{ p } shown in Figures 6 and 8 is the boundary of the region where the cubic law model is accurate. The reason for the large deviation from the cubic law model can also be found in the tracer tests. Preliminary tracer tests were conducted on an acrylic specimen with a circular hole, 4.0 mm in diameter and 80.0 mm in length. This acrylic specimen had a uniform pore structure in the permeation direction, where permeation and substance migration occurred. The results of the tracer tests with this acrylic specimen were compared with those with complex pore structure fractures that had the same permeation cross section area as the 4.0mmdiameter circular hole. As shown in Figure 9, the tR relationships at the entrance and exit were found to be parallel to each other in the pipe model. For fractures with complex wall profiles, there is a time delay in the substance migration curve. The figure shows that with the parallel plates, the time needed for the injected fluid to reach the exit is constant, while there is a delay in the time needed for the fluid flowing through the void created by the fracture to reach the exit, depending on which path is taken. As pointed out by Piggott and Elsworth (1993), the complex pore structure triggered local migration of the substance inside the fracture. In other words, selective flows are occurring. Figure 10 shows the changes with time in the electric conductivity for each shear displacement u value. Here again, a delay in the curve is observed at the initial shearing stage in accordance with the progress in the shearing process. Therefore, as mentioned before, the channeling phenomenon is presumed to have had a large influence on rapid changes in permeability characteristics before and after reaching the MohrCoulomb failure curve (Qian et al. 2011c).
Simulation of fluid behavior inside the fracture
Principle of lattice gas automaton method
The technique of starting from the conventional adoption of differential equations such as the NavierStokes formula or the Reynolds equation, in order to obtain the speed or pressure of the fluid in a continuous body, is limited to the understanding of average characteristics within the domain (e.g., Zimmerman and Bodvarsson 1996; Zimmerman et al. 2004; Koyama et al. 2006; Cardenas et al. 2007). However, the technique proposed here, which treats the fluid as an assembly of particles and thus a discontinuous body, can express any chaotic behavior created by particle interactions. Furthermore, it allows the consideration of interactions within rock representing fracture profiles, and this is beneficial for the identification of the relationship between the microstructure and hydraulic characteristics of the fracture. The lattice Boltzmann (LB) method, which has the same cellular automata structure as LGA, has also been used for many kinds of simulations of incompressible viscous flows. In the LGA method, particles are represented by binary digits, whereas in the LB method, real numbers are utilized to represent the local ensembleaveraged particle distribution functions and only the kinetic equation for the distribution function is solved (e.g., Madadi and Sahimi 2003; Eker and Akin 2006). The main advantages of the LGA techniques are stability, easy introduction of boundary conditions, and an effective approach to accurately calculate fluid flow parameters at the microscopic scale, enabling a highperformance computation. Because the LGA method uses Boolean numbers in simulations and is therefore free from roundoff error due to floatingpoint precision, this motivated us to choose the LGA method instead of the LB method.
In the LGA method, the fluid behavior is analyzed in the calculation process as follows:

1)
Divide the analysis target with the polygon lattice and discretize it.

2)
Express the fluid as an assembly of virtual particles of unit weight.

3)
Allocate the virtual particles on the lattice points. At each lattice point, there should be only one particle, which has a certain speed and direction at a certain time.

4)
Let the particles migrate, restricting them to the lattice lines. Each particle migrates to the closest lattice point at each discrete time step. During this process, it respects collision with other particles and scattering. The collisions are performed according to the conservation of mass and momentum.
In this study, a threedimensional projection of fourdimensional facecenteredhypercubic (FCHC) lattice is used to discretize the space, as shown in Figure 11. The FCHC lattice consists of lattices that connect neighboring points in 24 directions, each centered around (0,0,0,0). Thus, the state of lattice point n(r, t) = {n_{ i }(r, t); i = 1, 2,…, b} is expressed by b = 24 bits, and the particle can go to neighboring points in 24 directions. Here, the affected neighborhood is set at 0, meaning that the collision and scattering of a particle are only affected by the state at the point where the particle is present. As shown in the figure, the fourdimensional axes are denoted by X_{1,}X_{2,}X_{3}, and X_{4}. When projecting onto a threedimensional space, the X_{1,}X_{2}, and X_{3} axes correspond to X, Y, and Z axes, while the X_{4} axis is degenerated.
In the collision process of a particle between time steps t and t + 1, assuming that c_{ i } is a vector of the lattice line between lattice point r and the neighboring point, the mass and momentum conservation laws are given by Equations 7 and 8, respectively:
c_{ i } is the particle's migration speed in the i direction. Using a function Δ_{ i } to represent the collision process, the above equation can be written as Equation 9.
In this study, the particlefracture wall collision is expressed by the combination of slip and nonslip conditions. The nonslip condition represents cases where a particle is bounced back in the incoming direction on the wall. The nonslip condition on the fractured wall in the X_{1,}X_{2}, and X_{3} directions is given by Equation 10 below:
This is the boundary condition in which the flow speed on the wall becomes zero at the average time. For migration in the X_{4} direction, an incident particle on the wall is assumed to undergo specular reflection, the slip condition given by Equation 11 below is adopted:
With these equations, the complex fluidfracture interactions are represented by the collisions of virtual particles and fracture walls.
LGA simulation developed in this study
Since the LGA method is designed to track the collision and scattering of particles, it is impossible to set the hydraulic boundary condition on the positive side to be a hydraulic gradient. In particular, there is no pressure difference between the upper and lower streams when a particle collides with a fracture wall in the fluid flow direction. Furthermore, when injecting particles from outside the analytical model to eliminate the problem, the mass conservation law becomes invalid inside the model. For solving this problem, if the condition of r being less than one sixth the injected particle density is found to be true in the motion directions of six particles in the flow direction (+X_{ i } direction) in the FCHC lattice, namely (1,0,0,±1), (1,0,±1,0), and (1,±1,0,0), then a particle having the corresponding momentum is added to each particle at the upper end. Then, as shown in Figure 12a, the number of the particles flowing into the model becomes equal to the sum of the number of particles flowing out of the model exit and the number of particles flowing out of the model entrance after bouncing inside the model, satisfying the mass conservation law.In this case, however, the motion of particle near the model entrance/exit is affected by the fracture's porous structure and the interaction with the flow there, as well as the interaction with the domain outside the model. Thus, as shown in Figure 12b, this study assumes an imaginary domain to allow a virtual particle to flow outside the model, to perform hydraulic evaluation in the range where the influence of the interaction with the outside of the fracture cannot reach.The viscosity of the fluid flowing through the fracture is given as a function of the number of particles per lattice point. Injecting particles in the fracture surface in the LGA method leads to a different density of particles inside the fracture, and as a result, the viscosity ν is found to be different. To avoid this problem, the pressure difference and viscosity are calculated in the process of calculating the particle collision and scattering, as shown in Figure 13. Then, an algorithm is incorporated to keep a constant value for the injecting particle density inside the fracture. In other words, it was made possible to quantitatively evaluate the fluid behavior represented by particle density while keeping the fluid viscosity constant for various conditions inside the fracture surface.As shown in Figure 14, an example of analyzing the behavior of fluid flowing between two parallel plates in the LGA method is presented here. The aperture between the two parallel plates in the model had 300 lattices in the X direction (flow direction) and 100 in the Y direction (aperture width), with a number that varied between 10 and 30 in the Z direction (aperture thickness direction). The density of the injecting particles at the exit was set at 0, and at the entrance a value of between 0.45 and 0.55, respectively, with 20 lattices in the flow direction in the imaginary domain. In the Z direction, a reflective boundary was assumed in order to produce interactions with the fracture surface, and in the Y direction, there was a cyclic boundary condition.
The particle density within the aperture width was kept at 30. Figure 15a,b shows the values of pressure in the flow direction and flow speed in the Z direction (aperture thickness direction). The former shows a linear decrease, and the latter follows the parabolic distributions. This represents what is known as the HagenPoiseuille flow, which is derived from the NavierStokes formula. These results prove that the technique developed here allows the evaluation of fluid behavior by the collision/scattering of virtual particles in the microscopic process (Gao and Sharma 1994; Gutfraind and Hansen 1995).
LGA simulation of fluid behavior inside the fracture
An example of simulating the behavior of fluid flowing through the fracture using a model that faithfully represents the surface roughness structure of a specimen with a roughness of JRC 10.7 is shown in Figure 16. The part of the specimen shown here is where fluid flows into the fracture from below towards above at each time. The white areas represent where there are initially no particles. The figures show how the dark blue particles fill the pore inside the fracture at the beginning, and then red particles are injected into the fracture. The most reddish areas represent the highest tracer density. The lower the tracer density, the more bluish the color becomes. The analytical results show that the particles behave so as to avoid the narrow aperture parts, but a low density of tracer particles is found not only in the domains with narrow apertures created by the roughness of the fracture, but also in the vicinity of these domains. This implies that where the aperture width is small, the domains disrupt the fluid flow in a wide area.Using the aperture elevation distributions obtained in the shear tests, the number of particles on the upper and lower sides of the fracture was tracked for each value of shear displacement. The results are shown in Figure 17. Sheared specimens were extracted for each shear displacement, and a model made by measuring the state of the fracture surface. In this figure also, the ordinal axis represents the number of dark blue particles, which fill the pore at the beginning but are gradually replaced by the injecting particles. Where the shear displacement is large, there is only a small delay occurred in the time needed for substitutions on the upper and lower streams. However, where the shear displacement is small, there is a larger delay in substitution. This seems to be because of the fact that with a small aperture width, the particles selectively flow through narrow pores and go out of certain pores only as shown in Figure 16, and thus the particle substitution process takes more time. A local flow or ‘channeling phenomenon’ was produced because the upper and lower specimens were in contact with each other at many locations. When the contact area then became smaller, in accordance with the progress of the shearing process, the flow became uniform and the channeling phenomenon disappeared.Figure 18 shows a comparison of particle substitution results where fluid is assumed to flow through the fracture at a shear displacement of 0.1 mm, following a HagenPoiseuille flow. It is shown that a HagenPoiseuille flow corresponds to cases where the shear displacement is large. Given the results described in the previous section, the formation of a HagenPoiseuille flow leads to the formation of the cubic law model between the transmissivity and aperture width. The results of shearflow coupling experiments described in the previous section also showed that the stress field below the proportional limit and the yielding range above it had different transmissivityaperture width relation. According to the analytical results in the LGA method, the HagenPoiseuille flow was difficult to form up to the proportional limit where there was not much dilation development to accompany shear displacement, which as a result prevented the constitution of the cubic law between the transmissivity and aperture width.
Conclusions
For clarifying the permeability characteristics of rock fractures, shearflow coupling tests in constant normal stiffness conditions were conducted in this study. The main insights obtained in this study are as follows:

(1)
According to the uT relationship, T was found to rapidly increase at u _{ l }. In the CNS tests, it was found that the relation showed linear behavior in both logarithmic axes at η _{ p } and afterwards. This led to the realization that because η _{ p } is the crossings on the MohrCoulomb failure curve, the permeability characteristics represented by the uT relationship changed greatly before and after reaching the MohrCoulomb failure curve.

(2)
Even when the fractures had the same b _{ m } value, they had different permeability characteristics if their pore structures were different.

(3)
There existed a range in which T was not proportional to the cube of b _{ m } where b _{ m } was small in the b _{ m } T relation. This seems to be caused by the fact that the channeling phenomenon occurred at small b _{ m } values, which disappeared in accordance with the progress of shear process and transformed into a uniform flow.

(4)
The findings (3) above were also confirmed in the tracer tests. A delay in the curve was observed at the initial shearing stage, which confirmed that the flow was gradually transformed into the HagenPoiseuille flow in accordance with the progress in shearing process.

(5)
The b _{ m }T relation of the tests with different K _{ v } using the same specimens was found to follow the same path in accordance with increases in b _{ m }, showing that the same permeability characteristics were observed at large b _{ m } values if the fracture profiles were the same.
Furthermore, taking into account the microstructure of fracture, the LGA method has been developed as an analytical technique for hydraulic behavior using a cellular automaton method to evaluate macroscopic permeability characteristics. It is then proved that the formation of HagenPoiseuille flow is affected by the microstructure of fracture under shear, which as a result determines the relation between the mechanical aperture width and transmissivity.
References
 1.
Auradou H: Influence of wall roughness on the geometrical, mechanical and transport properties of single fractures. J Phys D 2009, 42: 214015. doi: 10.1088/0022–3727/42/21/214015
 2.
Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR: Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomesh Abstr 1983, 20(6):249–268. 10.1016/01489062(83)905958
 3.
Barla G, Barla M, Martinotti ME: Development of a new direct shear testing apparatus. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2010, 43: 117–122. 10.1007/s0060300900415
 4.
Barton N, Choubey V: The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 1977, 10: 1–54. 10.1007/BF01261801
 5.
Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K: Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock Joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomesh Abstr 1985, 22(3):121–140. 10.1016/01489062(85)932279
 6.
Brown SR: Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J Geophys Res 1987, 92(B2):1337–1347. 10.1029/JB092iB02p01337
 7.
Brown S, Caprihan A, Hardly R: Experimental observation of fluid flow channels in a single fracture. J Geophys Res 1998, 103(B3):5125–5132. 10.1029/97JB03542
 8.
Brush DJ, Thomson NR: Fluid flow in synthetic roughwalled fractures: Navier–Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations. Water Resour Res 2003, 39(4):1085. doi: 10.1029/2002WR001346
 9.
Cardenas MB, Slottke DT, Ketcham RA, Sharp JM Jr: Navier–Stokes flow and transport simulations using real fractures shows heavy tailing due to eddies. Geophys Res Lett 2007., 34: L14404 doi: 10.1029/2007GL030545 L14404
 10.
Chen Z, Narayan SP, Yang Z, Rahman SS: An experimental investigation of hydraulic behavior of fractures and joints in granitic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2000, 37(7):1061–1071. 10.1016/S13651609(00)000393
 11.
Chen Z, Qian J, Luo S, Zhan H: Experimental study of friction factor to groundwater flow in a single rough fracture. J Hydrodyn 2009, 21(6):820–825. 10.1016/S10016058(08)602188
 12.
Eker E, Akin S: Lattice boltzmann simulation of fluid flow in synthetic fractures. Transp Porous Med 2006, 65: 363–384. doi: 10.1007/s11242–005–6085–4
 13.
Esaki T, Du S, Mitani Y, Ikusada K, Jing L: Development of a shearflow test apparatus and determination of coupled properties for a single rock joint. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1999, 36: 641–650. 10.1016/S01489062(99)000443
 14.
Frisch U, d’Humières D, Hasslacher B, Lallemand P, Pomeau Y, Rivet JP, et al.: Lattice gas hydrodynamics in two and three dimensions. Complex Systems 1987, 1: 649–707.
 15.
Gao Y, Sharma MM: A LGA model for fluid flow in heterogeneous porous media. Transp Porous Med 1994, 17(1):1–17. 10.1007/BF00624047
 16.
Giger SB, Clennell MB, Harbers C, Clark P, Ricchetti M, Ter Heege JH, Wassing BBT, Orlic B: Design, operation and validation of a new fluidsealed direct shear apparatus capable of monitoring faultrelated fluid flow to large displacements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2011, 48: 1160–1172. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.005
 17.
Gutfraind R, Hansen A: Study of fracture permeability using lattice gas automata. Transp Porous Med 1995, 18(2):131–149. 10.1007/BF01064675
 18.
Jiang Y, Tanabashi Y, Xiao J, Nagaie K: An improved shearflow test apparatus and its application to deep underground construction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004, 41: 385–386. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.046
 19.
Kim HM, Inoue J: Analytical approach for anisotropic permeability through a single rough rock joint under shear deformation. J Geophys Res 2003, 108(B8):2366. doi: 10.1029/2002JB002283
 20.
Konzuk JS, Kueper BH: Evaluation of cubic law based models describing singlephase flow through a roughwalled fracture. Water Resour Res 2004., 40: W02402 doi: 10.1029/2003WR002356 W02402
 21.
Koyama T, Fardin N, Jing L, Stephansson O: Numerical simulation of shear induced flow anisotropy and scale dependent aperture and transmissivity evolutions of fracture replicas. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2006, 43(1):89–106. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.04.006
 22.
Madadi M, Sahimi M: Lattice Boltzmann simulation of fluid flow in fracture networks with rough, selfaffine fractures. Phys Rev E 2003, 67: 026309.
 23.
Mitsui Y, Iio Y, Fukahata Y: A scenario for the generation process of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake based on dynamic rupture simulation: role of stress concentration and thermal fluid pressurization. Earth Planets Space 2012, 64(12):1177–1187.
 24.
Mourzenko VV, Thovert JF, Adler PM: Permeability of a single fracture: validity of the Reynolds equation. J Phys II 1995, 5(3):465. doi: 10.1051/jp2:1995133
 25.
Mourzenko VV, Galamay O, Thovert JF, Adler PM: Fracture deformation and influence on permeability. Phys Rev E 1997, 56(3):3167–3184. 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.3167
 26.
Nicholl MJ, Detwiler RL: Simulation of flow and transport in a single fracture: macroscopic effects of underestimating local head loss. Geoph Res Lett 2001, 28(23):4355. doi: 10.1029/2001gl013647
 27.
Olsson R, Barton N: An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. Int J Rock Mec Min Sci 2001, 38(3):317–329. 10.1016/S13651609(00)000794
 28.
Oron AP, Berkowitz B: Flow in rock fractures: the local cubic law assumption reexamined. Water Resour Res 1998, 34(11):2811–2825. 10.1029/98WR02285
 29.
Park JW, Song JJ: Numerical method for the determination of contact areas of a rock joint under normal and shear loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2013, 58: 8–22.
 30.
Piggott AR, Elsworth D: Laboratory assessment of the equivalent apertures of a rock fracture. Geophys Res Lett 1993, 20(13):1387–1390. 10.1029/93GL01384
 31.
Pot V, Genty A: Dispersion dependence on retardation in a real fracture geometry using latticegas cellular automaton. Adv Water Res 2007, 30: 273–283. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.011
 32.
Pot V, Karapiperis T: A multispecies latticegas automaton model to study passive and reactive tracer migration in 2D fractures. Eur Phys J 2000, B13: 387–393.
 33.
Qian J, Liu Y, Wang J, Guan H, Chen S, Wang J: NonLCL and tracer test for groundwater flow in a single fracture. J Hydrodynamics Series B 2006, 18(1):104–108.
 34.
Qian J, Chen Z, Zhan H, Guan H: Experimental study of the effect of roughness and Reynolds number on fluid flow in roughwalled single fractures: a check of local cubic law. Hydrol Process 2011, 25: 614–622. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7849
 35.
Qian J, Zhan H, Chen Z, Ye H: Experimental study of solute transport under nonDarcian flow condition in a single fracture. J Hydrol 2011, 399: 246–254. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.003
 36.
Qian J, Chen Z, Zhan H, Luo S: Solute transport in a filled single fracture under nonDarcian flow. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2011, 48: 132–140. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.009
 37.
Qian J, Liang M, Chen Z, Zhan H: Eddy correlations for water flow in a single fracture with abruptly changing aperture. Hydrol Process 2012, 26: 3369–3377. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8332
 38.
Raven KG, Gale JE: Water flow in a natural rock fracture as a function of stress and sample size. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1985, 22(4):251–261. 10.1016/01489062(85)929523
 39.
Tse R, Cruden DM: Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1979, 16: 303–307. 10.1016/01489062(79)902419
 40.
Vilarrasa V, Koyama T, Neretnieks I, Jing L: Shearinduced flow channels in a single rock fracture and their effect on solute transport. Transp Porous Med 2011, 87: 503–523. doi: 10.1007/s11242–010–9698–1
 41.
Watanabe N, Hirano N, Tsuchiya N: Determination of aperture distribution and fluid flow in a rock fracture by highresolution numerical modeling on the basis of a flowthrough experiment under confining pressure. Water Resour Res 2008., 44: W06412 doi: 10.1029/2006WR005411 W06412
 42.
Watanabe N, Hirano N, Tsuchiya N: Diversity of channeling flow in heterogeneous aperture distribution inferred from integrated experimentalnumerical analysis on flow through shear fracture in granite. J Geophys Res 2009., 114: B04208 doi: 10.1029/2008JB005959 B04208
 43.
Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE: Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 1980, 16(6):1016–1024. 10.1029/WR016i006p01016
 44.
Xiong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C: Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2011, 48: 1292–1302. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.009
 45.
Yeo IW, Ge S: Applicable range of the Reynolds equation for fluid flow in a rock fracture. Geosci J 2005, 9(4):347–352. 10.1007/BF02910323
 46.
Yeo IW, De Freitas MH, Zimmerman RW: Effect of shear displacement on the aperture and permeability of a rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 1998, 35(8):1051–1070. 10.1016/S01489062(98)00165X
 47.
Yu X, Vayssade B: Joint profiles and their roughness parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sct Geomech Abstr 1991, 28(4):333–336. 10.1016/01489062(91)90598G
 48.
Zimmerman RW, Bodvarsson GS: Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Med 1996, 23: 1–30.
 49.
Zimmerman RW, Chen DW, Cook NGW: The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures. J Hydrology 1992, 139(1–4):79–96.
 50.
Zimmerman RW, AlYaarubi A, Pain CC, Grattoni CA: Nonlinear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004, 41(3):384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.045
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
The work presented here was carried out in collaboration between all authors. SN,YO and HI defined the research theme. SN and TY designed methods and experiments, carried out the laboratory experiments, analyzed the data, interpreted the results and wrote the paper. YO and HI codesigned experiments, discussed analyses, interpretation, and presentation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Shearflow coupling test
 Constant normal stiffness
 Fracture surface roughness
 MohrCoulomb failure
 Lattice gas cellular automaton
 Modified cubic law
 HagenPoiseuille flow