Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Full paper
  • Open Access

Magnetic properties of the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project Hole-1 (WFSD-1), Sichuan Province, China

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Earth, Planets and Space201466:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-23

  • Received: 1 August 2013
  • Accepted: 13 November 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

We measured the magnetic susceptibility of the core from the first borehole of the Wenchuan Earthquake (May 12, 2008, Mw 7.9) Fault Scientific Drilling Project (WFSD-1) at 1-cm intervals. The correlations between magnetic susceptibility anomalies and fault rock occurrence are shown by a few fault zones in the WFSD-1 core. The values for the mass and ferromagnetic material magnetic susceptibility for the sample at 589.25-m depth are higher than those for the other samples. All the thermomagnetic curves display a rapid increase in slope after 380°C, and a marked peak occurs at about 510°C in the heating curves. The cooling curves are clearly higher than the heating curves. The saturation magnetization (Ms) shows a significant peak at a depth of 589.25 m, as do the mass magnetic susceptibility and the ferrimagnetic magnetic susceptibility. The mechanism principally responsible for the high magnetic susceptibility at a depth of 589.25 m might be the production of new magnetite from iron-bearing silicates (e.g., chlorite) or clays caused by frictional heating during seismic slip. Therefore, we suggest that the presence of high magnetic susceptibility fault gouges in the same country rock can be considered as an indicator of earthquakes or seismic signatures.

Keywords

  • Wenchuan Earthquake
  • Yingxiu-Beichuan fault
  • Slip zone
  • Magnetic susceptibility

Background

The magnetic properties of fault rocks can be used as tracers for physical and chemical alterations caused by frictional heating during earthquakes. Magnetic susceptibility and rock magnetism have commonly been used to understand the physical characteristics and chemical processes of fault slip zones (Enomoto and Zheng 1998; Nakamura and Nagahama 2001; Ferré et al. 20052012). Correlations have been reported between magnetic susceptibility anomalies in borehole log data and the presence of cataclastic zones and faults in the main drill borehole of the German Deep Drilling Project (KTB) (Bosum et al. 1997), but the magnetic susceptibility of drill cuttings in the KTB do not support this correlation (Rauen et al. 2000). A series of studies demonstrated that higher magnetic susceptibilities might result from the production of new magnetic minerals with high magnetic susceptibility caused by frictional heating (Hirono et al. 2006; Mishima et al. 2006; Tanikawa et al. 2008) or from decreases in the grain size of magnetic minerals caused by shearing (Dearing 1999) during large-magnitude earthquakes (e.g., the Kobe and Chi-Chi earthquakes). Recently, the Chi-Chi earthquake gouge layer has been identified from the modern geomagnetic field direction recorded within the gouge layer (Chou et al. 2012).

Motivated by an interest in investigating the mechanism of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project (WFSD) was launched on November 4, 2008, only 178 days after the Wenchuan Earthquake (Xu and Li 2010). The Wenchuan Earthquake (Mw 7.9) produced two major surface rupture zones along the Yingxiu-Beichuan and Anxian-Guanxian faults. The Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault crosses heavily populated regions and is associated with destructive earthquakes. The first borehole (WFSD-1) of the project was drilled to investigate the mechanism of the southern segment of the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault (Li et al. 2012).

In recent studies, fault zone structures have been observed, and friction experiments and rock magnetic measurements have been performed on surface samples in the area of the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault (Lin et al. 2010; Verberne et al. 2010; Togo et al. 2011a, b). The internal structures of the Beichuan fault zone in the outcrop at Hongkou demonstrate that the Beichuan fault zone consists of fault breccias, cataclasite, and fault gouge, although there are differences in descriptions of the width of the fault gouge zone (Lin et al. 2010; Togo et al. 2011a; Wang et al. 2014). Friction experiments proved that the clay-rich sediments of the region might have a damping effect upon ruptures propagating from depth (Verberne et al. 2010). High-velocity friction experiments performed on the Hongkou outcrop clayey fault gouge showed that this rock exhibits dramatic weakening at seismic slip rates, and the steady-state frictional coefficient reduces to as low as 0.1 to 0.2 at a slip rate of 1.3 m/s (Togo et al. 2011b).

Rock magnetic measurements from Zhaojiagou and Dagou showed that the magnetic properties of most of the fault rocks are dominated by paramagnetic components. Although magnetic susceptibility measurements from the Zhaojiagou section showed insignificant anomalies in the gouge, the results from the Zhaojiagou outcrop fault rock measurements suggested that the temperature had been high enough to drive the decomposition of Fe-bearing minerals to form magnetite or maghemite (Yang et al. 2012a, b2013; Liu et al. 2014). Preliminary magnetic susceptibility measurement results of the WFSD-1 borehole core (but only within the fault zones) were reported by Pei et al. (2010), but results for all core samples have not yet been published. In particular, in the WFSD-1 borehole, the high magnetic susceptibility patterns obtained from logging data near the primary slip zone of the Wenchuan Earthquake look similar to the pattern at a single fault zone seen at a small scale. There may be a larger-scale high magnetic susceptibility anomaly in the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault Zone.

All samples from the WFSD-1 borehole underwent preliminary study in the WFSD field laboratory shortly after drilling. They were also studied later using several methods to obtain a complete set of data on the petrophysical, geochemical, and lithological properties (Li et al. 2012).

In this paper, we report the results of the magnetic susceptibility measurements for all core samples of the WFSD-1 borehole, present the magnetic susceptibility characteristics of the core samples, and discuss the difference between the core measurements and the logging data. We also assess the processes that caused the high magnetic susceptibility in the fault gouge by analyzing selected core samples from the primary slip zone in the WFSD-1 borehole. Finally, we discuss the implications of the presence of multi-segment fault rocks with high magnetic susceptibility in the WFSD-1 core.

Geological setting and drilling procedure

Longmen Shan is the main mountain range along and one of the steepest margins of the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau in Sichuan Province, China. The significant deformation in western Sichuan has been governed by interactions among three crustal blocks (Songpan, Chuandian, and South China) (Figure 1). The Longmen Shan thrust belt consists of the Wenchuan-Maoxian, Yingxiu-Beichuan, and Anxian-Guanxian faults, at the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau (e.g., Burchfiel et al. 2008; Densmore et al. 2007). These faults show long-term activity, and active faults have developed along previous faults since the late Triassic (Deng et al. 1994; Burchfiel et al. 1995; Li et al. 2006; Densmore et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2008). The Wenchuan Earthquake (Mw 7.9, May 12, 2008) is the largest inland earthquake to have hit southwest China during the past century. Two surface ruptures extend along the northeast, striking Yingxiu-Beichuan and Anxian-Guanxian faults. Most studies found the length of the co-seismic surface rupture to be 200 to 240 km (e.g., Liu-Zeng et al. 2009; Xu et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2010). However, as the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake ruptured the Qingchuan Fault, the total length of the rupture zone is approximately 275 km (Xu et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008), possibly even as much as 285 to 300 km (Lin et al. 2012).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Geological map of Longmen Shan and the western Sichuan basin area. This shows the site of the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling and highlights the Wenchuan Earthquake surface rupture (thick red lines) on two faults of the Longmen Shan thrust fault system (F1, Wenchuan-Maoxian Fault; F2, Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault; F3, Anxian-Guanxian Fault) (revised after Li et al. 2012).

The first borehole, WFSD-1, was drilled 178 days after the earthquake through 1,201.15 m of the Neoproterozoic Pengguan complex and the alternating sandstones and siltstones of the Triassic Xujiahe Formation. The borehole is located along the southern segment of the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault, and designed to be an inclined borehole, with an 80° inclination angle in a 134°NE direction. The borehole recovered 1,368.29 m of core sample (Li et al. 2012). The borehole consists of three segments, 32.17 to 304.26 m, 179.85 to 625.80 m, and 583.07 to 1,201.15 m, due to drilling accidents at depths of 304.26 and 625.80 m (Fan et al. 2009). Two general rock types are found in the borehole cores. Unit 1 is the Pengguan complex, consisting of gray-green diorite, volcanic rocks, and pyroclastic rocks, with ages of 850 to 750 Ma (Yan et al. 2004). This unit is the hanging wall of the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault and is found at depths shallower than 585.75 m. Pseudotachylyte has been found in an outcrop near the boundary of the Pengguan complex and the Xujiahe Formation, but does not occur in this borehole (Li et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2014). Unit 2 is the Triassic Xujiahe Formation, which consists of gray sandstone, siltstone, and dark gray mudstone with coal beds. This is the footwall of the fault and is found below depths of 598 m.

On the basis of the fault rock distribution and fault density, 12 fault zones with fault gouge, cataclastic rocks, and fault breccias have been identified within the WFSD-1 core (Li et al. 2012). The scale of these fault zones ranges from a few centimeters to tens of meters. The thickest fault zone occurs between 585 and 598 m. The fault zones containing significant fault gouge are FZ233 (from 232.2 to 233.9 m), FZ590 (from 575.7 to 595.5 m), and FZ759 (from 753.13 to 759 m). From the analysis of core observations and measurements of physical properties, Li et al. (2012) identified the principal slip zone (PSZ) of the Wenchuan Earthquake as having been at FZ590.

Methods

Magnetic susceptibility was measured on all core surfaces at 1-cm intervals using a Bartington MS2E surface sensor (Witney, Oxon, England). The active region of the MS2E sensor is at the end of a 25-mm diameter ceramic cylinder mounted in line with the electronics unit. The active region of the sensing surface is a 10.5 × 3.8-mm rectangle.

The results include three sections named WFSD-1-1 (32.17 to 304.26 m), WFSD-1-S1 (179.85 to 625.80 m), and WFSD-1-S2 (583.07 to 1,201.15 m) due to the down borehole drilling accidents at 304.26- and 625.80-m depths (Fan et al. 2009). The results for WFSD-1-S1a come from the same core as WFSD-1-S1, but include iron contamination. The drilling tool debris can be easily removed with forceps (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Metallic iron debris and particles found in the WFSD-1 core. The depths are at 628.45 m (left) and 594.1 m (right).

The magnetic susceptibility variation patterns of WFSD-1-1 from 179.85 to 304.26 m resemble those from the same depth interval in WFSD-1-S1, and the variations from 583.07 to 625.80 m in WFSD-1-S1 resemble the same depth interval in WFSD-1-S2, except for the abnormally high values at depths of approximately 594.2 and 629 m (Figure 3). The magnetic susceptibility of the WFSD-1 borehole includes all of WFSD-1-1, 304.26 to 625.80 m of WFSD-1-S1, and 625.80 to 1,201.15 m of WFSD-1-S2 (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

The magnetic susceptibility of the WFSD-1 borehole. The oval indicates an area of high magnetic susceptibility caused by iron debris from the drilling accidents in Figure 2.

The main damaged zone in the FZ590 fault zone consists of at least 12 layers of fault gouges, but the darkest layer of the gouge, including the PSZ position of the Wenchuan Earthquake, can only be seen in one layer (589.17- to 589.28-m depth), which seems to be the freshest (Figure 3, Li et al. 2012). To understand the high magnetic susceptibility in FZ590, we took six samples within every 10-cm interval between depths of 589.05 and 589.55 m. Thermomagnetic curves (k-T) and mass magnetic susceptibility were measured using a Kappabridge (KLY-4, AGICO, Brno, Czech Republic) with a CS-3 high-temperature furnace at the Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction of the Ministry of Land and Resources, China. Thermomagnetic measurements were conducted in an argon atmosphere and in air, while applying a steady field of 300 A/m. The samples were heated to 700°C and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 10°C/min.

Magnetic hysteresis loops were measured with an alternating gradient magnetometer (Princeton Micromag 2900, Westerville, OH, USA) at the physics laboratory of Beijing University. The magnetic field was cycled between ±1.0 T. Saturation magnetization (Ms), saturation remanence (Mrs), and magnetic coercivity (Hc) were determined after correction for the paramagnetic contribution. Coercivity of remanence (Hcr) is the field required to erase remanent magnetization permanently; it was obtained by backfield measurements after being magnetized at 1.0 T.

The mass magnetic susceptibility of these six samples ranges from 3.42 × 10−8 to 10.54 × 10−8 m3/kg. The 589.25-m-depth sample is the highest in magnetic susceptibility, which is similar to the pattern obtained from the surface measurements of the core. The k-T curves can help identify magnetic materials (Deng et al. 2001). The k-T curves of the selected samples from the FZ590 display a rapid increase in slope after 380°C, and a marked peak occurs at about 510°C in the heating curves. The magnetic susceptibility becomes effectively zero at about 585°C (Figure 4). All the cooling curves show a clear hump between 580°C and 380°C, the value of which is obviously higher than that of the peak in the heating curves.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Thermomagnetic susceptibility curves, in air and in argon, of the selected samples. The samples were taken at depths between 589.05 and 589.55 m of the WFSD-1 core.

Results and discussion

Iron contamination

In the WFSD-1 borehole, the high magnetic susceptibility values obtained from logging data near the primary slip zone, between the depths of 505 and 590 m and the depths of 675 and 695 m, seen on a larger scale, look similar to the patterns observed at a single fault zone on a small scale (e.g., the magnetic susceptibility at depths of approximately 589.25, 618, 730, and 732.5 m) (Figure 5). The results for the magnetic susceptibility of the core and logging data are consistent, except for depths between 500 and 700 m (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Depth logs. This shows the simplified lithology (left) and magnetic susceptibility of the core and logging data (right) of the WFSD-1 borehole.

This significant difference between the core and logging magnetic susceptibility data requires explanation. Some metallic iron debris was found in this borehole core during analysis around 628.45- and 594.1-m depths (Figure 2). It is also noteworthy that drilling accidents occurred at 590.76- and 625.80-m depths, and drilling was resumed in a separate borehole at 583.07 m (Fan et al. 2009). There are significant amounts of metal particles near 590.76-m depth caused by milling of the lost drill, and some abandoned metal instruments around 625.80-m depth. The significant magnetic susceptibility anomalies in the logging data at depths between 500 and 700 m are caused by these metallic iron particles that originated from the drilling accident.

Relationship between magnetic susceptibility and lithology

Granite and volcanic rocks make up most of the Neoproterozoic Pengguan complex, which occurs above 585-m depth in the WFSD-1 core. Pyroclastics, mainly consisting of celadon tuff, are present from 3- to 181.5-m depth. The main rock types from 181.5- to 291-m depths are porphyries and diorite, with three intervals of volcanic rocks: 189 to 196 m, 226 to 249 m, and 271 to 276 m. Between depths of 291 and 575.6 m, mostly volcanic rocks and pyroclastics occur, except for three intervals of diorite and porphyries located at 362.7 to 394 m, 494 to 512 m, and 545 to 555 m (Li et al. 2012).

The surface magnetic susceptibility values of the Pengguan complex range from hundreds to thousands of 10−6 SI, consistent with the great variations in lithology (Figures 5 and 6a). The lithology of the core between about 598- and 759-m depth is mainly gray sandstone, dark-gray siltstone, carbon shale, and coal bed. Below 759 m, the rocks are mainly gray sandstone, dark-colored fine sandstone, and liquefied breccias (Li et al. 2012).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Magnetic susceptibility and lithological sequence of the WFSD-1 core, showing the correlation between the two. (a) Pengguan complex, (b) gray sandstone, (c) dark-gray siltstone with carbon shale, (d) gray and dark-gray siltstone, and (e) black siltstone and gray sandstone.

The surface magnetic susceptibility values of the Xujiahe Formation usually range from a few to dozens of 10−6 SI (Figure 6b,d), and the carbon shale and coal bed rocks from zero to <10 × 10−6 SI (Figure 6c). Furthermore, the liquefied breccia segment cores are composed of gray sandstone and black siltstone, which may be seismites resulting from intense and strong earthquakes during the late Triassic. Higher values are associated with the black siltstone, and lower values with the gray sandstone in these segments (Figure 6e).

The magnetic susceptibility of a rock is strongly influenced by its concentration of ferrimagnetic minerals, mainly iron oxides such as magnetite, titanomagnetite, and hematite (Dunlop and Ŏzdemir 1997). On the whole, the lithology of the WFSD-1 core controls the pattern of the magnetic susceptibility variance. However, the large variations in magnetic susceptibility may not have been caused only by lithological changes (Figure 5).

Relationship between magnetic susceptibility and fault rocks

Correlations between magnetic susceptibility anomalies and the occurrence of cataclastic zones and faults have been reported (Bosum et al. 1997). Recently, a number of examples of high magnetic susceptibility within fault gouges have been described from several faults related to large earthquakes (Enomoto and Zheng 1998; Nakamura and Nagahama 2001; Fukuchi et al. 2005; Hirono et al. 2006; Mishima et al. 20062009). Similarly, some core gouges with high magnetic susceptibility occur within the WFSD-1 core.

In this paper, we present the results obtained from the fault rocks at depths of approximately 589.25, 618, 709, 730, and 732.5 m (Figure 7). These sections contain fault gouges, cataclasite, and host rock. The 589.25-m-depth gouge was generated during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake (Li et al. 2012). The magnetic susceptibility of this section shows a significant peak corresponding to the fresh black gouge (Figure 7b). In addition, some fault gouges are regarded as ancient slip zones because of their hardened features showing distinct highs in magnetic susceptibility (Figure 7c,d,f). However, lower magnetic susceptibilities corresponding to cataclasite or fault breccias also occur in the WFSD-1 borehole (Figure 7e). Moreover, insignificant anomalies were revealed from some fault gouges of the WFSD-1 core (Figure 7a) and sections in the outcrop, including fault gouges and immediate host rocks at the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault (Yang et al. 2012a, b2013). A possible reason for the insignificant variation in magnetic susceptibility of fault rocks (gouge) occurring in outcrop is that high magnetic susceptibility magnetic minerals (e.g., magnetite) transform into low magnetic susceptibility mineral assemblages as a result of surface processes such as weathering, microbial processes, and oxidation-reduction (Liu et al. 2014). Although a correlation between the magnetic susceptibility anomalies and the fault rock (fault gouge) occurrences is present in the WFSD-1 borehole, not all rocks with higher magnetic susceptibility are fault rocks; mafic intrusions can cause similar variations (Ferré et al. 2009). There is another possibility which is that faults can occur in places where the rocks on either side have different compositions, resulting in contrasting magnetic susceptibilities. Therefore, only cases in which high magnetic susceptibility fault rocks (fault gouge) occur in the same country rock can be considered as indicators of earthquakes or seismic signatures.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Magnetic susceptibility logs. These are the logs of the WFSD-1 core, showing high magnetic susceptibility gouges at depths of approximately 589.25, 618, 709, 730, and 732.5 m. (a) Fault rocks in Pengguan complex, (b) black fault gouge at the PSZ, (c) gray and black gouge in siltstone with carbon shale, (d) black gouge in sandstone, (e) cataclasite in sandstone, and (f) gray and black gouge in siltstone.

Mechanism of the magnetic susceptibility enhancement at the Wenchuan Earthquake PSZ and its implications

The results of the mass magnetic susceptibility confirm the high values at the PSZ of the Wenchuan Earthquake near 589.25-m depth (Figure 8i). The mechanism for susceptibility enhancement of fault gouges is still a subject for debate. The anomalies of the Chi-Chi earthquake are, in general, caused by increased amounts of ferrimagnetic minerals in the rocks (Mishima et al. 2009; Chou et al. 2012).
Figure 8
Figure 8

Hysteresis loops, depth logs, and theoretical mixing curves. Magnetic hysteresis loops before (a, c, e, g) and after (b, d, f, h) paramagnetic correction; depth logs of low-field (i), paramagnetic (j), and ferrimagnetic susceptibilities (k); saturation magnetization (Ms) (l); and coercivity (Hc) (m) of selected samples from depths between 589.05 and 589.55 m in the WFSD-1 core. Hysteresis parameters, Mr/Ms, and Hcr/Hc are plotted on a plot by Day et al. (1977) with the theoretical mixing curves (n) (Dunlop 2002a, b).

The k-T curves of the FZ590 samples show a Curie temperature near 580°C, a cooling curve above the heating curve, and a hump above 380°C during heating. The magnetic hysteresis experiments show the existence of paramagnetic minerals (Figure 8a,b,c,d,e,f,g). Paramagnetic susceptibility (χpara) is determined from the high-field slopes of the hysteresis curves (Table 1 and Figure 8j).
Table 1

Magnetic parameters of the selected samples from depths of 589.05 to 589.55 m in WFSD-1

Sample

χlf(10−8 m3/kg)

χpara(10−8 m3/kg)

χferri(10−8 m3/kg)

Ms (10−3Am2/kg)

Mrs (10−3Am2/kg)

Hc (mT)

Hcr (mT)

589-1

4.92

3.47

1.45

0.844

0.102

13.4

37.6

589-2

6.39

3.08

3.31

0.825

0.101

11.5

37.3

589-3

10.54

2.40

8.14

10.916

0.760

6.59

29.2

589-4

5.60

0.51

5.09

0.804

0.126

12.6

32.2

589-5

4.45

0.04

4.41

0.011

0.001

9.29

33.8

589-6

3.42

0.65

2.77

0.560

0.079

12.6

42.7

χlf, low field magnetic susceptibility; χpara, paramagnetic susceptibility verified by hysteresis measurements; χferri, ferrimagnetic susceptibility calculated from the difference between χlf and χpara; Ms, saturation magnetization; Mrs, saturation remanence; Hc, coercivity; Hcr, coercivity of remanence.

The Curie point near 580°C indicates that nearly-pure magnetite is the magnetic carrier (Dunlop and Ŏzdemir 1997). The high χpara of samples 589-1 and 589-2 indicate that the paramagnetic component is dominant in these samples, but ferrimagnetic susceptibility (χferri) shows a similar pattern to χlf (Table 1 and Figure 8k). Moreover, Ms shows a significant peak at a depth of 589.25 m, as do χlf and χferri; Hc at the 589.25-m depth is lower than those of the other samples (Table 1, Figure 8i,j,k,l,m). The behavior of the heating curves above 380°C is probably associated with the neoformation of magnetite from iron-containing silicates/clays or pyrrhotite (Hunt et al. 1995; Deng et al. 2001; Chou et al. 2012). The high magnetic susceptibility in the 589.25-m-depth sample is directly proportional to χferri, and the high Ms may show that new minerals with low Hc were formed during dynamic earthquake faulting. When compared to the theoretical hysteresis trends for SD-SP and SD-MD mixtures (Dunlop 2002a) on a Day diagram (Day et al. 1977), all samples display values generally parallel to the SD-MD mixing model curve (Figure 8n).

The clay minerals of the WFSD-1 PSZ of the Wenchuan Earthquake came to general attention when Si et al. (2010) pointed out the high smectite content, low illite and chlorite levels, and the tiny amount of kaolinite. In contrast, the fault gouge in the outcrop at the Hongkou surface rupture has high illite and chlorite contents and very little smectite content (Si et al. 2010; Togo et al. 2011a). The loss of clay minerals at depth was probably caused by their conversion into magnetite by complex reactions driven by frictional heating and hot fluids injected by the thermal pressurization slip mechanism (Lin 2011). For example, oxidized alteration of chlorite forms some iron oxides (Chamberlain et al. 1999), and siderite changes into pyrite and magnetite under low-oxygen conditions (Tanikawa et al. 2008).

The principal mechanism responsible for the 589.25-m-depth high magnetic susceptibility might have been the production of new magnetite from iron-containing silicates (e.g., chlorite) or clays caused by frictional heating during seismic slip (Yang et al. 2012a). The presence of several layers of fault gouge with high magnetic susceptibility in the WFSD-1 borehole indicates that large earthquakes have occurred repeatedly on the Yingxiu-Beichuan fault.

Conclusions

High-resolution measurements revealed detailed variations in the magnetic susceptibility of the WFSD-1 core. The reason that the results of the core surface measurement and the logging data are obviously different for depths between 500 and 700 m is that drilling accidents produced significant amounts metallic iron debris.

In general, the rock types control the greatest proportion of the magnetic susceptibility. The magnetic susceptibility values of the hanging wall (the Pengguan complex) range from dozens of to several hundred 10−6 SI, and the values for the footwall (the Xujiahe Formation) usually range from a few to dozens of 10−6 SI. Moreover, possible correlations between the magnetic susceptibility anomalies and the occurrence of fault rocks (fault gouge) are shown by a few fault zones in the WFSD-1 core. The high values of the fault gouge at 589.25-m depth require the formation of magnetic minerals with high magnetic susceptibility, such as magnetite. The production of new magnetite may have been from the breakdown of iron-containing silicates or clays (e.g., chlorite) as a result of the higher temperatures caused by frictional heating during a large earthquake.

Fault gouges with high magnetic susceptibility in the same wall rocks can be considered as a proxy for earthquakes or seismic signatures. That multi-segment fault rocks with high magnetic susceptibility which occur in the WFSD-1 core indicate that repeated seismic activity has taken place on the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault.

Questions remain, however, whether the high magnetic susceptibility fault gouges were formed by one earthquake; whether the fault gouges of different depths, such as surface outcrop and the drilling core, are of a similar nature; and why the magnetic susceptibility of some fault gouges does not display a significant anomaly. The rock magnetic properties of the WFSD-1 core for different rock types and fault zones will be addressed in future studies.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Wenchuan Earthquake Faults Scientific Drilling Centre for their help. The authors also thank the 403 geological survey teams for their field drilling work and well logging. We are particularly grateful to Eric C. Ferré and an anonymous reviewer for many useful and important comments, and Toshi Yamazaki for editorial help. The authors would like to thank Liu Ankun and Enago (http://www.enago.cn) for the English language review. This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China through the ‘Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Program (WFSD),’ the National Science Foundation of China (grant 41172177), and basic outlay of scientific research work from the Ministry of Science and Technology (DZLXJK201308).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism and Tectonic Reconstruction of Ministry of Land and Resources, Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Continental Tectonic and Dynamics, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China

References

  1. Bosum W, Casten U, Fieberg FC, Heyde I, Soffel HC: Three-dimensional interpretation of the KTB gravity and magnetic anomalies. J Geophys Res 1997, 102(B8):18307–18321. 10.1029/96JB03407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Burchfiel BC, Chen ZL, Liu Y, Royden LH: Tectonics of the Longmen Shan and adjacent regions, Central China. Int Geol Rev 1995, 37(8):661–735. 10.1080/00206819509465424View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchfiel BC, Royden LH, Van der Hilst RD, Hager BH, Chen Z, King RW, Li C, Lü J, Yao H, Kirby E: A geological and geophysical context for the Wenchuan Earthquake of 12 May 2008, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. GSA Today 2008, 18: 4–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chamberlain CP, Poage MA, Craw D, Reynolds RC: Topographic development of the Southern Alps recorded by the isotopic composition of authigenic clay minerals, South Island. New Zealand Chem Geol 1999, 155: 279–294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou YM, Song SR, Aubourg C, Lee TQ, Boullier AM, Song YF, Yeh EC, Kuo LW, Wang CY: An earthquake slip zone is a magnetic recorder. Geology 2012, 40: 551–554. 10.1130/G32864.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Day R, Fuller M, Schmidt VA: Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: grain-size and compositional dependence. Phys Earth Planet Inter 1977, 13: 260–267. 10.1016/0031-9201(77)90108-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Dearing J: Magnetic susceptibility. In Environmental magnetism: a practical guide. Edited by: Walden J, Oldfield F, Smith J. London: Quaternary Research Association; 1999:35–62.Google Scholar
  8. Deng QD, Chen SF, Zhao XL: Tectonics, seismicity, and dynamics of the Longmen Shan Mountains and its adjacent regions. Seismol Geol 1994, 16(4):389–403. (in Chinese with English abstract) (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  9. Deng CL, Zhu RX, Jackson MJ, Verosub KL, Singer MJ: Variability of the temperature-dependent susceptibility of the Holocene eolian deposits in the Chinese loess plateau: a pedogenesis indicator. Phys Chem Earth A 2001, 26(11–12):873–878.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Densmore AL, Ellis MA, Li Y, Zhou R, Hancock GS, Richardson N: Active tectonics of the Beichuan and Pengguan Faults at the Eastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Tectonics 2007, 26(4):TC4005. doi:10.1029/2006TC001987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunlop DJ: Theory and application of the Day plot: 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite. J Geophys Res 2002a, 107(B3):EPM 4–1-EPM 4–22. doi:10.1029/2001JB000486Google Scholar
  12. Dunlop DJ: Theory and application of the Day plot: 2. Application to data for rocks, sediments, and soils. J Geophys Res 2002b, 107(B3):EPM 5–1-EPM 5–15. doi:10.1029/2001JB000487Google Scholar
  13. Dunlop DJ, Ŏzdemir O: Rock magnetism, fundamentals and frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Enomoto Y, Zheng Z: Possible evidences of earthquake lightning accompanying the 1995 Kobe earthquake inferred from the Nojima fault gouge. Geophys Res Lett 1998, 25(14):2721–2724. 10.1029/98GL02015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan LS, Jia J, Wu JS, Zhao YG, You JW: Overview on drilling operation of the WFSD-1 in Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project. Exploration Eng 2009, 36(12):5–8. (in Chinese with English abstract) (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Ferré EC, Zechmeister M, Geissman J, MathanaSekaran N, Kocak K: The origin of high magnetic remanence in fault pseudotachylytes: theoretical considerations and implications for co-seismic electrical currents. Tectonophysics 2005, 402: 125–139. 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.01.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferré EC, Maes M, Butak KC: The magnetic stratification of layered mafic intrusions: natural examples and numerical models. Lithos 2009, 111: 83–94. 10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferré EC, Geissman JW, Zechmeister MS: Magnetic properties of fault pseudotachylytes in granites. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2012, 117(B1):B01106. doi:10.1029/2011JB008762View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukuchi T, Mizoguchi K, Shimamoto T: Ferrimagnetic resonance signal produced by frictional heating: a new indicator of paleoseismicity. J Geophys Res 2005, 110(B12):404. doi:10.1029/2004JB003485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirono T, Ikehara M, Otsuki K, Mishima T, Sakaguchi M, Soh W, Omori M, Lin WR, Yeh EC, Tanikawa W, Wang C: Evidence of frictional melting from disk-shaped black material, discovered within the Taiwan Chelungpu fault system. Geophys Res Lett 2006, 33: L19311. doi:10.1029/2006GL027329View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt CP, Subir KB, Jiamao H, Peter AS, Eric O, Weiwei S, Tungsheng L: Rock-magnetic proxies of climate change in the loess-paleosol sequences of the western Loess Plateau of China. Geophys J Int 1995, 123: 232–244. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06672.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Zhou RJ, Densmore AL, Ellis MA: Geomorphic evidence for the late Cenozoic strike-slipping and thrusting in Longmen Mountain at the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Quaternary Sci 2006, 26(1):40–51. (in Chinese with English abstract) (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  23. Li HB, Fu XF, Van der Word J, Si JL, Wang ZX, Hou LW, Qiu ZL, Li N, Wu FY, Xu ZQ, Tapponnier P: Co-seismic surface rupture and dextral-slip oblique thrusting of the Ms 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake. Acta Geological Sinica 2008, 82(12):1623–1643. (in Chinese with English abstract) (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Li HB, Wang H, Xu ZQ, Si JL, Pei JL, Li TF, Huang Y, Song SR, Kuo LW, Sun ZM, Chevalier ML, Liu DL: Characteristics of the fault-related rocks, fault zones and the principal slip zone in the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project Borehole-1 (WFSD-1). Tectonophysics 2012, 584: 23–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li HB, Xu ZQ, Niu YX, Kong GS, Huang Y, Wang H, Si JL, Sun ZM, Pei JL, Gong Z, Chevalier ML, Liu DL: Structural and physical properties characterization in the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project Borehole-1 (WFSD-1). Tectonophysics 2014, 619–620: 86–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin AM: Seismic slip recorded in the fluidized ultracataclastic veins formed along the coseismic shear zone during the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake. Geology 2011, 39: 547–550. 10.1130/G32065.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin AM, Ren Z, Kumahara Y: Structural analysis of the coseismic shear zone of the 2008 MW7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake, China. J Struct Geol 2010, 32: 781–791. 10.1016/j.jsg.2010.05.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin AM, Rao G, Yan B: Field evidence of rupture of the Qingchuan Fault during the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake, northeastern segment of the Longmen Shan Thrust Belt, China. Tectonophysics 2012, 522–523: 243–252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu DL, Li HB, Lee TQ, Chou YM, Song SR, Sun ZM, Chevalier ML, Si JL: Primary rock magnetism for the Wenchuan earthquake fault zone at Jiulong outcrop, Sichuan Province, China. Tectonophysics 2014, 619–620: 58–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu-Zeng J, Zhang A, Wen L, Tapponnier P, Sun J, Xing X, Hu G, Xu Q, Zeng L, Deng L, Ji C, Hunnut KW, Van Der Woerd J: Co-seismic surface ruptures of the 12 May 2008 Ms 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake, Sichuan: east–west crustal shortening on oblique, parallel thrusts along the eastern edge of Tibet. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009, 286: 355–370. 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.07.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mishima T, Hirono T, Soh W, Song SR: Thermal history estimation of the Taiwan Chelungpu fault using rock-magnetic methods. Geophys Res Lett 2006, 33: L23311. doi:10.1029/2006GL028088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mishima T, Hirono T, Nakamura N, Tanikawa W, Soh W, Song SR: Changes to magnetic minerals caused by frictional heating during the 1999 Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. Earth Planets Space 2009, 61: 797–801.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakamura N, Nagahama H: Changes in magnetic and fractal properties of fractured granites near the Nojima Fault, Japan. Island Arc 2001, 10: 486–494. 10.1046/j.1440-1738.2001.00347.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Pei JL, Li HB, Sun ZM, Wang H, Si JL: Fault slip in the Wenchuan Earthquake fault zone—information from fault rocks with higher magnetic susceptibility. Quaternary Sci 2010, 30(4):759–767. (in Chinese with English abstract) (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  35. Rauen A, Soffel HC, Winter H: Statistical analysis and origin of the magnetic susceptibility of drill cuttings from the 9.1-km-deep KTB drill borehole. Geophys J Int 2000, 142: 83–94. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00141.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Si JL, Li HB, Song SR, Kuo LW, Pei JL, Wang H: Clay mineral anomalies in WFSD Drilling Core and Surface Fault Rocks and their significances. San Francisco, CA, USA: Paper presented at the American Geophysical Unionfall annual meeting; 2010:13–17. T51B-2044 T51B-2044Google Scholar
  37. Tanikawa W, Mishima T, Hirono T, Soh W, Song SR: High magnetic susceptibility produced by thermal decomposition of core samples from the Chelungpu fault in Taiwan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2008, 272(1–2):372–381.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Togo T, Shimamoto T, Ma SL, Wen XZ, He HL: Internal structure of Longmenshan fault zone at Hongkou outcrop, Sichuan, China, that caused the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthq Sci 2011, 24(3):249–265. 10.1007/s11589-011-0789-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Togo T, Shimamoto T, Ma SL, Hirose T: High-velocity frictional behavior of Longmenshan fault gouge from Hongkou outcrop and its implications for dynamic weakening of fault during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Earthq Sci 2011, 24(3):267–281. 10.1007/s11589-011-0790-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Verberne BA, He CR, Spiers C: Frictional properties of sedimentary rocks and natural fault gouge from the Longmen Shan fault zone, Sichuan, China. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2010, 100(5B):2767–2790. 10.1785/0120090287View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Li HB, Si JL, Sun ZM, Huang Y: Internal structure of the Wenchuan earthquake fault zone, revealed by surface outcrop and WFSD-1 drilling core investigation. Tectonophysics 2014, 619–620: 101–114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu ZQ, Li HB: New results from the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Scientific Drilling Project (WFSD). San Francisco, CA, USA: Paper presented at the American Geophysical Union fall meeting; 2010:13–17. Abstract T53E-01 Abstract T53E-01Google Scholar
  43. Xu ZQ, Ji SC, Li HB, Hou LW, Fu XF, Cai ZW: Uplift of the Longmen Shan range and the Wenchuan Earthquake. Episodes 2008, 31(3):291–301.Google Scholar
  44. Xu XW, Wen XZ, Yu GH, Chen GH, Klinger Y, Hubbard J, Shaw J: Coseismic reverse- and oblique-slip surface faulting generated by the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake, China. Geology 2009, 37: 515–518. 10.1130/G25462A.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Yan QR, Hanson AD, Wang ZQ, Druschke PA, Yan Z, Wang T, Liu DY, Song B, Jian P, Zhou H, Jiang CF: Neoproterozoic subduction and rifting on the Northern Margin of the Yangtze Plate, China: implications for Rodinia Reconstruction. Int Geol Rev 2004, 46(9):817–832. 10.2747/0020-6814.46.9.817View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang T, Chen JY, Wang HQ, Jin HQ: Rock magnetic properties of fault rocks from the rupture of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China and their implications: preliminary results from the Zhaojiagou outcrop, Beichuan County (Sichuan). Tectonophysics 2012, 530–531: 331–341.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang T, Chen JY, Wang HQ, Jin HQ: Magnetic properties of fault rocks from the Yingxiu-Beichuan fault: constraints on temperature rise within the shallow slip zone during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake and their implications. J Asian Earth Sci 2012, 50: 52–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang T, Chen JY, Yang XS, Wang HQ, Jin HQ: Differences in magnetic properties of fragments and matrix of breccias from the rupture of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China: relationship to faulting. Tectonophysics 2013, 601: 112–124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang PZ, Wen X, Shen Z, Chen J: Oblique, high-angle, listric-reverse faulting and associated development of train: the Wenchuan Earthquake of May 12, 2008, Sichuan, China. Annu Rev Earth Planet Scis 2010, 38: 353–382. 10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152602View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pei et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement