Open Access

Fluid-rock interaction recorded in black fault rocks in the Kodiak accretionary complex, Alaska

  • Asuka Yamaguchi1Email author,
  • Tsuyoshi Ishikawa2,
  • Yasuhiro Kato3,
  • Tatsuo Nozaki4,
  • Francesca Meneghini5, 6,
  • Christie D Rowe7,
  • James Casey Moore5,
  • Akito Tsutsumi8 and
  • Gaku Kimura9
Earth, Planets and Space201466:58

Received: 28 February 2014

Accepted: 4 June 2014

Published: 19 June 2014


Ultrafine-grained black fault rocks (BFRs) in the Pasagshak Point Thrust of the Kodiak accretionary complex are examples of fault rocks that have recorded seismicity along an ancient subduction plate boundary. Trace element concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr ratios of BFRs and surrounding foliated/non-foliated cataclasites were measured to explore the nature of fluid-rock interactions along a subduction thrust. Foliated and non-foliated cataclasites do not show significant geochemical anomalies, suggesting that they were formed by slowly distributed shear. BFRs are characterized by Li and Sr enrichment, Rb and Cs depletion, and a low 87Sr/86Sr ratio. These geochemical signatures can be explained by fluid-rock interactions at >350°C, which result in preferential removal of Rb and Cs and formation of plagioclase under the presence of fluids with high Li and Sr concentrations and low 87Sr/86Sr ratios. Geochemical anomalies recorded by the BFRs indicate both frictional heating and external fluid influx into the subduction thrust.


Subduction zone Seismogenic zone Pseudotachylyte Fluid-rock interaction



In subduction zones, fluids are abundant due to porosity reduction and dehydration of hydrous minerals. Most of the seismic moments released by global earthquakes occur along subduction zones, where fluids play important mechanical and chemical roles in seismic faulting. From a geological perspective, pseudotachylytes formed by frictional melting during high-velocity seismic slip have classically been considered as the only definitive evidence of earthquakes (Sibson 1975; Cowan 1999). Although occurrences of pseudotachylytes in crystalline continental rocks were known until approximately the 1990s (Swanson 1992), several pseudotachylyte-bearing fault zones in subduction settings have been discovered in recent years (Ikesawa et al. 2003; Kitamura et al. 2005; Rowe et al. 2005, 2011; Mukoyoshi et al. 2006; Okamoto et al. 2006; Meneghini et al. 2010; Hashimoto et al. 2012).

The ultrafine-grained black fault rock (BFR) in the Kodiak accretionary prism, Alaska, was first discovered by Rowe et al. (2005), who considered this rock as an example of subduction zone pseudotachylytes. Because BFR is unique in terms of its large thickness (up to 30 cm) and widespread occurrence, it has been further investigated on both microscopic (Meneghini et al. 2010) and macroscopic (Rowe et al. 2011) scales. Meneghini et al. (2010) also characterized the geochemistry of fault rocks and detected Sr anomalies. Here, we describe new geochemical observations that emphasize the role of fluids in the development of BFR.

Anomalies of trace element concentrations and isotope compositions within fault zones have recently been used to estimate maximum fluid temperatures (Ishikawa et al. 2008; Hirono et al. 2009; Hamada et al. 2011; Honda et al. 2011) because trace elements and isotopes can reflect fluid-rock interactions at temperatures as high as approximately 350°C. The mineralogy of fault zones can also affect element distribution during fluid-rock interactions (Yamaguchi et al. 2011b). Taking these works into consideration, we attempt to reconcile trace element concentrations and Sr isotope ratios in the ultrafine-grained BFR and surrounding cataclasites in Kodiak Island to gain a better understanding of the role of fluids in faulting. Based on the geochemical result, we interpret these geochemical results in terms of fluid-rock interactions recorded in plate boundary thrusts.

Geological setting and occurrences of cataclasites

The Kodiak archipelago in Alaska (Figure 1a) consists of a Jurassic to Eocene accretionary complex composed of NW-dipping, thrust-bounded units showing progressively younger ages toward the southeast (Moore et al. 1983; Plafker et al. 1994) that are intruded by 58- to 59-Ma near-trench granitic rocks reflecting ridge subduction (Farris et al. 2006; Ayuso et al. 2009). The Ghost Rocks Formation, consisting of the latest Cretaceous-earliest Paleocene ridge-flank deposits, is distributed over the southeastern part of Kodiak Island (Fisher and Byrne 1987). This formation is overthrust by the Late Cretaceous Kodiak Formation and is underthrust by Eocene marine sediments (Moore 1969). The structural base of the Ghost Rocks Formation consists of a tectonic mélange composed of blocks of coherent turbidites and sandstones in a matrix of disrupted mudstones and argillites (Byrne 1982, 1984). Pillow basalts and hyaloclastites showing prehnite-pumpellyite facies metamorphism are included in the matrix (Moore 1969; Byrne 1982).
Figure 1

Geological setting of the study area. (a) Ghost Rocks Formation in Kodiak Island. (b) Simplified geological map of the Pasagshak Point Thrust and outcrop localities.

The Pasagshak Point Thrust (Rowe et al. 2005, 2011; Meneghini et al. 2010) is a strike-parallel fossil thrust zone exposed along the rocky shoreline of Pasagshak Point (Figure 1). The thrust is located within the basal mélange zone of the Ghost Rocks Formation, implying shear localization along an ancient subduction thrust (Rowe et al. 2005). Both the hanging wall and footwall of the thrust consist of mélanges composed of terrigenous sandstones, mudstones, and argillites (Additional file 1: Figure S1a) with minor greenstones. Large sandstone blocks (thickness >10 m) occur in the hanging wall in places. S-C structures, slickenlines, and rotated fold axes within the fault zone suggest a top-to-southeast sense of shear (Rowe et al. 2005, 2011; Meneghini et al. 2010). The paleotemperature of the syn-tectonic fluid is estimated to be 230°C to 260°C from fluid inclusions in quartz veins within the mélange zone (Vrolijk et al. 1988), whereas the maximum burial temperature of the wall rock is estimated to be 250°C ± 10°C from vitrinite reflectance analysis of carbonaceous material within the argillite (Rowe et al. 2011). The similarity of the two temperature estimates suggests that deformations recorded in the thrust zone occurred at approximately 250°C at seismogenic depths of the plate boundary décollement.

Various types of cataclasites, 7 to 31 m in thickness, occur within the thrust zone (Additional file 1: Figure S1) (Rowe et al. 2011). Detailed structures of cataclastic fault rocks have been described in previous accounts (Rowe et al. 2005, 2011; Meneghini et al. 2010). Cataclastic fault rocks are classified into three categories: foliated cataclasites (both clast-rich and matrix-rich; Additional file 1: Figure S1b), non-foliated cataclasites (Additional file 1: Figure S1c), and ultrafine-grained black fault rocks (BFRs; Additional file 1: Figure S1d). The BFRs, locally thicker than 30 cm, make up the principal shear zones in the thrust zone and are further classified into three types: aphanitic, grain-supported, and clast-bearing. The structural features of foliated and non-foliated cataclasites in comparison with the textures formed by experimentation suggest that foliated cataclasites were formed by slow creep (Niemeijer and Spiers 2006), whereas non-foliated cataclasites were formed at faster shear rates, such as through afterslips or delocalized slips associated with earthquakes (Rowe et al. 2011). The aphanitic BFRs contain crystalline microlayers that are regarded as melt-origin microtextures (Meneghini et al. 2010) and are therefore interpreted as pseudotachylytes formed during seismic slip. Conversely, grain-supported BFRs and clast-bearing BFRs are considered to be reworked pseudotachylytes that have mixed with surrounding cataclasites, respectively (Meneghini et al. 2010). BFRs show the greatest biomarker thermal maturity, whereas that of the cataclasites decreases with distance from the BFRs (Savage et al. 2014). BFRs, foliated cataclasites, and non-foliated cataclasites exhibit mutually crosscutting relationships (Additional file 1: Figure S1e) and represent repeated deformations with different strain rates, which may be related to seismic cycles (Rowe et al. 2011).

Geochemical analysis and results

Samples of two host rocks, six foliated cataclasites, two non-foliated cataclasites, two clast-bearing BFRs, and one aphanitic BFR were selected for geochemical analysis (Additional file 2: Table S1). These samples were collected from three representative outcrops (wpt 009, wpt 014, and wpt 015 of Meneghini et al. 2010; Rowe et al. 2011) and were carefully cut into approximately 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm chips to avoid the influence of surface weathering. The chips were ultrasonicated in deionized water and were then pulverized in an agate ball mill.

Major element concentrations were determined by an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF; MagiX PRO, Spectris, Egham, Surrey, UK) installed at the Kochi Core Center (KCC), Kochi, Japan, using the conventional glass bead method. Powdered splits for trace elements and isotope analyses were dissolved by HNO3-HF-HClO4 digestion and were then evaporated. The residue was dissolved with HNO3 and was diluted to approximately 1:1,000. Concentrations of Sc, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Cs, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, Pb, Th, and U were determined by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS; Agilent 7500c, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) installed at the Department of Systems Innovation, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Kato et al. 2005). Li, Be, Ti, W, and Tl concentrations were measured by ICP-MS (ELAN DRC II, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at the KCC. Sr was separated using ion-exchange resin columns (Sr Resin, Eichrom Technologies Inc., Lisle, IL, USA), and Sr isotope ratios were determined by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS; TRITON, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the KCC. The 87Sr/86Sr value obtained for the NIST SRM 987 standard was 0.7102570 ± 0.000010.

Analytical results are shown in Additional file 2: Table S1. Major element and some trace element compositions are consistent with previously reported values as determined by XRF (Meneghini et al. 2010). Element compositions normalized by averaged host rock values are presented in Figure 2. The clast-bearing BFRs and aphanitic BFRs show systematic positive or negative anomalies in some elements such as Li and Sr enrichments and Rb, Cs, and As depletions. Conversely, foliated and non-foliated cataclasites do not show such clear systematic patterns. Sr concentrations in the BFRs are generally high, ranging from 228 to 941 ppm, with the highest concentration exhibited in sample 015-10BS (aphanitic BFR). 87Sr/86Sr ratios are 0.70877 and 0.70922 in the host rocks, 0.70667 to 0.70875 in the foliated and non-foliated cataclasites, and 0.70593 to 0.70627 in the BFRs. The aphanitic BFR exhibits the lowest 87Sr/86Sr ratio (0.70593).
Figure 2

Trace element anomalies of fault rocks normalized by averaged host rock compositions.


The trace element composition of the BFRs exhibits tendencies similar to those of principal shear zones of other fault zones reported to possess coseismic fluid-rock interactions (Ishikawa et al. 2008; Hamada et al. 2011; Honda et al. 2011). Enriched and depleted elements in the Kodiak BFR (Li, Rb, Cs, and Sr) are known to be fluidly mobile elements easily affected by high-temperature fluid-rock interactions. The trace element concentration in a solid chemically equilibrated with fluid was modeled by Ishikawa et al. (2008) as
C s = D C s 0 + R C f 0 / R + D ,
where Cs0, Cs, and Cf0 are the element concentrations in the initial solid, solid equilibrated with fluid, and initial fluid, respectively; R is the fluid/solid mass ratio; and D is the temperature-dependent solid/fluid bulk distribution coefficient of the element. In our model analysis, the values for D were estimated by hydrothermal experimental results at 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C using hemipelagic sediments (You et al. 1996; Ishikawa et al. 2008). The values for Cf0 and Cs0 are based on the deep pore fluid data from offshore Texas (Kharaka and Hanor 2003) reported by Ishikawa et al. (2008) and averaged host rock, respectively. Figure 3 compares actual BFR composition (red and orange squares and triangles) and calculated fault rock compositions (solid and dashed lines, depending on R values) of selected trace elements (Rb, Sr, Cs, Ba, La, Sm, and Pb) at temperatures of 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C. The calculations at T = 350°C and R = 100 are closest to the actual trace element compositions of the aphanitic BFR. For the clast-bearing BFR, conditions of T = 350°C and R = 10 or T = 300°C and R = 100 are the most appropriate for reproducing trace element compositions, except for Li. The estimated R values (10 to 100) are significantly higher than those estimated in other fault zones that range from 3 to 7 (Ishikawa et al. 2008; Hamada et al. 2011; Honda et al. 2011). The reasons for this incongruity may be the lack of experimental data for temperatures higher than 350°C and that R values of 10 to 100 and T values of 300°C to 350°C were the maximum and minimum estimations. Alternatively, these results can be explained by a longer fluid residence time and greater duration of high temperatures due to the depth of the Pasagshak Point Thrust. In both cases, our geochemical datasets suggest that the overall composition of the BFR is controlled by fluid-rock interactions at temperatures higher than 350°C. This temperature is at least 100°C higher than the approximately 250°C estimated background temperature of the Pasagshak Point Thrust determined by vitrinite reflectance (Rowe et al. 2011) and is only achievable under conditions of coseismic frictional heating. High temperatures recorded in the BFR are consistent with recent results of biomarker thermal maturity (Savage et al. 2014). In contrast to BFR, foliated and non-foliated cataclasites exhibit no high-temperature signals. This is also consistent with the structural interpretation that foliated and non-foliated cataclasites are formed by slow creep and intermediate strain rate deformation, respectively (Rowe et al. 2011).
Figure 3

Comparison of actual BFR composition and calculated fault rock compositions of selected trace elements. Trace element anomalies of black fault rocks (BFRs; red diamonds and orange squares and triangles) and calculated fault rock compositions (solid and dashed lines, depending on R values) of selected trace elements (Rb, Sr, Cs, Ba, La, Sm, and Pb) at temperatures of 250°C, 300°C, and 350°C. The vertical axis shows host rock-normalized relative deviation.

Sr enrichment has been reported in the principal gouge zones of the Taiwan Chelungpu Fault, where it has been regarded as an indicator of plagioclase enrichment (Ishikawa et al. 2008). Ishikawa et al. (2008) concluded that plagioclase was hydrothermally precipitated from high-temperature fluid heated during coseismic frictional slip. Meneghini et al. (2010) reported that the tabular, euhedral, and zoned plagioclase crystals contained in the Pasagshak Point Thrust are enriched in aphanitic BFR. Particularly, in the crystalline microlayers, Ca-rich plagioclase is found only in the BFR. The Sr enrichment observed in the BFR would reflect the enrichment of plagioclase, as suggested by Meneghini et al. (2010). Based on this interpretation, Sr enrichment is caused by plagioclase microlites crystallized from fluid-rich frictional melt. Such an open-system fluid circulation during the formation of pseudotachylytes is also described in an Rb-Sr geochronometric study of pseudotachylytes from the North Cascade Mountains (Magloughlin 2003). An alternative possibility is that the Sr enrichment of the BFR was caused by hydrothermal precipitation of plagioclase from high-temperature fluid, as suggested by Ishikawa et al. (2008). Further detailed layer-by-layer microchemical analyses or Sr chemical mapping is needed to clarify the origin and distribution of Sr within the BFR because aphanitic BFR is composed of a micrometer-millimeter-scale ultrafine layering of granular and crystalline microlayers, which is much finer than the 1-cm3 scale of our sampling.

The 87Sr/86Sr ratio decreases with an increase in Sr concentration (Figure 4a). This reverse trend implies that the additional Sr incorporated into rocks with high Sr concentrations had a lower 87Sr/86Sr ratio (<0.7059) than the host rock, which has 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7088 to 0.7092. If we assume that the incorporated Sr originated from pore fluid that existed during the formation of fault rocks, the fluid would be characterized by a high Sr concentration and low, less radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratio. The observed substantially lower 87Sr/86Sr ratio (<0.7059) cannot be explained by seawater or terrigenous sediments. Possible candidates for the source of this lower 87Sr/86Sr ratio include hydrated oceanic crust such as the approximately 62-Ma syn-sedimentary mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) in the Ghost Rocks Formation related to ridge subduction (Moore et al. 1983) and subducted oceanic crust. Yamaguchi et al. (2012) detected calcite veins which precipitated from fluids with relatively low 87Sr/86Sr and large δ18O from a paleosubduction thrust in the Shimanto accretionary complex and suggested that fluids dehydrated from the oceanic crust might have acted as the sources of fluids along subduction thrusts. Recently, Sano et al. (2014) reported mantle-derived fluid from seawater at the bottom of the Japan Trench approximately 1 month after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Such co- or post-seismic discharges of deep-origin fluid are presumed to have the capability of producing the observed compositional and isotopic anomalies in the BFR.
Figure 4

87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios of host and fault rocks plotted against (a) 1/Sr and (b) Li concentrations.

We observed a negative correlation between the 87Sr/86Sr ratio and Li concentration (Figure 4b). The Li concentrations of the fault rocks are significantly higher than their simulated values (Figure 3). Li usually shows depletion in the principal shear zones of faults (Ishikawa et al. 2008; Hamada et al. 2011; Honda et al. 2011) because its D value is small at high temperatures. The high concentration of Li in the fault rocks therefore suggests extremely high concentrations of Li (approximately 10 to 100 ppm) in the pore fluid that are 102 to 103 times more concentrated than that of modern seawater (0.18 ppm; Wunder et al. 2006). The value of DLi at the background temperature of 250°C is low enough to preferentially mobilize Li relative to Rb and Cs; DLi, DRb, and DCs values at 250°C are 11, 290, and 80, respectively. The pore fluid that reacted with the BFR could have been significantly enriched in Li through Li extraction from the host rocks along the fluid pathways. High Li concentration in fluid along a seismogenic plate boundary thrust would explain the Li-enriched pore water up to 73 ppm discovered at the décollement zone of the Ocean Drilling Program Site 808 near the deformation front of the Nankai Trough (You et al. 1995). Direct measurement of fluid chemistry such as that through fluid inclusion analysis is a possible approach for understanding the geochemical characteristics of fluids existing in the deep portions of plate boundary thrusts.

The Kodiak complex is comparable to the Shimanto accretionary complex in southwest Japan: both complexes were formed by subduction of a relatively young oceanic plate, and they have similar lithologies characterized by thick terrigenous sediments with rare pelagic sediments. However, the occurrences of fault rock types and fluid-rock interaction patterns differ significantly, particularly considering their similar background temperatures (approximately 250°C). In the Shimanto complex, abundant quartz-calcite-ankerite veins are commonly observed along pseudotachylyte- and ultracataclasite-bearing large thrusts (Okitsu mélange: Ikesawa et al. 2003; Mugi mélange: Yamaguchi et al. 2012; Nobeoka Thrust: Okamoto et al. 2006; Yamaguchi et al. 2011a), whereas in the Pasagshak Point Thrust, mineral veins are relatively rare, except for minor quartz shear veins. Instead of mineral veins, plagioclase enrichment may reflect coseismic high-temperature fluid-rock interactions as recognized within the BFR. Such differences in mineralogy and precipitates may reflect variations in regional-scale fluid flow patterns and physicochemical characteristics of fluids along subduction plate boundary interfaces.


Trace element concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr ratios of fault rocks in the Pasagshak Point Thrust reflect fluid-rock interactions related to coseismic slip along an ancient subduction thrust. Sampled BFRs are characterized by Li and Sr enrichment, Rb and Cs depletions, and low 87Sr/86Sr ratios. Such geochemical signatures can be explained by plagioclase formation at temperatures higher than 350°C or the presence of a fluid with high Li and Sr concentrations and low 87Sr/86Sr ratios. The geochemical anomalies of the BFRs therefore suggest both frictional heating and influx of external fluid in a subduction thrust. In contrast to the BFRs, foliated and non-foliated cataclasites do not exhibit significant geochemical anomalies, suggesting that they were formed by slow deformation without large frictional heat or large-scale fluid flow. Further geochemical and comparative investigations are necessary to explore the nature of fluids along seismogenic subduction plate boundaries.



This manuscript was improved by the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers. Discussions with Y. Nishio, K. Ujiie, Y. Sano, M. Toriumi, T. Seno, J. Ashi, J. Kameda, and Y. Hamada were of great benefit in clarifying our concepts. O. Tadai and K. Nagaishi assisted with XRF and ICP-MS analyses at the KCC. This research was financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Grant Number 06 J11448; JSPS and MEXT KAKENHI Grant Numbers 22107505, 18340155, 21107001, and 21107005; the Plate Dynamics Program of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology; and the 21st Century Center of Excellence Program of the University of Tokyo. Field work in Alaska was supported by the US National Science Foundation Grant OCE-054901 T-01.

Authors’ Affiliations

Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, the University of Tokyo
Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
Department of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo
Research and Development (R&D) Center for Submarine Resources, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, University of California Santa Cruz
Departamento de Geologia, Campus do Morro do Cruzeiro, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, McGill University
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, the University of Tokyo


  1. Ayuso RA, Haeussler PJ, Bradley DC, Farris DW, Foley NK, Wandless GA: The role of ridge subduction in determining the geochemistry and Nd–Sr–Pb isotopic evolution of the Kodiak batholith in southern Alaska. Tectonophysics 2009, 464: 137–163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Byrne T: Structural evolution of coherent terranes in the Ghost Rocks Formation, Kodiak Islands, Alaska. In Trench–forearc geology. Trench–forearc geology: sedimentation and tectonics on modern and ancient active plate margins, vol 10. Edited by: Leggett JK. Boulder; 1982:229–242.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne T: Early deformation in mélange terranes of the Ghost Rocks Formation, Kodiak Islands, Alaska. In Mélanges: their nature, origin and significance, vol 198. Edited by: Raymond LA. Geological Society of America Special Paper; 1984:21–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan DS: Do faults preserve a record of seismic slip? A field geologist's opinion. J Struct Geol 1999, 21: 995–1001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Farris DW, Haeussler PJ, Friedman R, Paterson S, Saltus R, Ayuso R: Emplacement of the Kodiak batholith and slab-window migration. Geol Soc Am Bull 2006, 118: 1360–1376.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher D, Byrne T: Structural evolution of underthrusted sediments, Kodiak Islands, Alaska. Tectonics 1987, 6: 775–793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamada Y, Hirono T, Ishikawa T: Coseismic frictional heating and fluid–rock interaction in a slip zone within a shallow accretionary prism and implications for earthquake slip behavior. J Geophys Res 2011., 116: B01302 doi:10.1029/2010JB007730 B01302 doi:10.1029/2010JB007730Google Scholar
  8. Hashimoto Y, Eida M, Kirikawa T, Iida R, Takagi M, Furuya N, Nikaizo A, Kikuchi T, Yoshimitsu T: Large amount of fluid migration around shallow seismogenic depth preserved in tectonic mélange: Yokonami mélange, the Cretaceous Shimanto Belt, Kochi, Southwest Japan. Island Arc 2012, 21: 53–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirono T, Ujiie K, Ishikawa T, Mishima T, Hamada Y, Tanimizu M, Soh W, Kinoshita M: Estimation of temperature rise in a shallow slip zone of the megasplay fault in the Nankai Trough. Tectonophysics 2009, 478: 215–220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Honda G, Ishikawa T, Hirono T, Mukoyoshi H: Geochemical signals for determining the slip-weakening mechanism of an ancient megasplay fault in the Shimanto accretionary complex. Geophys Res Lett 2011., 38: L06310 doi:10.1029/2011GL046722 L06310 doi:10.1029/2011GL046722Google Scholar
  11. Ikesawa E, Sagaguchi A, Kimura G: Pseudotachylyte from an ancient accretionary complex: evidence for melt generation during seismic slip along a master décollement? Geology 2003, 31: 637–640.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishikawa T, Tanimizu M, Nagaishi K, Matsuoka J, Tadai O, Sakaguchi M, Hirono T, Mishima T, Tanikawa W, Lin W, Kikuta H, Soh W, Song SR: Coseismic fluid–rock interactions at high temperatures in the Chelungpu fault. Nat Geosci 2008, 1: 679–683.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kato Y, Fujinaga K, Suzuki K: Major and trace element geochemistry and Os isotopic composition of metalliferous umbers from the Late Cretaceous Japanese accretionary complex. Geochem Geophys Geosys 2005., 6: Q07004 doi:10.1029/2005GC000920Google Scholar
  14. Kharaka YK, Hanor JS: Deep fluids in the continents: I. Sedimentary basins. In Treatise on geochemistry, vol 5. Edited by: Drever JI. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003:499–540.Google Scholar
  15. Kitamura Y, Sato K, Ikesawa E, Ikehara-Ohmori K, Kimura G, Kondo H, Ujiie K, Onishi CT, Kawabata K, Hashimoto Y, Mukoyoshi H, Masago H: Mélange and its seismogenic roof décollement: a plate boundary fault rock in the subduction zone—an example from the Shimanto belt, Japan. Tectonics 2005., 24: TC5012 doi:10.1029/2004TC001635 TC5012 doi:10.1029/2004TC001635Google Scholar
  16. Magloughlin JF: An evaluation of Rb–Sr dating of pseudotachylyte: structural–chemical models and the role of fluids. Geochem J 2003, 37: 21–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Meneghini F, Di Toro G, Rowe CD, Moore JC, Tsutsumi A, Yamaguchi A: Record of mega-earthquakes in subduction thrusts: the black fault rocks of Pasagshak Point (Kodiak Island, Alaska). Geol Soc Am Bull 2010, 122: 1280–1297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore GW: New formations on Kodiak and adjacent islands, Alaska. U.S. Geological Surv Bull 1969, 1274-A: A27-A35.Google Scholar
  19. Moore JC, Byrne T, Plumley PW, Reid M, Gibbons H, Coe RS: Paleogene evolution of the Kodiak Islands, Alaska: consequences of ridge–trench interaction in a more southerly latitude. Tectonics 1983, 2: 265–293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mukoyoshi H, Sakaguchi A, Otsuki K, Hirono T, Soh W: Co-seismic frictional melting along an out-of-sequence thrust in the Shimanto accretionary complex: implications on the tsunamigenic potential of splay faults in modern subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2006, 245: 330–343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Niemeijer AR, Spiers CJ: Velocity dependence of strength and healing behaviour in simulated phyllosilicate-bearing fault gouge. Tectonophysics 2006, 427: 231–253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Okamoto S, Kimura G, Takizawa S, Yamaguchi H: Earthquake fault rock indicating a coupled lubrication mechanism. Earth 2006, 1: 23–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Plafker G, Moore JC, Winkler GR: Geology of the southern Alaska margin, chapter 12. In The geology of Alaska. The geology of North America, G-1. Edited by: Plafker G, Berg HC. Boulder: Geological Society of America; 1994:389–449.Google Scholar
  24. Rowe CD, Moore JC, Meneghini F, McKiernan AW: Large-scale pseudotachylytes and fluidized cataclasites from an ancient subduction thrust fault. Geology 2005, 33: 937–940.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowe CD, Meneghini F, Moore JC: Textural record of the seismic cycle: strain-rate variation in an ancient subduction thrust. In Geology of the earthquake source: a volume in honour of Rick Sibson, vol 359. Edited by: Fagereng A, Toy VG, Rowland JV. London: Geological Society; 2011:77–95.Google Scholar
  26. Sano Y, Hara T, Takahata N, Kawagucci S, Honda M, Nishio Y, Tanikawa W, Hasegawa A, Hattori K: Helium anomalies suggest a fluid pathway from mantle to trench during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Nat Commun 2014, 5: 3084. doi:10.1038/ncomms4084View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Savage HM, Polissar PJ, Sheppard R, Rowe CD, Brodsky EE: Biomarkers heat up during earthquakes: new evidence of seismic slip in the rock record. Geology 2014, 42: 99–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sibson RH: Generation of pseudotachylyte by ancient seismic faulting. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 1975, 43: 775–794.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Swanson MT: Fault structure, wear mechanisms and rupture processes in pseudotachylyte generation. Tectonophysics 1992, 204: 223–242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Vrolijk P, Myers G, Moore JC: Warm fluid migration along tectonic mélanges in the Kodiak accretionary complex, Alaska. J Geophys Res 1988, 93: 10313–10324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wunder B, Meixner A, Romer RL, Heinrich W: Temperature-dependent isotopic fractionation of lithium between clinopyroxene and high-pressure hydrous fluids. Contrib Mineral Petrol 2006, 151: 112–120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yamaguchi A, Cox SF, Kimura G, Okamoto S: Dynamic changes in fluid redox state associated with episodic fault rupture along a megasplay fault in a subduction zone. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2011, 302: 369–377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yamaguchi A, Sakaguchi A, Sakamoto T, Iijima K, Kameda J, Kimura G, Ujiie K, Chester FM, Fabbri O, Goldsby D, Tsutsumi A, Li C-F, Curewitz D: Progressive illitization in fault gouge caused by seismic slip propagation along a megasplay fault in the Nankai Trough. Geology 2011, 39: 995–998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yamaguchi A, Ujiie K, Nakai S, Kimura G: Sources and physicochemical characteristics of fluids along a subduction-zone megathrust: a geochemical approach using syn-tectonic mineral veins in the Mugi mélange, Shimanto accretionary complex. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2012, 13: Q0AD24. doi:10.1029/2012GC004137 doi:10.1029/2012GC004137View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. You C-F, Chan LH, Spivack AJ, Gieskes JM: Lithium, boron, and their isotopes in sediments and pore waters of Ocean Drilling Program Site 808, Nankai Trough: implications for fluid expulsion in accretionary prisms. Geology 1995, 23: 37–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. You C-F, Castillo PR, Gieskes JM, Chan LH, Spivack AJ: Trace element behavior in hydrothermal experiments: implication for fluid processes at shallow depths in subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1996, 140: 41–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Yamaguchi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.