Open Access

Non-volcanic seismic swarm and fluid transportation driven by subduction of the Philippine Sea slab beneath the Kii Peninsula, Japan

  • Aitaro Kato1, 2Email author,
  • Atsushi Saiga3,
  • Tetsuya Takeda4,
  • Takaya Iwasaki2 and
  • Toru Matsuzawa5
Earth, Planets and Space201466:86

https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-86

Received: 14 November 2013

Accepted: 21 July 2014

Published: 4 August 2014

Abstract

To understand the mechanism of an intensive non-volcanic seismic swarm in the Kii Peninsula, Japan, we used a dense seismic linear array to measure fine-scale variations of seismic velocities and converted teleseismic waves. A low-velocity anomaly confined to just beneath the seismic swarm area is clearly imaged, which correlates spatially with an uplifted surface area and a highly conductive and strong attenuative body. These results suggest that fluids such as partial melt or water are present beneath this non-volcanic seismic swarm area. It is notable that the island arc Moho below the seismic swarm area is at a depth of approximately 32 km in the northern part of the seismic swarm area and shallows to approximately 20 km towards the south, due to the raised structure of the serpentinized mantle wedge. In addition, we show that the hydrated oceanic crust of the subducting Philippine Sea slab is characterized by low velocities with a high Poisson's ratio at depths of less than 40 km. In contrast, dehydration conversion from oceanic basalt to eclogite takes place at depths greater than 50 km. Water released from the subducting oceanic crust could cause serpentinization of the mantle wedge and infiltration into the forearc base of the overlying plate. The interaction between dehydration of the subducting oceanic crust and hydration of the mantle wedge and overlying plate exerts an important role in driving the non-volcanic seismic swarm activity in the Kii Peninsula.

Keywords

Non-volcanic seismic swarm Fluid Dehydration of oceanic crust Serpentinized mantle wedge

Findings

Introduction

Based on the recent earthquake catalog created by state-of-the-art monitoring, many seismic swarms far from volcanoes have been identified worldwide that are characterized by spatial and temporal clustering (e.g., Vidale and Shearer 2006; Daniel et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2012). Well-determined hypocenters of non-volcanic seismic swarms have revealed that earthquakes migrate according to a diffusion equation during each sequence. Thus, the most plausible mechanism for driving non-volcanic seismic swarm activity has been linked to fluctuations or increases in fluid pressures at seismogenic depths (e.g., Hainzl 2004; Vidale and Shearer 2006; Kato et al. 2006, 2010a; Chen et al. 2012; Hainzl et al. 2012). However, the principal structural elements associated with the driving force for non-volcanic seismic swarms and hydration of the mantle wedge and overlying plate are less well documented because of a lack of high-resolution seismic structures, even though this knowledge is crucial in assessing the mechanisms of non-volcanic seismic swarms.

One of the most intensive non-volcanic seismic swarms in Japan is located in the Wakayama district of southwest Japan, far from the present volcanic front (e.g., Mizoue et al. 1983; Kato et al. 2010a; Yoshida et al. 2011) (Figure 1). Here, the Philippine Sea slab is subducting from a southeast-south direction beneath the Kii Peninsula. The swarm activity was initiated more than 40 years ago and has continued to the present day. The earthquake swarm consists of numerous shallow earthquake clusters (<10-km depth) and is spatially confined to an area of approximately 30 × 30 km2 around the western edge of the Kii Peninsula (Figure 1). The occurrence rate of earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 3.0 is >10 events/year.
Figure 1

Seismotectonic setting of the Wakayama district, Japan, and location of the linear seismic array. Distributions of 86 portable seismic stations (yellow triangles) deployed from December 2010 to June 2011 and grid nodes used in the tomographic analysis (black crosses). Open squares denote permanent stations. Relocated ordinary earthquakes are shown as circles scaled to earthquake magnitude and color-coded by depth. Red stars represent epicenters of LFEs relocated in the present study. Gray circles denote all of the earthquakes identified by JMA during the seismic observing period. Solid contours represent annual rate of uplift ≥4 mm/year (with an interval of 1 mm/year) observed by geodetic measurements (Yoshida et al. 2011). Major active faults are drawn as red lines. The inset shows the location of the dense seismic array deployed in the present study. Small dots denote epicenters of LFEs. Red triangles denote active volcanoes. EP, Eurasian Plate; PSP, Philippine Sea Plate.

In addition, the Wakayama district has unique geophysical characteristics such as high heat flow (Tanaka et al. 2004), uplift movement on the surface that implies a pressurized source (Yoshida et al. 2011), and deep low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) around the island arc Moho. Kato et al. (2010a) proposed that diorite has intruded into the bottom of the seismic swarm area and that fluids released from the solidifying diorite are invading the rocks immediately above, based on a local seismic tomographic image of the southern edge of the seismic swarm area.

To investigate the principal seismic structural elements linked to the non-volcanic seismic swarm and subduction complex associated with the Philippine Sea slab, we deployed a temporary, dense linear array consisting of 86 portable seismic stations extending 100 km, from the southern to the northern edge of the western Kii Peninsula, which crosscuts the Wakayama region (Figure 1). Seismic tomography and receiver function techniques combined with such a dense linear array are powerful tools for imaging high-resolution seismic structural elements, as well determining precise hypocenter solutions, including LFEs (e.g., Kato et al. 2009; Kato et al. 2010b). These data enable us to investigate the detailed velocity structure with higher spatial resolution, from 3 to 5 km, and constrain the key factors driving the non-volcanic seismic swarm and dehydration within the oceanic crust of the subducting Philippine Sea slab.

Data and methods

The dense seismic observations were conducted from December 2010 to June 2011 (Figure 1). The linear array consisted of 86 seismometers with a 1-Hz natural frequency, continuously recording three-component signals at a sampling rate of 200 or 100 Hz. Both P- and S-wave arrival times from 776 ordinary earthquakes and 6 LFEs listed in the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) catalog were manually picked from waveforms observed by dense temporary stations as well as permanent stations. The initial hypocenter locations for the tomographic analysis were determined by applying a maximum likelihood estimation algorithm (Hirata and Matsu'ura 1987) to the observed arrival times. We used a one-dimensional velocity structure with a Vp/Vs value of 1.73 (Kato et al. 2010a), which has been used for routine hypocenter determinations at the Wakayama Observatory of the Earthquake Research Institute. The location errors of the initial hypocenters were estimated to be 0.2 and 0.25 km for the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively.

Seismic tomography

The double-difference tomography method (Zhang and Thurber 2003) was then applied to the arrival time data. The number of absolute P- and S-wave arrival times was 47,785 and 43,155, with the differential arrival times for manually picked P and S waves reaching 257,416 and 225,281, respectively. We also included more accurate differential arrival times obtained by the waveform cross-correlation method, which contained 100,358 P-wave and 59,356 S-wave observations. These have a normalized cross-correlation coefficient exceeding 0.8. The grid nodes for the tomography analysis are located at -300, -100, -80, -60, -50, -45, -40, -35, -30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 80, 100, and 300 km on the X-axis (E65S; subparallel to the linear array); -300, -90, -60, -30, 0, 30, 60, 90, and 300 km on the Y-axis (N65E); and -150, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 19, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 54, 74, 94, and 300 km on the Z-axis (depth) (Figure 1). The initial velocity structure used for tomographic analysis is the same as that employed for the hypocenter determinations. The root-mean-square (RMS) travel time residual was reduced from 0.086 to 0.048 s after 18 iterations.

We conducted several tests to evaluate the model resolutions (Figure 2). We had initially conducted a checkerboard resolution test using perturbations of ±5% from the initial velocity model. Synthetic travel times were then calculated for this checkerboard model, adding random noises uniformly distributed from -0.05 to 0.05 s for the P wave and from -0.1 to 0.1 s for the S wave. We then estimated the model resolution of the tomography (diagonal element values) using the solution technique in the simul2000 algorithm (Thurber and Eberhart-Phillips 1999), using only the absolute arrival times. Since we do not include the double-difference data in estimating the resolution, simul2000 might underestimate the actual model resolution (Thurber et al. 2007). We see in Figure 2 that most of the model areas have very good resolution, as estimated from the resolution diagonal element values that were greater than 0.5, between the surface and the band of intraslab earthquakes. We masked poor resolution areas with gray in the depth sections of the velocity perturbations (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Model resolutions of the seismic tomography. Results of the checkerboard resolution test beneath the linear seismic array (N20W-S20E). (a) Vp. Solid line encloses the area where the model resolution of Vp (diagonal element values) is greater than 0.5. (b) Vs. Solid line encloses the area where the model resolution of Vp/Vs is greater than 0.5. Dots denote relocated hypocenters within 15 km of each cross section.

Receiver function

We calculated receiver functions using teleseismic waveforms recorded by the linear seismic array. After individual waveforms of teleseismic earthquakes (M ≥ 5.0 and angular distances from 30° to 90°, Figure 3) were visually inspected, a total of 2,621 waveforms with clear P-wave onsets and high signal-to-noise ratios were accepted for further analysis. We isolated the incident P wave by transforming the accepted waveforms to wave-vector space using the free-surface transfer matrix (Kennett 1991). We then calculated receiver functions using teleseismic waveforms along the linear array, applying the spectral division (Ammon 1991) method with a water level fraction of 0.001 and Gaussian filter width of 3.0 (approximately 1.5-Hz low-pass filters). The time series of the receiver functions were converted to depth sections by applying a form of migration to each event-station pairing, where each receiver function is repositioned to the predicted location of the P-S converted phases assuming a one-dimensional velocity model for each station. The one-dimensional velocity model beneath each station was constructed from interpolation of the final tomography model (Figure 4b,c). The depth section of each receiver function was represented by a bending ray with a ray parameter and back azimuth. The individual migrated receiver functions were then stacked onto 1 km by 1 km cells along the seismic array profile.
Figure 3

Epicenter distribution of teleseismic earthquakes. They were used in the receiver function analysis shown as circles color-coded by depth.

Figure 4

Depth sections of seismic velocities and receiver functions beneath the linear seismic array (along section Y= 0). (a) Profile of uplift rates observed by geodetic measurements (Yoshida et al. 2011). (b) P-wave velocity perturbation δVp/Vp. (c) S-wave velocity perturbation δVs/Vs. (d) Profile of low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) from 2004 to 2012 determined by JMA. (e) Vp/Vs ratio. (f) Receiver function results. Red and blue denote positive and negative amplitudes, respectively. Relocated hypocenters are plotted for events within 15 km of each cross section, with gray circles indicating ordinary earthquakes and red stars marking LFEs. Gray masked areas represent regions of poor model resolution. Our interpretations of seismic structure and locations of three low-velocity anomalies discussed in the text (LV1 to LV3) are superimposed on each section.

Results and discussions

We focus here on the seismic structural elements identified by the dense linear array, from the perspective of understanding the processes responsible for the non-volcanic seismic swarm and dehydration within the oceanic crust of the subducting Philippine Sea slab.

Low-velocity anomaly beneath the non-volcanic seismic swarm area

The most striking feature of the seismic image is a low-velocity anomaly confined to just beneath the Wakayama seismic swarm area (LV1 in Figure 4). The depths of relocated hypocenters gradually decrease towards the center of the swarm area, forming a dome-like shape. It should be noted that the dome-like shape of the hypocenters correlates well with the uplift pattern on the surface (Figure 4a). Given that the cutoff depth of crustal earthquakes implies that temperatures reach approximately 350°C, corresponding to the brittle-ductile transition of granitic rock (e.g., Ito 1990; Kato et al. 2003), the dome-like hypocenter distribution might be controlled by the isothermal structure generated by the low-velocity anomaly. The minimum cutoff depth of seismicity is less than 6 km at the center of the swarm area, which indicates a higher thermal gradient compared to the forearc region where crustal earthquakes extend to depths of approximately 25 km.

Although the spatial resolution of the velocity model is not particularly well constrained below the seismic swarm area due to poor coverage of seismic rays, the low-velocity anomaly (LV1) appears to extend deeper, perhaps close to the island arc Moho and mantle wedge corner. The deep extension of the low-velocity anomaly is supported by the receiver function analysis, which shows relatively strong negative polarities beneath the seismic swarm area (Figure 4f). Within this velocity anomaly (LV1), the reduction of Vp is larger than that of Vs, resulting in a low Vp/Vs ratio of approximately 1.64 (Figure 4e). The corresponding Poisson's ratio is 0.20, which is substantially smaller than Vp/Vs ratios measured for most common crustal rocks in laboratory experiments, except for quartzite (e.g., Christensen 1996). There are two candidates that can explain a low-velocity anomaly with a low Poisson's ratio beneath the seismic swarm area. The first possibility is the presence of fluids such as water or partial melt trapped in the cracks or pores, and the second explanation is the presence of quartz-rich rock. Based on theoretical studies for saturated cracked solids filled with water (e.g., O'Connell and Budiansky 1974; Shearer 1988; Takei 2002; Lin and Shearer 2009), water-filled cracks with high aspect ratios (>0.1) can produce Vp/Vs ratios as low as 1.64, in which case the porosity would be around 10% (see Figure three (a) in Lin and Shearer (2009)). Low Vp/Vs ratio anomalies have been widely observed in volcanic and geothermal areas (e.g., Nakajima et al. 2001; Reyners et al. 2007), beneath the northern Fossa Magna Basin in central Japan (Kurashimo and Hirata 2004), and in southern California (Lin and Shearer 2009). These low Vp/Vs ratio anomalies have been interpreted as indicating the presence of water.

A wideband magnetotelluric survey conducted in the southern part of the Wakayama region showed that a highly conductive body appears to be present beneath the seismic swarm area (Uyeshima et al. 2010). In addition, a seismic attenuation study has imaged a strong attenuation body beneath the Wakayama seismic swarm area (Umeyama et al. 2013), which spatially coincides with the low-velocity anomaly (LV1) imaged by our study. Given that it is difficult to explain high conductivity and strong attenuation features with only quartz-rich rock, we prefer a model where fluid-filled cracks with high aspect ratios are present beneath the seismic swarm area. Indeed, a deep LFE relocated near the island arc Moho beneath the Wakayama region (X ~ -35 km, Figure 4) implies the involvement of fluid near the base of the crust.

Combined with these observations, the long-term persistence of the dome-like pattern of seismicity (Yoshida et al. 2011; Japan Meteorological Agency 2014) and the pressurized source producing uplift and dilatation at the surface (Figure 1) indicate that fluids such as water or partial melt beneath the seismic swarm area are key factors driving the seismic swarm activity (Figure 5).It is notable that the island arc Moho as defined by the strong positive amplitude of the receiver function is located at depths of approximately 32 km in the northern part of the seismic swarm area and approximately 20 km towards the southern part of the area (Figure 4f). This strong lateral variation of the Moho depth is linked to the structure of the mantle wedge corner and will be discussed later in this paper.
Figure 5

Schematic interpretations of the seismic structures beneath the Kii Peninsula. Light blue arrows denote potential water pathways in the subduction complex.

Dehydration processes within subducting oceanic crust

In Figure 4f, we see that the top and bottom of the subducting oceanic crust (i.e., plate interface and oceanic Moho) are defined by strong negative and positive amplitudes of receiver functions, respectively. At depths greater than 40 km, a depth section of receiver functions shows that the oceanic crust is subducting with a dip angle of approximately 15°. Intraslab earthquakes dipping parallel to the oceanic crust are distributed near the Moho of the subducting oceanic crust. The subducting oceanic crust at depths of less than 40 km is generally characterized by relatively low velocities and a high Vp/Vs ratio, as shown by the seismic tomography and receiver functions (Figure 4). We interpret this as indicating water trapped within the oceanic sedimentary layer or released by progressive metamorphic dehydration reactions in the oceanic crust (e.g., Christensen 1984). Low-velocity layers within the oceanic crust representing trapped water have been widely identified in the Nankai, Cascadia, southern Mexico, and Costa Rica subduction zones (e.g., Hirose et al. 2008; Audet et al. 2009; Song et al. 2009; Kato et al. 2010b; Audet and Schwartz 2013).

In contrast, the polarity of the top plate interface changes from negative to positive at depths greater than 50 km. The dip angle of the oceanic crust increases rapidly with depth, due to the initiation of slab bending. This initiation of slab bending is supported by the change in dip angle of the alignment of intraslab earthquakes located near the oceanic Moho (Figure 4). We interpret this transition of the polarities of receiver functions as marking the onset of eclogitization of hydrous minerals in oceanic basalt (e.g., Hacker et al. 2003) (Figure 5). Although the possibility of conversion from oceanic basalt to eclogite was possibly identified by seismic observations of coda waves trapped within the low-velocity oceanic crust layer (Fukao et al. 1983), our study provides a more direct and complete picture of the dehydration process within the oceanic crust. Based on a calculated thermal structure in the Kii Peninsula (Yoshioka et al. 2009), the conversion from oceanic basalt to eclogite at depths of 40 to 50 km is taking place at approximately 500°C. Similar transitions in receiver function polarities due to the conversion from oceanic basalt to eclogite have been recognized in the Cascadia subduction zone (Abers et al. 2009) and Kyushu region (Abe et al. 2011).

Between the island arc Moho and subducting oceanic crust (mantle wedge), a northward dipping low-velocity anomaly represented as a negative amplitude is imaged by the receiver function (LV2 in Figure 4f). Due to the shallower extension of this low-velocity anomaly parallel to the dip direction of the oceanic crust, the island arc Moho shows a raised structure near the mantle wedge corner between X = -10 km and X = 10 km. We interpret this low-velocity anomaly in the mantle wedge to be due to a partial serpentinization of dry olivine (e.g., Pommier 2014). Indeed, a recent study using a dense seismic array on the western Kii Peninsula (Saiga et al. 2013) identified a 1- to 15-km-thick layer of seismic anisotropy in the mantle wedge, interpreted to be a serpentinized layer parallel to the dip direction of the plate interface. The serpentinization in the mantle might be caused by partial leakage of water into the mantle wedge corner released by dehydration associated with the formation of eclogite from basalt at depths greater than 50 km (Figure 5). Although it is difficult to identify the precise location of the toe of the mantle wedge corner (X = 10 to 30 km), both the receiver function and the seismic tomography suggest that there is a gradual transition from crustal to mantle material therein.

Interestingly, relocated LFEs on the forearc side (X = 10 to 30 km) align along the plate interface around the onset of contact between the serpentinized mantle wedge and the top of the subducting oceanic crust. Similar features were observed in a study that imaged the fine-scale seismic structures in the Tokai district, Japan (e.g., Kato et al. 2010b). These observations suggest that serpentinite layers in the mantle wedge corner may be important for generating LFEs in subduction zones (Kaproth and Marone 2013), along with high fluid pressures within the oceanic crust.

We identified a vertically elongated low-velocity anomaly near the base of the forearc crust on the southern side of a zone of LFEs (LV3 in Figure 4). This low-velocity anomaly with a diapiric shape has a moderate Vp/Vs ratio that appears to originate at the plate boundary, and is not associated with crustal earthquakes. Furthermore, this low-velocity anomaly corresponds to a highly conductive zone imaged by a wideband magnetotelluric survey crossing the present dense linear array at X ~ 25 km (Umeda et al. 2006). It thus seems probable that some water leaking from the highly pressurized oceanic crust migrated upwards within the forearc crust. Similar vertically elongated anomalies originating in the oceanic crust have also been imaged in subduction complexes in New Zealand and the Tokai district, Japan (Wannamaker et al. 2009; Kato et al. 2010b). Therefore, water leakage from subducting oceanic crust into the mantle wedge and infiltration into the base of the forearc of the overlying plate are important in transporting and circulating water in subduction zones.

In summary, we propose that the mantle wedge and lower crust beneath the non-volcanic seismic swarm area are being hydrated by fluids released from dehydration of subducting oceanic crust (Figure 5). Fluids such as water or partial melt beneath the seismic swarm area are key factors driving the non-volcanic seismic swarm activity. On the forearc side, dehydrated water also appears to be infiltrating into the base of the overlying plate. These views are consistent with geochemical studies (e.g., Umeda et al. 2006) that have shown that 3He/4He ratios in the Kii Peninsula are anomalously high, which may be indicative of renewed or incipient magmatism.

Some aspects of the hydration process beneath the seismic swarm area still remain unclear and cannot be addressed within the framework of the present study because of the poor spatial resolution of the seismic tomographic image for depth variations. Further studies of the three-dimensional seismic structure imaged by a wider and denser network, along with detailed geological and laboratory studies, are needed to advance our understanding of the process.

Conclusions

Detailed variations of seismic velocities and converted teleseismic waves along a profile in the western part of the Kii Peninsula have shown that a low-velocity anomaly is confined to just beneath the seismic swarm area. This low-velocity anomaly correlates well spatially with an uplifted surface area and a highly conductive and strong attenuation body. These results suggest that fluids such as partial melt or water are present beneath the non-volcanic seismic swarm area and are key factors driving the non-volcanic seismic swarm. The island arc Moho below the seismic swarm area is at a depth of approximately 32 km in the northern part of the seismic swarm area and shallows to approximately 20 km towards the south, due to a raised structure in the serpentinized mantle wedge corner. In addition, we have shown that the hydrated oceanic crust of the subducting Philippine Sea slab is characterized by low velocities with a high Poisson's ratio at depths <40 km. In contrast, dehydration conversion from oceanic basalt to eclogite takes place at depths >50 km. Water released from the subducting oceanic crust may be causing serpentinization of the mantle wedge and infiltrating into the forearc base of the overlying plate. It is likely that the non-volcanic seismic swarm in the Wakayama district is a manifestation of water transportation in the subduction system.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers for useful comments and suggestions. We are grateful to T. Haneda, M. Serizawa, M. Saka, S. Watanabe, K. Tagami, and M. Kobayashi for data acquisition. We thank NIED and JMA for allowing us to use waveform data collected from their permanent stations. JMA provided us with the earthquake catalog. This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan, under KAKEN (21109002) and its Observation and Research Program for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Earthquake and Volcano Research Center, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University
(2)
Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo
(3)
Geological and Seismological Analysis Group, FBR Safety Technology Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency
(4)
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention
(5)
Research Center for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University

References

  1. Abe Y, Ohkura T, Hirahara K, Shibutani T: Water transportation through the Philippine Sea slab subducting beneath the central Kyushu region, Japan, as derived from receiver function analyses. Geophys Res Lett 2011, 38: L23305. doi:10.1029/2011GL049688 doi:10.1029/2011GL049688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Abers GA, MacKenzie LS, Rondenay S, Zhang Z, Wech AG, Creager KC: Imaging the source region of Cascadia tremor and intermediate-depth earthquakes. Geology 2009, 37: 1119–1122. doi:10.1130/G30143A.1 doi:10.1130/G30143A.1 10.1130/G30143A.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammon CJ: The isolation of receiver function effect from teleseismic P waveforms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1991, 81(6):2504–2510.Google Scholar
  4. Audet P, Bostock MG, Christensen NI, Peacock SM: Seismic evidence for overpressured subducted oceanic crust and megathrust fault sealing. Nature 2009, 457: 76–78. 10.1038/nature07650View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Audet P, Schwartz SY: Hydrologic control of forearc strength and seismicity in the Costa Rican subduction zone. Nat Geosci 2013, 6(10):852–855. 10.1038/ngeo1927View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Shearer PM, Abercrombie RE: Spatial migration of earthquakes within seismic clusters in Southern California: evidence for fluid diffusion. J Geophys Res 2012, 117: B04301. doi:10.1029/2011JB008973 doi:10.1029/2011JB008973Google Scholar
  7. Christensen NI: Pore pressure and oceanic crustal seismic structure. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 1984, 79: 411–423. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb02232.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen NI: Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology. J Geophys Res 1996, 101: 3139–3156. 10.1029/95JB03446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniel G, Prono E, Renard F, Thouvenot F, Hainzl S, Marsan D, Helmstetter A, Traversa P, Got JL, Jenatton L, Guiguet R: Changes in effective stress during the 2003–2004 Ubaye seismic swarm, France. J Geophys Res 2011, 116: B01309. doi:10.1029/2010JB007551 doi:10.1029/2010JB007551Google Scholar
  10. Fukao Y, Hori S, Ukawa M: A seismological constraint on the depth of basalt-eclogite transition in a subducting oceanic crust. Nature 1983, 303: 413–415. 10.1038/303413a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hacker BR, Abers GA, Peacock SM: Subduction factory: 1. Theoretical mineralogy, densities, seismic wave speeds, and H2O contents. J Geophys Res 2003, 108(B1):2029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hainzl S: Seismicity patterns of earthquake swarms due to fluid intrusion and stress triggering. Geophys J Int 2004, 159(3):1090–1096. doi:10.1111/j.1365–246X.2004.02463.x doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02463.x 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02463.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hainzl S, Fischer T, Dahm T: Seismicity-based estimation of the driving fluid pressure in the case of swarm activity in Western Bohemia. Geophys J Int 2012, 191: 271–281. doi:10.1111/j.1365–246X.2012.05610.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirata N, Matsu'ura M: Maximum-likelihood estimation of hypocenter with origin time eliminated using nonlinear inversion technique. Phys Earth Planet Inter 1987, 47: 50–61. doi:10.1016/0031–9201(87) 90066–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirose F, Nakajima J, Hasegawa A: Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure and configuration of the Philippine Sea slab in southwestern Japan estimated by double-difference tomography. J Geophys Res 2008, 113: B09315. doi:10.1029/2007JB005274Google Scholar
  16. Ito K: Regional variations of the cutoff depth of seismicity in the crust and their relation to heat flow and large inland earthquakes. J Phys Earth 1990, 38: 223–250. 10.4294/jpe1952.38.223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Japan Meteorological Agency: JMA unified hypocenter catalog. 2014. . Accessed 10 June 2014 http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/bulletin/index.html . Accessed 10 June 2014Google Scholar
  18. Kaproth BM, Marone C: Slow earthquakes, preseismic velocity changes, and the origin of slow frictional stick–slip. Science 2013, 341: 1229–1232. doi:10.1126/science.1239577 doi:10.1126/science.1239577View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato A, Iidaka T, Sakai S, Hirata N, Kanazawa T: Seismic swarm observed by high-resolution seismic experiment: role of crustal fluids. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006; 2006. abstract #T13A-0482 abstract #T13A-0482Google Scholar
  20. Kato A, Kurashimo E, Igarashi T, Sakai S, Iidaka T, Shinohara M, Kanazawa T, Yamada T, Hirata N, Iwasaki T: Reactivation of ancient rift systems triggers devastating intraplate earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36: L05301. doi:10.1029/2008GL036450Google Scholar
  21. Kato A, Ohnaka M, Mochizuki H: Constitutive properties for the shear failure of intact granite in seismogenic environments. J Geophys Res 2003, 108(B1):2060. doi:10.1029/2001JB000791View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kato A, Sakai S, Iidaka T, Iwasaki T, Hirata N: Non-volcanic seismic swarms triggered by circulating fluids and pressure fluctuations above a solidified diorite intrusion. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37: L15302. doi:10.1029/2010GL043887Google Scholar
  23. Kato A, Iidaka T, Ikuta R, Yoshida Y, Katsumata K, Iwasaki T, Sakai S, Thurber C, Tsumura N, Yamaoka K, Watanabe T, Kunitomo T, Yamazaki F, Okubo M, Suzuki S, Hirata N: Variations of fluid pressure within the subducting oceanic crust and slow earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37: L14310. doi:10.1029/2010GL043723Google Scholar
  24. Kennett BLN: Removal of free surface interactions from three component seismograms. Geophys J Int 1991, 104: 153–163. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb02501.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurashimo E, Hirata N: Low Vp and Vp/Vs zone beneath the northern Fossa Magna basin, central Japan, derived from a dense array observation. Earth Planets Space 2004, 56: 1301–1308. 10.1186/BF03353354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lin G, Shearer PM: Evidence for water-filled cracks in earthquake source regions. Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36: L17315. doi:10.1029/2009GL039098View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mizoue M, Nakamura M, Seto N, Ishiketa Y, Yokota T: Three-layered distribution of microearthquakes in relation to focal mechanism variation in the Kii Peninsula, southwestern Honshu, Japan. Bull Earthquake Res Inst Univ Tokyo 1983, 58: 287–310.Google Scholar
  28. Nakajima J, Matsuzawa T, Hasegawa A, Zhao D: Three dimensional structure of Vp, Vs, and Vp/Vs beneath northeastern Japan: implications for arc magmatism and fluids. J Geophys Res 2001, 106: 21,843–21,857. 10.1029/2000JB000008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. O'Connell RJ, Budiansky B: Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J Geophys Res 1974, 79: 5412–5426. 10.1029/JB079i035p05412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pommier A: Geophysical assessment of migration and storage conditions of fluids in subduction zones. Earth Planets Space 2014, 66: 38. doi:10.1186/1880–5981–66–38 doi:10.1186/1880-5981-66-38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Reyners M, Eberhart-Phillips D, Stuart G: The role of fluids in lower-crustal earthquakes near continental rifts. Nature 2007, 446: 1075–1078. 10.1038/nature05743View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Saiga A, Kato A, Kurashimo E, Iidaka T, Okubo M, Tsumura N, Iwasaki T, Sakai S, Hirata N: Anisotropic structures of oceanic slab and mantle wedge in a deep low-frequency tremor zone beneath the Kii Peninsula, SW Japan. J Geophys Res 2013, 118: 1091–1097. doi:10.1002/jgrb.50069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Shearer PM: Cracked media, Poisson's ratio, and the structure of the upper oceanic crust. Geophys J Int 1988, 92: 357–362. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1988.tb01149.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Song TR, Helmberger DV, Brudzinski MR, Clayton RW, Davis P, Pérez-Campos X, Singh SK: Subducting slab ultra-slow velocity layer coincident with silent earthquakes in southern Mexico. Science 2009, 324: 502–506.Google Scholar
  35. Takei Y: Effect of pore geometry on VP/VS: from equilibrium geometry to crack. J Geophys Res 2002, 107(B2):2043. doi:10.1029/2001JB000522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanaka A, Yamamoto M, Yano Y, Sasada M: Geothermal gradient and heat flow data in and around Japan (I): appraisal of heat flow from geothermal gradient data. Earth Planets Space 2004, 56: 1191–1194. 10.1186/BF03353339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Thurber CH, Brocher TM, Langenheim VE: Three-dimensional P wave velocity model for the San Francisco Bay region, California. J Geophys Res 2007, 112: B07313. doi:10.1029/2006JB004682Google Scholar
  38. Thurber CH, Eberhart-Phillips D: Local earthquake tomography with flexible gridding. Comput Geosci 1999, 25: 809–818. 10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00007-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Umeda K, Ogawa Y, Asamori K, Oikawa T: Aqueous fluids derived from a subducting slab: observed high 3He emanation and conductive anomaly in a non-volcanic region, Kii Peninsula southwest Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2006, 149: 47–61. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.06.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Umeyama E, Tsumura N, Kurashimo E, Iidaka T, Sakai S, Kato A, Saiga A: Three-dimensional attenuation structure beneath Kii Peninsula. In Programme and abstracts of the Seismological Society of Japan 2013. Kanagawa Kenmin Hall, Yokohama: Fall meeting B21–06; 2013. 7–9 October 2013 (in Japanese) 7–9 October 2013 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  41. Uyeshima M, Yamaguchi S, Patro PK, Ogawa T, Kato A, Hasegawa K, Ueda T, Aizawa K, Hase H: Wideband MT survey in Aridagawa nonvolcanic earthquake swarm area in NW Kii Peninsula. Paper presented at the conductivity anomaly conference, Tokyo; 2010. 16–17 February 2010 (in Japanese) 16–17 February 2010 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  42. Vidale JE, Shearer PM: A survey of 71 earthquake bursts across southern California: exploring the role of pore fluid pressure fluctuations and aseismic slip as drivers. J Geophys Res 2006, 111: B05312. doi:10.1029/2005JB004034Google Scholar
  43. Wannamaker P, Caldwell TG, Jiracek GR, Maris V, Hill GJ, Ogawa Y, Bibby HM, Bennie SL, Heise W: Fluid and deformation regime of an advancing subduction system at Marlborough, New Zealand. Nature 2009, 460: 733–736. doi:10.1038/nature08204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Yoshida A, Hosono K, Takayama H, Kobayashi A, Maeda K: Seismic and geodetic evidence for the existence of hot materials beneath the Wakayama swarm activity, southwestern Japan. Tectonophysics 2011, 510: 124–131. 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.06.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Yoshioka S, Toda M, Nakajima J: Regionality of deep low-frequency earthquakes associated with subduction of the Philippine Sea plate along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2009, 272: 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang H, Thurber CH: Double‒difference tomography: the method and its application to the Hayward fault, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2003, 93: 1875–1889. doi:10.1785/0120020190View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kato et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.