Skip to main content

Transfer function measured by electromagnetic sounding with an accurately controlled signal


We present the fundamentals of an electromagnetic sounding with an accurately controlled source signal. In this method, the tensor transfer function between transmitted and received vector electromagnetic fields is measured. We formulated the transfer function by introducing a ray model that describes the propagation of the general electromagnetic field in the whole frequency region. The transfer function includes information of the underground structure: electromagnetic parameters, propagation distance, and boundary planes. The information of the electromagnetic parameters and the propagation distance is commonly described in all the tensor elements. It is in a form of complex functions of frequency. The information concerning the boundary planes is described as real coefficients of the complex functions. The coefficients are different for each of the tensor elements. When we use an accurately controlled signal, we can estimate the information as a linear inversion problem. A profile of the transfer function varies with the frequency region: it decays rapidly in the low-frequency region and oscillates in the high-frequency region. Such a profile can be explained by the approximate form of the transfer function: a sum of complex exponential functions in a narrow frequency band. The approximate form also provides a good model for data decomposition.


  1. Duncan, P. M., A. H. Wang, R. N. Edwards, R. S. Bailey, and G. D. Garland, The development and applications of a wide band electromagnetic sounding system using a pseudo-noise source, Geophysics, 45, 1276–1296, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasada, Y., H. Kumagai, and M. Kumazawa, Autoregressive modeling of transfer functions in frequency domain to determine complex travel times, Earth Planets Space, 53, 3–11, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman, A. A. and G. V. Keller, Frequency and Transient Soundings, 685 pp., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kay, S. M. and S. L. Marple, Spectrum analysis—a modern perspective, Proc. IEEE., 69, 1380–1419, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumazawa, M., Theoretical basis, development and prospect of EM ACROSS—An approach unifying low frequency MT (magnetotellulic) and high frequency radar, Abstracts of international workshop on frontiers in monitoring science and technology for earthquake environments, A2-21, 1998a.

  6. Kumazawa, M., A new light and new eye to look into the solid Earth and a potential monitoring methodology of geodynamics states—introduction to ACROSS, Abstracts of international workshop on frontiers in monitoring science and technology for earthquake environments, A-11, 1998b.

  7. Kumazawa, M., Y. Imanishi, Y Fukao, M. Furumoto, and A. Yamamoto, A theory of spectral analysis based on the characteristic property of a linear dynamic system, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 613–630, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakajima, T., M. Kumazawa, T. Kunitomo, and K. Tsuruga, Current approach and the preliminary results on the EM ACROSS utilizing the diffusional transmission of electromagnetic signals in the MT range, Abstracts of international workshop on frontiers in monitoring science and technology for earthquake environments, AP2-41, 1998.

  9. Nakajima, T., T. Kunitomo, M. Kumazawa, and Y. Yokoyama, Development of EM-ACROSS and its field test, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 75, 229–244, 2000 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ogawa, K. and M. Kumazawa, Towards the continuous remote sensing of H2O, tectonic stress and physical states in the Earth’s crust by means of acoustic and electromagnetic ACROSS, Proceedings of fall meeting of the Seismological Society of Japan, P45, 1996 (in Japanese).

  11. Oppenheim, A. V. and R. W. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing, 585 pp., Prentice Hall, London, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Strack, K. M., Exploration with Deep Transient Electromagnetics,373 pp., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ward, S. H. and G. W. Hohmann, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics vol. 1, edited by M. N. Nabighian, pp. 131–312, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Oklahoma, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoyama, Y., M. Kumazawa, and T. Nakajima, A decomposition method of electromagnetic transfer function using ray model and autoregressivetype model—the case of horizontal layered structure—, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 75, 245–263, 2000a (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yokoyama, Y., M. Kumazawa, T. Kunitomo, and T. Nakajima, Waveform of digital signal for a 3-D electric structure sounding using accurately controlled electromagnetic wave, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 75, 265–282, 2000b (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhdanov, M. S. and G. V. Keller, The Geoelectrical Methods in Geophysical Exploration, 873 pp., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Nakajima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yokoyama, Y., Kumazawa, M. & Nakajima, T. Transfer function measured by electromagnetic sounding with an accurately controlled signal. Earth Planet Sp 54, 459–472 (2002).

Download citation


  • Transfer Function
  • Phase Delay
  • Propagation Distance
  • Ground Penetrate Radar
  • Boundary Plane