- Open Access
Characteristics of the surface ruptures associated with the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence, central Kyushu, Japan
© The Author(s) 2016
- Received: 31 July 2016
- Accepted: 29 October 2016
- Published: 24 November 2016
- 2016 Kumamoto earthquake surface rupture
- Futagawa fault zone
- Hinagu fault zone
- Slip distribution
- Urgent field investigation
We began an urgent field investigation on the day of the mainshock to map coseismic ruptures and measure their displacements. This three-week exercise documented approximately 34 km of surface ruptures associated with the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence. The ruptures occurred mainly on the eastern part of the Futagawa fault zone, an eastern extension of the Futagawa fault zone across the western rim of the caldera of Aso volcano, and the northernmost part of the Hinagu fault zone (Fig. 1c). We surveyed offset artificial and natural features at more than 200 places. In addition, we interviewed local residents and measured faulted features repeatedly to investigate postseismic activity of the surface ruptures.
In this paper, we report the distribution and morphology of surface ruptures and their displacements. We then discuss their active tectonic implications.
The Futagawa fault zone extends ENE–WSW between the Aso caldera and the north coast of the Uto Peninsula, and the Hinagu fault zone extends NE–SW between Mashiki and the south end of the Yatsushiro Sea (Fig. 1b). These were defined as separate seismogenic fault zones by ERC, HERP (2013) with the following characteristics. The Futagawa fault zone consists of three segments: Futagawa, Uto, and the north coast of the Uto Peninsula segments (Fig. 1b). The Futagawa segment has 0.2 m/kyr of dextral long-term slip rate and 0.1–0.3 m/kyr of vertical long-term slip rate, and paleoseismological studies indicate that its latest rupture event occurred 2200–6900 years ago. The distribution of seismicity indicates that the fault plane of the Futagawa segment is nearly vertical near the surface and northwest-dipping at depth. The Hinagu fault zone consists of the Takano-Shirahata, Hinagu, and Yatsushiro Sea segments (Fig. 1b). The Takano-Shirahata segment has a long-term dextral slip rate of 0.04–0.2 m/kyr, and its latest event occurred 1200–1600 years ago. The fault plane of the Takano-Shirahata segment is probably nearly vertical, because seismicity in 1999 and 2000 was distributed almost directly beneath the surface fault trace.
Active traces of the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones were previously mapped on the basis of aerial photographs and field surveys by Ikeda et al. (2001), Nakata et al. (2001), and Nakata and Imaizumi (2002). In the Futagawa fault zone, right-lateral offsets of ridges and gullies were reported (Research Group for Active Faults of Japan 1991), and many tectonic features clearly indicate south-side-up ground displacements (Ikeda et al. 2001). In the Hinagu fault zone, fault scarps in the Takano-Shirahata segment irregularly faced east or west along the disconnected fault trace, and in the Hinagu and Yatsushiro Sea segments fault traces are recognized as scarps clearly showing southeast-side-up displacement.
We mapped surface ruptures associated with the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence and measured their displacement using measuring tapes, leveling staffs, and handheld laser rangefinders. Here, we report slip measurements in terms of strike-slip and vertical components, because most of the surface ruptures had predominantly dextral strike-slip or vertical offsets with little extension. Only surface ruptures along the northeastern part of the Futagawa segment had a significant extensional component. Near the Takaki area on the Takano-Shirahata segment, we measured displacements twice (April 16 and 28) after the mainshock to assess possible afterslip.
Surface ruptures trending NNE–SSW appeared along 6 km of the northern part of the Takano-Shirahata segment of the Hinagu fault zone. It is noted that they directly coincided with previously recognized fault traces (Fig. 3a). Along this segment, the strike-slip component of displacement reached a maximum of 70–80 cm at Takaki (Figs. 3g, 6a) and gradually decreased with distance from Takaki to the north and south.
Most ruptures in this segment were left-stepping en echelon arrays of open cracks with little vertical displacement (Fig. 3e), consistent with nearly pure right-lateral strike-slip. The southernmost ruptures, at Yamaide, displayed only a few centimeters of dextral slip. North of Takigawa, ruptures appeared in the alluvial plain on both sides of the Yakata River (Fig. 3b). At Kamitakano, roads, houses, and fields were systematically disrupted by 50–60 cm of dextral offset (Figs. 3c, 6a). In the Takaki area, ruptures in paddy fields coincided exactly with fault traces previously mapped by a paleoseismological survey (Shimokawa and Kinugasa 1999). North of Tsuchiyama, the surface ruptures scattered and then vanished.
Some residents at Takaki reported that only small cracks were present on April 15, the day after the initial M J 6.5 event, and that after the April 16 mainshock those cracks had grown, displaying more than 40 cm of dextral displacement. In addition, some researchers reported that no clear ruptures were present along the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones on April 15 (Asia Air Survey Co. 2016). In aerial photographs of Takaki taken before and after the mainshock (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2016a, b), no surface rupture was apparent on April 15, but ruptures were clearly visible on April 20 (Fig. 3f). It is clear that surface ruptures along this section were mainly produced by the mainshock.
We also observed a temporal growth at Takaki. Our first measurements on April 16 indicated dextral displacements of about 50 cm (Fig. 3c), whereas our second measurements on April 28 indicated displacements of about 60 cm. We also found that temporarily repaired cracks in a road crossing the surface rupture had opened further by April 28 (Fig. 3d).
Distinct surface ruptures extend about 28 km along the Futagawa segment between Mashiki and Minamiaso (Fig. 1c). We describe them here in three sections that are based on differences in morphology, geometry, and slip distribution of the surface ruptures.
In the southwestern section of the Futagawa segment, most ruptures displayed 70–100 cm of dextral offset (Fig. 6a). Near Dozon, at the eastern end of this section, ruptures are composed of two strands that bound the Kiyama plain, a 5-km-long north strand along the northern edge and a 7-km-long main strand, along the southern edge of the plain (Fig. 4a). The main strand consisted of a left-stepping en echelon array of five sub-strands striking NE-SW. These sub-strands displayed dominantly dextral slip and south-side-up normal slip and were separated by releasing stepovers 1–2 km long and 0.5–1 km wide. This complex distribution of the sub-strands resulted in large scattering of measured displacements of the southwestern section (Fig. 6). The main strand ended just east of Shimojin, and the north strand continued eastward to the main strand in the adjoin central section. The north strand was a relatively continuous and displayed a few restraining double bends. Displacements on the two strands were largest (90–120 cm) at their northeastern tips, and systematically decreased toward the west (Fig. 6a). These two strands constituted a tweezers-shaped pair of splay faults, connected by a NW-striking sinistral-slip rupture near their closest approach (Fig. 4a, i). Most of the surface ruptures were accompanied by left-stepping en echelon arrays of open cracks associated with dextral faulting, sometimes with a small south-side-up normal component (Fig. 4c, d, f, g, h). At ruptures south of Shimojin and in Shimotogawa, the north side was downthrown 40–50 cm by normal faulting (Fig. 4e). Near Shimojin and Fukuhara, pairs of dextral ruptures striking NW–SE were connected by a rupture with sinistral and reverse offsets (Fig. 4a, i). The vertical and horizontal displacements on those sinistral ruptures both systematically decreased toward the northwest. The ruptures along the main strand nearly coincided with the previously recognized fault trace. The north strand was previously recognized as an active fault, Kiyama fault, only estimated by geological analyses of borehole cores (Tsuruta and Watanabe 1978).
Ruptures along the main strand continued eastward into the mountains and along talus slopes. The Okirihata dam was damaged by surface ruptures, and the banks of its impoundment on both sides of the dam were offset dextrally by 180 cm (Figs. 5d, 6a). The ruptures outlined a rhomboidal stepover 1.5 km long and 400 m wide located northeast of the dam. Father northeast, the ruptures intersected a road at several points where we measured about 150 cm of dextral fault slip.
In the central section, most dextral slip measurements were around 200 cm, which is considered for a representative slip along the Futagawa segment. Some measurements less than 180 cm probably reflect the partial displacements on the rupture zone along the central section (Fig. 6a).
Whereas the main strand displayed little or no vertical displacement, ruptures on the south strand were dominated by southeast-side-up normal slip (Fig. 6b) along fault planes with measured dip angles between 50° and 70°. These ruptures exhibited normal slip up to 120 cm (Fig. 5e), horizontal displacements in the dip direction up to 30 cm, and sinistral strike-slip displacements up to 70 cm (Fig. 6). All along the 4-km-long ruptures were distinguished from ruptures associated with mass movement by their continuity across rivers and ridges. The combination of dextral offsets on the main strand and primarily normal offsets on the southern strand may represent large-scale slip partitioning, as reported by King et al. (2005) for the Kunlun fault. In that case, decreasing the dextral offsets with the distance from the main strand may produce relative sinistral motion on the south strand.
Along the 8-km-long northeastern section of the Futagawa segment, ruptures consisted of several en echelon arrays and gradually decreased in displacement toward the northeast (Figs. 5a, 6a). The central and northeastern sections were separated at Oginosaka by a stepover 2 km long and 1 km wide, connected by NW-striking ruptures with sinistral displacement, similar to stepovers described in the southwestern section near Shimojin and Fukuhara.
At Oginosaka, on the north side of the stepover, a rupture oriented ENE–WNW passed beneath a bridge oriented E–W, where about 200 cm of compression damaged the abutments (Fig. 5f). On the south side of the stepover, east of Oginosaka, an extensional branch rupture was observed in aerial photographs taken on April 16 (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2016c). From Tateno to the end of the rupture, three strands 1–2 km long constituted an en echelon array separated by releasing stepovers 100–500 m wide. The dextral displacement decreased along this array from 140 cm at Tateno and 120 cm at Kawayo (Fig. 5g) to 80 cm at Aso Farm Land and several centimeters at the eastern end (Fig. 6a).
Another E–W trending branch rupture 2.5 km long appeared south of Kawayo (Fig. 5a, i). This branch was a zone of sub-parallel fissures and grabens (Fig. 5h, i). Although much of the natural topography had been artificially modified, some of these grabens appeared to coincide with preexisting small valleys.
Morphology and geometry of surface ruptures
The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence produced about 34 km of surface ruptures. This discussion focuses on the 28-km surface ruptures along the Futagawa segment of the Futagawa fault zone, which we divided into three sections on the basis of fault geometry and slip distributions.
The surface ruptures generally appeared along previously recognized fault traces, but did not always follow them precisely (Figs. 1c, 3a, 4a, 5a). Large dextral strike-slip displacements of about 200 cm occurred along the 12-km-long central section of the Futagawa segment, accompanied by significant normal slip in the middle part of the section. Surface ruptures of the southwestern and northeastern sections of the Futagawa segment were characterized by arrays of releasing stepovers 7–8 km long and 2.5 km wide that diverged toward the ends of the segment, unlike the continuous curvilinear traces that were previously mapped there (e.g., Ikeda et al. 2001) (Fig. 4a). Especially in the southwestern section, stepovers of the ruptures appeared where fault traces were indistinct in the previous fault maps. This reflects the difficulty of mapping active faults where their distribution is complex.
The most remarkable features of the 2016 surface rupture were the development of sub-parallel ruptures at various scales. Our observations showed that these sub-parallel ruptures accommodated coseismic slip by two different deformation styles, slip partitioning and graben formation. The most conspicuous slip partitioning was in the northeastern part of the central section of the Futagawa segment, where two sub-parallel primary ruptures formed 2–2.5 km apart (Fig. 5a). The southern rupture (south strand) displayed south-side-up normal slip greater than 100 cm with a small strike-slip component, whereas the northern rupture displayed dextral slip exceeding 150 cm with little or no vertical slip (Figs. 5d, 6a). Both of these ruptures occurred on previously mapped active fault traces (Nakata and Imaizumi 2002), suggesting that slip partitioning has been repeated during previous large earthquakes to form fault-related landforms. Grabens were especially prominent in the northeastern section of the Futagawa segment (Fig. 5i). Some of these had a distinct geomorphic expression suggestive of similar behavior in the past. Thus, to reconstruct the history of surface rupture in this area, paleoseismic trenching would be desirable because these grabens may preserve sedimentary evidence of past earthquakes.
Comparison with previous surveys
The total surface rupture length of about 28 km, the maximum slip of 220 cm, and the mainshock magnitude of M J 7.3 are all broadly consistent with the fault length, slip, and earthquake magnitude assigned to the Futagawa segment by the ERC, HERP (2013) based upon the length of the segment. In addition, along the Futagawa segment, dextral slip of about 200 cm was measured throughout the central section, and slip gradually decreased bilaterally away from the central section to the far ends of the southwestern and northeastern sections. These lines of evidence strongly suggest that the April 16 mainshock was an example of the representative event anticipated for the Futagawa segment. On the other hand, the surface ruptures on the Takano-Shirahata segment of the Hinagu fault zone were only about 6 km long and were limited to its northernmost part. Understanding the implications of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence on the long-term behavior of the Takano-Shirahata segment will require further tectonic, geomorphic, and paleoseismic investigations.
Paleoseismic trenching studies were previously conducted at two sites where surface ruptures occurred in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence (Figs. 3a, 4a): the Takaki trench on the Takano-Shirahata segment (Shimokawa and Kinugasa 1999) and the Tanaka trench on the southwestern section of the Futagawa segment (Kumamoto Prefecture 1996; Yoshioka et al. 2007). Both trenches, excavated on the geomorphically distinct fault scarps suggestive of past faulting, exposed steeply dipping faults with evidence of Holocene faulting. Our field mapping revealed that surface ruptures around both sites lay along single traces and that locations of the ruptures coincided with the locations of the faults in the trench walls. This result shows that trenching can capture a history of multiple faulting when sites have been selected on the basis of sound tectonic and geomorphic interpretations.
The trenching survey at Tanaka revealed dextral 5.2 m displacement of sediment containing a volcanic ash (28 ka; AT tephra [Machida and Arai 2003)] along a fault trace (ERC, HERP 2013). At the location of the Tanaka trench, we measured 60 cm of dextral slip associated with the Kumamoto earthquake. To explain this accumulated displacement (5.8 m), 9–10 events similar to the 2016 earthquake are needed. Then, the recurrence period can be roughly estimated as about 3 kyrs.
Temporal growth of surface ruptures
Detailed seismological observations have shown that the rupture plane of the mainshock differed from that of the initial M J 6.5 event, which was south of the junction of the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones (e.g., Shimizu et al. 2016; Uchide et al. 2016; Fig. 1c). This means that large slip on the Takano-Shirahata segment coincided with slip from the mainshock on the rupture plane of the Futagawa segment. The surface ruptures around the junction between the two segments, therefore, may record seismic events generated by two different rupture planes at depth. The temporal changes in surficial slip may reflect the structural complexity around the junction of the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones.
Surface ruptures occurred along 28 km of the Futagawa segment of the Futagawa fault zone, 6 km of the northern part of the Takano-Shirahata segment of the Hinagu fault zone, and 1 km of the eastern part of the Uto segment of the Futagawa fault zone.
Rupture zones generally consisted of left-stepping en echelon arrays of discontinuous fault traces of various lengths.
Along the Futagawa segment, dextral slip of about 200 cm was measured throughout the central section, and the slip gradually decreased bilaterally along the adjoining southwestern and northeastern sections.
Surface ruptures generally followed previously documented active fault traces, except in the northeastern and southwestern sections of the Futagawa segment.
Slip along the Takano-Shirahata segment occurred after both the initial M J 6.5 event and the mainshock, suggesting that surface ruptures along this segment may record seismic activity generated by two different rupture planes at depth.
All authors did the fieldwork. YS compiled all the data, drafted most of the manuscript and drew all the figures. YA and TM drafted part of the manuscript. YS, MY, YA, TM, TA, YM, KI, TO, MO, AM, and HM discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
HM did the fieldwork as a member of the Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, and moved to Shinshu University on June 1, 2016.
We are grateful to Takashi Nakata (Hiroshima University), Hiroyuki Goto (Kyoto University), and Masashi Omata (PASCO Corporation) for providing useful information on surface ruptures during our survey. We especially thank local residents for permitting our access to their properties; many of them also gave information on surface ruptures from the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence. We also thank Yuichi Sugiyama, Wang Yu, and anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and advice. We used hypocenters from the unified earthquake catalog of the Japan Meteorological Agency.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The measurement datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the supplementary materials.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Asia Air Survey Co., Ltd. (2016) Aerial photos taken on 15 April. http://www.ajiko.co.jp/article/detail/ID56EDF7EZH/. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
- Bray J, Cohen-Waeber J, Dawson T, Kishida T, Sitar N (2014) Geotechnical engineering reconnaissance of the August 24, 2014 M6 South Napa earthquake. Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Association Report Number GEER-037, doi:10.13140/2.1.1094.7844Google Scholar
- Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2013) Long-term evaluation of the Futagawa and Hinagu fault zones (2013 revision). 66 (in Japanese). http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/13feb_chi_kyushu/k_11.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2016
- Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2016a) Evaluation of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake (in Japanese). http://www.static.jishin.go.jp/resource/monthly/2016/2016_kumamoto.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2016
- Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2016b) Evaluation of Earthquake in Kumamoto Region, Kumamoto Prefecture on April 16, 2016 (in Japanese). http://www.static.jishin.go.jp/resource/monthly/2016/2016_kumamoto_2.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2016
- Fujiwara S, Yarai H, Kobayashi T, Morishita Y, Nakano T, Miyahara B, Nakai H, Miura Y, Ueshiba H, Kakiage Y, Une H (2016) Small-displacement linear surface ruptures of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence detected by ALOS-2 SAR interferometry. Earth Planets Space 68:160. doi:10.1186/s40623-016-0534-x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fusejima Y, Mizuno K, Shishikura M, Imura R, Komatsubara T, Sasaki T, Yoshioka T (2001) Surface ruptures associated with the 2000 Tottori-ken Seibu earthquake. Annu Rep Act Fault Paleoearthquake Res 1:1–26 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016a) Orthoimages at Mashiki area, taken on 15 April. http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#18/32.737249/130.795554/&base=std&ls=std%7C_20160414kumamoto_0415dol1&disp=11&lcd=_20160414kumamoto_0420dol04&vs=c1j0l0u0f0&d=vl. Accessed 25 July 2016
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016b) Orthoimages at Mifune area, taken on 20 April. http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#18/32.737249/130.795554/&base=std&ls=std%7C_20160414kumamoto_0420dol04&disp=11&lcd=_20160414kumamoto_0420dol04&vs=c1j0l0u0f0&d=vl. Accessed 25 July 2016
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016c) Orthoimages at Nishihara area, taken on 16 April. http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#14/32.874469/130.970163/&base=std&ls=std%7C_20160414kumamoto_0416dol4&disp=11&lcd=_20160414kumamoto_0416dol4&vs=c1j0l0u0f0&d=vl. Accessed 27 July 2016
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016d) InSAR images published on 15 AprilGoogle Scholar
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016e) InSAR images published on 18 AprilGoogle Scholar
- Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (2016f) InSAR images published on 3 MayGoogle Scholar
- http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#11/32.678107/130.720139/&ls=std%7Curgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20141114_20160415_u06l&disp=01&lcd=urgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20141114_20160415_u06l&vs=c1j0l0u0f1&d=vl. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
- http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#11/32.727798/130.841675/&ls=std%7Curgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20160307_20160418_u07r&disp=01&lcd=urgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20160307_20160418_u07r&vs=c1j0l0u0f1&d=vl. Accessed 29 Sept 2016
- http://maps.gsi.go.jp/#11/32.727798/130.841675/&ls=std%7Curgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20160416_20160430_u03r&disp=01&lcd=urgent_earthquake_20160414kumamoto_20160418_20160502_u07r&vs=c1j0l0u0f1&d=vl Accessed 29 Sept 2016
- http://www.hp1039.jishin.go.jp/danso/Kumamoto2Afrm.htm. Accessed 24 July 2016
- Hudnut KW, Brocher TM, Prentice CS, Boatwright J, Brooks BA, Aagaard BT, Blair JL, Fletcher JB, Erdem JE, Wicks CW, Murray JR, Fred FP, John L, Jerry S, David PS, Daniel JP, Suzanne H, Stephen D, Carla R, Brenda J, Rynn L, Anne MR, Timothy PM, Timothy ED, Gordon S, Ron SR, Craig G, Darren H, Todd E, Dan M, Don FH, Jonathan DB (2014) Key recovery factors for the August 24, 2014, South Napa earthquake. US Geol Surv Open-File Rept 1249:51Google Scholar
- Ikeda Y, Nakata T, Kaneda H, Tajikara M, Takazawa S, Chida N (2001) Active fault map in urban area [Kumamoto]. GSI Tech. Rep. D.1-No.368 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- King G, Klinger Y, Bowman D, Tapponnier P (2005) Slip-Partitioned Surface Breaks For the Mw 7.8 2001 Kokoxili Earthquake, China. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:731–738. doi:10.1785/0120040101 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumamoto Prefecture (1996) Evaluation of the Futagawa and Tatsutayama fault zone (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Lienkaemper JJ, DeLong SB, Domrose CJ, Rosa CM (2016) Afterslip behavior following the 2014 M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake with implications for Afterslip forecasting on other seismogenic faults. Seismol Res Lett 87(3):609–619View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machida H, Arai F (2003) Atlas of tephra in and around Japan. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Nakata T, Imaizumi T (eds) (2002) Digital active fault map of Japan. University of Tokyo Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Nakata T, Chida N, Kaneda H, Tajikara M, Takazawa S, Okada A (2001) Active fault map in urban area [Yatsushiro]. GSI Tech. Rep. D.1-No.388 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Research Group for Active Faults of Japan (1991) Active faults in Japan: sheet maps and inventories (revised edition). University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Shimizu H, Iio Y, Sakai S, Okada T, Takahashi H, Watanabe T, Goto K, Ohkura T, Asano Y, Matsushima T, Yamashita Y, Nakamoto N, Miyazaki M, Matsumoto S, Aizawa K, Shito A, Uchida K, Miyamachi R, Kamizono M, Teguri Y, Miyamachi H, Nakao S, Yakiwara H, Hirano S, Ohzono M, Shiina T, Takada M, Ichiyanagi M, Yamaguchi T, Okada K, Kosuga M, Azuma R, Uchida N, Emoto K, Ohta Y, Kaida T, Kozono T, Suzuki S, Takagi R, Demachi T, Nakahara H, Nakayama T, Hirahara S, Matsuzawa T, Miura S, Yamamoto M, Iwasaki T, Hirata N, Iidaka T, Kurashimo E, Kato A, Nakagawa S, Yamanaka Y, Ito T, Terakawa T, Maeda Y, Horikawa S, Matsuhiro K, Okuda T, Katao H, Kano Y, Miura T, Tsuda H, Muramoto T, Okubo M, Yamashina T, Ueno T (2016) Urgent joint seismic observation of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake–Seismic activities and their background. In: Abstract of Japan Geoscience union meeting 2016, MIS34-02, Chiba, 22–26 May 2016Google Scholar
- Shimokawa K, Kinugasa Y (1999) Paleoseismicity and activity study of the Hinagu fault system. Research in Fiscal Year 1998 Findings of Active Fault Survey Projects EQ/99/3:253–262 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Tsuruta K, Watanabe K (1978) Active faults in the southeast area of the Kumamoto plain. J Kumamoto Geosci Assoc 58:2–4 (in Japanese) Google Scholar
- Uchide T, Horikawa H, Nakai M, Matsushita R, Shigematsu N, Ando R, Imanishi K (2016) The 2016 Kumamoto-Oita earthquake sequence: Aftershock seismicity gap and dynamic triggering in volcanic area. Earth Planets Space. doi:10.1186/s40623-016-0556-4
- Yoshioka T, Shintani K, Iemura K, Miyawaki R (2007) Paleoseismicity of the Futagawa-Hinagu fault zone, central Kyushu, Japan. Annu Rep Active Fault Paleoearthquake Res 7:241–258 (in Japanese with English abstract) Google Scholar