Skip to main content

Oxidation during magma mixing recorded by symplectites at Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, Central Japan


Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano is an active Quaternary andesitic-to-dacitic volcano located in the Central Japan Arc. We conducted a detailed petrological investigation of orthopyroxene (opx)–magnetite (mt) symplectites associated with olivine in the Sessho lava, an andesitic lava flow from Kusatsu–Shirane. We concluded that the symplectites are pseudomorphs after olivine and were formed through the breakdown of olivine in a mafic magma as a result of oxidation during mixing with a felsic magma. Various olivines and opx–mt symplectites that show different stages of the progressive breakdown reaction of olivine coexist in a single lava flow. We suggest that basaltic recharge into the magma reservoir beneath Kusatsu–Shirane occurred repeatedly, leading to a hybrid andesite magma with different types of olivine and symplectite being erupted at Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano.


Mixing between mafic and felsic magmas in arc crust is considered to be an essential process not only for generating various arc magmas (Anderson 1976; Koyaguchi 1986; Sakuyama 1979; Ueki and Iwamori 2017), but also for the chemical evolution of a continental arc (Arndt 2013; Hildreth and Moorbath 1988; Tatsumi and Suzuki 2009). Understanding magma mixing could also be important for understanding the magmatic activity that leads to eruption, as mixing between mafic and felsic magma is a possible trigger for explosive magmatic eruptions (Sparks et al. 1977). Petrological investigations of the textures and zoning profiles of minerals provide information on such open-system magmatic processes (e.g., Streck 2008). In this study, we investigate magma mixing and the magma plumbing system of Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, a Quaternary andesitic-to-dacitic active volcano located in the Central Japan Arc, using detailed petrological observations of orthopyroxene (opx)–magnetite (mt) symplectites found in an andesitic lava flow.

Kusatsu–Shirane is a composite volcano that consists of multiple pyroclastic cones and craters, including Shirane, Moto-shirane, Kagamiike, and Kagamiike-kita (e.g., Hayakawa 1983; Hayakawa and Yui 1989; Takahashi et al. 2010; Uto et al. 1983). Kusatsu–Shirane is known for its hydrothermal system, with active hot springs and fumaroles (e.g., Ohba et al. 2008, 2019; Terada 2018). Geophysical studies including seismic (Kumagai et al. 2002; Nakano and Kumagai 2005; Nakano et al. 2003) and magnetotelluric methods (Matsunaga et al. 2020; Nurhasan et al. 2006) have been conducted to understand the structure of the hydrothermal system beneath Kusatsu–Shirane. The hydrothermal heat flow rate around Kusatsu–Shirane is one of the highest for an active volcano in the Japan Arc (e.g., Sumi 1977; Ueki and Terada 2012). Historical eruptions of Kusatsu–Shirane have been dominated by phreatic eruptions from the Shirane pyroclastic cone (e.g., Ossaka et al. 1980), and on January 23, 2018, phreatic eruptions occurred at the Kagamiike-kita and Kagamiike pyroclastic cones (e.g., Terada et al. 2018). Although historical activity of Kusatsu–Shirane has been typified by hydrothermal activity and phreatic eruptions, voluminous andesitic-to-dacitic lava flows have also been erupted throughout its lifetime (Hayakawa and Yui 1989). In this study, we present petrological observations of opx–mt symplectites found in an andesitic lava flow from Kusatsu–Shirane. We use the process of formation of these symplectites to investigate the magma plumbing system of Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, which has produced voluminous andesitic magma.

Geological setting and sample descriptions

Kusatsu–Shirane is located about 25 km in the back-arc direction from Asama Volcano, which is in the volcanic front of the Central Japan Arc (Fig. 1). The Pacific and Philippine plates are subducting beneath Kusatsu–Shirane. The surface of the Pacific Plate is about 150 km beneath the volcano (Nakajima and Hasegawa 2006). Although the Philippine Sea Plate is not clearly detected beneath Kusatsu–Shirane in seismic studies, its surface is estimated to be at a depth of 110 km based on extrapolation (Hirose et al. 2008; Nakajima et al. 2009). The seismic Moho beneath Kusatsu–Shirane is at a depth of ~ 40 km (Zhao et al. 1992). Regions of high seismic attenuation are observed in the uppermost mantle beneath the volcano, and the central part of the high seismic attenuation zone (30–100 km depth) is interpreted to be a zone of partial melting (Kashiwagi and Nakajima 2019).

Fig. 1

a Location and simplified tectonic map of Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, prepared using Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith 1998). The locations of Quaternary volcanoes (Committee for Catalogue of Quaternary volcanoes in Japan 1999) are shown as triangles. Solid gray and black lines are contours of the depth of the upper surface of the Pacific Plate at 50-km intervals (Nakajima and Hasegawa 2006) and of the Philippine Sea Plate at 10-km intervals (Hirose et al. 2008; Nakajima et al. 2009), respectively (modified after Ueki and Terada 2012). b Geologic map of Kusatsu–Shirane, showing sampling locations, modified by Ueki and Terada (2012) after Uto et al. (1983) and Hayakawa and Yui (1989). The spatial distributions of symplectites and olivine are also shown. The star indicates the location of the bulk sample presented in Table 1. Numbers refer to the samples shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and additional files

The basement at Kusatsu–Shirane is made up of altered Neogene volcanic rocks (Hayakawa and Yui 1989; Uto et al. 1983) and the Quaternary Yokote volcanic rocks (Kaneko et al. 1991). Following basaltic–andesitic activity at Matsuozawa Volcano at ~ 0.6 Ma (Kaneko et al. 1991; Nagai et al. 2015), volcanic activity at Kusatsu–Shirane started with the eruption of the Horakuchi lava flow and the dacitic Oshi pyroclastic flow at around 0.55 Ma (Kaneko et al. 1991; Nagai et al. 2015). A period of quiescence between 0.25 Ma and 14 ka interrupted volcanic activity that involved the eruption of voluminous lava flows including the Aoba (0.3 Ma), Heibei-ike (~ 14 ka), Kagusa (~ 7 ka), Sessho (~ 3 ka), Ishizu (~ 3 ka), and Furikozawa (~ 3 ka) lavas, alongside associated pyroclastic cones and lava domes (e.g., the Moto-shirane and Shirane pyroclastic cones) and the Yazawahara pyroclastic flow (Hayakawa and Yui 1989; Kaneko et al. 1991; Takahashi et al. 2010; Uto et al. 1983). The SiO2 contents of the magmas erupted since 0.55 Ma are restricted to 58–66 wt% (Takahashi et al. 2010). Basaltic, amphibole-bearing (i.e., hydrous) melt inclusions have been reported in olivine phenocrysts in an andesite lava from Kusatsu–Shirane (Yamaguchi et al. 2005). Textures indicating mingling between andesite and dacite are found in some lavas (Ushioda 2015; Uto et al. 1983). On Harker diagrams, many major-element oxides decrease toward a dacitic composition with SiO2 content of ~ 65 wt%, and dacite with ~ 65 wt% SiO2 was therefore inferred to be the felsic end-member (Kametani et al. 2017; Takahashi et al. 2010). These observations indicate that mixing between hydrous basalt and dacite played a dominant role in the generation of intermediate magmas at Kusatsu–Shirane.

We studied the Sessho lava, which is an andesitic lava flow erupted from the Kagamiike pyroclastic cone at 5 ka (Nigorikawa et al. 2016) with an estimated volume of ~ 0.1 km3 (Hayakawa 1983). The lava is porphyritic, containing about 35 vol.% plagioclase, opx, clinopyroxene (cpx), and magnetite phenocrysts, with rare olivine and rare quartz (Takahashi et al. 2010; Ueki and Terada 2012). The lava has an andesitic composition (SiO2 = 60–63 wt%; Table 1; Takahashi et al. 2010; Uto et al. 1983).

Table 1 Representative bulk composition of the Sessho lava

Analytical methods

Samples were collected from different locations of the Sessho lava flow (Fig. 1). Back-scattered electron (BSE) images were collected and phenocryst compositions determined using a JEOL JXA–8800M electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) at the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology and at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of the University of Tokyo. The acceleration voltage was 15 kV and the beam current 12 nA. Representative phenocryst compositions are given in Additional file 1. BSE images were also obtained by SEM–EDS (JEOL JSM–6010LA) at the School of Science and Engineering, Kokushikan University, with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Photomicrographs and BSE images are presented in Fig. 2 and Additional file 2.

Fig. 2

Photomicrographs and BSE images of symplectites and olivine. a, b Symplectite core surrounded by an opx rim. c, d Unrimmed olivine. e, f Opx-rimmed olivine. g, h Symplectite with an olivine core and opx rim

Whole-rock major element concentrations were determined using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) at the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology (Rigaku Simultix 3550). For whole rock analyses, rock chips were sliced using a diamond saw to avoid surface contamination, polished on a grinder, rinsed in an ultrasonic bath, crushed manually in a tungsten pestle, and ground in an agate ball mill. The rock powder was dried at 110 °C for more than 24 h before the preparation of fused glass beads. Fused glass beads were prepared from a mixture of 0.4 g of rock powder and 4.0 g of lithium tetraborate flux in a platinum melting pot (1:10 sample dilution). Details of the calibrations of the XRF analyses and analytical procedures used are given in Tani et al. (2002). A representative bulk composition is presented in Table 1.

Petrography and mineral chemistry

Several types of symplectite consisting of opaque and transparent minerals are found in the Sessho lava. Figure 2a, b shows a symplectite core surrounded by fine-grained opx. Figure 3 shows EPMA analyses of the lamellar zone of this symplectite. The EPMA analyses shown in Fig. 3 were randomly made across the lamellar zone of the symplectite. Therefore, the analytical results in Fig. 3 are considered to represent the variations in compositions due to variations in the ratios of the two phases present. We infer, therefore, that each end-member of this compositional variation represents the composition of a single phase, and the average of all the analyses is considered to represent the bulk composition of the symplectite zone. Figure 3 demonstrates that the symplectite comprises two phases: an Fe-bearing Si-absent phase and a silicate phase with a molar Si:(Mg + Fe) ratio of 1:1. These EPMA analyses indicate that the transparent silicate mineral in the symplectite is opx and the opaque mineral is magnetite. Opx in the symplectite and in the surrounding rim is fine-grained and exhibits low birefringence. Magnetite typically occurs in lamellae of 1–5 µm in width.

Fig. 3

EPMA analyses of a symplectite. EPMA analyses were randomly made across the lamellar zone of the symplectite shown in Fig. 2a, b

Three types of olivine are identified: unrimmed olivine (Fig. 2c, d), olivine with a thin rim of opx and magnetite lamellae at the opx–olivine interface (opx-rimmed olivine; Fig. 2e, f), and olivine surrounded by a symplectite zone and a fine-grained opx rim (Fig. 2g, h). The spatial distribution of these various olivine and symplectite types is summarized in Fig. 1.

Olivine and opx zoning profiles are presented in Fig. 4. The EPNA analyses of the symplectite zone in Fig. 4 were carefully arranged to analyze a single opx phase. The analytical results were carefully scrutinized and any analyses that captured two phases (opx and magnetite) were discarded. The unrimmed olivine (Fig. 4a) has a homogeneous core with Mg# (molar MgO/(MgO + FeO) value > 80 and normally zoned edges. The opx-rimmed olivine in Fig. 4b has a normally zoned core with Mg# < 80 at its center. The olivine surrounded by zones of symplectite (Fig. 4c) has a homogeneous composition of Mg# < 70. Opx in a symplectite core has a homogeneous composition with a Mg# value of ~ 65 (Fig. 4d). Opx rims associated with olivine or symplectite cores exhibit normal zoning (Fig. 4). The opx at the olivine–opx interface exhibits a higher Mg# value than the coexisting olivine (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Zoning profiles of olivine and opx in the examples shown in Fig. 2. Gray and white circles are olivine and opx analyses, respectively. The shaded areas represent symplectite or lamellar zones. Numbered arrows indicate locations of analyses given in Additional file 1

The compositions of isolated opx and cpx phenocryst edges are shown in Fig. 5, together with the two-pyroxene isotherms of Lindsley (1983). The edges of opx phenocrysts typically have Mg# values of 60–65, which correspond to the Mg# values of the opx in the symplectite. Crystal pairs of opx with Mg# values of 60–65 and adjacent cpx yield temperatures of 866–958 °C (average, 911 °C) and pressures of 5–9 kbar (average, 7.3 kbar), as estimated using the two-pyroxene geothermobarometer of Putirka (2008). Some opx and cpx grains exhibit high values of Mg#, and the temperature and pressure calculated for one pair of high-Mg# opx and adjacent cpx (1076 °C and 2.8 kbar, respectively) indicate that the high-Mg# pyroxene has a different origin to the low-Mg# pyroxenes and symplectites.

Fig. 5

Pyroxene phenocryst edge compositions obtained by EPMA analyses plotted on a pyroxene quadrilateral diagram with the 5-kbar isotherms of Lindsley (1983). The edges of isolated pyroxene phenocrysts were analyzed

Symplectite formation mechanism

The formation of opx–mt symplectites in igneous rocks has mostly been attributed to the breakdown of olivine (Ambler and Ashley 1977; Barton and van Gaans 1988; Barton et al. 1991; Del Moro et al. 2013; Fan et al. 2019; Goode 1974; Haggerty and Baker 1967; Johnston and Stout 1984; van Lamoen 1979; Moseley 1984). Petrological observations of the symplectites found in the Sessho lava (Figs. 2, 3, 4) demonstrate that they are associated with olivine. The major chemical constituents of the symplectites are Fe, Mg, and Si (Fig. 3 and Additional file 1). The stoichiometry of the average analyses in the symplectite zone corresponds to that of olivine (Fig. 3; mean Si/(Fe + Mg) molar ratio = 0.5 ± 0.3). Moreover, the symplectites have a concentric form, so that symplectites often surround an olivine core, and are always surrounded by a fine-grained opx rim. Magnetite lamellae between olivine and opx appear to be nearly perpendicular to the olivine–opx interface. These concentric fine-grained polyphase microstructures and the interface between the fine-grained and coarse-grained minerals are typical of symplectites that form after the breakdown of a mineral (Gaidies et al. 2017). We therefore conclude that the symplectites found in the Sessho lava are pseudomorphs after olivine.

In the symplectites, opx has a Mg# value that corresponds to that of the phenocryst edges, suggesting that the opx in the symplectite shown in Fig. 4 was formed at ~ 911 °C, above the solidus temperature of andesite (e.g., Green 1972; Huang and Wyllie 1986).

It has been suggested that opx–mt symplectites can be formed through the following oxidation reaction (e.g., Del Moro et al. 2013; Goode 1974; Haggerty and Baker 1967; Johnston and Stout 1984):

$${\text{Mg}}_{ 2} {\text{SiO}}_{ 4} + {\text{ Fe}}_{ 2} {\text{SiO}}_{ 4} + \, {1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-0pt} 3}{\text{O}}_{ 2} = {\text{ 2MgSiO}}_{ 3} + \, {2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}} \right. \kern-0pt} 3}{\text{Fe}}_{ 3} {\text{O}}_{ 4} .$$

During this reaction, the bulk Si:(Fe2+ + Fe3+ + Mg2+) molar ratio of the system (1:2) is conserved, and the average stoichiometry of the lamellar zones of symplectites in the Sessho lava is 1:2 (Fig. 3). After oxidation, the opx that formed through the breakdown of olivine would exhibit higher values of Mg# than the coexisting olivine, and there is an increase in Mg# values at the opx–olivine interface in the symplectites (Fig. 4). We infer that the olivine–opx interface represents the oxidation reaction front.

Olivine and opx compositions (i.e., zoning profiles and Mg# values) are systematically related to the types of symplectite and olivine (Fig. 4). These different types can be summarized consistently as snapshots of different stages of a continuous reaction–diffusion process. It is inferred that the more symplectized olivines record longer residence times. If we take the degree of symplectization to represent the residence time, the variations in the zoning profiles of olivine and opx can be interpreted to be the result of a continuous process of Fe–Mg diffusion. Olivine crystals with no opx rim have flat cores with the highest Mg#, and they are inferred therefore to have undergone the least Fe–Mg diffusion (Fig. 4a). Olivines with an opx rim and magnetite lamellae exhibit normally zoned profiles, suggesting Fe–Mg diffusion from the melt occurred (Fig. 4b). Olivines surrounded by a symplectite zone and opx rim have homogeneous cores with the lowest values of Mg#, and they are inferred to have homogenized completely through Fe–Mg diffusion (Fig. 4c). Similarly, it is inferred that the opx in Fig. 4b records the least Fe–Mg diffusion, the opx in Fig. 4c somewhat more Fe–Mg diffusion, and the opx with the complete symplectite core that has the lowest Mg# (Fig. 4d), the greatest amount of Fe–Mg diffusion (Fig. 5). The widths of symplectite or lamellar zones (e.g., Fig. 2) correlate with the degree of Fe–Mg diffusion in olivine and opx, which suggests that symplectite formation and Fe–Mg diffusion proceeded simultaneously. The complete breakdown of olivine resulted in symplectites without olivine cores, and the opx in the rims and symplectites equilibrated with the melt.

Generally, a thin opx rim surrounding an individual olivine phenocryst indicates a reaction between the olivine and a non-equilibrium melt, suggesting magma mixing (e.g., Sakuyama 1979; Streck 2008). Based on Putirka (2005) which is a function of pressure, the KFe/MgD (Fe–Mg exchange coefficient between olivine and melt) at a crustal pressure of 1 bar to 1 GPa is 0.29–0.32. Based on the KFe/MgD value, the Mg# value of olivine in equilibrium with the bulk composition of the Sessho lava is 76.8–78.5 (Table 1), which indicates that the olivine without rims (Fig. 4a; maximum Mg# = 81) did not crystallize from the host andesite. Hydrous basaltic melt inclusions in olivine from an andesitic lava at Kusatsu–Shirane (Yamaguchi et al. 2005) indicate that the olivine crystallized from a hydrous basalt. Based on the pressure and temperature estimates derived from amphiboles in melt inclusions within olivine, Yamaguchi et al. (2005) suggested that the olivine in the andesitic lava of Kusatsu–Shirane crystallized under lower-crustal conditions of > 950 °C and > 1 GPa, which point to greater depths than those indicated by the pressures and temperatures calculated using the pyroxene geothermobarometry (911 °C and 7.3 kbar on average). We infer, therefore, that the olivine-bearing basalt magma ascended from a lower-crustal magma reservoir and mixed with material in a middle-crustal magma reservoir to form the andesitic magma.

Mixing between olivine-bearing basalt magma and felsic magma results in the rapid formation of opx reaction rims around disequilibrium olivine (e.g., Coombs and Gardner 2004). However, a redox difference between the two magmas is necessary to produce opx–mt symplectites from olivine (Eq. 1). Thermodynamic calculations (Dohmen and Chakraborty 2007; Nitsan 1974) indicate that an increase in fO2 of 3 log units from the NNO or QFM buffers can account for the breakdown of olivine to form opx–mt symplectites. An fO2 contrast of similar magnitude is generally observed between mafic and felsic magmas (e.g., Carmichael 1991). Hence, we infer that the opx–mt symplectites were formed by oxidation during mixing between an oxidized felsic magma and a reduced mafic magma. As mentioned above, an fO2 contrast would be required to drive the reaction described by Eq. 1. Such an fO2 contrast would not be conserved when thermodynamic equilibrium is attained after the mixing of magmas with different temperatures and fO2 (Russell 1990). The interface between the high-fO2 felsic magma and low-fO2 mafic magma might be the site of such a contrast in fO2. The experimental results of Fiege et al. (2017) show that a redox gradient is rapidly developed through diffusion at the interface between felsic and mafic magmas.

Based on the diffusion and reaction sequence shown in Fig. 4, the reactions that account for the formation of the symplectites can be summarized as follows. The opx reaction rims around the olivine crystals (Fig. 2e, f) were formed by the reaction between olivine and felsic melt during magma mixing. The opx–mt symplectites were formed by a reaction driven by oxidation (Eq. 1). In some cases the reaction proceeded to completion, and the olivine crystal was completely replaced by symplectite (Fig. 2a, b). At the same time, Fe–Mg diffusion in olivine and opx proceeded, and both were homogenized (Fig. 4). Olivines and symplectites at various reaction stages coexist in a single lava flow (Fig. 1), indicating a range of residence times for the olivine crystals in the middle-crustal reservoir that fed the Sessho lava.

Although we assume that the symplectites formed through an oxidation reaction (Eq. 1) in which the bulk Si:(Fe + Mg) ratio was conserved (Fig. 3), the process of formation may not have been in an entirely closed system. A gain of Fe from, and a loss of Mg to, the melt is necessary to produce the observed diffusion profiles (Fig. 4). CaO and Al2O3 contents in the opx in the symplectites are similar to those in the opx phenocrysts (Additional file 1). The simple oxidation of olivine (i.e., open to oxygen and closed to cations) and Fe–Mg diffusion cannot explain the chemical imbalance. Consequently, a reaction in an open system is required to produce the observed chemical compositions of the symplectites. Ambler and Ashley (1977) proposed an open-system reaction in which symplectites are formed through the breakdown of olivine and the instantaneous precipitation of opx and magnetite from the surrounding melt.

Geological implications

The symplectites we studied were found in an andesitic lava flow and are assumed to have formed above the solidus, whereas most of the opx–mt symplectites described in previous studies were found in mafic–ultramafic plutonic rocks (Ambler and Ashley 1977; Barton and van Gaans 1988; Barton et al. 1991; Chambers and Brown 1995; Daval 1987; Johnston and Stout 1984) and were interpreted to have formed through a subsolidus reaction (Del Moro et al. 2013; Goode 1974; Haggerty and Baker 1967; Johnston and Stout 1984). This suggests that specific magma chamber conditions were required to form opx–mt symplectites from olivine above the solidus. Previous studies have showed that degassing can oxidize residual magmas (e.g., Candela 1986; Holloway 2004; Humphreys et al. 2015; Mathez 1984). These previous studies suggest the following redox reaction of H2O with ferrous iron in the melt:

$${\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O }}\left( {\text{melt}} \right) \, + {\text{ 2FeO }}\left( {\text{melt}} \right) \, = {\text{ Fe}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{melt}} \right) \, + {\text{ H}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{gas}} \right)$$

and the subsequent degassing of H2 to oxidize the residual magma.

The typical eruptive style of Kusatsu–Shirane is effusive that produced lava flows and pyroclastic cones rather than the pyroclastic flows or widespread tephra deposits that result from explosive eruptions (e.g., Hayakawa and Yui 1989). An effusive eruptive style is indicative of efficient open-system outgassing from the magmatic system and a slow rate of magma ascent (Cassidy et al. 2018). Energy released by non-eruptive heat discharge (e.g., Kagiyama 1986, 2008) through hydrothermal activity is also prominent at Kusatsu–Shirane. These geological and volcanological observations indicate efficient degassing from the magma reservoir beneath Kusatsu–Shirane, and we infer, therefore, that the magma was effectively oxidized by this degassing as H2 and related gas species were removed from the Kusatsu–Shirane magmas (e.g., Ohba et al. 2019; Ossaka et al. 1980).

The range of olivine and symplectite types indicates multiple injections of olivine-bearing basalt into the magma reservoir beneath Kusatsu–Shirane. In the Sessho lava, different olivine crystals and pseudomorphs after olivine coexist in a single flow, and even in a single sample (Fig. 1), showing that olivine crystals with different magma residence times coexisted in a single magma batch. Given that diffusivity has a unit of m2/s, if one knows the diameter of the mineral and the diffusion coefficient, a timescale for Fe–Mg diffusive re-equilibration can be calculated as ~ L2/D, where L is the diameter of the mineral and D is the diffusion coefficient (e.g., Zhang 2010). Based on the equation of Dohmen and Chakraborty (2007), which is a function of pressure, temperature, and olivine composition, the Fe–Mg diffusion coefficient of olivine (Fig. 2c) is 10−17.7 (m2/s) at the average pressure and temperature determined in the present study (7.3 kbar and 911 °C). Based on this diffusion coefficient, the time required for Fe–Mg diffusive re-equilibration of the unrimmed olivine (Fig. 2c) is estimated to be 509 years. Therefore, the typical time required for the formation of the symplectites and olivine zoning profiles is estimated to be ~ 500 years. Kusatsu–Shirane has had at least ~ 10 magmatic eruptions over the last 14 ky (Hayakawa and Yui 1989; Nigorikawa et al. 2016). The magmas from each eruption had slightly different compositions (Nigorikawa et al. 2016; Takahashi et al. 2010), and this variation is interpreted to have resulted from mixing between different basaltic andesites and a dacite (Takahashi et al. 2010). Olivine-bearing mafic magma was injected into the magma chamber repeatedly (every ~ 500 years) and the olivines reacted with the oxidized felsic magma to form various types of olivine and symplectite. Eruptions of the hybrid andesite occurred, producing lava flows and pyroclastic cones. In other words, there is a steady-state magma chamber in which the influx of mafic magma and the outflux of evolved magma are balanced (de Silva et al. 2015).

Concluding remarks

We investigated the formation of opx–mt symplectites in the Sessho lava flow at Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano using detailed petrological observations. We conclude that the opx–mt symplectites were formed through the breakdown of olivine by oxidation caused by magma mixing. The different olivine and symplectite types were produced by multiple injections of olivine-bearing basalt into the magma reservoir beneath Kusatsu–Shirane. The following four processes were involved in the formation of the symplectites: (1) reaction between olivine and melt to form an opx reaction rim; (2) olivine oxidation and the exsolution of opx and magnetite to form symplectites; (3) Fe–Mg diffusion in olivine and opx, and (4) the input of major elements (Fe, Ca, and Al) from the melt. Some of these processes could have occurred simultaneously, such as the breakdown of olivine and the precipitation of opx and magnetite from the interstitial liquid (Ambler and Ashley 1977). The typical time required for the formation of the opx–mt symplectite after olivine is estimated to be ~ 500 years. Future study of the details of the symplectite-forming reaction–diffusion system, taking account of multiple phases (e.g., Ashworth and Chambers 2000; Gaidies et al. 2017; Nakamura 1995; Nishiyama 1983), will enable us to make better quantitative estimates on the time required for symplectite formation and to advance our understanding of the associated magmatic processes, including how the physicochemical conditions in the magma storage system beneath Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano produce symplectite-bearing andesitic magma.

Availability of data and materials

Representative analytical results are provided in Table 1 and Additional file 1. The data are available from the corresponding author (KU) upon request ( Samples and thin sections are held in the laboratory of the second author (MI) at Kokushikan University.



Back-scattered electron




Electron probe micro-analyzer

fO2 :

Oxygen fugacity


Molar MgO/(MgO + FeO) value (%)






Scanning electron microscope–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy


X-ray fluorescence spectrometer


  1. Ambler EP, Ashley PM (1977) Vermicular orthopyroxene–magnetite symplectites from the Wateranga layered mafic intrusion, Queensland, Australia. Lithos 10:163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AT (1976) Magma mixing: petrological process and volcanological tool. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 1:3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt NT (2013) The formation and evolution of the continental crust. Geochem Perspect 2:405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashworth JR, Chambers AD (2000) Symplectic reaction in olivine and the controls of intergrowth spacing in symplectites. J Petrol 41:285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barton M, van Gaans C (1988) Formation of orthopyroxene–Fe–Ti oxide symplectites in Precambrian intrusives, Rogaland, southwestern Norway. Am Mineral 73:1046–1059

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barton M, Sheets JM, Lee WE, van Gaans C (1991) Occurrence of low-Ca clinopyroxene and the role of deformation in the formation of pyroxene–Fe–Ti oxide symplectites. Contrib Mineral Petrol 108:181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Candela PA (1986) The evolution of aqueous vapor from silicate melts: effect on oxygen fugacity. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50:1205–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmichael ISE (1991) The redox states of basic and silicic magmas: a reflection of their source regions? Contrib Mineral Petrol 106:129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassidy M, Manga M, Cashman K, Bachmann O (2018) Controls on explosive–effusive volcanic eruption styles. Nat Commun 9:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers AD, Brown PE (1995) The Lilloise intrusion, East Greenland: fractionation of a hydrous alkali picritic magma. J Petrol 36:933–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee for Catalog of Quaternary Volcanoes in Japan (1999) Catalog of Quaternary volcanoes in Japan, ver. 1.0 [CD-ROM]. The Volcanological Society of Japan, Tokyo

  12. Coombs ML, Gardner JE (2004) Reaction rim growth on olivine in silicic melts: implications for magma mixing. Am Mineral 89:748–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daval D (1987) Petrogenesis of orthopyroxene–magnetite–ilmenite intergrowths from an ultramafic layer. Contrib Mineral Petrol 95:301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Silva SL, Riggs NR, Barth AP (2015) Quickening the pulse: fractal tempos in continental arc magmatism. Elements 11:113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Del Moro S, Renzulli A, Landi P, La Felice S, Rosi M (2013) Unusual lapilli tuff ejecta erupted at Stromboli during the 15 March 2007 explosion shed light on the nature and thermal state of rocks forming the crater system of the volcano. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 254:37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dohmen R, Chakraborty S (2007) Fe–Mg diffusion in olivine II: point defect chemistry, change of diffusion mechanisms and a model for calculation of diffusion coefficients in natural olivine. Phys Chem Minerals 34:409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan S, Zhang Z, Ma C, Xie Q, Wang L, Li Y, Zhang Y (2019) Coronas around olivine in the Miaowan olivine norite, Yangtze Craton, South China. J Earth Sci 30:924–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiege A, Ruprecht P, Simon A (2017) A magma mixing redox trap that moderates mass transfer of sulphur and metals. Geochem Perspect Lett 3:190–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaidies F, Milke R, Heinrich W, Abart R (2017) Metamorphic mineral reactions: porphyroblast, corona and symplectite growth. In: Heinrich W, Abart R (eds) Mineral reaction kinetics: microstructures, textures, chemical and isotopic signatures. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, vol. 16. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London, pp. 469–540.

  20. Goode ADT (1974) Oxidation of natural olivines. Nature 248:500–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Green TH (1972) Crystallization of calc-alkaline andesite under controlled high-pressure hydrous conditions. Contrib Mineral Petrol 34:150–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haggerty SE, Baker I (1967) The alteration of olivine in basaltic and associated lavas. Contrib Mineral Petrol 16:233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayakawa Y (1983) Geology of Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano. J Geol Soc Jpn 89:511–525. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayakawa Y, Yui M (1989) Eruptive history of the Kusatsu Shirane volcano. Quat Res 28:1–17. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hildreth W, Moorbath S (1988) Crustal contributions to arc magmatism in the Andes of central Chile. Contrib Mineral Petrol 98:455–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirose F, Nakajima J, Hasegawa A (2008) Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure and configuration of the Philippine Sea slab in southwestern Japan estimated by double-difference tomography. J Geophys Res 113:B09315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Holloway JR (2004) Redox reactions in seafloor basalts: possible insights into silicic hydrothermal systems. Chem Geol 210:225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang WL, Wyllie PJ (1986) Phase relationships of gabbro–tonalite–granite–water at 15 kbar with applications to differentiation and anatexis. Am Mineral 71:301–316

    Google Scholar 

  29. Humphreys MC, Brooker RA, Fraser DG, Burgisser A, Mangan MT, McCammon C (2015) Coupled interactions between volatile activity and Fe oxidation state during arc crustal processes. J Petrol 56:795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnston AD, Stout JH (1984) Development of orthopyroxene–Fe/Mg ferrite symplectites by continuous olivine oxidation. Contrib Mineral Petrol 88:196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kagiyama T (1986) Thermal activity of volcano. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 30:S121–S136. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kagiyama T (2008) Eruption dominant volcanism vs. geothermal activity dominant volcanism—new aspect in volcanism. J Geotherm Res Soc Jpn 30:193–204. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kametani N, Ishizaki Y, Yoshimoto M, Terada A (2017) Holocene eruption history of Kusatsu–Shirane volcano [in Japanese]. Paper presented at Volcanological Society of Japan 2017 Fall meeting, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan. 21 September 2017.

  34. Kaneko T, Shimizu S, Itaya T (1991) K-Ar ages of the Quaternary volcanoes in the Shin-etsu highland area, central Japan, and their formation history. Bull ERI Univ Tokyo 66:299–332 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kashiwagi H, Nakajima J (2019) Three-dimensional seismic attenuation structure of central Japan and deep sources of arc magmatism. Geophys Res Lett.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koyaguchi T (1986) Textural and compositional evidence for magma mixing and its mechanism, Abu volcano group, Southwestern Japan. Contrib Mineral Petrol 93:33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumagai H, Chouet BA, Nakano M (2002) Temporal evolution of a hydrothermal system in Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan, inferred from the complex frequencies of long-period events. J Geophys Res 107:2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindsley DH (1983) Pyroxene thermometry. Am Mineral 68:477–493

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mathez EA (1984) Influence of degassing on oxidation states of basaltic magmas. Nature 310:371–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Matsunaga Y, Kanda W, Takakura S, Koyama T, Saito Z, Seki K, Suzuki A, Kishita T, Kinoshita Y, Ogawa Y (2020) Magmatic hydrothermal system inferred from the resistivity structure of Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 390:106742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moseley D (1984) Symplectic exsolution in olivine. Am Mineral 69:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nagai M, Ueki K, Mizuno Y, Tanaka Y, Inui M (2015) Stratigraphy and radiometric ages of volcanic rocks from the drill hole of the Hoshimata observation station of Kusatsu–Shiranesan Volcano, Central Japan [in Japanese]. Paper presented at Volcanological Society of Japan 2015 Fall meeting, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan, 28–29 September 2015.

  43. Nakajima J, Hasegawa A (2006) Anomalous low-velocity zone and linear alignment of seismicity along it in the subducted Pacific slab beneath Kanto, Japan: reactivation of subducted fracture zone? Geophys Res Lett 33:L16309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nakajima J, Tsuji Y, Hasegawa A (2009) Seismic evidence for thermally-controlled dehydration reaction in subducting oceanic crust. Geophys Res Lett 36:L03303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nakamura M (1995) Residence time and crystallization history of nickeliferous olivine phenocrysts from the northern Yatsugatake volcanoes, Central Japan: application of a growth and diffusion model in the system Mg–Fe–Ni. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 66:81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakano M, Kumagai H (2005) Response of a hydrothermal system to magmatic heat inferred from temporal variations in the complex frequencies of long-period events at Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 147:233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nakano M, Kumagai H, Chouet BA (2003) Source mechanism of long-period events at Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan, inferred from waveform inversion of the effective excitation functions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 122:149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nigorikawa A, Ishizaki Y, Kametani N, Yoshimoto M, Terada A, Ueki K, Nakamura K (2016) Holocene eruption history of the Motoshirane pyroclastic cone group, Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, Japan. Paper presented at Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2016, Makuhari Messe, Chiba, Japan, 22 May 2016

  49. Nishiyama T (1983) Steady diffusion model for olivine–plagioclase corona growth. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nitsan U (1974) Stability field of olivine with respect to oxidation and reduction. J Geophys Res 79:706–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nurhasan, Ogawa Y, Ujihara N, Tank SB, Honkura Y, Onizawa S, Mori T, Makino M (2006) Two electrical conductors beneath Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, Japan, imaged by audiomagnetotellurics, and their implications for the hydrothermal system. Earth Planet Space 58:1053–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ohba T, Hirabayashi JI, Nogami K (2008) Temporal changes in the chemistry of lake water within Yugama Crater, Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan: implications for the evolution of the magmatic hydrothermal system. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178:131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ohba T, Yaguchi M, Nishino K, Numanami N, Tsunogai U, Ito M, Shingubara R (2019) Time variation in the chemical and isotopic composition of fumarolic gasses at Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano, Japan. Front Earth Sci 7:249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ossaka J, Ozawa T, Nomara T, Ossaka T, Hirabayashi J, Takaesu A, Hayashi T (1980) Variation of chemical compositions in volcanic gases and water at Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano and its activity in 1976. Bull Volcanol 43:207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Putirka KD (2005) Mantle potential temperatures at Hawaii, Iceland, and the mid-ocean ridge system, as inferred from olivine phenocrysts: evidence for thermally driven mantle plumes. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 6:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Putirka KD (2008) Thermometers and barometers for volcanic systems. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:61–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Russell JK (1990) Magma mixing processes; insights and constraints from thermodynamic calculations. Rev Mineral Geochem 24:153–190

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sakuyama M (1979) Evidence of magma mixing—petrological study of Shirouma-oike calc-alkaline andesite volcano, Japan. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 5:179–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sparks SR, Sigurdsson H, Wilson L (1977) Magma mixing: a mechanism for triggering acid explosive eruptions. Nature 267:315–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Streck MJ (2008) Mineral textures and zoning as evidence for open system processes. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sumi K (1977) The relationship of the rates of convective heat discharge to the tectonic provinces in Japan. Bull Geol Surv Jpn 28:277–325 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Takahashi M, Kawamata H, Yasui M, Kanamaru T (2010) Whole-rock major element chemistry for eruptive products of Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, central Japan: summary of 306 analytical data. Proc Inst Nat Sci Nihon Univ 45:205–254 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tani K, Orihashi Y, Nakata S (2002) Major and trace components of silicate rocks by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer using fused glass beads: evaluation of analytical precision of three, six, eleven times dilution fused glass beads methods. Tech Res Rep ERI Univ Tokyo 8:26–46 (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tatsumi Y, Suzuki T (2009) Tholeiitic vs calc-alkalic differentiation and evolution of arc crust: constraints from melting experiments on a basalt from the Izu–Bonin–Mariana Arc. J Petrol 50:1575–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Terada A (2018) Kusatsu-Shirane volcano as a site of phreatic eruptions. J Geol Soc Jpn 124:251–270. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Terada A, Morita Y, Hashimoto T, Mori T, Ohba T, Yaguchi M, Kanda W (2018) Water sampling using a drone at Yugama crater lake, Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, Japan. Earth Planet Space 70:64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ueki K, Iwamori H (2017) Geochemical differentiation processes for arc magma of the Sengan volcanic cluster, northeastern Japan, constrained from principal component analysis. Lithos 290:60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ueki K, Terada A (2012) Field excursion guide to Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 57:235–251. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ushioda M (2015) Magma mingling of the Kagusa lava in the Kusatsu Shirane volcano: preliminary results from analyses of a boring core. Paper presented at Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2015, Makuhari Messe, Chiba, Japan, 26 May 2015

  70. Uto K, Hayakawa Y, Aramaki S, Ossaka J (1983) Geological map of Kusatsu-Shirane Volcano. Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  71. van Lamoen H (1979) Coronas in olivine gabbros and iron ores from Susimäki and Riuttamaa, Finland. Contrib Mineral Petrol 68:259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans 79:579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yamaguchi Y, Yamaguchi T, Ohta Y (2005) Amphibole as a daughter phase of olivine-hosted melt inclusion from Asama and Kusatsu-Shirane volcanoes. Earth Sci 59:57–61. Japanese with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang Y (2010) Diffusion in minerals and melts: theoretical background. Rev Mineral Geochem 72:5–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhao D, Horiuchi S, Hasegawa A (1992) Seismic velocity structure of the crust beneath the Japan Islands. Tectonophys 212:289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive reviews, and Yasuo Ogawa for editorial handling of the manuscript. We thank the Volcanic Fluid Research Center, School of Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, for support in the field and fruitful discussions throughout this study. We received permission from Agatsuma District Forest Office, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries for fieldwork and sampling. The authors also thank officials at Kusatsu Town, Gunma Prefecture, for assistance during fieldwork.


K.U. was supported financially by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant numbers JP17H02063 and JP19K04026.

Author information




KU collected samples, performed XRF analyses, drafted the manuscript, and designed the framework of this study. MI collected samples, performed EPMA and SEM–EDS analyses, reviewed and edited the manuscript, and designed the framework of this study. NO, KM, and KO collected samples, performed EPMA and SEM–EDS analyses, and processed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenta Ueki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Excel Spreadsheet with representative EPMA results (Figs. 4 and 5).

Additional file 2.

BSE images of symplectites. Sample locations are given in Fig. 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ueki, K., Inui, M., Matsunaga, K. et al. Oxidation during magma mixing recorded by symplectites at Kusatsu–Shirane Volcano, Central Japan. Earth Planets Space 72, 68 (2020).

Download citation


  • Kusatsu–Shirane
  • Andesite
  • Symplectite
  • Magma mixing
  • Olivine
  • Active volcano