 Full paper
 Open access
 Published:
Inversion of Love waves in earthquake ground motion records for twodimensional Swave velocity model of deep sedimentary layers
Earth, Planets and Space volume 73, Article number: 17 (2021)
Abstract
We propose a new waveform inversion method to estimate the 2D Swave velocity structure of deep sedimentary layers using broadband Love waves. As a preprocessing operation in our inversion scheme, we decompose earthquake observation records into velocity waveforms for periods of 1 s each. Then, we include in the inversion only those periods for which the assumption of 2D propagation holds, which we propose to determine through a principal component analysis. A linearized iterative inversion analysis for the selected Love wave segments filtered for periods of 1 s each allows a detailed estimation of the boundary shapes of interfaces over the seismic bedrock with an Swave velocity of approximately 3 km/s. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique with applications to observed seismograms in the Kanto Plain, Japan. The differences between the estimated and existing velocity structure models are remarkable at the basin edges. Our results show remarkable differences from previous existing structural models, particularly near the basin edges while being in good agreement with the surface geology. Since a subsurface structure at a basin edge strongly affects the earthquake ground motions in a basin with the generation of surface waves, our method can provide a detailed model of a complex Swave velocity structure at an edge part for strong ground motion prediction.
Introduction
Predicting earthquake ground motion using a theoretical approach such as a FD simulation requires an appropriate model of the subsurface Swave and Pwave velocities, density, and attenuation factors. Particularly, the Swave velocities of deep sedimentary layers over seismic bedrock with an Swave velocity of approximately 3 km/s must be accurately modeled when estimating sitespecific ground motions at periods of less than approximately 10 s in a large basin. Accordingly, several 3D velocity models have been constructed for large basins in Japan (e.g., Sato et al. 1999; Yamanaka and Yamada 2006; HERP 2009, 2012, 2017; Yoshimoto and Takemura 2014). Of these models, hereinafter, we refer to the models by HERP (2009), HERP (2012), and HERP (2017) as the HERP 2009, HERP 2012, and HERP 2017 models, respectively. The HERP 2009 and HERP 2012 models cover all of Japan. The latter model was constructed from procedures suggested by Koketsu et al. (2012) as an updated version of the HERP 2009 model, with improvements made with additional data such as the results of earthquake ground motion simulations and geophysical surveys. The HERP 2017 model was constructed only for the Kanto Plain by combining Swave velocity structures deeper than a layer with an Swave velocity of 0.5 km/s and shallower than that simultaneously, which had ever been modeled separately. These velocity models have been validated by comparing simulated earthquake ground motions with observed motions for moderatesize seismic events. For example, the HERP 2017 model was examined for its appropriateness on the basis of estimations of goodnessoffit analyses between synthetic and observed waveforms for several earthquakes.
An Swave velocity structure at the edge of a sedimentary basin is well known to affect the ground motion characteristics in an entire basin, because it generates/induces surface waves when affected by incident body waves. For example, Kawase (1996) showed that a large amplitude area was caused by the constructive interference of direct Swaves and basininduced Rayleigh waves generated at a basin edge during the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu earthquake through strong ground motion simulations. Most of the existing 3D models were mainly established by interpolating accumulations of 1D profiles with several velocity discontinuities from geophysical explorations. The 2D profiles detected by seismic reflection and refraction surveys are useful for constructing a 3D model, but the amount of profile data is limited. Therefore, the existing 3D models may lack detailed features in the edge parts because of difficulties in modeling their complicated shapes.
As one of the alternatives for modeling deep sedimentary layers with a detailed basinedge structure, inversion analyses using seismograms from moderatesize events have been performed for 3D basin profiles (e.g., Aoi 2002; Iwaki and Iwata 2011). However, these 3D inversions rely on iterative forward calculations for partial derivatives using a 3D FD scheme with numerous computational costs. Thus, a long computational time is required to conduct many inversion analyses using various conditions and initial models. Therefore, a waveform inversion method for retrieving a 2D profile of the deep sedimentary layers from earthquake records can be practically effective because of its low computational costs. As examples of previous studies on 2D waveform inversions, Aoi et al. (1995) proposed an inversion method with an assumed plane incident wave that employs a 2D boundaryelement method. Ji et al. (2000) set a 1D structural model outside a basin and performed an inversion analysis to estimate a 2D basin structure by perturbing the depths of several control points in numerical experiments. Most of the studies on 2D waveform inversions have examined the performances of their methods through numerical experiments with synthetic ground motions. Few case studies have applied 2D inversion techniques to observation records (e.g., Zhao et al. 2004; Hikima and Koketsu 2010). One of the reasons for the difficulty in applying them to actual data is the need to approximate the actual 3D wave propagation to the 2D one. For example, Aoi et al. (1997) pointed out that a simple vertically impinged plane wave might not sufficiently represent a real complex incident wave and cause errors in the 2D inversion results. Hikima and Koketsu (2010) assumed that body and surface wave propagations can be fully reproduced by 2D modeling. However, they could not adequately verify the assumption of the 2D approximations of the body and surface wave propagations. The violation of the 2D assumption might distort an estimated 2D model from a true velocity structure.
In this study, we propose a new waveform inversion method to estimate the 2D Swave velocity structure of deep sedimentary layers using Love waves from a moderatesize earthquake. As a preprocessing operation in our method, we first analyze the observation records for the validation of the 2D Love wave propagation assumption to select the corresponding segments to be used in the inversion. We demonstrate the applicability of our method to actual data recorded in the Kanto Plain, Japan, from comparisons of estimated 2D structures with existing models.
Earthquake records
Here, we describe the characteristics of longperiod earthquake ground motion records acquired during a moderatesize M_{J} 6.4 (JMA magnitude) earthquake in the Kanto Plain, Japan, that we will subject later to waveform inversion. Figure 1 shows the locations of the earthquake epicenter estimated by the JMA and seismic observatories, whose records are used in this study. The top depths of the seismic bedrock with an Swave velocity of 3.2 km/s from the HERP 2009 model are also illustrated in the figure by red contours. The event is a strikeslip crustal earthquake with a focal depth of 14 km and has a fault mechanism with a compression axis in the northwest–southeast direction (Fukuyama et al. 1998). Densely distributed strongmotion stations have been installed as parts of strongmotion networks such as KNET, KiKnet (NIED 2019), and MeSOnet (Hirata et al. 2009) in the study area. The KNET stations have accelerometers installed on the surface, while two accelerometers, one on the surface and one at depths greater than 100 m, are used at the KiKnet stations. The accelerometers at the MeSOnet stations were installed at a depth of 20 m. We used the surface records at the KNET and KiKnet stations and the borehole records at the MeSOnet stations as the surface motions.
The velocity Fourier amplitude spectra at the SIT003, TKY007, and E.KNJM stations are shown in Fig. 2 as examples of the observed ground motion records. These stations are located in areas with thick sedimentary layers (e.g., Shima 1977), which can amplify longperiod ground motions with spectral peaks at a period of approximately 8 s. The sediments in the central part of the Kanto Plain have a predominant period of 8 s of motion, as determined in previous studies with a focus on longperiod surface wave propagation (e.g., Tanaka et al. 1980; Yamanaka et al. 1989; Kinoshita et al. 1992).
Figure 3 shows the velocity waveforms at eight stations in the northwest–southeast direction, which is almost equal to the transverse direction, along Line1 from TKY003 to E.MZUM. The vertical axis of each panel denotes the distance from TKY003 at the edge of the basin. This distance is hereinafter referred to as the basinedge distance. The velocity waveforms were calculated from the acceleration records by integration with the fast Fourier transform. A Gaussian bandpass filter represented by Eq. (1) was also applied to the records in the integration at central periods, T^{m}, of 1, 3, 5, and 9 s for the filtered velocities. This filter shape is expressed as
where T^{j} represents a discrete period calculated by the Fourier transform. γ is a coefficient for determining the filter width, which is set to 50 with reference to Uetake and Kudo (2001), who investigated the characteristics of longperiod Love wave propagations in the Kanto area. Figure 3 shows that large amplitude surface waves propagate to the northeast direction, which is almost equivalent to the radial direction, after the arrival of Swaves. For example, the record at E.IMIM at a period of 3 s has the surface wave arriving at approximately 70 s with a much larger amplitude than that of the Swave. We can also see surface waves with amplitudes larger than those of the Swaves in other periods.
Particle motions
The horizontal orbits of the velocity motions at the eight stations along Line1 are shown in Fig. 4a. These orbits are calculated for the segments, including the surface waves at the times indicated by the crosses from 0 s in Fig. 3. We use the motions at periods from 1 to 10 s, because the surface wave motions whose generations and propagations are influenced by the deep sedimentary layers over the seismic bedrock are predominant, especially in this period range. The particle motions for periods with a 1 s interval are arranged from the top to the bottom in Fig. 4a. The horizontal axes in the figures denote the basinedge distances of each station. The principal axis directions, evaluated by principal component analysis (Montalbetti and Kanasewich 1970), are superimposed as red lines. The motions are polarized in the transverse direction, especially at long periods, such as a period of 10 s, which means that the transversely oriented components of the ground motions are mainly Love waves propagating in the radial direction.
Methodology for estimating the 2D Swave velocity structure
Preprocessing
We select the segments used for the waveform inversion by inspecting the polarization features of the horizontal particle motions described in the previous section. The amplitude of the motion in the radial direction becomes large as the basinedge distance increases, such as in the horizontal motions at SIT003 and E.MZUM at a period of 7 s in Fig. 4a. Accordingly, we observe deviations of the principal directions from the transverse direction and increases in the ellipticities of the horizontal particle motions. We also see that the principal axis directions of the particle motions tend to differ largely from the transverse direction for short periods. The shortperiod ground motions may be greatly influenced by scattering waves due to 3D irregularities. These biases of the principal axis directions of the motions clearly suggest a difficulty in assuming the 2D approximation of the Love wave propagations, especially for short periods. Therefore, bandpass filtered segments of Love wave motions must be selected for our inversion to estimate a 2D Swave velocity structure. Hereinafter, the assumption of the 2D approximation in the Love wave propagations is referred to as twodimensionality. From the above analyses of the observed Love waves in each period, we can suppose that the twodimensionality is satisfied in the propagation of the longperiod Love wave motion at stations with long basinedge distances.
The bandpass filtered segments to be used in the 2D inversion are selected from the polarization features (e.g., Vidale 1986). As described above, the propagations of the shortperiod Love waves contain nontwodimensional waves due to 3D irregularities. We thus define an E value to examine the twodimensionality quantitatively as follows:
where \({\theta }_{i}^{m}\) and \({\varnothing }_{i}^{m}\) represent the principal axis direction and the ellipticity of the motions calculated by the principal component analyses using the segments in the transverse and radial directions at the ith station and the mth period, respectively. Here, \({\theta }_{i}^{m}\) is measured from − 90° to 90°. We suppose that the twodimensionality of the Love wave propagation is sufficiently satisfied at a period of 10 s, because this period is longer than the predominant period of the Love wave amplification expected from the Swave velocity structure of the deep sedimentary layers, as explained earlier. Thus, the principal axis direction \({\theta }_{i}^{ref}\) and the ellipticity \({\varnothing }_{i}^{ref}\) of the motions over a period of 10 s are regarded as reference values. The biases of \({\theta }_{i}^{m}\) and \({\varnothing }_{i}^{m}\) from \({\theta }_{i}^{ref}\) and \({\varnothing }_{i}^{ref}\) are used for the E value \({E}_{i}^{m}\) as their product. The reference period can be set to the longest period considering the ratios of the Fourier amplitude spectra between the pretrigger and principal motions of the observation records. We set the reference period to 10 or 9 s in this study.
Figure 4b shows the E values of the Love wave segments at the eight stations along Line1. The horizontal axes in the figure indicate the basinedge distances. The E values over periods from 1 to 9 s are arranged from the top to the bottom. The E values of the stations for periods of 1 s each are plotted with circles in Fig. 4b. The E values have a clear dependency on the periods. Namely, we see that the longperiod segments have small E values at stations far from TKY003. For example, the principal axis direction for a period of 8 s deviates from the transverse direction by approximately 45° at distances greater than 50 km (as shown in Fig. 4a) with an E value of approximately 0.2. Furthermore, the biases of the principal axis directions of the motions for a period of 5 s are also large at distances greater than 15 km (as shown in Fig. 4a) with E values greater than 0.2. We, therefore, considered that small E values less than approximately 0.2 indicate satisfaction of the twodimensionality assumption for the 2D waveform inversion. The maximum basinedge distances of the stations with E values less than 0.2 for individual periods are shown by the arrows in Figs. 4a–c. In Fig. 4c, the horizontal and vertical axes denote the basinedge distance and the period of motion, respectively. We also illustrate (grayshaded area in the figure) a range of basinedge distances and periods, where the twodimensionality can be satisfied. We use the bandpass filtered segments for periods and distances inside this range for the inversion analysis.
The most important point of the above preprocessing is that the number of segments used in the 2D waveform inversion differs depending on the periods of the motions. Table 1 shows the number of stations whose E values are less than 0.2 and the maximum basinedge distances used in later inversion analyses for each period. The shorter the periods of the Love wave motions are, the smaller the number of segments used in the inversion. The shortperiod Love waves at stations around only the edge part can be used in the 2D inversion, while the longperiod Love waves at stations at distances far from the edge can be used.
Model parameterization
In the waveform inversion, we assume a homogeneous layered model with irregular interfaces. The boundary shapes of the layers in the 2D model are deduced in the inversion of the bandpass filtered segments of the Love wave motions selected in the preprocessing. Physical parameters such as the Swave and Pwave velocities, density, and attenuation factors are given in advance.
We employed the boundary shape parameterization suggested by Aoi et al. (1997). The difference in discretized boundary shapes between the present and initial 2D models, ζ(x) − ζ_{0}(x), is described by a linear combination of the coefficients p_{n,k} and basis functions c_{k} as in Eq. (3):
where x denotes the horizontal distance from the left end of the model. The suffixes n and k represent the nth boundary interface and the kth basis function, respectively. c_{k} is common to all the interfaces and is represented as follows:
The model to be estimated has a length of 2L in the range of − L \(\le\) x \(\le\) L. The model in the horizontal direction is equally divided into K + 1 pieces with K + 2 node points that are numbered from 0 to K + 1. Δ indicates the horizontal interval of the basis functions, which is equal to 2L/K + 1. x_{k} denotes the horizontal distance of the kth basis function contributing to the depths at distances from x_{k1} to x_{k+1}. p_{n,k} denotes the unknown parameters in the inversion used to minimize the residuals between the observed and synthetic Love waves, as described in the next subsection.
Inversion Method
We employed a linearized iterative inversion algorithm using the Gauss–Newton method to obtain an optimized solution. The linearized system to be solved can be expressed as
where δp, A, G, and e are the correction matrix, the Jacobian matrix, the smoothing matrix, and the residual matrix, respectively. The partial derivatives of the Jacobian matrix A can be numerically computed with model perturbations, dp, using the backward FD scheme. dp is set to 2.5 times the vertical FD grid spacing in the 2.5D forward calculation, which is described in the next subsection.
The residual matrix e is defined from the residuals between the observed and synthetic segments. We evaluate the residuals with the L2 norm as follows:
where \({o}_{i}^{m}\left({t}_{j}\right)\) and \({s}_{i}^{m}\left({t}_{j}\right)\) are the observed and synthetic velocities of the Love wave segments selected with the E values over periods of 1 s each. The suffixes i, j, and m represent the ith station, the jth time interval of the digitized segment, and the mth period, respectively. The residual between \({o}_{i}^{m}\left({t}_{j}\right)\) and \({s}_{i}^{m}\left({t}_{j}\right)\) is normalized with the observed maximum amplitude \({o}_{i}^{m}\left({t}_{\mathrm{max}}\right)\) of each bandpass filtered segment. M is the number of the periods. N^{m} is the number of stations for each individual period. \({ts}_{i}^{m}\) and \({te}_{i}^{m}\) are the start and end times of the segments to be inverted, respectively. The number of rows of matrix e is given by multiplying M with N^{m} and the number of samples of the inverted digitized waveforms.
To make the inversion robust, we include the smoothing matrix G, for which the differences between p_{n,k} and p_{n,k+1} at the nth boundary interface do not change largely, as follows:
where L denotes the number of layer interfaces to be deduced. β is a coefficient for determining the strength of the smoothing, which is set to 30 in consideration of the stability of solutions from the results of several inversion analyses using different coefficients in this study. The number of rows of the matrix G is given by multiplying L with K + 1. We solve Eq. (7) using the singular value decomposition method (Lawson and Hanson 1974) to obtain δp for the optimal p_{n,k} values.
Forward FD Modeling
We use a FD staggeredgrid formulation of the 2.5D elastic equation of the SH motion (Liner 1991) with the fourthorder approximation in space and the secondorder approximation in time to simulate the Love wave behaviors in the 2D model. The temporal evolutions of the velocity and stress are solved using the explicit FD scheme. The A1 absorbing boundary condition (Clayton and Engquist 1977) and the buffer region (Cerjan et al. 1985) are introduced at the right, left, and bottom edges of our numerical model to reduce the amplitude of nonphysical reflections. The top surface is implemented using the improved vacuum formulation suggested by Zeng et al. (2012). Attenuation is introduced by employing the method of Graves (1996) with a reference frequency of 0.4 Hz (Kasamatsu and Kato 2020).
A point load is given at horizontal distances greater than 20 km from the basin edge at the top of the bedrock as an external force to generate the Love waves. One of the major difficulties in waveform inversion is the treatment of effects due to a fault rupture process. We, therefore, not only give the point load far from the basin part but also convolute the observed and synthetic waveforms to solve this problem (e.g., Ji et al. 2000; Amrouche and Yamanaka 2015). The convoluted waveform \({s}_{i}^{m}\left(t\right)\) can be expressed as
where \({T}_{i}^{m}\) is a transfer function at the mth period defined from the Fourier spectra of the synthetic waveforms at the ith station, \({C}_{i}^{m}\), and a reference station, \({C}_{r}^{m}\), in Eq. (11). An asterisk indicates a complex conjugate of the Fourier spectrum. \({T}_{i}^{m}\) is multiplied by the observed Fourier spectrum of the reference station, \({O}_{r}^{m}\), to generate the convoluted waveform, \({s}_{i}^{m}\left(t\right)\), using the inverse Fourier transform, F^{−1}, as shown in Eq. (10).
Result of line1
Inversion result
We applied our method to the records of the Mt. Fuji region earthquake in 2011 (M_{J}6.4) to retrieve the 2D Swave velocity profiles of the deep sedimentary layers for the three survey lines shown in Fig. 1. Here, we explain the inversion results for Line1 in detail.
We prepared an initial model by HERP (2009) with seven homogenous layers and Swave velocities of 0.5 to 4.6 km/s. The sediments over the seismic bedrock consist of three layers with Swave velocities of 0.5, 0.9, and 1.5 km/s. The optimal bottom depth shapes of these three layers were detected from the inversion of the filtered segments of the Love wave motions selected in the previous section (see Figs. 4a–c). Since the HERP 2009 model is an old version of the HERP 2012 model, we used the HERP 2009 model as the initial model in the inversion analysis. We then compared our 2D models with the HERP 2012 model, which includes improvements with additional data, such as the results of earthquake ground motion simulations and geophysical surveys obtained after the release of the HERP 2009 model.
We estimated a velocity structure at horizontal distances from 0 to 57 km using the 15 basis functions. The horizontal interval of the basis functions, Δ, represented in Eqs. (4) and (5) was approximately 4 km. A total of 45 p_{n,k} values for the three boundaries of the sediments expressed by Eq. (3) were optimized. We used TKY003 as the reference station for the convolution processing. The grid spacings of the 2.5D FD forward modeling were 50 m in the horizontal direction and 20 m in the vertical direction. The vertical grid spacing was 50 m at depths greater than 5 km to reduce the computational costs.
Figure 5 shows the inverted and observed velocity waveforms over periods of 1, 3, 5, and 9 s. The amplitudes of the synthetic motions for a period of 9 s are slightly underestimated at E.MZUM, E.IMIM, and SIT009. However, the overall characteristics over all periods are well reproduced at every station. Even the observed and inverted motions for relatively short periods, such as 1 and 3 s, show high similarities at SIT012, E.KSRM, and E.OKDM. The synthetic waveforms in the initial 2D model (HERP 2009) were calculated by a forward simulation, as shown in Fig. 5. These synthetic waveforms for a period of 9 s contain Love waves with arrival times slightly later than those observed at distances greater than 47 km. Furthermore, the amplitudes of the synthetic motions over periods of 3 and 5 s in the initial model are overestimated at E.OKDM and E.KSRM.
Figure 6 shows the estimated 2D structure along Line1. The physical parameters of each layer are listed in Table 2. The third layer can be regarded as an outcrop at distances from 0 to 5 km. The bottom depth of the first layer becomes deep at distances greater than 5 km. Then, it reaches 0.2 km at distances of approximately 10 km. The bottom depth of the first layer becomes shallow at distances from 12 to 25 km, and the second layer exists near the surface at approximately 17 km.
The initial model (HERP 2009) and the HERP 2012 model are also shown in Fig. 6. At distances greater than 30 km, all of our estimated boundary depths of the sedimentary layers are shallower than those in the HERP 2012 model. The differences between the inverted and HERP 2012 models are remarkable in the shallow parts of the basinedge area. The estimated bottom depth of the second layer becomes shallow at distances less than 10 km and deep at distances greater than 10 km. As a result, the estimated bottom interface of the second layer becomes steeper than that in the HERP 2012 model at distances from 5 to 15 km. The bottom depth of the first layer becomes slightly shallow around SIT009 in the HERP 2012 model, but the top of the second layer does not exist near the surface, unlike our results.
As above, our obtained 2D profile shows more irregular structural features around the basinedge area than does the HERP 2012 model. This outcome suggests that we could model the detailed velocity structure, especially in the edge part, due to the introduction of the shortperiod Love waves in the inversion.
Comparison with the HERP 2017 Model
For the Kanto Plain, the HERP 2017 model was constructed as a further updated version of the HERP 2012 model. The HERP 2017 model contains layers with Swave velocities less than 0.5 km/s, which are not included in the HERP 2009 and HERP 2012 models. Our inversion results, therefore, cannot be directly compared with those of the HERP 2017 model. However, we can still find a similarity between them around the basinedge part along Line1. Figure 7 compares their 2D structural models at distances from 0 to 22 km as the edge part. The top depths of the bedrock in the HERP 2017 model and our model show high similarity. On the other hand, our estimated upper depths of the second and third layers with Swave velocities of 0.9 km/s and 1.5 km/s are different from those of the HERP 2017 model.
Comparison with surface geological classifications
The surface geological classifications (Geological Survey of Japan 2015) around the basinedge area along Line1 are indicated in Fig. 7. According to a previous study on the relationship between Swave velocities and geological ages (Yamamizu et al. 1977), those layers with Swave velocities of 1.2 to 1.6 and 0.4 to 0.9 km/s belong to the Neogene and Quaternary ages, respectively.
In the estimated structure, the third layer with an Swave velocity of 1.5 km/s can be regarded as an outcrop at distances from 0 to 5 km because of the thin thicknesses of the overlying layers. The surface geology in this area belongs mostly to the Neogene age. At distances from 5 to 13 km, the estimated bottom depth of the first layer with an Swave velocity of 0.5 km/s gradually becomes deep away from station SIT012. The geological age of the surface formation in this area is categorized as Quaternary with lower terrace sediments. In the estimated structure, a second layer with an Swave velocity of 0.9 km/s exists near the surface locally at distances of approximately 17 km. Although the surface geology around this part also belongs to the Quaternary age, the Geological Survey of Japan (2015) reported the existence of middle terrace sediments that are older than the lower terrace sediments in this part. Therefore, our estimated Swave velocity structure near the surface is in good agreement with the surface geology.
Results of lines2 and 3
Line2
Figure 8a illustrates an inverted 2D velocity structure along Line2. The horizontal length along Line2 is approximately 58 km from the basin edge. We used 28 stations along this line in the inversion analysis. Segments of the Love waves used in the inversion were selected for individual periods from 1 to 10 s except for 6 s from the E values, as shown in Table 1. We excluded the segments for a period of 6 s in the inversion, because the Fourier amplitude spectrum of the motion at each station has a trough during this period. The horizontal axis in Fig. 8a indicates the horizontal distance from the OK.NKYM reference station, where seismic bedrock exists near the surface. Each estimated boundary depth is shallower than that in the initial model (HERP 2009) at almost all distances. These boundary depths are also shallower than those in the HERP 2012 model at distances greater than 25 km. We found remarkable differences between the estimated and initial structures in the basinedge part. The estimated bottom depth of the first layer is shallower than that in the initial model at approximately 10 km, and then it gradually deepens away from OK.NKYM. The shape of the bottom interface of the first layer in the edge part is similar to that in the HERP 2012 model.
Line3
Figure 8b shows an inverted 2D velocity structure along Line3. The horizontal length along Line3 is approximately 34 km. We used seven records covering periods from 1 to 9 s except for 6 s in the inversion analysis, as shown in Table 1. The segments for a period of 6 s were excluded for the same reason as for the Line2 inversion, as explained in the previous subsection. All the boundary depths of the sedimentary layers are significantly shallower than those in the initial model (HERP 2009) at distances less than 30 km, and they are in good agreement with the HERP 2012 model. A second layer with an Swave velocity of 0.9 km/s exists near the surface at distances from 15 to 20 km. The Swave velocities of the top layers in the deep sediments around this area are reportedly 0.7 to 0.8 km/s (Yamanaka and Yamada 2006). Although we do not consider lateral variation in the Swave velocities, the existence of the second layer with an Swave velocity of 0.9 km/s near the surface means that our estimated structure has features similar to those of the surface Swave variation of the model by Yamanaka and Yamada (2006). The estimated bottom depths of layers 1 to 3 at distances greater than 30 km in our model are almost the same as those of the HERP 2009 and HERP 2012 models.
Effect of introducing shortperiod motions
We indicated the importance of the preprocessing operation for confirming the twodimensionality of the Love wave propagations before the 2D waveform inversion with its applications to the earthquake records in the previous sections. As a result of introducing the preprocessing step, we were able to obtain detailed 2D profiles, especially at the edge parts, with the introduction of shortperiod Love wave motions as well as longperiod motions. In this section, a numerical experiment using synthetic waveforms generated by a 3D computation is performed to examine the effectiveness of introducing shortperiod motions in the waveform inversion.
The synthetic records were generated using the 3D model by HERP (2012) for the numerical test. The ground motions of the Mt. Fuji region earthquake in 2011 (M_{J}6.4) were simulated at the seven stations along Line3 by employing a 3D FD scheme (e.g., Graves 1996; Pitarka 1999). We regard them as synthetic earthquake ground motion records. These seven stations are located at the same locations as the actual observatories. A doublecouple point force with a source mechanism by Fnet (Fukuyama et al. 1998) was given as an external force at the hypocenter location. Fault parameters such as the seismic moment are listed in Fig. 1. The HERP 2012 model used in the 3D calculation was discretized with a horizontal grid spacing of 100 m and a vertical grid spacing of 10 m.
We performed two inversion analyses to model sedimentary layers from 0 to 34 km along Line3 using the synthetic records covering periods from 1 to 9 s and from 7 to 9 s, respectively. Then, we compared the 2D profiles retrieved from the two inversions with the above true profiles (HERP 2012). In the former inversion, the segments for periods from 1 to 9 s selected from the E values were inverted in the same way as the inversion carried out using actual observation records in the previous section. In the latter inversion, only the segments covering periods of 7 to 9 s were used at distances from 0 to 34 km without consideration of the E values. Other conditions in the two inversions were the same as those in the inversion described in the previous section.
The 2D profile from the inversion using the segments corresponding to periods from 1 to 9 s is illustrated in Fig. 9 with the true structure (HERP 2012). The true model is well reconstructed by the inversion. The 2D velocity structure estimated using the segments corresponding to periods from 7 to 9 s is also shown in Fig. 9. Obvious differences are observed between the estimated and true structures at the basinedge part. The bottom depth of the first layer estimated using only the longperiod segments is shallower than that of the true structure at distances from 0 to 15 km. Furthermore, the upper depths of the second and third layers in the estimated structure using the segments corresponding to periods from 7 to 9 s also become shallow at distances of approximately 5 km. Thus, inversion using only longperiod Love waves cannot offer an accurate 2D profile at the basin edge. The preprocessing carried out with the E values to include the shortperiod segments in the 2D inversion enhances the reliability of the inverted 2D profile.
Conclusions and discussion
We have proposed a waveform inversion method to estimate the 2D Swave velocity structure of deep sedimentary layers using broadband Love waves. As a preprocessing operation in our inversion scheme, we decompose earthquake observation records into velocity waveforms for periods of 1 s each to confirm the assumption of 2D propagations of the Love waves with a principal component analysis of the horizontal ground motions. Our linearized iterative inversion analysis allows an accurate estimation of boundary shapes from the top depth of seismic bedrock to the bottom depth of a layer with an Swave velocity of approximately 0.5 km/s from the segments of the Love wave motions for periods of 1 s each, which is selected in the preprocessing step.
We have demonstrated the effectiveness of our technique with applications to observed seismograms in the Kanto Plain, Japan. Remarkable differences were observed between our inverted model and the existing ones (HERP 2009, 2012), especially in the basinedge area. Our method can offer detailed 2D velocity profiles at the edges due to the introduction of shortperiod segments selected from the E values for the inversions. A velocity structure at a basin edge strongly affects the earthquake ground motions in a basin because of the generation of surface waves (e.g., Vidale and Helmberger 1988; Kawase 1996; Hartzell et al. 2016). 2D profiles including the details of the basinedge structure along many lines from our proposed inversions can be used to improve the existing 3D models for accurate earthquake ground motion evaluations.
In actual work for the prediction of strong ground motion from a large earthquake, many inversion analyses using various conditions are required to estimate the Swave velocity structures. Since a highperformance computer for these inversions is not always available in practice, we have to reduce the calculation cost in the forward calculation as much as possible. In this study, our 2D inversion employing the 2.5D FD calculations took approximately one day to obtain an optimal solution after performing parallel computing using the openMP algorithm with a conventional PC equipped with four Intel Xeon processors (E78891 v4, 2.8 GHz, 10 cores). The calculation time required for one iteration was approximately two hours when using 40 cores in total, and the number of iterations until the solution converged was approximately ten. On the other hand, the 3D FD calculation performed to generate the synthetic records for the numerical test in the previous section took several days with the same conventional PC. This outcome indicates several100fold differences in the calculation costs between the 2D and 3D inversion analyses. Although the computational costs depend on the performance of the PC used in the calculation, an optimal solution is still difficult to obtain from a 3D waveform inversion at a reasonable computational cost with a conventional PC.
The above differences in the computational cost can be critical when conducting many inversions of records at dense seismic stations in a large basin. Recently, many earthquake observatories were installed in large basins, especially in seismically active areas. Our 2D inversion technique can be effectively applied to earthquake records along many lines in these areas with reasonable computational costs.
Availability of data and materials
The KNET and KiKnet strongmotion data are available at the website of strongmotion seismograph networks operated by the NIED (http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/). The MeSOnet strongmotion data are available at the Hinet website operated by the NIED (https://hinetwww11.bosai.go.jp/auth/download/cont/?LANG=en). The JMA catalog data are available at the Hinet website operated by the NIED (http://www.hinet.bosai.go.jp/?LANG=en).
Abbreviations
 HERP:

The Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion
 NIED:

National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience
 JMA:

Japan Meteorological Agency
 3D:

Threedimensional
 2D:

Twodimensional
 2.5D:

Two and onehalf dimensional
 1D:

Onedimensional
 FD:

Finitedifference
References
Amrouche M, Yamanaka H (2015) Twodimensional shallow soil profiling using timedomain waveform inversion. Geophysics 80:E27–E41. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo20140027.1
Aoi S (2002) Boundary shape waveform inversion for estimating the depth of threedimensional basin structures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2410–2418. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010245
Aoi S, Iwata T, Irikura K, SánchezSesma FJ (1995) Waveform inversion for determining the boundary shape of a basin structure. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1445–1455
Aoi S, Iwata T, Fujiwara H, Irikura K (1997) Boundary shape waveform inversion for twodimensional basin structure using threecomponent array data of plane incident wave with an arbitrary azimuth. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:222–233
Cerjan C, Kosloff D, Kosloff R, Reshef M (1985) A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics 50:705–708. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441945
Clayton R, Engquist B (1977) Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67:1529–1540
Fukuyama E, Ishida M, Dreger DS, Kawai H (1998) Automated seismic moment tensor determination by using online broadband seismic waveforms. J Seismol Soc Jpn 51:149–156. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin1948.51.1_149 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Geological Survey of Japan (2015) Seamless digital geological map of Japan (1: 200,000). Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba
Graves RW (1996) Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3D elastic media using staggeredgrid finite differences. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:1091–1106
Hartzell S, Leeds AL, RamirezGuzman L, Allen JP, Schmitt RG (2016) Seismic site characterization of an urban sedimentary basin, Livermore Valley, California: site response, basinedgeinduced surface waves, and 3D simulations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106:609–631. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150289
HERP (2009) Seismic hazard map for the longperiod ground motion, the trial version in 2009. https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/seismic_hazard_map/lpshm/09_choshuki/. Accessed 11 Apr 2016 (in Japanese)
HERP (2012) Seismic hazard map for the longperiod ground motion, the trial version in 2012. https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/seismic_hazard_map/lpshm/12_choshuki/. Accessed 2 May 2016 (in Japanese)
HERP (2017) Kantou chihouno senbu sinbu tougou jibankouzou moderu. https://www.jishin.go.jp/evaluation/strong_motion/underground_model/integration_model_kanto/. Accessed 6 Apr 2020 (in Japanese)
Hikima K, Koketsu K (2010) Waveform inversion for 2D velocity structures and construction of 3D velocity structure using its results. In: Proceeding of the 13th Japan earthquake engineering symposium, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 17–20 November 2010 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hirata N, Sakai S, Sato H, Satake K, Koketsu K (2009) An outline of the special project for earthquake disaster mitigation in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area subproject 1: Characterization of the plate structure and source faults in and around the Tokyo Metropolitan area. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 84:41–56 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Iwaki A, Iwata T (2011) Estimation of threedimensional boundary shape of the Osaka sedimentary basin by waveform inversion. Geophys J Int 186:1255–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.2011.05102.x
Ji C, Helmberger DV, Wald DJ (2000) Basin structure estimation by waveform modeling: forward and inverse methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:964–976. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990080
Kasamatsu K, Kato K (2020) Long period ground motion simulation of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake using theoretical Green’s function: examination based on inverted pseudo point source model. J Struct Constr Eng 85:427–437. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.85.427 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Kawase H (1996) The cause of the damage belt in Kobe: “The BasinEdge Effect”, constructive interference of the direct Swave with the basininduced diffracted/ Rayleigh waves. Seismol Res Lett 67:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.67.5.25
Kinoshita S, Fujiwara H, Mikoshiba T, Hoshino T (1992) Secondary love waves observed by a strong motion array in the Tokyo Lowlands, Japan. J Phys Earth 40:99–116. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.40.99
Koketsu K, Miyake H, Suzuki H (2012) Japan integrated velocity structure model version 1. In: Proceeding of the fifteenth world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 September 2012
Lawson CL, Hanson RJ (1974) Solving least squares problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Liner CL (1991) Theory of a 2.5D acoustic wave equation for constant density media. Geophysics 56:2114–2117. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443025
Montalbetti JF, Kanasewich ER (1970) Enhancement of teleseismic body phases with a polarization filter. Geophys J Int 21:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1970.tb01771.x
NIED (2019) NIED KNET, KiKnet. http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/. doi:https://doi.org/10.17598/NIED.0004
Pitarka A (1999) 3D Elastic finitedifference modeling of seismic motion using staggered grids with nonuniform spacing. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:54–68
Sato T, Graves RW, Somerville PG (1999) Threedimensional finitedifference simulations of longperiod strong motions in the Tokyo metropolitan area during the 1990 Odawara earthquake (M_{J} 5.1) and the great 1923 Kanto earthquake (M_{S} 8.2) in Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:579–607
Shima E (1977) On the deep underground structure of Tokyo Metropolitan Area. In: Proceeding of the sixth world conference on earthquake engineering, New Delhi, India, 10–14 January 1977
Tanaka T, Yoshizawa S, Osawa Y (1980) Characteristics of strong earthquake ground motion in the period range from 1 to 15 seconds. In: Proceeding of the seventh world conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 8–13 September 1980
Uetake T, Kudo K (2001) Three dimensional Swave velocity structure in and around Ashigara valley, west of Kanagawa prefecture, Japan, evaluated from Love wave dispersion data. J Seismol Soc Jpn 54:281–297. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin1948.54.2_281 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Vidale JE (1986) Complex polarization analysis of particle motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:1393–1405
Vidale JE, Helmberger DV (1988) Elastic finitedifference modeling of the 1971 San Fernando, California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:122–141
Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis J, Wobbe F (2013) Generic mapping tools: improved version released. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 94:409–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO450001
Yamamizu F, Takahashi H, Goto N, Ohta Y (1977) Shear wave velocities in deep soil deposits Part III: measurements in the borehole of the Fuchu observatory to the depth of 2,750 m and a summary of the results. J Seismol Soc Jpn 34:465–479. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin1948.34.4_465 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Yamanaka H, Yamada N (2006) Modeling 3D Swave velocity structure of Kanto basin for estimation of earthquake ground motion. ButsuriTansa 59:549–560. https://doi.org/10.3124/segj.59.549 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Yamanaka H, Seo K, Samano T (1989) Effects of sedimentary layers on surfacewave propagation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:631–644
Yoshimoto K, Takemura S (2014) Surface wave excitation at the northern edge of the Kanto Basin. Japan Earth Planets Space 66:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/188059816616
Zeng C, Xia J, Miller RD, Tsoflias GP (2012) An improved vacuum formulation for 2D finitedifference modeling of Rayleigh waves including surface topography and internal discontinuities. Geophysics 77:T1–T9. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo20110067.1
Zhao L, Zheng T, Xu W (2004) Modeling the Jiyang depression, northern China, using a wavefield extrapolation finitedifference method and waveform inversion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030167
Acknowledgements
We thank the NIED for providing earthquake observation record data and the JMA for their catalog data. We used the Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel et al. 2013) to draw the figures.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K01324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KK conducted the analysis. KK and HY drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasamatsu, K., Yamanaka, H. & Sakai, S. Inversion of Love waves in earthquake ground motion records for twodimensional Swave velocity model of deep sedimentary layers. Earth Planets Space 73, 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623020013473
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623020013473