| STDerr change (%) | Corr change (%) | Varexp change (%) | RMSD change (%) |
---|
χ1 | χ2 | χ1 | χ2 | χ1 | χ2 | χ1 | χ2 |
---|
Overall (land) | − 30 | − 29 | − 3 | 5 | − 13 | 18 | 4 | − 9 |
Overall (global) | 300 | − 94 | 38 | 40 | 414 | 92 | − 17 | − 30 |
Seasonal (land) | 166 | − 65 | 4 | − 1 | − 9 | 43 | 8 | − 57 |
Seasonal (global) | − 16 | − 54 | 5 | − 4 | − 3 | 33 | 2 | − 30 |
Non-seasonal (land) | − 2 | − 8 | − 7 | 0 | − 14 | 0 | 3 | − 1 |
Non-seasonal (global) | − 32 | − 84 | 39 | 60 | 267 | 146 | − 19 | − 30 |
- Both land data (land MAS-based HAM/CAM compared to TWS-based HAM/CAM) and global data (global MAS-based HAM/CAM compared to GSM-based HAM/CAM) are considered in this table. We examine overall detrended time series, seasonal variations, and non-seasonal variations. The values showing an improvement in results after using MAS data are italicized. Note that for STDerr change and RMSD change the improvement is when variation is negative (STDerr and RMSD decreased after using MAS data), whereas for Corr change and Varexp change, the improvement occurs when the parameter value is positive (Corr and Varexp increased after using MAS data)