Motivations for muon radiography of active volcanoes
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB 2010
Received: 5 December 2008
Accepted: 30 March 2009
Published: 22 February 2010
Muon radiography represents an innovative tool for investigating the interior of active volcanoes. This method integrates the conventional geophysical techniques and provides an independent way to estimate the density of the volcano structure and reveal the presence of magma conduits. The experience from the pioneer experiments performed at Mt. Asama, Mt. West Iwate, and Showa-Shinzan (Japan) are very encouraging. Muon radiography could be applied, in principle, at any stratovolcano. Here we focus our attention on Vesuvius and Stromboli (Italy).
The dynamics of active volcanoes is controlled by many factors, including magma chemical composition, gas content, depth and dimensions of the magmatic reservoir, geometry of the magmatic conduits, and physical characteristics of the volcanic structure. Usually, information on the storage system and the composition of magma is based on the chemical analysis of the products of past eruptions. In fact, the nature of the erupted material carries information about the magma storage. The eruptive style (explosive or effusive) is a first qualitative indicator of the quantity of the gas dissolved in the magma, being lower for effusive and higher for explosive eruptions. The chemical analysis of the glassy part of the magma and of the fluid inclusions captured by the crystals during their residence inside the magma reservoir allows the quantity of the dissolved gas to be estimated and, in addition, the contacts between the glassy part of magma and the crystals provides information on the temperature and pressure during crystals growth (see Scaillet et al., 2008 and references therein). The magmatic pressure is often related to the depth of the reservoir (typically around a few km) through the simple hydrostatic law (dP/dz = ρcg), where P is the pressure at a given depth, ρc is the density of the country rock above the reservoir, g is the gravity constant, and z is the vertical coordinate (taken positive upward).
During their life, volcanoes often alternate between eruptions characterized by the formations of fractures through which magma reaches the surface and spreads and periods of quiescence in the closed-conduit condition, as observed for Mt. Vesuvius (Italy) and Mt. Asama (Japan). Alternatively, volcanoes show persistent activity with frequent eruptions of small intensity, such as Stromboli or Vesuvius itself in the period between 1631 and 1944.
The internal structure of a volcano, especially in the upper part, is a product of past eruptions and typically features many superposed layers and remnants. Of course, the knowledge of the internal structure of the volcano is of paramount importance for understanding its behaviour and for forecasting the nature and style of the next eruption. For this reason, in parallel with the analysis of past eruptions, much effort has been extended in past years in experiments investigating the interior of the volcanoes (e.g. Vesuvius) with different techniques, including deep drilling (Cassano and La Torre, 1987; Principe et al., 1987), passive (Scarpa et al., 2002) and active (Zollo et al., 1996, 2002) seismic tomography, geoelectrics and magnetotellurics (Di Maio et al., 1998) and gravimetry (Cella et al., 2007). Each of these methods has its own characteristic advantages and drawbacks, and a complete description of the volcano interior can be achieved only through a synthesis of combined investigations with all the available techniques. One of the limits of conventional geophysical methods is the spatial resolution, which typically ranges between some tens of meters up to 1 km. Although this approach is very important to detect the presence of large magmatic reservoirs, it is inadequate to detect small magma bodies or magma conduits.
In this sense, the radiography of active volcanoes based on natural muons, even if limited to the external part of the volcano, represents an important tool for investigating the internal structure of the volcano at higher spatial resolution.
The experiment of muon radiography carried out at Mt. Asama volcano (Tanaka et al., 2007c) allowed the reconstruction of the density map of the cone and detection of a dense region that corresponds to the position and shape of a lava dome created during the last eruption in 2004. Using a detector of 0.4 m2, at a distance of 1 km, it was possible to reach an angular resolution of 10 mrad, which corresponds to about 10 m in spatial resolution: a limit quite impossible to reach actually with other geophysical techniques due to the strong structural heterogeneities. Moreover, muon radiography is able to resolve density contrasts of the order of 1–3%, significantly greater than the resolution obtained with conventional methods (Tanaka et al., 2007c).
Although the muon radiography can be applied to any volcano, in this paper we will focus our attention on Mt. Vesuvius and Stromboli (Italy).
2. Previous Experiments of Muon Radiography on Active Volcanoes
Muon radiography is a new technique that is used to produce an image of the volcano interior. The imaging method is, in principle, the same as the X-ray radiography used in medical settings, except for the substitution of penetrating cosmic muons in lieu of X-rays (Tanaka et al., 2003). Experiments on volcanoes were performed on Mt. West Iwate (Tanaka et al., 2003, 2005), Mt. Asama (Tanaka et al., 2007a, b) and Showa-Shinzan (Tanaka et al., 2007b) in Japan. The muon receptor is placed in the shadow of the volcano for the incoming muon stream, thereby enabling the imaging of the structure crossed by muons. Since cosmic-ray muons are particles generated in the atmosphere that continuously bombard the earth’s surface, the radiography can be performed everywhere at anytime on Earth. The muons interact with electrons and nucleons and the number of muon interactions with matter increases proportional to the “density length” (density × path length). Thus, muon interactions produce an attenuation of the muon flux along paths across the volcano interior which is proportional to the density of the encountered rocks (Tanaka et al., 2007a). The effect of the path length is accounted for by geometrical consideration, using an accurate digital elevation model of the volcano (a 5-m resolution model is available for Vesuvius). Moreover, Monte Carlo simulations of particle tracking is often performed to define the particle flux on the detector, accounting also for the zenith angle distribution of the flux and energy of the incoming muons (Tanaka et al., 2007a). In fact, given that the flux of muons (with a given energy) is lower for muons coming from near-horizontal directions, the radiographic images need to be corrected to produce the rock density maps.
Two months of observations at Mt. Asama allowed the detection of density contrasts of 1–2% within a thickness of rock of a few hundreds meters, with a spatial resolution of 30 m verticallly and 60 m horizontally. However, these limits depend on the number of muons detected and can be improved using larger detectors (Tanaka et al., 2007c).
The density maps obtained by Tanaka et al. (2007c) reveal the presence of the lava dome formed inside the crater in 2004, and allow an estimation of a bulk density of 2.76–2.84 g/cm3 for the lava, and 2.27–2.33 g/cm3 for the surrounding rocks.
3. Motivations for Muon-Radiography at Vesuvius
Mt. Vesuvius is considered to be one of the most dangerous volcanoes in the world because of the densely inhabited area around its flanks. It is estimated that about 600,000 people would have to be evacuated in the case of volcanic reactivation.
It is expected that the muon radiography would reveal the internal structure of the cone and, possibly, the presence of the magmatic conduits that fed past eruptions. Most of the cone of Vesuvius results from the superposition of numerous layers of pyroclastic material and lava flows that erupted after the eruption of 472. The upper part of the cone was formed during the persistent activity between 1631 and 1944, when Vesuvius was in the open-conduit state. A reconstruction of the morphology of the Vesuvius cone in the period between 1631 and 1944 was generated by Scarpato et al. (2005), based on a rich collection of historical pictures of the volcano (Ricciardi, 2005).
The conditions of the detectability of the residual conduits are related to their dimensions, shape and density contrast with the surrounding material. Volcanic conduits assume their typical circular shape only near the surface. At greater depths, the common shape of a magma conduit resembles a filled fissure, better as a “dike”. The underlying mechanisms that induce the transition between flat and circular conduits are not yet completely investigated, and volcano radiography could also provide information for understanding such a process.
4. Motivations for Muon-Radiography at Stromboli
For the Stromboli volcano as well, muon radiography represents an independent technique for investigating the internal structure of the cone and revealing the location and extent of the conduits that feed the continuous explosions.
A knowledge of the internal structure of active volcanoes is of paramount importance for understanding their behaviour and mitigate volcanic hazard. Muon radiography represents an innovative tool for investigating the shallow structures of volcanoes and provides additional information independent from those obtained using conventional geophysical methods. In this paper we focused our attention on Vesuvius and Stromboli as good candidates for a muon radiography experiment. However, other volcanoes in the world, such as Montserrat, Teide, Piton de la Furnaise, La Soufriere, could benefit from a muon radiography. Previous experiences at Mt. Asama, Mt. West Iwate and Showa-Shinzan (Japan) have shown the potentiality of the method.
- Bertagnini, A., N. Métrich, P. Landi, and M. Rosi, Stromboli volcano (Aeolian Archipelago, Italy): An open window on the deep-feeding system of a steady state basaltic volcano, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B7), 2336, doi:10.1029/2002JB002146, 2003.Google Scholar
- Bonaccorso, A., S. Calvari, G. Garfì, L. Lodato, and D. Patanè, Dynamics of the December 2002 flank failure and tsunami at Stromboli volcano inferred by volcanological and geophysical observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(18), 1941, doi:10.1029/2003GL017702, 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cassano, E., and P. La Torre, Geophysics, in Somma-Vesuvius, edited by Santacroce, R., Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica, 114, 175–196, CNR, Roma, 1987.Google Scholar
- Cella, F., M. Fedi, G. Florio, M. Grimaldi, and A. Rapolla, Shallow structure of the Somma-Vesuvius volcano from 3D inversion of gravity data, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 161, 303–317, 2007.Google Scholar
- Chouet, B., P. Dawson, T. Ohminato, M. Martini, G. Saccorotti, F. Giudicepietro, G. De Luca, G. Milana, and R. Scarpa, Source mechanisms of explosions at Stromboli Volcano, Italy, determined from momenttensor inversion of very-long period data, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B1), doi:10.1029/2002JB001919, 2003.
- Chouet, B., P. Dawson, and M. Martini, Shallow-conduit dynamics at Stromboli Volcano, Italy, imaged from waveform inversions, Geol. Soc., London, Special Publications, 307, 57–84, 2008a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chouet, B., P. Dawson, and M. Martini, Upper conduit structure and explosion dynamics at stromboli, in The Stromboli volcano, an integrated study of the 2002-2003 eruption, edited by Calvari, S., S. Inguaggiato, G. Puglisi, M. Ripepe, and M. Rosi, Geophysical Monography, 182, 81–92, AGU, 2008b.Google Scholar
- Cioni, R., A. Bertagnini, R. Santacroce, and D. Andronico, Explosive a activity and eruption scenarios at Somma-Vesuvius (Italy): Towards a new classification scheme, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 178(3), 331–346, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Di Maio, R., P. Mauriello, D. Patella, Z. Petrillo, S. Piscitelli, and A. Siniscalchi, Electric and electromagnetic outline of Mt. Vesuvius structural setting, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 82, 219–238, 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Macedonio, G., A. Neri, J. Martì, and A. Folch, Temporal evolution of flow conditions in sustained magmatic explosive eruptions, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 143(1-3), 153–172, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MU-RAY International Workshop, Università di Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Napoli, Italy, 11-12 September 2008, http://muray.fisica.unina.it/events/workshop sep08, 2008.
- Principe, C., M. Rosi, R. Santacroce, and A. Sbrana, Explanatory notes to the geological map, in Somma-Vesuvius, edited by Santacroce, R., Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica, 114, 11–52, CNR, Roma, 1987.Google Scholar
- Ricciardi, G. P., Vesuvio: Tu vuoi che io ti narri, DVD, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Napoli, Italy, 2005.Google Scholar
- Santacroce, R., A general model for the behaviour of the Somma Vesuvius volcanic complex, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 17, 237–248, 1983.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scaillet, B., M. Pichavant, and R. Cioni, Upward migration of Vesuvius magma chamber over the past 20,000 years, Nature, 455, 216–220, doi:10.1038/nature07232, 2008.Google Scholar
- Scarpa, R., F. Tronca, F. Bianco, and E. Del Pezzo, High resolution velocity structure beneath Mt. Vesuvius from seismic array data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(21), 2040–2043, doi:10.1029/2002GL015576, 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scarpato, G., G. Ricciardi, F. Giudicepietro, and M. De Lucia, L’evoluzione morfologica del vesuvio in relazione alla sua storia eruttiva attraverso un’applicazione Web: SlideVes, Open File Report 6, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, Napoli, Italy, http://www.ov.ingv.it/doc/ofr05006.pdf, 2005.
- Tanaka, H. K. M., K. Nagamine, N. Kwamura, S. Nakamura, K. Ishida, and K. Shimomura, Development of a two-fold segmented detection system for near horizontal cosmic-ray muons to probe the internal structure of a volcano, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A}, 507}, 657, 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka, H. K. M., K. Nagamine, S. Nakamura, and K. Ishida, Radiographyc measurements of the internal structure of Mt. West Iwate with near-horizontal cosmic-ray muons and future developments, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, 555, 164–172, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka, H. K. M., T. Nakano, S. Takahashi, J. Yoshida, and K. Niwa, Development of an emulsion imaging system for cosmic-ray muon radiography to explore the internal structure of a volcano, Mt. Asama, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A, 575, 489–497, 2007a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka, H. K. M., T. Nakano, S. Takahashi, J. Yoshida, H. Ohshima, T. Maekawa, H. Watanabe, and K. Niwa, Imaging the conduit size of the dome with cosmic-ray muons: The structure beneath Showa Shinzan lava dome, Japan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22311, doi:10.1029/2007GL031389, 2007b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka, H. K. M., T. Nakano, S. Takahashi, J. Yoshida, M. Takeo, J. Oikawa, T. Ohminato, Y. Aoki, E. Koyama, H. Tsuji, and K. Niwa, High resolution imaging in the inhomogeneous crust with cosmic-ray muon radiography: The density structure below the volcanic crater floor of Mt. Asama, Japan, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 263, 104–113, 2007c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tibaldi, A., Multiple sector collapses at Stromboli volcano, Italy: how they work, Bull. Volcanol., 63(2/3), 112–125, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zollo, A., P. Gasparini, J. Virieux, H. Le Meur, G. De Natale, G. Biella, E. Boschi, P. Capuano, R. de Franco, P. Dell’Aversana, R. De Matteis, I. Guerra, G. Iannaccone, L. Mirabile, and G. Vilardo, Seismic evidence for a low-velocity zone in the upper crust beneath Mount Vesuvius, Science, 274, 592–594, 1996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zollo, A., L. D’Auria, R. De Matteis, A. Herrero, J. Virieux, and P. Gasparini, Bayesian estimation of 2-D P-velocity models from active seismic arrival time data: Imaging the shallow structure of Mt. Vesuvius (Southern Italy), Geophys. J. Int., 151, 566–582, 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar