# Amplification of tsunami heights by delayed rupture of great earthquakes along the Nankai trough

- Kentaro Imai
^{1, 2}Email author, - Kenji Satake
^{2}and - Takashi Furumura
^{1, 2}

**62**:620040427

https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2009.12.005

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB 2010

**Received: **16 March 2009

**Accepted: **18 December 2009

**Published: **17 June 2010

## Abstract

We investigated the effect of delayed rupture of great earthquakes along the Nankai trough on tsunami heights on the Japanese coast. As the tsunami source, we used a model of the 1707 Hoei earthquake, which consists of four segments: Tokai, Tonankai, and two Nankai segments. We first searched for the worst case, in terms of coastal tsunami heights, of rupture delay time on each segment, on the basis of superposition principle for the linear long wave theory. When the rupture starts on the Tonankai segment, followed by rupture on the Tokai segment 21 min later, as well as the eastern and western Nankai segments 15 and 28 min later, respectively, the average coastal tsunami height becomes the largest. To quantify the tsunami amplification, we compared the coastal tsunami heights from the delayed rupture with those from the simultaneous rupture model. Along the coasts of the sea of Hyu’uga and in the Bungo Channel, the tsunami heights become significantly amplified (>1.4 times larger) relative to the simultaneous rupture. Along the coasts of Tosa Bay and in the Kii Channel, the tsunami heights become amplified about 1.2 times. Along the coasts of the sea of Kumano and Ise Bay, and the western Enshu coast, the tsunami heights become slightly smaller for the delayed rupture. Along the eastern Enshu coast, the coast of Suruga Bay, and the west coast of Sagami Bay, the tsunami heights become amplified about 1.1 times.

## Key words

## 1. Introduction

*M*

_{w}

*>*8) have recurred along the Nankai trough with an interval of approximately 100 years. The source areas of these earthquakes consist of four segments: Tokai (N1), Tonankai (N2) and two Nankai (N3 and N4) segments (Fig. 1). The rupture history on these segments has been estimated from Japanese historical documents. Figure 1 shows recurrence of historical earthquakes along the Nankai trough. Many earthquakes have been documented since the 684 Hakuho event. For older earthquakes occurred before the Edo period (started 1603), the estimated source areas have some ambiguity (shown in dashed lines), because of limited historical documents.

The 1707 Hoei earthquake was one of the largest earthquakes occurred in Edo period, when historical documents had become available throughout Japan. This earthquake resulted *M*_{w} over 8.4 and the tsunami runup heights more than 5 m on the Pacific coast. For this event, the rupture is considered to have started from the N2 segment and all the (N1 to N4) segments were broken with short time delay. However, based on historical documents, some studies claimed that time delay of less than several tens of minutes might exist between fault rupture at each segment during the 1707 Hoei earthquake (Iida, 1985; Usami, 2003). Such delayed rupture between segments would produce positive interference of tsunami amplitude and duration compared with simultaneous rupture, hence important for mitigating tsunami disasters associated with the Nankai trough earthquakes.

The effect of such rupture delay on coastal tsunami heights was studied by Kawata *et al.* (2003), and also by Central Disaster Mitigation Council (http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/chubou/nanka/16/sankousiryou2_9.pdf). They evaluated, based on the superposition principle for the linear long wave theory, the tsunami heights at 10 local points such as Shizuoka, Nagoya and Wakayama. They simply considered the worst case for each of evaluation points without considering seismological or geophysical rupture scenarios. Evaluation of tsunami heights based on the superposition principle is simple and efficient; however, there is a possibility to overestimate the tsunami heights by using linear long wave equation without considering the effects of bottom friction or advection terms.

In addition to the historical records of past earthquakes, geophysical modeling supports the nucleation of large earthquakes from the Tonankai (N2) segment off Kii Peninsula. Hori *et al.* (2004) made numerical simulation of cyclic occurrence of large earthquakes along the Nankai trough and showed that large earthquakes nucleate off Kii Peninsula, where both dip angle and the convergence rate of the subducting slab are larger than the other segments.

In this paper, we investigate the effects of delayed rupture of the Nankai and Tokai segments, based on a seismological model by assuming that the rupture initiates at the Tonankai (N2) segment off Kii Peninsula. We first search for the worst case of rupture delay in terms of coastal tsunami heights based on the superposition principle for the linear long wave theory. We then make tsunami simulation of nonlinear long wave theory for the worst case scenario, to examine the amplification of tsunami heights relative to the simultaneous rupture on the coasts from Sagami Bay through Kyushu.

## 2. Numerical Computation

*η*is wave amplitude,

*D*is total depth,

*M*and

*N*are flux discharge in two horizontal directions,

*g*is gravity acceleration, and

*n*is Manning’s roughness coefficient (0.025 m

^{−1/3}s in the sea and 0.03 m

^{−1/3}s on land). The computational region (Fig. 2) extends from Kanto to Kyushu, with the grid size of 270 m. The computational time interval is 0.6 s to satisfy the stability condition of the finite difference method.

Fault parameter of the 1707 Hoei earthquake (Annaka et al., 2003).

Seg. No. | Fault locaton | Length | Width | Depth | Strike | Dip | Rake | Slip | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Lat. (N) | Lon. (E) | (km) | (km) | (km) | (m) | ||||

N1 | 35.120° | 138.706° | 120 | 50 | 6.4 | 193° | 20 | 71° | 5.6 |

N2 | 33.823° | 138.235° | 205 | 100 | 4.1 | 246° | 10° | 113° | 7.0 |

N3 | 33.006° | 136.074° | 155 | 100 | 7.8 | 251° | 12° | 113° | 5.6 |

N4 | 32.614° | 134.481° | 125 | 120 | 10.1 | 250° | 8° | 113° | 9.2 |

*et al.*(2003), which consists of four fault segments (N1 to N4) along the plate boundary between the Eurasian plate and the Philippine Sea plate. This model reproduces distribution of the actual tsunami heights better than previous models (e.g., Ando, 1975; Aida, 1981). The surface displacement is calculated by using the method of Mansinha and Smylie (1971), and the surface displacement is assumed to accomplish in 60 s. Table 1 shows the fault parameter and Fig. 3 shows the surface displacement.

## 3. Search for the Worst Case of Rupture Delay

The rupture delay time for each segment is searched under three conditions based on the seismological and geophysical information; 1) the rupture starts on the N2 segment, 2) the delay time is less than 60 min on neighboring segments, and 3) rupture on the N4 segment is followed by that on the N3 segment. The tsunami waveform at each local point is evaluated based on the superposition principle. The maximum tsunami height is searched with 1 min interval for 120 min from the initial rupture of the N2 segment.

At Susaki on the coast of Tosa Bay, the synthetic waveform is dominated by waveforms from the N4 and N3 segments, and the contribution from the N1 and N2 segments is small. Because Susaki is located far from the N1 and N2 segments, the delayed rupture on the N1 segment has little effect on the synthetic waveform. The same feature is seen on the coasts of the sea of Hyu’uga, in the Bungo Channel, of Tosa Bay and in the Kii Channel.

Rupture delay time of the worst case scenario.

Seg. No. | Rupture delay time (min) |
---|---|

N1 | 21 |

N2 | 0 |

N3 | 15 |

N4 | 28 |

At Shimoda in Izu Peninsula, the waveform from the N1 segment has the largest contribution, followed by that from the N2 segment, to the synthetic waveform. By delaying the N1 waveform, the synthetic waveform has larger amplitude than the simultaneous rupture. The same feature is seen on the eastern Enshu coast, on the coast of Suruga Bay, and on the west coast of Sagami Bay.

To quantify the amplification of coastal tsunami heights with respect to the simultaneous rupture, we introduce geometric average *A* of the ratios of computed tsunami heights from the delayed rupture to that from the simultaneous rupture at 36 points. Computed coastal heights less than 0.5 m are excluded for the calculation of *A* value.

We search for a combination of rupture delay times on the N1, N3 and N4 segments, which makes the amplitude of synthetic tsunami waveforms maximum. We vary the rupture delay times up to 60 min for 1 min interval, hence we examined 60 * 60 * 60 cases to find the maximum value.

The combination that gives the maximum *A* value is shown in Table 2. The *A* value is 1.26 for this worst case. Unlike the previous scenario (Kawata *et al.*, 2003), this scenario is based on seismological studies and considered to be realistic rather than a purely worst case scenario.

## 4. Nonlinear Computation for the Rupture Scenario

The search made in the last section indicates that the rupture scenario shown in Table 2 produces the largest tsunami heights on the average. Because we assumed the superposition principle for the linear long waves, there is a possibility to have overestimated tsunami heights without considering the effects of bottom friction and advection terms. We therefore calculate the coastal tsunami heights for the above scenario by using nonlinear long wave theory.

*A*for 36 local points is 1.27 for the nonlinear long wave computation, very similar to the linear case. While the absolute values of computed tsunami heights are different for the linear and nonlinear cases, the ratio of computed tsunami heights from delayed and simultaneous ruptures are similar. Therefore, it is expected the worst scenario estimated from the linear long wave computation also yields the worst scenario for the nonlinear case.

## 5. Tsunami Heights Along the Japanese Coast

*A*value for the Japanese coast is 1.13 for the nonlinear long wave computation, which is slightly larger than 1.09 for the linear long wave equation. However, amplification of the tsunami heights varies from coast to coast. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the

*A*value for each coast. Depending on the

*A*value, the coasts are grouped into four types, Coasts 1 through 4.

Along Coast 1, the east coast of Kyushu (1-1) and the coast in the Bungo Channel (1-2, 3), tsunami heights in most of the coastline are significantly amplified (*A >* 1.4) for the delayed rupture scenario. As we have seen in Fig. 5, the tsunami from the delayed ruptures of the N3 and N4 segments interferes with the westward propagating tsunami from the N2 segment to cause larger amplitudes. But the delayed rupture on the N1 segment has little effect on the tsunami height.

Along Coast 2, the coast of Tosa Bay (2-1) and the west (2-2) and east (2-3, 4) coasts in the Kii Channel, tsunami heights in most of the coastline are amplified for the delayed rupture scenario (1 *< A <* 1.2). At some locations around Susaki, Kaifu and Tanabe, the tsunami heights for the delayed rupture become very large.

Along Coast 3, the coast of the sea of Kumano (3-1), and close to Ise Bay (3-2, 3) and the western Enshu coast (34), the tsunami heights for the delayed rupture scenario are similar to (3-1, 2, 3, *A ∼* 1) or smaller than (3-4, *A <* 1) the simultaneous rupture. Maximum tsunami heights on Coast 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 are controlled by the N2 segment, hence the delayed rupture on the other segments has little effect on the maximum tsunami heights. Tsunami heights on Coast 3-4 are controlled by both N1 and N2 segments; tsunamis from these segments arrive almost the same time to amplify the coastal heights.

Along Coast 4, the eastern Enshu coast and the coast of Suruga Bay (4-1), and the west coast of Sagami Bay (42), tsunami heights for the delayed rupture scenario become larger than the simultaneous rupture (1 *< A <* 1.2), particularly around Omaesaki and Irouzaki. These amplifications of tsunami heights are due to delayed rupture on the N1 segment as we have seen in Fig. 5. On the coast east of Ito, the heights are almost the same for the simultaneous and delayed ruptures.

## 6. Conclusion

We investigated the effects of delayed rupture of the Tokai and Nankai segments on coastal tsunami heights. The parameter search based on the superposition principle of linear long wave theory indicates that the worst case scenario is the rupture starts on the Tonankai (N2) segment followed by the rupture on the Tokai (N1) segment 21 min later, and the Nankai (N3 and N4) segments 15 min and 28 min later. In this scenario, the tsunami heights become significantly amplified (*A >* 1.4) with respect to the simultaneous rupture along the coasts of the sea of Hyu’uga and in the Bungo Channel, amplified (1 *< A <* 1.2) along the coasts of Tosa Bay and in the Kii Channel. The tsunami heights are similar (*A* ∼ 1) along the coasts of the sea of Kumano and of Ise Bay, and smaller (*A <* 1) along the western Enshu coast. Along the coast of Suruga Bay and along the west coast of Sagami Bay, the tsunami heights become amplified (1 *< A <* 1.2).

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Research Project of the “Improvements of strong ground motion and tsunami simulation accuracy for application of realistic disaster prevention of the Nankai-Trough mega-thrust earthquake” of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports, Science and Technology. Bathymetry data in this study was offered by the Cabinet Office. We are grateful to Drs. Tatsuhiko Saito of ERI, Univ. of Tokyo and Yuichi Namegaya of AIST for their advice during the course of this study.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Aida, I., Numerical experiments for the tsunamis generated off the coast of the Nankaido district,
*Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst.*,**56**, 713–730, 1981 (in Japanese).Google Scholar - Ando, M., Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai trough, Japan,
*Tectonophysics*,**27**, 204–215, 1975.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Annaka, T., K. Inagaki, H. Tanaka, and K. Yanagisawa, Characteristics of great earthquakes along the Nankai trough based on numerical tsunami simulation,
*J. Earthq. Eng.*, JSCE, CD-ROM, 2003 (in Japanese).Google Scholar - Goto, C. and Y. Ogawa, (IUGG/IOC TIME PROJECT), Numerical method of tsunami simulation with the leap-frog scheme, Part 1 Shallow water theory and its difference scheme, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Manuals and Guides, No. 35, 43 p., 1997.Google Scholar
- Hori, T., N. Kato, K. Hirahara, T. Baba, and Y. Kaneda, A numerical simulation of earthquake cycles along the Nankai trough, southwest Japan: Lateral variation in frictional property due to the slab geometry controls the nucleation position,
*Earth Planet. Sci. Lett*,**228**, 215–226, 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Iida, K., Investigation of historical earthquakes (5): Earthquake and tsunami damages by the Hoei earthquake of October 28, 1707,
*Bull. Aichi Inst. Technol. Part B*,**17**, 143–157, 1985 (in Japanese).Google Scholar - Ishibashi, K., Status of historical seismology in Japan,
*Ann. Geophys.*,**47**, 339–368, 2004.Google Scholar - Kawata, Y., S. Suzuki, and T. Takahashi, An effect of giant earthquake scenarios at the Nankai trough on a tsunami hazard,
*Proc. Coastal Eng., JSCE***50**, 326–330, 2003 (in Japanese).View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mansinha, L. and D. E. Smylie, The displacement fields of inclined faults,
*Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am*,**61(5)**, 1433–1440, 1971.Google Scholar - Usami, T.,
*Materials for Comprehensive List of Destructive Earthquakes in Japan*, University of Tokyo Press, 2003 (in Japanese).Google Scholar