- Open Access
Variability of solar/stellar activity and magnetic field and its influence on planetary atmosphere evolution
- Helmut Lammer1Email author,
- Manuel Güdel2,
- Yuri Kulikov3,
- Ignasi Ribas4,
- Teimuraz V. Zaqarashvili1, 5,
- Maxim L. Khodachenko1,
- Kristina G. Kislyakova6, 7,
- Hannes Gröller1,
- Petra Odert7,
- Martin Leitzinger7,
- Bibiana Fichtinger7,
- Sandro Krauss1,
- Walter Hausleitner1,
- Mats Holmström8,
- Jorge Sanz-Forcada9,
- Herbert I. M. Lichtenegger1,
- Arnold Hanslmeier7,
- Valery I. Shematovich10,
- Dmitry Bisikalo10,
- Heike Rauer11, 12 and
- Malcolm Fridlund13
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2012
Received: 31 January 2011
Accepted: 7 April 2011
Published: 8 March 2012
It is shown that the evolution of planetary atmospheres can only be understood if one recognizes the fact that the radiation and particle environment of the Sun or a planet’s host star were not always on the same level as at present. New insights and the latest observations and research regarding the evolution of the solar radiation, plasma environment and solar/stellar magnetic field derived from the observations of solar proxies with different ages will be given. We show that the extreme radiation and plasma environments of the young Sun/stars have important implications for the evolution of planetary atmospheres and may be responsible for the fact that planets with low gravity like early Mars most likely never build up a dense atmosphere during the first few 100 Myr after their origin. Finally we present an innovative new idea on how hydrogen clouds and energetic neutral atom (ENA) observations around transiting Earth-like exoplanets by space observatories such as the WSO-UV, can be used for validating the addressed atmospheric evolution studies. Such observations would enhance our understanding on the impact on the activity of the young Sun on the early atmospheres of Venus, Earth, Mars and other Solar System bodies as well as exoplanets.
The Sun has always played a major role in solar-planetary relations of planetary atmospheres. During the past decade the study of the history of our Sun and its influence on the evolution of Solar System planets has become an interdisciplinary effort between stellar astronomy, astrophysics of star and planet formation, astrochemistry, solar physics, geophysics, planetology, as well as climatological science. The great importance of understanding the historical evolution of our host star is obvious; the Sun’s radiative energy, the plasma outflow, and various forms of transient phenomena such as shock waves, high-energy particle events during flares, and Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are key factors in the formation and atmospheric evolution of the planets including Earth’s biosphere (e.g., Lundin et al., 2007; Lammer et al., 2008, 2009).
The increase in solar luminosity over time and its cli-matological effect on Venus, Earth and Mars have been discussed by various authors in the past (e.g., Sagan and Mullen, 1972; Walker, 1975; Newman and Rood, 1977; Owen, 1979; Chassefière, 1996; Guinan and Ribas, 2002; Lammer et al., 2003; Ribas et al., 2005; Tian et al., 2005; Kulikov et al., 2006, 2007; Cnossen et al., 2007). The early Sun, with a luminosity of about ~70% of that today, should have been too faint to prevent the early Earth and Mars from freezing. However, paleoclimate studies show that the young Earth always had liquid water and was therefore, typically warmer than during recent times and possibly heated by greenhouse gases such as CO2, CH4, and H2O. Similar for Mars we know that our outer neighbor planet has traces of liquid H2O-flows on its surface which indicates that there was once a time when Mars had a denser atmosphere and a warmer climate.
Besides the impact of the Sun on the planetary climate, solar radiation and particle fluxes play a tremendous role in the heating of the upper planetary atmospheres. The studies based on previous observation indicated that contrary to a weaker total luminosity the young Sun was a far stronger source of energetic particles and electromagnetic radiation (e.g., Newkirk Jr., 1980; Skumanich and Eddy, 1981; Zahnle and Walker, 1982). These early studies are now more and more supported by a large number of mul-tiwavelength (X-ray, SXR, EUV, FUV, UV, optical) observations of solar proxies which are a solid evidence that the early Sun was a much more active star than it is at present (e.g., Ribas et al., 2005).
Young stars rotate more rapidly and have an internal magnetic dynamo that is more efficient than that of the present-day Sun. This results in stronger surface magnetic fields and/or higher surface magnetic filling factors which induce enhanced “activity” in all its variations, from larger surface spots to stronger, extended solar wind.
The optical and infrared emissions of the young star largely control the planetary atmosphere and its related climate. The X-ray, SXR, EUV photons as well as the interaction with high-energy particles and the solar/stellar wind lead to atmospheric modifications which can be observed by satellites.
In Section 2 we discuss the latest research within the “Sun in time” project including uncertainties in stellar rotation periods, ages, radiation and plasma flow. Because the radiation and plasma history of our Sun can be separated into a period of a more moderate decrease from present to about 4 Gyr ago and a very early extreme period of about 500 Myr after the young Sun arrived at the Zero-Age-Main-Sequence (ZAMS) we discuss its related radiation and plasma environment separately in Section 3 and Section 4. In Section 5 we discuss the latest theoretical findings on the impact of the extreme space weather of the young Sun on the evolution of the atmospheres of Venus, Earth and Mars and the consequences for terrestrial exoplanets orbiting stars with lower masses than the Sun. Finally we discuss in Section 6 a new innovative idea how one can test the atmospheric evolution theories addressed in Section 5 by transit observations of Earth-size exoplanets, which are exposed to higher SXR/EUV fluxes of dwarf stars.
2. From “The Sun in Time” to “Stars in Time”
In our understanding of the past magnetic evolution of the Sun, solar analogs or the so-called solar proxies, Sun-like stars with different ages and activity levels play an important role. For stars with masses ≤ 1.5MSun and ages of about a few 100 Myr, angular momentum loss by a stellar wind brakes rotation in a way that correlates very well with the stellar age (e.g., Soderblom, 2010). The only independent variable, the stellar age, then determines the rotation period and, through the internal magnetic dynamo, magnetic activity at all levels of the stellar atmosphere, probably including characteristics of the stellar wind (Wood et al., 2002, 2005; Güdel, 2007).
Physical parameters and age-rotation relation of well observed and studied solar proxies in comparison with the Sun (after Güdel, 2007). LX refers to a range of 0.1–2.4 keV as measured by the ROSAT satellite.
HD 129333 [EK Dra]
HD 72905 [π1 UMa]
HD 206860 [HN Peg]
HD 39587 [χ1 Ori]
HD 1835 [BE Cet]
HD 20630 [κ1 Cet]
HD 114710 [β Com]
HD 190406 [15 Sge]
HD 146233 [18 Sco]
HD 128620 [α Cen A]
HD 2151 [β Hyi]
HD 186408 [16 Cyg A]
The observation of and detailed research on a series of near-solar-mass stars back to ages close to the ZAMS-age is therefore sufficient to reconstruct the history of our Sun and the interaction of its magnetic activity with its overall environment. This is the main goal of the so-called “Sun in Time” project which was established more than a decade ago by Dorren and Guinan (1994a, b). Table 1 shows a sample of very well observed and studied solar proxies and their main physical parameters.
The FUV studied with FUSE to infer transition-region magnetic activity (Guinan et al., 2003).
To obtain full coverage in coronal temperatures and characterize flares, X-rays were studied by ROSAT and ASCA (Dorren et al., 1995; Güdel et al., 1995a, 1997; Güdel, 1997). For spectroscopic coverage X-rays have been investigated by XMM-Newton (Telleschi et al., 2005).
Magnetic cycles of solar proxies (Messina and Guinan, 2002) are measured in the optical or in X-rays. Cycles were also studied for α Cen A a G2V star (Robrade et al., 2005; Ayres, 2009) and HD 81809 (G2V+G9V) (Favata et al, 2004, 2008) stars.
Differential rotation of the solar proxies as seen in stars spot measurements were studied by Messina and Guinan (2003).
Because lower-mass stars are very common and hence may host rocky planets within their habitable zones, progress in this direction has started by expanding the “Sun in Time” project to time sequences of the high-energy emissions, CME activity, stellar winds, and flare activity to lower-mass K and M-type stars. These stars are far more numerous than the solar type stars, have long main-sequence lifetimes, and have become prime targets for terrestrial planet searches in recent years. Because of the low luminosities, their habitable zones (e.g., Kasting et al., 1993; Lammer et al., 2009) can be quite close to the host stars. Because these dwarf stars have deeper outer con-vective zones than Sun-like stars and thus possess very efficient magnetic dynamos, the expected enhanced X-ray, SXR, EUV radiation environment combined with extreme space weather effects should play a major role in the development of the atmospheres and habitability on such planets (Scalo et al., 2007; Lammer et al., 2009).
3. The Moderate Activity Period: Solar Radiation, Plasma and Magnetic Environment From the Present to 4 Gyr Ago
Ultraviolet emission from the Sun and late-type stars originates in magnetic chromospheric and transition-zone regions which have been heated to temperatures of ~104–105 K. Based on spectral measurements obtained by IUE, Dorren and Guinan (1994a) have studied the evolution of ultraviolet (UV) line fluxes in detail and Güdel et al. (1997) and Ribas et al. (2005) extended this research to X-rays, SXR and EUV. The relevant wavelengths for thermo-spheric heating are the “ionizing” ones ≤1000 Å (e.g., Hunten, 1993), which contain only a small fraction of the present solar spectral power. Planetary atmospheres are opaque to EUV radiation (100–920 Å), as in the case of Earth, due to photo-absorption by N2, O2 and O, so that the optical depth of unity at 100 Å occurs at an altitude of about 130 km.
Dissociation of molecular ions and ion-neutral reactions produce so-called “hot” atoms which can reach the upper thermosphere and exobase where they form planetary coronae which can be ionized and picked up by the solar wind plasma flow (e.g. Nagy et al., 1981; Lammer and Bauer, 1991; Kim et al., 1998; Hodges, 2000; Krestyanikova and Shematovich, 2006; Lammer et al, 2006; Lichtenegger et al., 2009; Gröller et al., 2010; Valeille et al., 2010).
Solar photon fluxes for moderate solar activity at 1 AU (Bauer and Lammer, 2004).
Φ [109ph cm−2 sec −1]
I∞ [erg cm−2 sec−1]
1215.7 (Ly α)
977 (C III)
584.3 (He I)
303.8 (He II)
3.1 Short- and longtime variation of the short wavelength radiation
Solar minimum and maximum values compared to the intensity flux of medium solar activity cycle for X-ray, SXR, EUV, FUV and Lyman-alpha wavelength ranges.
High solar activity
Low solar activity
X-ray [1–20 Å ]
SXR [20–100 Å ]
EUV [100–912 Å]
FUV [912–1180 Å ]
Lyman-α [1200–1300 Å]
Space observatories and instruments used for the relevant observations within the “Sun in Time” project (Güdel, 2007).
λ [Å ]
Solar age [Gyr]
t b.p. [Gyr]
X-ray [1–20 Å ]
SXR [20–100 Å ]
EUV [100–920 Å ]
FUV [920–1180 Å ]
Lyman-α [1200–1300 Å ]
UV [1300–1700 Å ]
Stars with mass loss rates determined from Lyα absorption. Spectral types and mass loss rates taken from Wood et al. (2005). Ages determined via gyrochronology (tgyro), chromospheric activity (tchromo) and isochrones ( tiso) were taken from Barnes (2007). Other ages (tother) are taken from the references in the last column ( Eggenberger et al. (2004);  Soderblom and Mayor (1993);  King et al. (2010);  Eggen (1996);  DeWarf et al. (2010);  Eggenberger et al. (2008);  Montes et al. (2001)).
Method & Ref.
UMa moving group 
Age of BD companion 
61 Cyg A
61 Cyg moving group 
Hyades supercluster 
Ages adopted from α Cen
UMa moving group 
Solar age [Gyr]
t b.p. [Gyr]
X-ray [1–20 A]
SXR [20–100 A]
EUV [100–920 A]
FUV [920–1180 A]
Lyman-α [1200–1300 A]
UV [1300–1700 A]
It should be mentioned that the present solar activity also shows intermediate periodicities in the range of several months (Rieger et al., 1984) and ~2 years (Vecchio et al., 2010). These periodicities are explained in terms of a Rossby wave instability in the solar interior (Zaqarashvili et al., 2010a, b). Similar periodicities have been observed in other solar like stars (Massi et al., 1998). Recently, Lanza et al. (2009) observed short term cyclic oscillations of the total spotted area on the photosphere of CoRoT-Exo-2a, which has been suggested to be caused by Rossby waves. The Rossby wave activity was probably enhanced in the early stage of solar evolution due to rapid rotation, therefore this aspect requires future detailed study.
3.2 The solar magnetic field
Rotation and convection lead to the solar dynamo activity, which results in complex magnetic fields in the solar interior and atmosphere. Rotation rate and convective mixing length have been continuously changing during the solar evolution, therefore the magnetic field structure in the solar atmosphere/corona was most likely different in the early stage of solar evolution from what is observed today. Young solar analogs with fast rotation ≤5 days show polar spots in addition to the present day low latitude Sun-spots (Strassmeier, 2009). It has been suggested that a dominance of the Coriolis force over the buoyancy force in the dynamics of rising magnetic flux tubes tends to the polar appearance of magnetic flux in fast rotators (Schüssler and Solanki, 1992; Schüssler et al., 1996). On the other hand, the meridional advection also may lead to the transport of photospheric magnetic flux towards the polar regions (Schrijver and Title, 2001; Mackay et al., 2004). High-latitude appearance of Sun-spots could change the solar wind structure (possible interchange of fast and slow solar wind locations) and may also have affected the initiation latitudes of solar flares/CMEs. This could completely change the solar activity patterns, butterfly diagram and influence of solar wind/CMEs on the Solar System. However, this would have happened in the very early stages of the solar evolution, when the Sun just arrived at the ZAMS. The solar rotation period was ~10 days 4 Gyr ago (see Table 1), which is faster than the nowadays Sun, but still slower than at the time when the young Sun arrived at the ZAMS. This rotation rate does not affect too much on appearance of sunspot and therefore the magnetic structure of solar atmosphere/corona probably has not changed significantly during the past 4 Gyr.
3.3 The time evolution of the solar wind
As a consequence of solar/stellar activity, plasma winds are ejected from the star but their detection in solar proxies is very difficult. Although the wind formation and acceleration mechanisms are still not completely understood at the Sun, there is much evidence that magnetic fields play an important role for acceleration of the wind, for its heating, or for guiding the wind at least out to the Alfvén radius at which the stellar wind speed reaches the value of the Alfvén speed. Beyond the Alfvén radius the stellar wind is super-Alfvenic. One of the best indirect confirmation of the presence of magnetized winds in young stars is their spin-down to slower rotation (as shown in Table 1) after their arrival at the ZAMS because the outward flowing plasma carries away angular momentum from the star.
Potential detection methods of stellar winds include the measurement of thermal radio emission from the plasma flow (Lim and White, 1996; Gaidos et al, 2000), and signatures of charge exchange in X-ray spectra (Wargelin and Drake, 2001). The most successful approach so far is an indirect method which makes use of the Lyman-α absorption in astrospheres due to the interaction between stellar winds and the interstellar medium (ISM) (e.g., Wood, 2004). When stellar winds collide with the ISM, at further distance from the star, a termination shock where the wind is shocked to subsonic speeds is formed. The heliosphere is permeated by interstellar H I with T ~ (2–4) × 104 K (Wood, 2004; Wood et al., 2005). Much of this gas is piled up between the heliopause and the bow shock producing a hydrogen wall that can be detected by UV observations as an absorption signature in the Lyman-α line. The excess absorption from the Sun’s own hydrogen wall is, due to the deceleration of the ISM relative to the star, redshifted, while that of astrospheres are blueshifted. The measurable absorption depths are then compared with results from hy-drodynamic model calculations (Wood et al., 2005). We note that the the amount of astrospheric absorption scales with the wind ram pressure, and the stellar wind velocity has to be assumed to derive the mass loss rate (Wood and Linsky, 1998).
The density scaling (Eqs. (5)–(7)) was derived from the measured mass loss rates from Wood et al. (2005), hence using , with proton mass m p together with Eqs. (4)–(6) and r = 1 AU yields a similar evolution of the mass loss rate as indicated by the shaded area in Fig. 1, valid for main-sequence G-type stars with an age of at least 0.7 Gyr (Grießmeier et al, 2007; Lichtenegger et al, 2010).
4. The Extreme Period: The First 500 Myr After the Sun’s Arrival at the ZAMS
The first 500 Myr after the origin of a terrestrial planet and the evolution of its host star to the ZAMS are the most crucial period for the development of a biosphere. During this early evolutionary stage a star (including the young Sun) is more active at short wavelengths and plasma outflows can therefore remove a planet’s atmosphere or initial water inventory. To understand how the atmospheres of terrestrial planets were affected by the young Sun it is of tremendous importance to gain more knowledge from astrophysical observations of magnetic properties, location of activity centers, radiation, plasma outflow (e.g., winds, CMEs), mass loss, and rotation periods, of very young solar proxies and stars with ages <500 Myr.
4.1 The magnetic field and plasma outflow of the early young Sun
The rotation period of the young Sun was much faster (~few days) during the first 500 Myr after the arrival at the ZAMS, therefore the activity and magnetic field configuration was most likely quite different from the current appearance. Star-spots on the young solar analog EK Dra which rotates with a period of ~2.68 days are observed to be formed everywhere; from the low latitudes up to polar regions (Strassmeier, 2009). The young Sun probably had the same structure of active regions. The high latitude Sun-spots could change the structure of coronal magnetic fields as well as the formation of prominences, which might lead to a predominant occurrence of flares and CMEs near the polar regions. The polar CMEs may propagate significantly above the ecliptical plane, which may cause more convenient conditions for planetary evolution. However, not much is known about solar magnetic dynamo during that time. It is not well constrained what the duration of activity cycles was, and also the butterfly diagram and the other laws of current solar activity just after the arrival of the Sun at the ZAMS. Therefore, the understanding of solar influence on planets requires further modeling of solar magnetic dynamos with all consequences in appearance of magnetic flux at the surface and in the possible structure of coronal magnetic field in the young Sun. This may be related to the fact that very young stars rotate fast and their active regions appear therefore at high latitudes. Furthermore, if the magnetic field becomes more akin to a global dipole, then the escape of the stellar plasma may be more inhibited (Wood et al., 2005). Thus, a possibly preferred appearance of CMEs at polar regions during the fast rotating young Sun may lead to the propagation of shocks and magnetic ropes and clouds off the ecliptic plane before 4 Gyr ago, which might completely change the current picture of solar/stellar-planetary atmosphere-magnetosphere interaction processes (Zaqarashvili et al, 2011). All these questions need to be answered in order to understand the influence of the young Sun on Solar System dynamics after its arrival at the ZAMS.
4.2 X-ray to UV fluxes after the Sun arrived at the ZAMS
One can see from Table 1 that the “Sun in Time” sample contains 6 nearby G0 V-G5 V stars (EK Dra, π1 UMa, HN Peg, χ1 Ori, BE Cet, κ1 Cet) that have known rotation periods and well-determined temperatures, luminosities, and metallicities which fall into the early age domain where t ≤ 0.65 Gyr after the Sun’s arrival at the ZAMS.
Short-wavelength radiation not only gets stronger toward younger solar analogs, it also becomes spectrally harder. This property is by no means trivial. In principle, increased luminosity could be achieved by populating the stellar surface with a larger number of similar magnetic active regions, which would not imply a change in hardness.
The cause of the hardening with increasing luminosity is an increasing population of coronal loops with maximum temperature around ~10 MK with increasing rotation of the star (e.g. Sanz-Forcada et al., 2003). The nature of these loops is not clear in detail, but an attractive possibility is the operation of flares. For flares, a similar temperature-luminosity relation applies in X-rays (Güdel, 2004). Statistical studies during the past decade have addressed the problem of the occurrence rate of flares as a function of their total radiative energy (e.g., Audard et al, 2000; Güdel et al., 2003). The occurrence rate distributions are steep power-laws in energy. The summation of all small flares unresolved in the light curves may suffice to generate the entire observed radiation including “quiescent radiation”. Toward more active stars, progressively larger flares contribute to this baseline level; because larger flares are hotter, the summed, average radiation also becomes harder. This model is also supported by the continuous presence of nonthermal electrons in extremely active young solar analogs (Güdel, 2007) that are presumably accelerated by frequent flares. One would thus expect not only more intense X-rays in young solar analogs or around the young Sun itself, but also an increased level of flare-produced hard X-rays, gamma rays, ejected energetic particles and CMEs.
From this observational evidence one can expect that early planetary thermospheres should have been extremely hot and most likely expanded (Lammer et al., 2008; references therein). In Section 5 we will discuss the problems regarding the “survival” or stability of planetary atmospheres during such extreme solar/stellar activity periods.
5. Solar Activity Response of Planetary Upper Atmospheres
When the temperature of the thermosphere is large, a significant fraction of the light constituents of the upper atmosphere attain velocities above the escape value, and the thermosphere may even become non-hydrostatic and start to expand accompanied by adiabatic cooling to several planetary radii (Chassefière, 1996; Tian et al., 2005, 2008a, b, 2009; Kulikov et al., 2007; Lammer et al., 2008).
On the basis of their energy source, we can separate two main escape categories: thermal escape and non-thermal escape. For thermal escape, atoms at the exobase level have more or less a Maxwellian velocity distribution that is determined by the exobase temperature. Particles with velocities which are larger than the escape velocity of the planet can escape from the planet (e.g., Chamberlain, 1963). In extreme cases when the mean thermal energy of the major species at the exobase level (where the mean free path of the particles is comparable to the atmospheric scale height) exceeds their gravitational potential energy, thermal escape can be considered as “blow-off” (Öpik, 1963). Assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, Kulikov et al. (2007) showed that terrestrial upper atmospheres exposed to enhanced EUV radiation of the early Sun could be heated to extremely high exobase temperatures which could be over 10 000 K. Tian et al. (2008a, b) studied the response of thermospheres against high EUV fluxes in more detail and discovered that one can classify the thermosphere response into two thermal regimes.
In regime I, the thermosphere is in hydrostatic equilibrium in which the bulk atmosphere below the exobase can be considered as static. This is the situation in the thermo-spheres of the Solar System planets today. However, if the Sun’s EUV flux or that of another star was/is much higher than that of the present Sun the thermosphere can enter a second regime.
In regime II the upper atmosphere becomes non-hydrostatic. In the hydrodynamic flow regime, the major gases in the thermosphere can expand very efficiently to several planetary radii above the planetary surface. As a result light atoms experience high thermal escape rates and expand to large distances (Tian et al., 2008a, 2009) where the whole atmosphere may be eroded by solar/stellar wind plasma flow related non-thermal escape processes (Khodachenko et al., 2007; Lammer et al., 2007; Lundin et al., 2007; Lichtenegger et al., 2010).
5.1 Hydrogen-rich upper atmospheres of terrestrial planets
Terrestrial planets may evolve through phases where their upper atmospheres are hydrogen-rich. There is some evidence from planetary formation theories that early Venus once lost its initial H2O inventory during an episode of a runaway and/or wet greenhouse effect via thermal and non-thermal atmospheric escape processes which could have been related to the form of “hydrodynamic” outflow. These extreme conditions may be reached in H-rich primordial thermospheres heated by the strong EUV flux of the young Sun (Sekiya et al., 1980a, b; Watson et al., 1981; Zahnle and Walker, 1982; Tian et al., 2005).
Sekiya et al. (1980a, b) and Watson et al. (1981) in their early works studied hydrodynamic conditions of H-rich thermospheres from early Earth or Venus due to solar EUV heating by applying idealized hydrodynamic equations. From their thermospheric model Watson et al. (1981) obtained exobase levels for an Earth which is exposed to EUV fluxes of ~5 times that of the present Sun of ~7 planetary radii. This result also agrees with hydrodynamic model simulations for a H-rich early Earth thermosphere by Tian et al. (2005). An idea that EUV exposed upper atmospheres expand dynamically to larger distances is also confirmed by more sophisticated models such as that of Chassefière (1996), and Tian et al. (2008a, b, 2009) which matched subsonic outflow solutions to Jeans boundary conditions at the exobase.
5.2 Response of N2-rich atmospheres to high EUV fluxes
One can also see that the exobase distance which separates the collision dominated thermosphere from the collisionless exosphere moves from ~500 km up to ~12.7 Earth-radii above the surface for a 20 EUV (4.2 Gyr ago) solar flux which would move about ~3.7 Earth-radii above the present-day average subsolar magnetopause location of ~9 Earth-radii. Under such extreme SXR and EUV conditions the magnetosphere would not protect the upper atmosphere, the planet experiences Venus or Mars-like solar wind-atmospheric plasma interaction and as a result the exosphere could experience strong non-thermal escape.
In view of large uncertainties in the solar wind evolution discussed in Section 3.3Lichtenegger et al. (2010) estimated also the ion pick up loss rate of these N2 atmospheres by assuming present-day solar wind parameters. Although the loss rates are about a factor 10 lower, Earth would have lost its present nitrogen atmosphere within some tens of million years at the latest when the EUV flux was > 10 times from that of the present Sun. The main reason for these large escape rates is the EUV heated and expanded large solar wind plasma interaction area which is not protected beyond a present Earth-type magnetospheric shield.
Because the Earth’s nitrogen inventory is not lost, Lichtenegger et al. (2010) argued that these results indicate that the CO2 amount in the early N2-rich terrestrial atmosphere was at least two orders of magnitude higher than the present-time level. Such an amount was needed to confine the upper atmosphere after the onset of the geo-dynamo within the shielding magnetosphere and thus might have protected it from complete destruction.
However, the model simulation results show that planets with the size and mass ≤ of the Earth with even a 95% CO2 atmosphere would experience problems when the EUV flux reaches values which are ≥30 time that of the present Earth (Tian, 2009; Lichtenegger et al., 2010). Moreover, photo-chemically produced low energy (“hot”) atoms and additional thermospheric heating due to energetic solar/stellar particles could have additionally enhanced the atmospheric escape. On the other hand the expected initial CO2 reservoir on early Earth was perhaps much larger compared to its nitrogen reservoir, so that a non-thermal loss to space of several bars of CO2 during the first 100–300 Myr would have only slightly modified the CO2 budget of the Earth.
5.3 Response of CO2-rich atmospheres to high EUV fluxes
Kulikov et al. (2006) studied the expected O+ ion pick up loss rates over Venus’ history by using EUV data from solar proxies discussed in Section 2 and a range of solar wind plasma densities and velocities which were expected for the young active Sun. These authors used a diffusive-gravitational equilibrium and thermal balance model, which was applied for a study of the heating of the early thermosphere by photodissociation and ionization processes, exothermic chemical reactions, and cooling by CO2 IR emission in the 15 µm band. The results of their study yield expanded thermospheres with exobase altitudes between about 200 km for present EUV flux values and about 1700 km for 100 times higher EUV fluxes after the Sun arrived at the ZAMS. The exobase temperatures yield values of about 8000 K for the earliest EUV fluxes after the Sun arrived at the ZAMS.
However, one can expect that the high EUV flux will dissociate CO2 molecules in the thermosphere which results in less IR-cooling and in a possible non-hydrostatic upper atmosphere environment with high thermal escape rates for dissociated C and O atoms. By considering the uncertainties discussed on the solar wind parameters expected for the young Sun as discussed in Section 3.3, with the model discussed in Kulikov et al. (2006) one obtains loss rate from a CO2-rich early Venus atmosphere which is equivalent to about 2–10 bars during the planets’ history. From the present knowledge of the stellar wind parameters discussed in this work we expect that the high mass loss cases shown in Kulikov et al. (2006), where Venus could have lost much more atmosphere than 10 bar over its livetime may be overestimations based on solar wind parameters which are too large.
If Venus evaporated its initial H2O inventory during that period, the planets upper atmosphere would have been hydrogen-rich (Chassefière, 1996) as discussed in Section 5.1 and a dense hydrogen corona would have protected the initial N2 and CO2 inventory from escape until the evaporated water inventory was lost by thermal and nonthermal escape processes.
According to their results the thermal neutral atom C and O escape fluxes >1011 cm s−1 from early Mars were as high as the outgassing fluxes which depended on initial CO2 inventories (e.g. Phillips et al., 2001) during the early Noachian when the EUV flux was even larger than 20 times of the solar value. Due to the EUV heating and expansion of the upper atmosphere an early martian magnetic field could have not most likely protect the ion escape of C+ and O+ atoms which originated from dissociation of CO2 molecules. By applying the same test-particle model, as in the study of early Earth by Lichtenegger et al. (2010), to the upper atmosphere profiles and estimated martian mag-netopause distances as given in Dehant et al. (2007), we can show that the expanded thermosphere-exosphere can interact with the solar wind plasma which results in pick up C+ ion escape fluxes of >1011 cm s-−1 before 4 Gyr ago.
Thus, due to the high activity of young Sun and the low gravity of Mars a dense early Noachian martian atmosphere may not have built up during the first 300–400 Myr after the planet’s origin. A question remains when the outgassing rate was larger compared to the thermal and non-thermal neutral escape rates and what role impacts play in the formation or removal of the atmosphere (Pham et al., 2009). These processes may have played a role at the end of the Noachian so that a CO2 atmosphere with a surface pressure of a few 100 mbars and a resulting warmer climate may have been established so that Mars warmed up sporadically ~3.5–4 Gyr ago. However, such an accumulated CO2 atmosphere should have been lost since about 4 Gyr ago by solar wind erosion (ion pick up, cold ion outflow), sputtering and photochemical hot atom escape after the martian magnetic dynamo stopped working.
6. Testing Atmosphere Evolution Scenarios via UV-transit Observations of Earth-like Exoplanets Orbiting Dwarf Stars
As discussed in the previous section, dynamically expanded thermospheres and related coronae should form if SXR and EUV fluxes ≥5 EUV and light atoms such as hydrogen populate the upper atmosphere, or if no IR-cooling molecules are present. As a consequence the upper atmosphere expands beyond a possible magnetospheric shield and hydrogen energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) are produced via charge exchange collisions between the atmosphere and charged solar/stellar wind particles (Lammer et al., 2011a, b). As discussed recently by Holmström et al. (2008), Ekenbäck et al. (2010) and Lammer et al. (2011a) ENAs have been observed around all Solar System planets when a spacecraft was equipped with an accurate instrument.
Lammer et al. (2011b) pointed out that, the observation and theoretical modeling of hydrogen and ENA-clouds around a terrestrial exoplanet would indicate that its ther-mosphere is not in hydrostatic equilibrium but experiences hydrodynamic expansion beyond its magnetospheric shield. Therefore, by observing planetary hydrogen clouds and related ENA-coronae around transiting terrestrial exoplanets in UV (Lyman-α attenuation) we will learn more on how the early Solar System planetary atmospheres have evolved. Because transiting Earth-size exoplanets and their hydrogen clouds are too small relative to the size of Sun-like G-stars to detect them, Lammer et al. (2011b) proposed to study hydrogen clouds around such planets within orbits of M dwarf stars. Due to the large number of M-type stars in our neighborhood (Scalo et al., 2007) and their small size and comparably long periods of strong stellar activity in X-rays, SXR, and EUV M dwarf stars may represent the most promising candidates for the detection of hydrogen clouds and related ENAs.
dense hydrogen envelopes which remained from the primordial nebulae;
hydrogen-rich thermospheres produced via dissociation of CH4, NH3 and H2O molecules;
ocean planets or planets which evaporate their initial H2O reservoir;
evaporation of H2O oceans due to cometary or aster-oidal impacts.
Since the past years the search for Earth-like exoplanets around low-mass M-type stars has become one of the major activities in stellar astrophysics. Besides several ground-based search projects such as CRIRES, CARMENES, or HZPF (e.g., Lammer et al., 2011b; and references therein) ESA’s M3 candidate PLATO (PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars) will also be dedicated to detect transiting terrestrial exoplanets within and outside of habitable zones, and determine their basic parameters with unprecedented accuracy (Catala and the PLATO team, 2009a, b). The PLATO mission has been selected for a definition study phase in the context of ESA’s Cosmic Vision 2015–2025 program as an M-class mission with foreseen launch in 2017–2024 (Stankov et al., 2010). The instrument concept of PLATO (Catala and the PLATO team, 2009a) consists of a multi-telescope approach. In total 32 refractive telescopes (pupil size about 120 mm each) are combined to produce highly photometrically accurate lightcurves covering a wide dynamic range. In addition, two so-called fast telescopes with fixed color filters and higher read-out cadence are used for seismic studies of the brightest targets. PLATO is planned to be launched into an orbit around the L2 Lagrange point. Two target fields will be monitored for at least 2–3 years with high duty cycle. In a “step-and-stare” phase several fields will be monitored for shorter durations (2–5 months each). In total, PLATO will cover about 50% of the sky.
If selected, this mission will follow the ongoing CoRoT and Kepler missions to obtain a new sample of transiting exoplanets, focussing on terrestrial planets around bright stars (mV ≤ 11 mag). This sample will not only provide planetary systems with highly accurately known basic planetary and stellar parameters, but will also provide access to a well-constrained age of planetary systems. Planetary radii will be determined from PLATO transit observations. Combined with a world-wide ground-based follow-up campaign to obtain radial velocity measurements, planet masses will be derived. However, previous transit searches have shown that well constrained stellar parameters are crucial to derive accurate planet parameters. PLATO therefore combines photometric transit search with astroseimology of the central stars of planetary systems. These astroseismologi-cal studies are further keys to obtain a well constrained age (goal: 10% accuracy; Kjeldsen et al., 2009) of stars, and therefore planetary systems.
The search will include planets of all orbital periods and with all physical sizes, with focus on bright central stars of solar type. PLATO will perform a full characterization of the observed very bright stars using seismic analysis. The highest priority sample, therefore, are about 20 000 dwarfs and sub-giants with mV ≤ 11 mag for which Earth-sized planets can be detected and accurate seismic analysis be performed. A smaller sample of very bright stars (mV ≤ 8 mag) will provide targets for future spectral characterization of the detected planets. Finally, a large sample of stars (more than 245 000 cool dwarfs/subgiants with 11 mag < mV < 13 mag) will be monitored to detect terrestrial planets, but without detailed astroseismology. What is interesting in the context of our work outlined in this section, PLATO will also search for exoplanets around more than 10 000 nearby M-type dwarfs (down to mV = 15−16 mag), including planets within their habitable zones.
High resolution spectroscopy of point sources in a wavelength range 1020–3200 Å by means of 2 high resolution echelle set ups with a sensitivity which is about 10 times better than that of the HST/STIS.
Long-slit resolution spectroscopy in the 1020–3200 Å range.
High resolution imaging in the 1500–2800 Å range with a field view of 1’× 1’.
High resolution imaging in the 2000–7000 Å range with a sensitivity which is about 3 times higher than the HST/ACS system.
Molecular hydrogen mapping in extended, faint as-trophysical objects with a large field far UV (1150–1900 Å) camera.
Thus, transit follow-up observations of exoplanets discovered by ESA’s currently studied PLATO mission in the UV-range of terrestrial exoplanets around M-type stars with space observatories such as the WSO-UV would provide a unique opportunity to shed more light on the early evolution of Earth-like planets, including those of our own Solar System. Moreover, as pointed out in Lammer et al. (2011a) observations of exoplanets with various ages, together with hydrogen cloud and ENA modeling efforts could be used for the reconstruction of the solar wind history as well as testing magnetic dynamo evolution scenarios of gas giants.
By analyzing solar and astrophysical observations and phenomena we present strong evidence that the Sun and similar stars underwent much more active phases after they arrived at the ZAMS. The enhanced activity reveals itself in the form of strong high energy radiation emissions, frequent flares, and a denser and faster stellar wind. Results from the “Sun in Time” project suggest that the coronal X-ray and EUV emissions of the very young main-sequence Sun were ~1550 and ~80 times stronger than those of the present Sun, respectively. We showed that such an energy and particle environment certainly had an impact on the origin and evolution of Solar System planets and their atmospheres. Due to the heating of the much higher solar/stellar SXR and EUV flux the planetary thermospheres and exobase levels extended to higher altitudes than at present time, which resulted in larger solar wind-atmosphere interaction areas, no protection of intrinsic magnetospheres, the production of huge hydrogen ENA-clouds and higher non-thermal escape rates. Under certain activity conditions of the young Sun or planetary host star hydrostatic equilibrium could not have been kept. Finally we addressed the possibility of studying the detection and follow-up observations of extended upper atmospheres around exoplanets by near future space observatories such as ESAs PLATO mission in combination with the WSO-UV space telescope. Such observations would enhance our knowledge regarding the interaction of the host star’s plasma environment and with Earth-like exoplanets itself, as well as shed light into the evolutionary stage of their atmospheres.
This research is supported by the Helmholtz Association through the research alliance “Planetary Evolution and Life.” The authors also acknowledge support from the European Science Foundation (ESF) and the Europlanet Networking activity Na1 (Observational Infrastructure Networking), and Science Networking Na2 working group (WG4 and WG5) activities. The authors also acknowledge support from the Austrian FWF (Wissenschaftsfond) via projects FWF I 199-N16, P21197-N16, as well as P22950-N16 and acknowledge also the RFBR project 09-02-91002 ANF_a. K. G. Kislyakova also acknowledges support by the RFBR project 08-02-00119_a, by the project NK-21P of the Education Ministry of the Russian Federation and by the EU grant #228319 in the framework of the Project Europlanet RI-FP7. This work was also carried out under the support by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI, Bern, Switzerland) and the ISSI team “Evolution of exoplanet atmospheres and their characterization”. Finally the authors want to thank two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions which helped to improve the manuscript.
- Alibert, Y. B. C, W. Benz, G. Wuchterl, O. Grasset, C. Sotin, C. Eiroa, T. Henning, T. Herbst, L. Kaltenegger, A. Leger, R. Liseau, H. Lammer, C. Beichman, W. Danchi, M. Fridlund, J. Lunine, F. Paresce, A. Penny, A. Quirrenbach, H. Röttgering, F. Selsis, J. Schneider, D. Stam, G. Tinetti, and G. J. White, Origin and formation of planetary systems, Astrobiology, 10, 19–32, 2010.Google Scholar
- Audard, M., M. Güdel, and E. F Guinan, Implications from Extreme-Ultraviolet observations for coronal heating of active stars, Astrophys. J. Lett., 513, L53–L56, 1999.Google Scholar
- Audard, M., M. Güdel, J.J. Drake, and V. L. Kashyap, Extreme-Ultraviolet flare activity in late-type stars, Astrophys. J., 541, 396–409, 2000.Google Scholar
- Ayres, T. R., Evolution of the solar ionizing flux, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 1641–1652, 1997.Google Scholar
- Ayres, T. R., The cycles of α Centauri, Astrophys. J., 696, 1931–1949, 2009.Google Scholar
- Bakalian, F, Production of hot nitrogen atoms in the martian thermo-sphere, Icarus, 183, 69–78, 2006.Google Scholar
- Barnes, S. A., Ages for illustrative field stars using gyrochronology: Viability, limitations, and errors, Astrophys. J., 669, 1167–1189, 2007.Google Scholar
- Bauer, S. J. and H. Lammer, Planetary Aeronomy, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
- Bowman, B. R., W. K. Tobiska, F A. Marcos, C. Y Huang, C. S. Lin, and W. J. Burke, A new empirical thermospheric density model JB2008 using new solar and geomagnetic indices, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA 2008–6438, pp. 19, 2008.Google Scholar
- Catala, C. and the PLATO team, PLATO: PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars, Exp. Astron., 23, 329–356, 2009a.Google Scholar
- Catala, C. and the PLATO team, PLATO: PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars, Commun. Asteroseismol., 158, 330–336, 2009b.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, J. W., Planetary coronae and atmospheric evaporation, Planet. Space. Sci., 11, 901–996, 1963.Google Scholar
- Chassefière, E., Hydrodynamic escape of oxygen from primitive atmospheres: applications to the cases of Venus and Mars, Icarus, 124, 537–552, 1996.Google Scholar
- Cnossen, I., J. Sanz-Forcada, F Favata, O. Witasse, T. Zegers, and N. F Arnold, Habitat of early life: Solar X-ray and UV radiation at Earth’s surface 4–3.5 billion years ago, J. Geophys. Res., 112(E2), E02008, 2007.Google Scholar
- Dehant, V, H. Lammer, Yu. N. Kulikov, J.-M. Grießmeier, D. Breuer, O. Verhoeven, Ö. Karatekin, T. van Hoolst, O. Korablev, and P. Lognonnè, Planetary magnetic dynamo effect on atmospheric protection of early Earth and Mars, Space Sci. Rev., 129, 279–300, 2007.Google Scholar
- DeWarf, L. E., K. M. Datin, and E. F Guinan, X-ray, FUV, and UV observations of α Centauri B: Determination of long-term magnetic activity cycle and rotation period, Astron. Astrophys., 722, 343–357, 2010.Google Scholar
- Dorren, J. D. and E. F Guinan, HD 129333: The Sun in its infancy, Astrophys. J., 428, 805–818, 1994a.Google Scholar
- Dorren, J. D. and E. F Guinan, The Sun in time: Detecting and modelling magnetic inhomogenities on Solar-type stars, in The Sun as a Variable Star: Solar and Stellar Irradiance Variations, edited by Pap, J. M., C. Frohlich, H. S. Hudson, and S. K. Solanki, 206–216 pp., Proceedings of IAU Colloquium 143, held in Boulder, Colorado, USA, June 20–25, 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.; New York, U.S.A., 1994b.Google Scholar
- Dorren, J. D., M. Guedel, and E. F Guinan, X-Ray emission from the Sun in its youth and old age, Astrophys. J., 448, 431–436, 1995.Google Scholar
- Eggen, O. J., Distribution and correlation of age, abundance, and motion of lower main sequence stars, Astron. J., 111, 466–475, 1996.Google Scholar
- Eggenberger, P., C. Charbonnel, S. Talon, G. Meynet, A. Maeder, F Carrier, and G. Bourban, Analysis of α Centauri AB including seismic constraints, Astron. Astrophys., 422, 235–246, 2004.Google Scholar
- Eggenberger, P., A. Miglio, F Carrier, J. Fernandes, and N. C. Santos, Analysis of 70 Ophiuchi AB including seismic constraints, Astron. Astrophys., 482, 631–638, 2008.Google Scholar
- Ekenbäck, A., M. Holmström, P. Wurz, J.-M. Grießmeier, H. Lammer, F Selsis, and T. Penz, Energetic neutral atoms around HD 209458b: Estimations of magnetospheric properties, Astrophys. J., 709, 670–679, 2010.Google Scholar
- Favata, F, G. Micela, S. L. Baliunas, J. H. M. M. Schmitt, M. Güdel, F R. Harnden, Jr., S. Sciortino, and R. A. Stern, High-amplitude, long-term X-ray variability in the solar-type star HD 81809: The beginning of an X-ray activity cycle?, Astron. Astrophys., 418, L13–L16, 2004.Google Scholar
- Favata, F, G. Micela, S. Orlando, J. H. M. M. Schmitt, S. Sciortino, and J. Hall, The X-ray cycle in the solar-type star HD 81809. XMM-Newton observations and implications for the coronal structure, Astron. Astrophys., 490, 1121–1126, 2008.Google Scholar
- Fox, J. L. and A. B. Hać, Photochemical escape of oxygen from Mars: A comparison of the exobase approximation to a Monte Carlo method, Icarus, 204, 527–554, 2009.Google Scholar
- Gaidos, E. J., M. Güdel, and G. A. Blake, The faint young Sun paradox: An observational test of an alternative solar model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 501–503, 2000.Google Scholar
- Gümez de Castro, A. I., I. Pagano, M. Sachkov, A. Lecavelier des Etangs, G. Piotto, R. González, and B. Shustov, Science with the world space observatory–ultraviolet, in New Quests in Stellar Astrophysics. II. Ultraviolet Properties of Evolved Stellar Populations, Proceedings of the International Conference held in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, April 16–20, 2007, edited by Chavez, M., E. Bertone, D. Rosa-Gonzalez, and L. H. Rodriguez-Merino, 319–327 pp., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
- Grießmeier, J. M., U. Motschmann, A. Stadelmann, T. Penz, H. Lammer, F Selsis, I. Ribas, E. F Guinan, H. K. Biernat, and W. W. Weiss, The effect of tidal locking on the magnetospheric and atmospheric evolution of “Hot Jupiter”, Astron. Astrophys., 425,753–762, 2004.Google Scholar
- Grießmeier, J.-M., S. Preusse, M. Khodachenko, and U. Motschmann, Exoplanetary radio emission under different stellar wind conditions, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 618–630, 2007.Google Scholar
- Gröller, H., V I. Shematovich, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, H. Lammer, M. Pfleger, Yu. N. Kulikov, W Macher, U. V Amerstorfer, and H. K. Biernat, Venus’ atomic hot oxygen environment, J. Geophys. Res., 115, E12017, doi:10.1029/2010JE003697, 2010.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., Are coronae of magnetically active stars heated by flares?, Astrophys. J. Lett., 480, L121–L124, 1997.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., X-Ray Astronomy of stellar coronae, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 12,71-237, 2004.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., The Sun in Time: Activity and environment, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 4(3), 2007.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., J. H. M. M. Schmitt, and A. O. Benz, Microwave emission from X-ray bright solarlike stars: the F-G main sequence and beyond, Astron. Astrophys., 302, 775–787, 1995a.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., J. H. M. M. Schmitt, A. O. Benz, and N. M. Elias, II, The corona of the young solar analog EK Draconis, Astron. Astrophys., 301, 201–212, 1995b.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., E. F Guinan, R. Mewe, J. S. Kaastra, and S. L. Skinner, A determination of the coronal emission measure distribution in the young solar analog EK Draconis from ASCA/EUVE spectra, Astrophys. J., 479, 416–426, 1997.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M. and E. J. Gaidos, Deep radio observations of young solar analogs, in Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun: 11th Cambridge Workshop, edited by Garćýa López, R. J., R. Rebolo, and M. R. Zapate-rio Osorio, Proceedings of a meeting held at Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain, 4–8 October 1999,662–667 pp., ASP Conference Series 223, San Francisco, U.S.A., 2001.Google Scholar
- Güdel, M., M. Audard, V L. Kashyap, J.J. Drake, and E. F Guinan, Are coronae of magnetically active stars heated by flares? II. Extreme Ultraviolet and X-ray flare statistics and the differential emission measure distribution, Astrophys. J., 582, 423–442, 2003.Google Scholar
- Guinan, E. F and I. Ribas, Our changing Sun: the role of solar nuclear evolution and magnetic activity on Earth’s atmosphere and climate, in The Evolving Sun and its Influence on Planetary Environments, edited by Montesinos, B., A. Gimenz, and E. F Guinan, 85–107 pp, ASP 269, San Francisco, 2002.Google Scholar
- Guinan, E. F, I. Ribas, and G. M. Harper, Far-Ultraviolet emissions of the Sun in Time: Probing solar magnetic activity and effects on evolution of paleoplanetary atmospheres, Astrophys. J., 594, 561–572, 2003.Google Scholar
- Hall, L. A., J. E. Higgins, C. W. Chagnon, and H. E. Hinteregger, Solarcy-cle variation of the extreme ultraviolet radiation, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 4181–4183, 1969.Google Scholar
- Hedin, A. E., Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle and lower atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1159–1172, 1991.Google Scholar
- Hodges, R. R., Jr., Distributions of hot oxygen for Venus and Mars, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6971–6981, 2000.Google Scholar
- Holmstrom, M., A. Ekenback, F Selsis, T. Penz, H. Lammer, and P. Wurz, Energetic neutral atoms as the explanation for the high-velocity hydro-gen around HD 209458b, Nature, 451, 970–972, 2008.Google Scholar
- Hunten, D. M., Atmospheric evolution of the terrestrial planets, Science, 259, 915–920, 1993.Google Scholar
- Kasting, J. F., D. P. Whitmire, and R. T. Reynolds, Habitable zones around Main Sequence Stars, Icarus, 101, 108–128, 1993.Google Scholar
- Khodachenko, M. L., I. Ribas, H. Lammer, J.-M. Grießmeier, M. Leitner, F. Selsis, C. Eiroa, A. Hanslmeier, H. K. Biernat, C. J. Farrugia, and H. O. Rucker, Coronal mass ejection (CME) activity of low mass M Stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. I. CME impact on expected magnetospheres of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones, Astrobiology, 7, 167–184, 2007.Google Scholar
- Kim, J., A. F. Nagy, J. L. Fox, and T. E. Cravens, Solar cycle variability of hot oxygen atoms at Mars, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 29339–29342, 1998.Google Scholar
- King, R. R., M. J. McCaughrean, D. Homeier, F. Allard, R.-D. Scholz, and N. Lodieu, ϵ Indi Ba, Bb: A detailed study of the nearest known brown dwarfs, Astron. Astrophys., 510, A99, 2010.Google Scholar
- Kjeldsen, H., T. R. Bedding, and J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, Measurements of stellar properties through Asteroseismology: A tool for planet transit studies, in Transiting Planets, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 2009, IAU Symposium, 253, 309–317 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.Google Scholar
- Krestyanikova, M. A. and V. I. Shematovich, Stochastic models of hot planetary and satellite coronas: A hot oxygen corona of Mars, Sol. Syst. Res., 40, 384–392, 2006.Google Scholar
- Kulikov, Y. N., H. Lammer, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, N. Terada, I. Ribas, C. Kolb, D. Langmayr, R. Lundin, E. F Guinan, S. Barabash, and h. K. Biernat, Atmospheric and water loss from early Venus, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 1425–1444, 2006.Google Scholar
- Kulikov, Y. N., H. Lammer, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, T. Penz, D. Breuer, T. Spohn, R. Lundin, and h. K. Biernat, A comparative study of the influence of the active young Sun on the early atmospheres of Earth, Venus and Mars, Space Sci. Rev., 129, 207–243, 2007.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H. and S. J. Bauer, Nonthermal atmospheric escape from Mars and Titan, J. Geophys. Res.,96, 1819–1825, 1991.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., H. I. M. Lichtenegger, C. Kolb, I. Ribas, E. F Guinan, R. Abart, and S. J. Bauer, Loss of water from Mars: Implications for the oxidation of the soil, Icarus, 106, 9–25, 2003.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., H. I. M. Lichtenegger, H. K. Biernat, N. V Erkaev, I. L. Ar-shukova, C. Kolb, H. Gunell, A. Lukyanov, M. Holmström, S. Barabash, T. L. Zhang, and W. Baumjohann, Loss of hydrogen and oxygen from the upper atmosphere of Venus, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 1445–1456, 2006.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., H. I. M. Lichtenegger, Yu. N. Kulikov, J.-M. Grieß2meier, N. Terada, N. V Erkaev, H. K. Biernat, M. L. Khodachenko, I. Ribas, T. Penz, and F Selsis, Coronal mass ejection (CME) activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. II. CME-induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones, Astrobiology, 7, 185–207, 2007.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., J. F Kasting, E. Chassefière, R. E. Johnson, Yu. N. Kulikov, and F Tian, Atmospheric escape and evolution of terrestrial planets and satellites, Space Sci. Rev., 139, 399–436, 2008.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., J. H. Bredehoft, A. Coustenis, M. L. Khodachenko, L. Kaltenegger, O. Grasset, D. Prieur, F Raulin, P. Ehrenfreund, M. Ya-mauchi, J.-E. Wahlund, J.-M. Grießmeier, G. Stangl, C. S. Cockell, Yu. N. Kulikov, L. Grenfell, and H. Rauer, What makes a planet habitable?, Astron. Astrophys., 17, 181–249, 2009.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., A. Hanslmeier, J. Schneider, I. K. Stateva, M. Barthelemy, A. Belu, D. Bisikalo, M. Bonavita, V Eybl, V Coudé Du Foresto, M. Frid-lund, R. Dvorak, S. Eggl, J.-M. Grießmeier, M. Güdel, E. Gunther, W. Hausleitner, M. Holmström, E. Kallio, M. L. Khodachenko, A. A. Kono-valenko, S. Krauss, L. V Ksanfomality, Yu. N. Kulikov, K. Kyslyakova, M. Leitzinger, R. Liseau, E. Lohinger, P. Odert, E. Palle, A. Reiners, I. Ribas, H. O. Rucker, N. Sarda, J. Seckbach, V I. Shematovich, A. Sozzetti, A. Tavrov, and M. Xiang-Grüß, Exoplanet status report: Observation, characterization and evolution of exoplanets and their host stars, Sol. Syst. Res., 44, 290–310, 2010.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., K. G. Kislyakova, M. Holmström, M. L. Khodachenko, and J.-M. Grießmeier, Hydrogen ENA-cloud observation and modeling as a tool to study star-exoplanet interaction, Astrophys. Space Sci., 335, 9–23, doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0604-2, 2011a.Google Scholar
- Lammer, H., V Eybl, K. G. Kislyakova, J. Weingrill, M. Holmström, M. L. Khodchenko, Yu. N. Kulikov, A. Reiners, M. Leitzinger, P. Odert, M. Xian Grüß, B. Dorner, M. Güdel, and A. Hanslmeier, UV transit observations of EUV-heated expanded thermospheres of Earth-like exoplanets around M-stars: Testing atmosphere evolution scenarios, Astrophys. Space Sci., 335, 39–50, doi:10.1007/s10509-011-0646-5, 2011b.Google Scholar
- Lanza, A. F, I. Pagano, G. Leto, S. Messina, S. Aigrain, R. Alonso, M. Auvergne, A. Baglin, P. Barge, A. S. Bonomo, P. Boumier, A. Collier Cameron, M. Comparato, G. Cutispoto, J. R. de Medeiros, B. Foing, A. Kaiser, C. Moutou, P. S. Parihar, A. Silva-Valio, and W. W. Weiss, Magnetic activity in the photosphere of CoRoT-Exo-2a. Active longitudes and short-term spot cycle in a young Sun-like star, Astron. Astrophys., 493, 193–200,2009.Google Scholar
- Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D. Ehrenreich, A. Vidal-Madjar, G. E. Ballester, J.-M. Désert, R. Ferlet, G. Hébrard, D. K. Sing, K.-O. Tchak-oumegni, and S. Udry, Evaporation of the planet HD 189733b observed in H I Lyman-α, Astron. Astrophys., 514, A72, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913347, 2010.Google Scholar
- Lichtenegger, H. I. M., H. Gröller, H. Lammer, Y N. Kulikov, and V I. Shematovich, On the elusive hot oxygen corona of Venus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10204, doi:10.1029/2009GL037575, 2009.Google Scholar
- Lichtenegger, H. I. M., H. Lammer, J.-M. Grießmeier, Yu. N. Kulikov, P. von Paris, W Hausleitner, S. Krauss, and H. Rauer, Aeronomical evidence for higher CO2 levels during Earth’s Hadean epoch, Icarus, 210, 1–7, 2010.Google Scholar
- Lim, J. and S. M. White, Limits to mass outflows from late-type dwarf stars, Astrophys. J. Lett., 462, L91–L94, 1996.Google Scholar
- Lundin, R., H. Lammer, and I. Ribas, Planetary magnetic fields and solar forcing: Implications for atmospheric evolution, Space Sci. Rev., 129, 245–278, 2007.Google Scholar
- Mackay, D. H., M. Jardine, A. Collier Cameron, J. F Donati, and G. A. J. Hussain, Polar caps on active stars: magnetic flux emergence and transport, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, 354, 737–752, 2004.Google Scholar
- Massi, M., J. Neidhöfer, G. Torricelli-Ciamponi, and F Chiuderi-Drago, Activity cycles in UX ARIETIS, Astron. Astrophys., 332, 149–154, 1998.Google Scholar
- Messina, S. and E. F Guinan, Magnetic activity of six young solar analogues I. Star spot cycles from long-term photometry, Astron. Astrophys., 393, 225–237, 2002.Google Scholar
- Messina, S. and E. F Guinan, Magnetic activity of six young solar analogues II. Surface differential rotation from long-term photometry, Astron. Astrophys., 409, 1017–1030, 2003.Google Scholar
- Montes, D., J. López-Santiago, M. C. Gálvez, M. J. Fernández-Figueroa, E. De Castro, and M. Cornide, Late-type members of young stellar kinematic groups-I. Single stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc, 328, 45–63, 2001.Google Scholar
- Nagy, A. F, T. E. Cravens, J. H. Yee, and A. I. F Stewart, Hot oxygen atoms in the upper atmosphere of Venus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 8, 629–632, 1981.Google Scholar
- Newkirk Jr., G., Solar variability on time scales of 109.6 years to 109.6 years, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Suppl., 13, 293–301, 1980.Google Scholar
- Newman, M. J. and R. T. Rood, Implications of solar evolution for the Earth’s early atmosphere, Science, 198, 1035–1037, 1977.Google Scholar
- Öpik, E. J., Selective escape of gases, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 7, 490–509, 1963.Google Scholar
- Owen, T, The Martian atmosphere-Some unanswered questions, J. Mol. Evol., 14, 5–12, 1979.Google Scholar
- Peres, G., S. Orlando, F Reale, R. Rosner, and H. Hudson, The Sun as an X-ray star. II. Using the Yohkoh/Soft X-ray telescope-derived solar emission measure versus temperature to interpret stellar X-ray observations, Astrophys. J., 528, 537–551, 2000.Google Scholar
- Pham, Le Binh San, Ö. Karatekin, and V Dehant, Effects of meteorite impacts on the atmospheric evolution of Mars, Astrobiology, 9, 45–54, 2009.Google Scholar
- Phillips, R. J., M. T. Zuber, S. C. Solomon, M. P. Golombek, B. M. Jakosky, W. B. Banerdt, D. E. Smith, R. M. E. Williams, B. M. Hynek, O. Aharonson, and S. A. Hauck, Ancient geodynamics and global-scale hydrology on Mars, Science, 291, 2587–2592, 2001.Google Scholar
- Ribas, I., E. F Guinan, M. Güdel, and M. Audard, Evolution of the solar activity overtime and effects on planetary atmospheres. I. High-energy irradiances (1-1700 Å), Astrophys. J., 622, 680–694, 2005.Google Scholar
- Rieger, E., G. H. Share, D. J. Forrest, G. Kanbach, C. Reppin, and E. L. Chupp, Nature, 312, 623–625, 1984.Google Scholar
- Roble, R. G., E. C. Ridley, and R. E. Dickinson, On the global mean structure of the thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8745–8758, 1987.Google Scholar
- Robrade, J., J. H. M. M. Schmitt, and F Favata, X-rays from α-Centauri-The darkening of the solar twin, Astron. Astrophys, 442,315–321,2005.Google Scholar
- Sagan, C. and G. Mullen, Earth and Mars: Evolution of atmospheres and surface temperatures, Science, 177, 52–56, 1972.Google Scholar
- Sanz-Forcada, J., N. S. Brickhouse, and A. K. Dupree, The structure of stellar coronae in active binary systems, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 145, 147–179, 2003.Google Scholar
- Sanz-Forcada, J., G. Micela, I. Ribas, A. M. T. Pollock, C. Eiroa, A. Velasco, E. Solano, and D. García-Álvarez, Evaporation in close planets produced by XUV radiation, Astron. Astrophys., 532, A6, 2011.Google Scholar
- Scalo, J., L. Kaltenegger, A. G. Segura, M. Fridlund, I. Ribas, Yu. N. Kulikov, J. L. Grenfell, H. Rauer, P. Odert, M. Leitzinger, F. Selsis, M. L. Khodachenko, C. Eiroa, J. Kasting, and H. Lammer, M stars as targets for terrestrial exoplanet searches and biosignature detection, Astrobiology, 7, 85–166, 2007.Google Scholar
- Schrijver, K. J. and A. M. Title, On the formation of polar spots in Sun-like stars, Astrophys. J., 551, 1099–1106, 2001.Google Scholar
- Schüssler, M. and S. A. Solanki, Why rapid rotators have polar spots, Astron. Astrophys., 264, L13–L16, 1992.Google Scholar
- Schüssler, M., P. Caligari, A. Ferriz-mas, S. A. Solanki, and M. Stix, Distribution of starspots on cool stars. I. Young and main sequence stars of 1MSun, Astron. Astrophys., 314, 503–512, 1996.Google Scholar
- Sekiya, M., K. Nakazawa, and C. Hayashi, Dissipation of the primordial terrestrial atmosphere due to irradiation of the solar EUV, Prog. Theor. Phys., 64, 1968–1985, 1980a.Google Scholar
- Sekiya, M., K. Nakazawa, and C. Hayashi, Dissipation of the rare gases contained in the primordial Earth’s atmosphere, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 50, 197–201, 1980b.Google Scholar
- Shematovich, V. I., D. Bisikalo, S. Krauss, W. Hausleitner, and H. Lammer, Influence of the hot oxygen corona on the satellite drag in the Earth’s upper atmosphere, Sol. Syst. Res., 45, 238–246, 2011.Google Scholar
- Shustov, B., M. Sachov, A. I. Gomez de Castro, I. Ana, and I. Pagano, WSO-UVultraviolet mission for the next decade, Astrophys. Space Sci., 320, 187–190, 2009.Google Scholar
- Skumanich, A. and J. A. Eddy, Aspects of long-term variability in Sun and stars, in Solar Phenomena in Stars and Stellar Systems, 349–397 pp., D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1981.Google Scholar
- Smithtro, C. G. and J. J. Sojka, A new global average model of the coupled thermosphere and ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A08305, doi:10.1029/2004JA010781, 2005a.Google Scholar
- Smithtro, C. G. and J. J. Sojka, Behavior of the ionosphere and thermosphere subject to extreme solar cycle conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 110(A8), A08306, 2005b.Google Scholar
- Soderblom, D. R., The ages of stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 48,581–629, 2010.Google Scholar
- Soderblom, D. R. and M. Mayor, Stellar kinematic groups. I. The Ursa Major group, Astron. J., 105, 226–249, 1993.Google Scholar
- Stankov, A., M. Baldesarra, O. Piersanti, M. Fridlund, R. Lindberg, and N. Rando, Definition phase activities for ESA’s Cosmic Vision mission PLATO, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, edited by Oschmann, J. M., Jr., M. C. Clampin, and H. A. MacEwen, Proceedings of the SPIE, 7731,77311M–77311M, pp. 2010.Google Scholar
- Strassmeier, K. G., Starspots, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 17, 251–308, 2009.Google Scholar
- Sutton, E. K., J. M. Forbes, R. S. Nerem, and T. N. Woods, Neutral density response to the solar flares of October and November, 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L22101, doi:10.1029/2006GL027737, 2006Google Scholar
- Telleschi, A., M. Güdel, K. Briggs, M. Audard, J.-U. Ness, and S. L. Skinner, Coronal evolution of the Sun in Time: High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy of solar analogs with different ages, Astrophys. J., 622, 653–679, 2005.Google Scholar
- Terada, N., Yu. N. Kulikov, H. Lammer, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, T. Tanaka, H. Shinagawa, and T. Zhang, Atmosphere and water loss from early Mars under extreme solar wind and Extreme Ultraviolet conditions, Astrobiology, 9, 55–70, 2009.Google Scholar
- Tian, F, Thermal escape from super Earth atmospheres in the habitable zones of M Stars, Astrophys. J., 703, 905–909, 2009.Google Scholar
- Tian, F, O. B. Toon, A. A. Pavlov, and H. De Sterck, A hydrogen-rich early Earth atmosphere, Science, 308, 1014–1017, 2005.Google Scholar
- Tian, F, J. F Kasting, H. Liu, and R. G. Roble, Hydrodynamic planetary thermosphere model: 1. The response of the Earth’s thermosphere to extreme solar EUV conditions and the significance of adiabatic cooling, J. Geophys. Res., 113, doi:10.1029/2007JE002946, 2008a.Google Scholar
- Tian, F, S. C. Solomon, L. Qian, J. Lei, and R. G. Roble, Hydro-dynamic planetary thermosphere model: 2. Coupling of an electron transport/energy deposition model, J. Geophys. Res., 113(E7), E07005, 2008b.Google Scholar
- Tian, F, J. F Kasting, and S. C. Solomon, Thermal escape of carbon from the early Martian atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(2), L02205,2009.Google Scholar
- Tobiska, W. K., Recent solar extreme ultraviolet irradiance observations and modelling: A review, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 18879–18893, 1993.Google Scholar
- Tobiska, W. K. and F G. Eparvier, EUV97: Improvements to EUV irradiance modeling in the soft X-rays and FUV, Sol. Phys., 177, 147–159, 1998.Google Scholar
- Valeille, A., M. R. Combi, V. Tenishev, S. W. Bougher, and A. F Nagy, A study of suprathermal oxygen atoms in Mars upper thermosphere and exosphere over the range of limiting conditions, Icarus, 206, 18–27, 2010.Google Scholar
- Vecchio, A., M. Laurenza, V. Carbone, and M. Storini, Quasi-biennial modulation of solar neutrino flux and solar and galactic cosmic rays by solar cyclic activity, Astrophys. J., 709, L1–L5, 2010.Google Scholar
- Vidal-Madjar, A., A. Lecavelier des Etangs, J. M. Désert, G. E. Ballester, R. Ferlet, G. Hébrard, and M. Mayor, An extended upper atmosphere around the extrasolar planet HD209458b, Nature, 422, 143–146, 2003.Google Scholar
- Walker, J. C. G., Evolution of the atmosphere of Venus, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1248–1256, 1975.Google Scholar
- Walker, G. A. H., B. Croll, R. Kuschnig, A. Walker, S. M. Rucinski, J. M. Matthews, D. B. Guenther, A. F J. Moffat, D. Sasselov, and W W. Weiss, The differential rotation of κ1Ceti as observed by MOST, Astrophys. J., 659, 1611–1622, 2007.Google Scholar
- Wargelin, B. J. and J. J. Drake, Observability of stellar winds from late-type dwarfs via charge exchange X-ray emission, Astrophys. J. Lett., 546, L57–L60, 2001.Google Scholar
- Watson, A. J., T. M. Donahue, and J. C. G. Walker, The dynamics of a rapidly escaping atmosphere: applications to the evolution of Earth and Venus, Icarus, 48, 150–166, 1981.Google Scholar
- Wood, B. E., Astrospheres and solar-like stellar winds, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 1(2), 2004.Google Scholar
- Wood, B. E. and J. L. Linsky, The Local ISM and its interaction with the winds of nearby late-type stars, Astrophys. J., 492, 788–803, 1998.Google Scholar
- Wood, B. E., H.-R. Müller, G. Zank, and J. L. Linsky, Measured mass loss rates of solar-like stars as a function of age and activity, Astrophys. J., 574, 412–425, 2002.Google Scholar
- Wood, B. E., H.-R. Müller, G. P. Zank, J. L. Linsky, and S. Redfield, New mass-loss measurements from astrospheric Ly-α absorption, Astrophys. J., 628, L143–L146, 2005.Google Scholar
- Zahnle, K. J. and J. C. G. Walker, The evolution of solar ultraviolet luminosity, Rev. Geophys., 20, 280–292, 1982.Google Scholar
- Zaqarashvili, T. V, M. Carbonell, R. Oliver, and J. L. Ballester, Magnetic Rossby waves in the solar tachocline and Rieger-type periodicities, Astrophys. J., 709,749–758, 2010a.Google Scholar
- Zaqarashvili, T. V, M. Carbonell, R. Oliver, and J. L. Ballester, Quasi-biennial oscillations in the solar tachocline caused by magnetic Rossby wave instabilities, Astrophys. J. Lett., 724, L95–L98, 2010b.Google Scholar
- Zaqarashvili, T. V, R. Oliver, J. L. Ballester, M. Carbonell, M. L. Khodachenko, H. Lammer, M. Leitzinger, and P. Odert, Rossby waves and polar spots in rapidly rotating stars: implications for stellar wind evolution, Astron. Astrophys., 532, A139, 2011.Google Scholar