- Open Access
Three-dimensional numerical modeling of tsunami-related internal gravity waves in the Hawaiian atmosphere
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2011
Received: 8 April 2011
Accepted: 30 June 2011
Published: 27 September 2011
The tremendous tsunami following the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake produced internal gravity waves (IGWs) in the neutral atmosphere and large disturbances in the overlying ionospheric plasma while propagating through the Pacific ocean. To corroborate the tsunamigenic hypothesis of these perturbations, we use a 3D numerical modeling of the ocean-atmosphere coupling, to reproduce the tsunami signature observed in the airglow by the imager located in Hawaii and clearly showing the shape of the modeled IGW. The agreement between data and synthetics not only supports the interpretation of the tsunami-related-IGW behavior, but strongly shows that atmospheric and ionospheric remote sensing can provide new tools for oceanic monitoring and tsunami detection.
After the 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake and the consequent Indian Ocean Tsunami, the scientific community put its attention to alternative methods in oceanic monitoring to improve the response of tsunami detection and estimation.
Improvement of classic techniques, such as seismic source estimation (e.g., Ammon et al., 2006) and densifi-cation of the number of buoys in the oceans (González et al., 2005), was supported by a new effort in remote sensing: nominally the space-altimetry observation of the tsunami in the open sea (Okal et al., 1999; Smith et al., 2005) and the tsunami detection by ionospheric monitoring (Artru et al., 2005; Occhipinti et al., 2006). The recent devastating tsunamigenic earthquake occurred on 11 March, 2011, off the Pacific coast of Tohoku (Mw = 9.3, 05:47:32 UT,), indicating once again the importance of moving forward in this direction.
The encouraging work of Artru et al. (2005) on the detection of the Peruvian tsunamigenic quake on 23 June, 2001 (Mw = 8.4 at 20:33 UT) in the total electron content (TEC) measured by the Japanese dense GPS network, GEONET, opened the modern debate about the feasibility of tsunami detection by ionospheric sounding. The giant tsunami following the Sumatra-Andaman event (Mw = 9.3, 00:58:50 UT, 26 December, 2004, Lay et al., 2005), an order of magnitude larger than the Peruvian tsunami, provided worldwide remote sensing observations in the ionosphere, giving the opportunity to deeply explore ionospheric tsunami detection by ionospheric sounding (DasGupta et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2006a, b; Lognonné et al., 2006; Occhipinti et al., 2006, 2008b).
The theoretical and numerical work of Occhipinti et al. (2006) supported by TEC observation from the on-board altimeters Topex/Poseidon and Jason-1 quantitatively confirms the link between the ionospheric perturbation and the sea level displacement induced by the tsunami propagation.
Recent observational works highlight systematic ionospheric tsunami detection following several events with magnitude around 8 (Kuril 2006, Samoa 2009 and Chile 2010) utilizing GPS-derived TEC performed by moderatly-sized networks, such as those on Hawaii (Rolland et al., 2010; Galvan et al., 2011).
Subsequent modeling studies estimate the role of the geomagnetic field in the tsunami signature at the E-region and F-region (Occhipinti et al., 2008a) as well as the detection possibility by over-the-horizon radar (Coïsson et al., 2011)
More recently, Hickey et al. (2010) have suggested that appreciable airglow modulations in the 630.0-nm intensity should be expected. However, the first observations of this effect were not made until the 2011 Tohoku earthquake (Makela et al., 2011).
In this work, we model the IGW passing over Hawaii produced by the propagation of the Tohoku tsunami through the Pacific Ocean in order to reproduce the airglow observation measured by the ground-based camera located on the Haleakala Volcano on Maui, Hawaii (Makela et al, 2011).
Following Occhipinti et al. (2006, 2008a) we compute, by three-dimentional numerical modeling, the atmospheric IGWs induced by the propagation of the 11 March 2011 tsunami in the overlying atmosphere. In essence, the IGW modeling is divided into two steps: first, we compute the tsunami propagation using a realistic bathymetry taking into account the Earth sphericity, then we compute the excited IGW in the neutral atmosphere in a cartesian coordinate system.
The ocean surface displacement is calculated using a finite difference scheme that resolves the hydrodynamical equations on a 30″ bathymetric grid following Hébert et al. (2007). The input earthquake source consists of the USGS finite fault model (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes).
Tsunami propagation is calculated through the whole Pacific Ocean every minute during the 12 hours following the earthquake.
The vertical velocity produced by the sea level displacement is used as input to the pseudo spectral propagator based on the linearised momentum and continuity equations, for irrotational, inviscid and incompressible flow (see Occhipinti et al. (2006, 2008a) for more details).
Attenuation effects, such as viscosity and thermal conduction, are neglected in our model as we are principally interested to the shape of the tsunami signature in the air-glow data. Anyway, we highlight that their effect at 250 km of altitude reduces by a factor 5 the amplitude of the IGWs (Hickey et al., 2009).
As a consequence of the combined effect of the period and the bathymetry on the IGW group velocities, the IGWs generated before the interaction with the Hawaiian archipelagos and the Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain, go beyond the tsunami wave front during their propagation in the atmosphere.
This effect is visible in the vertical cross-section of the IGW close to Hawaii (Fig. 2) as well as on the IGW propagating at 250 km of altitude, clearly highlighting the differentiation link to the period (Fig. 3(a–b)): the longer wavelength IGW (indicated by the X in Fig. 3) is over the tsunami wavefront where the shorter wavelength IGW with the “Y” shape stay behind the tsunami wavefront. We note that this effect is also visible in the airglow data (Fig. 3(a)).
3. Comparison with Hawaiian Airglow Observation
The tsunami reached Hawaii during the night hours with a predominantly clear sky, optimal conditions to detect the expected IGWs by optical sensors. The highly sensitive, wide-angle camera system located atop the Haleakala Volcano on Maui, Hawaii, was able to record the airglow emission at 630.0 nm with a temporal resolution of approximately 5 minutes during the time when the tsunami was crossing that area. The spatial coverage of the observation is approximately 106 km2 in the ionosphere at the assumed emission altitude of 250 km. The 630.0-nm airglow emission is produced by the dissociative recombination of (Link and Cogger, 1988) and is sensitive to both changes in the electron and neutral densities.
Comparison between the modeled IGW and the airglow observation in Fig. 3 shows several interesting likenesses explaining the nature of the airglow observation:
The Y shape presents in our IGW modeling is also recognizable in the data, this is clear evidence of the tsunami nature of the airglow observation. Additionally, we highlight a longer wavelength signal (X) in both airglow data and IGW modeling, arriving before the Y curved feature and also before the tsunami arrival time (white dotted line). This effect has been detailed in the previous section and is the consequence of the low bathymetry around Hawaii.
The Y curved feature also allows us to quantify the shift of 2° between airglow data and the synthetic IGW (Fig. 3(c)). A similar shift was observed by Occhipinti et al. (2006) in comparison between altimeters-TEC data and synthetics, and is most likely due to the zonal and meridional wind neglected in our modeling.
The tremendous tsunami following the 11 March 2011 Tohoku mega-quake generated a huge amount of data all around the Pacific Ocean. This event particularly highlight, for the first time, the possibility to detect tsunami relate IGW with the ground-based airglow camera located in Hawaii (Makela et al, 2011).
The observed airglow signal presents several questions and uncertainties that are explored here with the support of the three-dimensional modeling of the tsunami related IGW propagating in the atmosphere overlying the Hawaiian archipelagos.
The comparison with the modeling, first, highlights the tsunamic nature of the airglow data by the characteristic “Y” shape appearing in both synthetics and data; second, it explains the anticipated signal arriving before the tsunami front-wave, and finally, it allows quantification of the shift of 2° mainly due to the wind effect.
This preliminary result motivate the development of a full modeling of the airglow observation taking into account, not only the wind, but above all the different ionized species taking part in the formation of the airglow signal, as well as the observational geometry of the ground-based camera.
Waiting for a full airglow modeling, the effort of this preliminary work highlights that remote sensing of tsunamis via the atmospheric/ionospheric monitoring by ground-based or on-board camera is a mature technique for oceanic monitoring and can take a role in the future of tsunami detection.
This project is supported by the CNES, and PNTS/INSU. This work has been supported by the French Space Agency CNES and by the Unite States Office of Naval Research (ONR) Global under contract IONONAMI-N07-25. Work at the University of Illinois was supported by the United States Office of Naval Research (ONR) through grant N00014-09-1-0439 and the National Science Foundation through grant ATM 06-44654 CAR. We thank Dr R. McCoy for fruitful discussion and bridging the US and French groups. We thank M. Hickey and an anonymous reviewer for their accurate and constructive remarks. This is IPGP contribution 3180.
- Ammon, C. J., A. A. Velasco, and T. Lay, Rapid estimation of first-order rupture characteristics for large earthquakes using surface waves: 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett.,33, L14314, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Artru, J., V. Ducic, H. Kanamori, P. Lognonne, and M. Murakami, Ionospheric detection of gravity waves induced by tsunamis, J. Geophys. Res.,160, 840, 2005.Google Scholar
- Coisson, P., G. Occhipinti, P. Lognonne, J. P. Molinie, and L. M. Rolland, Tsunami signature in the ionosphere: the innovative role of OTH radar, Radio Sci., 2011 (under revision).Google Scholar
- DasGupta, A., A. Das, D. Hui, K. K. Bandyopadhyay, and M. R. Sivara-man, Ionospheric perturbation observed by the GPS following the December 26th, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Earth Planets Space,35, 929–959, 2006.Google Scholar
- Galvan, D. A., A. Komjathy, M. P. Hickey, and A. J. Mannucci, The 2009 Samoa and 2010 Chile tsunamis as observed in the ionosphere using GPS total electron content, J. Geophys. Res.,116, A06318, doi:10.1029/2010JA016204, 2011.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, F. I., E. N. Bernard, C. Meinig, M. C. Eble, H. O. Mofjeld, and S. Stalin, The NTHMP tsunameter network, Nat. Hazards,35, 25–39, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hebert, H., A. Sladen, and F. Schindelé, The great 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: numerical modeling of the impact in the Mascarene Islands, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,97(1A), S208–S222, 2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hickey, M. P., G. Schubert, and R. L. Walterscheid, The Propagation of Tsunami-Driven Gravity Waves into the Thermosphere and Ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.,114, A08304, doi:10.1029/2009JA014105, 2009.Google Scholar
- Hickey, M. P., G. Schubert, and R. L. Walterscheid, Atmospheric airglow fluctuations due to a tsunami-driven gravity wave disturbance, J. Geophys. Res.,115, A06308, doi:10.1029/2009JA014977, 2010.Google Scholar
- Hines, C. O., Gravity waves in the atmosphere, Nature,239, 73–78, 1972.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kelley, M. C, F. J. Garcia, J. Makela, T. Fan, E. Mak, C. Sia, and D. Alcocer, Highly structured tropical airglow and TEC signatures during strong geomagnetic activity,Geophys. Res. Lett.,27(4), 465–468, 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lay, T., H. Kanamori, C. J. Ammon, M. Nettles, S. N. Ward, R. C. Aster, S. L. Beck, S. L. Bilek, M. R. Brudzinski, R. Butler, H. R. DeShon, G. Ekstrom, K. Satake, and S. Sipkin, The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004, Science,308, 1127–1133, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Link, R. and L. L. Cogger, A reexamination of the O I 6300-A nightglow, J. Geophys. Res.,93(A9), 9883–9892, 1988.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu, J. Y, Y B. Tsai, S. W Chen, C. P. Lee, Y C. Chen, H. Y. Yen, W. Y Chang, and C. Liu, Giant ionospheric distrubances excited by the M9.3 Sumatra earthquake of 26 December 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett.,33, L02103, doi:10.1029/2005GL023963, 2006a.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., Y. Tsai, K. Ma, Y. Chen, H. Tsai, C. Lin, M. Kamogawa, and C. Lee, Ionospheric GPS total electron content (TEC) disturbances triggered by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, J. Geophys. Res.,111, A05303, doi:10.1029/2005JA011200, 2006b.Google Scholar
- Lognonne, P., J. Artru, R. Garcia, F. Crespon, V. Ducic, E. Jeansou, G. Occhipinti, J. Helbert, G. Moreaux, and P. E. Godet, Ground based GPS imaging of ionospheric post-seismic signal, Planet. Space Sci.,54, 528–540, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makela, J. J. and M. C. Kelley, Using the 630.0-nm nightglow emission as a surrogate for the ionospheric Pedersen conductivity, J. Geophys. Res.,108(A6), 1253, doi:10.1029/2003JA009894, 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makela, J. J., P. Lognonné, H. Hébert, T. Gehrels, L. Rolland, S. Allgeyer, A. Kherani, G. Occhipinti, E. Astafyeva, P. Coïsson, A. Loevenbruck, E. Clévédé, M. C. Kelley, and J. Lamouroux, Imaging and modelling the ionospheric response to the 11 March 2011 Sendai Tsunami over Hawaii, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2011 (accepted).Google Scholar
- Occhipinti, G., P. Lognonné, E. Alam Kherani, and H. Hébert, Three-dimensional waveform modeling of ionospheric signature induced by the 2004 Sumatra tsunami, Geophys. Res. Lett.,33, L20104, doi:10.1029/2006GL026865, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Occhipinti, G., E. Alam Kherani, and P. Lognonné, Geomagnetic dependence of ionospheric disturbances induced by tsunami-genic internal gravity waves, Geophys. J. Int., doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03760.x, 2008a.Google Scholar
- Occhipinti, G., A. Komjathy, and P. Lognonne, Tsunami detection by GPS: how ionospheric observation might improve the Global Warning System, GPS World, 50–56, Feb., 2008b.Google Scholar
- Okal, E. A., A. Piatanesi, and P. Heinrich, Tsunami detection by satellite altimetry, J. Geophys. Res.,104, 599–615, 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peltier, W. R. and C. O. Hines, On the possible detection of tsunamis by a monitoring of the ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.,81(12), 1995–2000, 1976.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rolland, L., G. Occhipinti, P. Lognonné, and A. Loevenbruck, The 29 September 2009 Samoan tsunami in the ionosphere detected offshore Hawaii, Geophys. Res. Lett.,37, L17191, doi:10.1029/2010GL044479, 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smith, W., R. Scharroo, V. Titov, D. Arcas, and B. Arbic, Satellite altimeters measure Tsunami, Oceanography,18(2), 11–13, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar