Open Access

Electrical signatures of the Earth’s crust in central India as inferred from magnetotelluric study

Earth, Planets and Space201263:6301201175

Received: 27 January 2010

Accepted: 4 August 2011

Published: 21 February 2012


The tectonic scenario of the Narmada-Son Lineament (NSL) zone has been the subject of debate for the last few decades. It is characterized tectonically as a highly-disturbed zone in Indian geology since Precambrian times. A magnetotelluric (MT) study has been carried out across the NSL zone along a 270-km-long N-S-trending traverse, extending from Hoshangabad in the North to Ner in the South. As a part of the present study, 25 magnetotelluric soundings have been collected and the data rotated to N70°E after removing local distortions, arising from 3D galvanic effects, using the Groom-Bailey decomposition technique. 2-D inversion has been carried out using an NLCG scheme. The results derived from the 2-D inversion have brought out the highly conductive nature of the mid-lower crust at places coinciding with the known faults. The significant high heat flow and seismicity in the region associated with these faults may be caused by tectonic activity and the highly conductive nature of the mid-lower crust. This may be due to the partial melting of subsurface rocks resulting from the high temperature caused by mantle upwarping in the region. The results are also compared with the gravity and a nearby Deep Seismic Sounding (DSS).

Key words

Magnetotelluricsdeep crustNarmada-Tapti regionelectrical conductivityseismotectonics

1. Introduction

The Narmada-Son Lineament (NSL) is a late Archean mega geo-fracture extending for about 1200 km across the Indian peninsula in the E-W/ENE-WSW direction. Tecton-ically, this lineament is highly disturbed and reactivation of this lineament is believed to be due to the collision of the Indian plate with the Eurasian plate. As a result, the rigid continental crust has broken down along the pre-existing fracture system (Jain et al., 1984). Detailed geological studies of the region have been reported (West, 1962; Wellman and Mc Elhinny, 1970; Ghosh, 1976 etc.). The origin of the lineament is believed to have been formed in two distinctly different periods—after the commencement of the eruption of the Deccan traps, and the period prior to it. From various geological studies, this lineament is shown to be situated close to the zones of fractures belonging to early Precam-brian, Cretaceous and post-Deccan trap period. The Nar-mada valley dates back predominantly to the pre-Deccan trap period. Although the tectonic movements began significantly before the Deccan traps, it is still active as is attested by the number of earthquakes reported along the lineament (Ramalingeswara Rao and Sitapathi Rao, 1984).

Though several geophysical studies have been carried out earlier(Kaila et al., 1985; Verma and Banerjee, 1992; Singh and Meissner, 1995; Tewari and Prakash Kumar, 2003; Mall et al., 2005) including MT studies (Gokarn et al., 2001; Rao et al., 2004; Patro et al., 2005; Harinarayana et al., 2007; Naidu and Harinarayana, 2009) to understand the tectonic scenario of the lineament, the present study has been undertaken in order to add value to the earlier results. A major contribution from the present study is to understand the nature of the crust and mantle structure more clearly and also to examine the electrical signatures of the surface mapped faults such as the Narmada South Fault (NSF), Tapti Fault (TF), Gavligarh Fault (GF) and Purna Fault (PF), etc. The present study has been carried out along a N-S-trending traverse, with a total of 25 MT sites, of about 270-km long from Hoshangabad towards the north to Ner towards the south. The traverse cuts across the major faults mentioned above and various geological formations of different ages, as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Location of the Hoshangabad-Ner traverse (MT soundings are black triangles) plotted on a geological and tectonic map of the present study area (GSI, 2000). The black solid line is the seismic line from Khajuriakalan (23.5°N, 77°E) to Pulgaon (20.75°N, 78.25°E).

2. Data Analysis

The MT data were collected using an ADU-06 (Metronix) in the frequency range of 1000–0.001 Hz. In order to obtain MT impedance tensor and magnetic transfer functions, robust single-station processing to down-weigh or discard outliers of impedance estimates was used at each frequency in the band of measurement (Jupp and Vozoff, 1997). A typical example of the MT impedance tensor data is shown in Fig. 2(a).
Fig. 2

(a) A typical example of MT data for station 12. (b) Best fitted regional strike direction of N70°E and its 90° ambiguity N20°W are plotted using the Groom-Bailey decomposition technique (Rose diagram) in the frequency range of 100–0.001 Hz considering all the stations.

In order to obtain the strike angle free from near surface distortions, the impedance tensors at each site for all frequencies were decomposed using the Groom-Bailey decomposition method (Groom and Bailey, 1989). The impedance tensors for all frequencies (eight frequencies per decade and forty frequencies in five decades) at each site were rotated at intervals of 5° to obtain the shear and twist for each rotation. This determines the frequency invariant values of the shear and twist and also the range of the strike angles over which these parameters are reasonably stable. The shear and twist values obtained at each site were fixed and the unconstrained strike angles were obtained at each frequency for all the sites. The strike has a weak dependence on the twist and shear and thus such large variations are not unusual. The regional strike is constrained in the range of N55°E and N80°E over a range of frequencies (100–0.001 Hz) for all the sites, and a regional strike of N70°E is observed to be the best-fitting strike for most of the sites in the close vicinity of the major tectonic elements, as shown in the rose diagram (Fig. 2(b)). This suggests a regional strike direction of N70°E. In an earlier study (Patro et al., 2005), a nearby MT traverse located parallel to the present traverse, N75°E, is also obtained as a geo-electric strike. The apparent resistivity and phase along this direction are aligned to the TE-mode (electrical field parallel to the strike) and as the TM-mode (electrical field perpendicular to the strike). In the present study, the dimensionality indicator is estimated from the measured impedance tensor data. The observed Swift (Swift, 1967) and Bahr (Bahr, 1988) skew values fall below 0.3 for the majority of the frequencies ranging from 1000–0.001 Hz, as shown in Fig. 3(a), thus indicating the 2-D subsurface structure. Hence, the subsurface structure is assumed to be 2-D for further analysis.
Fig. 3

(a) Dimensionality parameters (Swift’s and Bahr’s skew) are plotted for the present data set. Dots in a grey color indicate the Swift skew whereas dots in black indicate the Bahr’s skew. (b) The rms error in percentage is plotted against model roughness to obtain the trade-off parameter (Hansen, 1998). Optimal trade-off parameter is chosen.

3. 2-D Inversion Results

The 2-D inversion has been carried out using the Rodi and Mackie’s (2001) RLM2DI code, as implemented in the WinGLink software package. This finds regularized solutions (Tikhonov Regularization) to the two-dimensional inverse problem for MT data using the method of nonlinear conjugate gradients (NLCG) to minimize an objective function that penalizes data residuals and second spatial derivatives of resistivity.

The trade-off parameter represents a measure of compromise between data fit and model smoothness. To find a suitable value of , the inversion procedure is repeated with different values of 5, 10, 15....... 50, 100 and an L curve (Hansen, 1998) is plotted between model roughness and rms error. The value corresponding to the corner of the curve (in our case, ) is considered to be the most appropriate for the model shown in Fig. 3(b). The inversion process was repeated with different starting models (homogeneous half space) of 50, 100, 500 and 1000 ohm-m and, for the final model, a resistivity of 100 ohm-m was set. Error floors of 20% for the apparent resistivity and 5% (1.5°) for the phase were assigned, thus down-weighing the apparent resistivity with respect to phase in minimizing the static shift effect on apparent resistivity. The root-mean-square (RMS) fit indicates the misfit between the observed and modeled data as a percentage. Here, the value of the misfit is 2.25% for the derived model after 100 iterations. Beyond this, the RMS misfit remained constant.

4. 2-D Geo-electric Crustal Structure

A 2-D geo-electric section derived from 2-D inversion is presented in Fig. 4(b). The geo-electric section is characterized by several less-resistive to high-resistive features all along the traverse. A basin like structure with thin trap and sediments is clearly delineated with a resistivity of the order of 50–100 ohm-m at shallow crustal depths followed by a high-resistive (>1000 ohm-m) basement between the stations 12 and 20. The high-resistive basement is exposed near the Tapti fault, where the older rocks of Archaean age are mapped (Fig. 4(b)). The high-resistive upper crust is thin towards the north of the Tapti fault and thickens towards the southern side of the traverse.
Fig. 4

The Bouguer gravity anomaly (a) plotted over the deep geoelectric crustal section (b). The deep seismic section (c) with Moho and deep seated fault features (after Tewari and Prakash Kumar, 2003). A basin like structure can also be seen between stations 11 and 21 at shallow depths (b).

Towards the north, the thin high-resistive (500–5000 ohm-m) upper crust and the anomalously conductive (130 ohm-m) nature of the mid crust (A) in Fig. 4(b) and the seismicity near the Narmada south fault are pointers to the tectonic activity in the region. The two other conductive features, B and C (Fig. 4(b)), are also observed between the Tapti and Gavligarh faults as well as the Gavligarh and Purna faults. The lower crust is characterized by a conductive (1 –30 ohm-m), to a moderately resistive (50–200 ohm-m), nature. The results of the MT study in the form of the geo-electric section are compared with nearby Deep Seismic Sounding (DSS) and the regional Bouguer gravity data (NGRI, 2006) as shown in Fig. 4. The gravity values are taken for each station by digitizing the gravity map (NGRI, 2006). A maximum value of −25 mGal at station 9 is observed and maintains a value of about −40 mGal towards the southern end of the traverse, while small highs and lows are caused by local features (Fig. 4(a)). A steep fall in the gravity is observed near station 7, where it has a minimum value of − 70 mGal. A small gravity high is observed between stations 4 and 6. This is probably caused by a local feature. The Narmada South fault (NSF) is located between stations 3 and 4, whereas the Tapti North fault (TNF) is located close to station 7. We can find a minimum gravity value of about −70 mGal at both the faults. The MT traverse passes nearer to the earlier Deep Seismic Sounding profile (Kaila et al., 1985) from Khajuria Kalan (23.5°N, 77°E) to Pulgaon (20.75°N, 78.25°E). The seismic section along the MT traverse is presented in Fig. 4(c).

The data fit for observed and calculated values is shown in the form of pseudo-sections for all the stations (Fig. 5). The data fit for observed and calculated values for representative sites for both TE and TM are shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 5

The observed and computed pseudo-sections for apparent resistivity and phase data in TE and TM modes.

Fig. 6

The data fit between observed and calculated apparent resistivity and phase for the stations 10 and 22.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

There have been few MT studies carried out in central India over the Deccan volcanic province across the major fault zones. A recent study by Naganjaneyulu and Santosh (2010) identified the highly-conductive bodies as mafic/ultra mafic layered intrusives in the central India tectonic zone (CITZ), and also they have proposed a double-sided subduction history along the CITZ. Patro and Sarma (2009) identified a two-layered lithospheric mantle structure of this region describing a highly-resistive nature of the lithospheric structure on the top, and a low resistive nature at the bottom. In addition, other studies by Naidu and Harinarayana (2009), Gokarn et al. (2001), and Rao et al. (2004) have identified anomalous conductive features at mid-lower crustal depths, through various factors such as partial melts, fluids, etc., in the same region. However, anomalous conductive features associated with significant seismicity is not discussed in detail in the previous studies. Hence, the present study confirms anomalous conductive features in the region, and also proposes that the relation between seismicity and conductivity is of relevance to understand the earthquake mechanism.

The present MT study infers that a basin-like structure with thin trap and buried sediments is identified at shallow crustal depths, confined between the stations 12 (close to the Tapti fault) and 20 (close to the Purna fault) in the geo-electric section. The results clearly infer that the faults are close to the anomalous conductive features (A, B and C). This is more prominent near the Narmada south fault towards the northern part, as compared with the southern part of the traverse at mid-lower crustal depths. The conductive features at upper-mid crustal depths obtained from the geo-electric section spatially correlates with the absence of reflections and an indication of low seismic velocity in the Deep Seismic Sounding section (Fig. 4(c)). The gravity is low near the anomalous conductor A (Fig. 4(b)). Though the Deep Seismic Sounding study does not provide any suggestions regarding low gravity and high conductivity, it can be assumed to be of low seismic velocity. Together, these three observations suggest that the reasons for the anomalous conductive features (A, B and C) can be attributed to any one of the factors such as graphite, minerals, fluids or partial melt (Patro et al., 2005) as explained below.

5.1 Graphite boundary films

Graphite boundary films are often a probable candidate for high electrical conductivity in the lower crustal depths (Frost et al., 1989). Graphite is stable only at low oxygen fugacity in the stable continental regions. However, the present study region (NSL) is not a stable zone; it is a rift zone and active since Precambrian times. Hence, the existence of graphite in the NSL zone is not certain.

5.2 Conducting minerals

Metallic ore minerals, such as iron and copper sulphides, can produce high electrical conductivity (100 ohm-m) at mid-crustal depths, while they often occur in discrete ore bodies and also disseminated over a large volume (Li et al., 2003). A large-scale mineral deposit would probably produce detectable gravity and magnetic anomalies. However, in the absence of evidence for the occurrence of such large-scale mineral deposits in the study area, we can rule out this factor as a reason for the high electrical conductivity in the NSL zone.

5.3 Fluids

In active subduction zones, at lower crustal depths, saline fluids can produce high electrical conductivity (Hyndman and Hyndman, 1968; Brace, 1971). A large amount of water is available in subduction zones at depths less than 40 km, from the expulsion of pore waters and from CH4–H2O fluids produced by diagenetic and low-grade metamorphic reactions (Peacock, 1990). However, the NSL zone is a rift zone and not a subduction zone. Hence, fluids are unlikely to be a probable candidate for producing the high electrical conductivity in the NSL zone.

5.4 Partial melting

Dry rocks begin to melt at around 1200°C and would produce high electrical conductivity. Partial melts, in most cases, are associated with a low seismic velocity and low gravity (Schilling et al., 1997). Hence, the low crustal seismic velocity in the study region with the absence of reflections starting from shallow depths to mid-lower crustal depths, and the low gravity anomaly, could be evidence to infer that the presence of partial melting could be a favorable source of observed crustal conductors. The partial melting of subsurface rocks may be due to high temperature and pressure conditions at mid-lower crustal depths that could be caused by mantle upwarping due to tectonic activity in the NSL zone. Additionally, this zone is considered to be a high heat flow zone (Ravi Shanker, 1988).

MT modeling results brought out three high conductive structural features (A, B and C) extending from mid to lower crustal depths. These features can be interpreted as the electrical signatures responsible for the geologically-mapped major tectonic faults, namely, the Narmada South, Tapti, Gavligarh and Purna faults as they occur in their vicinity. The distribution of the epicenters (>M 5.0) along the faults in the area suggests that the origin of the earthquakes are probably related to the faults which are conductive in nature. Rapid crustal erosion must have been taken place due to a high-temperature partial melt (where conductivity is high) in the northern part which causes faulting along pre-existing zones of weakness. The block movement along the faults could generate an earthquake. The Narmada South fault is more prominent and active compared with the other fault features, and is associated with the M 6.0 Ja-balpur earthquake on 22 May, 1997 (Rastogi, 1997) in the study region. Thus, the present study helps in understanding the tectonic features and their nature in the NSL region.



We thank Dr. V. P. Dimri, former Director, and Dr. Y. J. Bhaskar Rao, the acting Director, of NGRI for giving permission to publish this work. The authors are thankful to Prof. Heinrich Brasse and an anonymous reviewer for their critical comments and valuable suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript which has greatly helped to improve the manuscript. We are also thankful to Makoto Uyeshima, editor of the journal for his support during the editorial process. We also would like to thank Shri. D. N. Murthy for useful discussions and all the help regarding the modeling work. G. Dhanunjaya Naidu thanks CSIR for the Senior Research Fellowship.

Authors’ Affiliations

CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
Central Water and Power Research Station, Ministry of Water Resources, Pune, India
Gujarat Energy Research and Management Institute (GERMI) Research Centre, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India


  1. Bahr, K., Interpretation of magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion,J Geophys., 62, 119–127, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. Brace, W. F., Resistivity of saturated crustal rocks to 40 km based on laboratory measurements, in Structure and Physical Properties of the Earth’s Crust, edited by Heacock, J. G., 14, 206–210, AGU Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Frost, B. R., W. S. Fyfe, K. Tazaki, and T. Chan, Grain-boundary graphite in rocks and implications for high electrical conductivity in the lower crust, Nature, 340, 134–136, 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Geological Survey of India, Seismotectonic Atlas of India and Its Environs, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Ghosh, D. B., The nature of the Narmada-Son lineament, Geol. Soc. Ind., Publ., 34, Pt. III, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Gokarn, S. G., C. K. Rao, G. Gupta, B. P. Singh, and M. Yamashita, Deep crustal structure in central India using magnetotelluric studies, Geophys. J. Int., 144, 685–694, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Groom, R. W. and R. C. Bailey, Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensor in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion, J Geophys. Res., 94, 1913–1925, 1989.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen, P. C., Rank deficient and discrete Ill—Posed problems, numerical aspects of linear inversion, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. Harinarayana, T., B. P. K. Patro, K. Veeraswamy, C. Manoj, K. Naganjaneyulu, D. N. Murthy, and G. Virupakshi, Regional Geo-electric structure beneath Deccan volcanic province of the Indian subcontinent using magnetotellurics, Tectonophysics, 445,66–80, 2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyndman, R. D. and D. W. Hyndman, Water saturation and high electrical conductivity in the lower crust, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 4, 427–432, 1968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jain, A. K., N. Annup, and D. C. Singhal, Crustal evolution of the Narmada-Son lineament and associated shear zones of the Indian litho-sphere, J. Earth. Sci., CEISM Seminar, 125–148, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Jupp, D. L. B. and K. Vozoff, The magnetotelluric method in the explo-1182 ration of sedimentary basins—Discussion, Geophysics, 62 (2), 692–692, 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaila, K. L., P. R. Reddy, M. M. Dixit, and P. Koteswar Rao, Crustal structure across the Narmada-Son lineament, Central India from deep seismic soundings, J. Geol. Soc. India., 26, 465–480, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. Li, S., M. J. Unsworth, J. R. Booker, W. Wei, H. Tan, and A. G. Jones, Partial melt or aqueous fluid in the mid-crust of Southern Tibet? Constraints from INDEPTH Magnetotelluric data, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 289–304, 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mall, D. M., A. P. Singh, and D. Sarkar, Structure and tectonics of satpura, central India, Curr. Sci., 88 (10), 1621–1627, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. Naganjaneyulu, K. and M. Santosh, The Central India Tectonic Zone: a geophysical perspective on continental amalgamation along a Mesopro-terozoic suture, Gondwana Res., 18, 547–564, 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Naidu, G. D. and T. Harinarayana, Deep electrical imaging of the Narmada-Tapti region, central India from magnetotellurics, Tectono-physics, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. NGRI, Bouguer gravity anomaly (Terrain corrected) Map of India, A collaborative project of Geological survey of India, National Geophysical Research Institute, Oil and Natural Gas Commission Limited, Survey of India, Oil India Limited, 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Patro, B. P. K., T. Harinarayana, R. S. Sastry, Madhusushana Rao, C. Manoj, K. Naganjaneyulu, and S. V. S. Sarma, Electrical imaging of Narmada-Son Lineament Zone, Central India from magnetotellurics, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 48, 215–232, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Patro, P. K. and S. V. S. Sarma, Lithospheric electrical imaging of the Deccan trap covered region of western India, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B01102, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Peacock, S. M., Fluid processes in subduction zones, Science, 248, 329337, 1990.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramalingeswara Rao, B. and P. Sitapathi Rao, Historical seismicity of Peninsular India, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 2519–2533, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Rao, C. K., Y. Ogawa, S. G. Gokarn, and G. Gupta, Electromagnetic imaging of magma across the Narmada Son lineament, central India, Earth Planets Space, 56, 229–238, 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rastogi, B. K., Seismo-tectonics along Narmada-Son rift zone, Proceedings of Workshop on the Tectonics of Narmada-Son Lineament,37–49 (Misc. Publ. No. 63), 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Ravi Shanker, Heat flow map of India and discussion on its geological and economic significance, Indian Minerals, 42,89–110, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. Rodi, W. and R. L. Mackie, Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2D magnetotelluric inversions, Geophysics, 66, 174–187, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schilling, F. R., G. M. Partzsch, H. Brasse, and G. Schwarz, Partial melting below the magmatic arc in the central Andes deduced from geo-electromagnetic field experiments and laboratory data, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 103,17–31, 1997.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh, A. P. and R. Meissner, Crustal configuration of the Narmada-Tapti region (India) from gravity studies, J. Geodyn., 20, 111–127, 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Swift, Jr., C. M., A magnetotelluric investigation of electrical conductivity anomaly in the southwestern United States, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 1967.Google Scholar
  30. Tewari, H. C. and Prakash Kumar, Deep seismic sounding studies and its tectonic implications, J. Virtual Explor., 12,30–54, 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Verma, R. K. and P. Banerjee, Nature of continental crust along the Narmada-Son lineament, inferred from gravity and deep seismic sounding data, Tectonophysics, 202, 375–397, 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wellman, P. and M. W. Mc Elhinny, K-Ar age of the Deccan traps, India, Nature, 227, 595–596, 1970.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. West, W. D., The line of the Narmada and Son valleys, Cur. Sci., 31, 143144, 1962.Google Scholar


© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2011