- Open Access
Two-dimensional resistivity structure of Unzen Volcano revealed by AMT and MT surveys
© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2012
- Received: 17 November 2011
- Accepted: 26 October 2012
- Published: 23 August 2013
AMT and MT surveys were conducted to investigate at high resolution the spatial resistivity structure of Unzen volcano, with consideration given to understanding its regional dimensionality. Our phase tensor analysis supports the conclusion that the resistivity structure is two-dimensional, with the strike in the E-W direction. Two-dimensional inversions suggest that Unzen volcano is likely to comprise 4 layers: a high resistivity surface (greater than 1000 Ω m), an intermediate second layer (20 to several hundreds of Ωm), a low resistivity third layer (less than 20 Ω m), and a relatively high resistivity basement. We assume the upper-most high resistivity layer consists of undersaturated lava and pyroclastic flow deposits. The second and third layers are likely to be water-saturated and form an aquifer that seems to correlate well with the emergence of groundwater discharge at the surface. In deeper areas beneath the summit, a region with a resistivity of 20–80 Ω m is surrounded by areas of extremely low resistivity (less than 3 Ω m); this structural features in Unzen volcano was first identified in this study, but is typical of the resistivity structure observed in active volcanoes. Interpreting the results of well logs and geodetic studies of Unzen volcano in light of the findings of the present study and the resistivity structure of other active volcanoes, we suggest that Unzen volcano possesses a hydrothermal system of high-temperature fluids beneath its edifice; this hydrothermal system may play a non-negligible role in controlling heat and mass transfer in the magmatic system of Unzen volcano.
- Unzen volcano
- resistivity structure
- Unzen graben
- volcanic fluids
- hydrothermal alteration
Regarding the summit area, the presence of the active hydrothermal system was inferred at the surface, from the high SP (self-potential) anomaly (Hashimoto and Tanaka, 1995; Hashimoto, 1997) and the low resistivity surface (Kagiyama et al., 1999). These facts expected that the magmatic activity might extend the low resistivity region from the deeper part to the surface, making high conductance at the area; such resistivity feature, however, was not detected by Srigutomo et al. (2008). In the authors’ work, the detailed resistivity structure could not be obtained because of the one-dimensional analysis and the insufficient observation points around the summit area. Therefore, the geometry and condition of the hydrothermal system beneath Un-zen volcano have remained unknown. The present study aims to determine the regional dimensionality of the system and provide a high resolution understanding of the resistivity structure of Unzen volcano (Mt. Fugen-dake, shown in Fig. 1) and the underlying hydrothermal system.
2.1 Data acquisition and processing
Magneto-tellurics (MT) is a geoelectrical sounding method used for estimating resistivity structure on the basis of electromagnetic induction (e.g., Cagniard, 1953; Vozoff, 1991; Simpson and Bahr, 2005). For the present study, AMT (Audio Magneto-tellurics) and MT surveys were conducted in November 2008, and July and August 2009 on the Unzen volcanic massif, using Phoenix Geophysics MTU-5 system. The observation points, shown in Fig. 1, were configured in a N-S direction across the summit of Unzen volcano. Four Pb-PbCl2 electrodes were used for measuring two orthogonal components of electric fields (N-S and E-W directions), and one additional electrode was used for grounding. Three orthogonal components of magnetic field (N-S, E-W, and vertical directions) were measured using three induction coils, which consist of a coil of copper wire wound on a core with high magnetic permeability. Data were collected in the frequency range between 1 Hz and 10 kHz. For the relatively high frequency range between 100 Hz and 10 kHz, AMT induction coils were used, and each observation point continued data acquisition for four hours. For the relatively low frequency range between 1 Hz and 100 Hz, MT induction coils were used, and each observation point continued data acquisition for one week. To remove contamination in the data due to local noise, we applied Gamble et al.’s (1979) remote reference processing method using geomagnetic data from Sawauchi (1000 km from Unzen). For the data obtained with the AMT induction coils, we performed mutual referencing within the survey area.
2.2 Dimensionality and strike estimation
Secondly, the regional strike of Unzen volcano was estimated using the histograms of the major axes of the impedance phase tensors. The error of the axes is less than a few degrees for a frequency of 10–10800 Hz, and about several tens degrees for a frequency of 1–10 Hz. The modes of the regional strikes were N3.6°E for over 1000 Hz, N2.4°W for 100–1000 Hz, N0.1°E for 10–100 Hz, and N1.5°W for 1–10 Hz respectively. Thus, the averaged mode of the regional strikes for whole frequencies was either N0.1°E or N89.9°E, noting that regional strike obtained from phase tensor ellipses has 90° ambiguity. In this study area, E-W striking faults are predominant, due to N-S tensional stress (Hoshizumi et al., 1999). According geological information obtained from boreholes, the basement has continuity in the E-W direction, deepening towards the center of the Unzen graben (Hoshizumi et al., 2002). Taken together, these facts suggest the regional geology is discontinuous in the N-S di-rection. Induction arrows are also oriented roughly in N-S directions for most frequencies. Therefore, regional strike is estimated at N89.9°E, that is, almost in the E-W direction. Accordingly, the impedance tensors were rotated to correspond with a 2-D strike oriented to N89.9; after which, distortion analysis by the method of Bibby et al. (2005) was performed. This procedure estimates the distortion tensor, produced by the surface heterogeneity, considering the el-lipticity of the phase tensor and β angle. The effect of the distortion was removed from the rotated impedance tensor by multiplying the inversion matrix of the distortion tensor and the impedance tensor.
TM modes of UZ402, 403, 404, 405, and 406 have almost the same phase characteristics as those reported in the above, with the exception of the apparent resistivities of UZ402 and 403, which are shifted slightly lower than the other observation points. In fact, UZ402 and UZ403 are located at the by precipitous cliffs. We attribute these shifts to the location of the transects near precipitous cliffs, as it is known that steep topographical changes can influence MT observations (e.g., Wannamaker et al., 1986; Jiracek, 1990).
2.3 2-D analysis
The pseudosection calculated from the best fit model is shown in Fig. 3. The inferred model is considered to reproduce most of the apparent resistivity and phase distributions. The discontinuity of phase between UZ406 and UZ407 at high frequencies is explained by shallowly-emplaced uniform resistivity blocks below UZ407 with a thickness of several hundred meters. The discontinuity between UZ398 and UZ399 is explained similarly by the inclusion of shallow blocks of uniform resistivity. In addition, TM-mode apparent resistivities are shifted to higher values at UZ402 and UZ403 as a correction of the static shift by the inversion process.
2.4 Sensitivity tests
Before making any interpretations on the basis of our analyses, we performed a series of tests to examine the sensitivity of the model. The tests performed are described in the following paragraphs.
2.4.1 linear sensitivity analysis
Where, S j is the sensitivity of the respective grid element j, Δ j is the size of the grid element j, f i (m) is the forward solution of model m, m j is the resistivity change of the grid element j, σ i is the standard deviation of the data, and N is the number of elements (N = number of observation sites × number of frequency × data types). This equation states that model resolution is the sum of the gradient of forward solution to the resistivity change of a given grid element, which is normalized by the standard deviation of the data, and weighted by the size of each grid element. Data and forward solutions include 4 types: apparent resistivities and phases of the TE- and TM-modes.
The sensitivity obtained in this analysis is a measure of the confidence that can be placed in the model. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the minimum sensitivity to constrain the reliable domain of the model. In order to determine the minimum reliable sensitivity, the southern deeper area with low sensitivities was used for the following further sensitivity analysis.
2.4.2 Determination of minimum reliable sensitivity
The further analysis examines the change of sounding curves by distinctively changing the model. The southern deeper part contains two regions as shown by the region X and Y in Fig. 4. Resistivities of the region X is higher than those of the upper layer, in contrast to those of the region Y, which shows resistivities that are lower than the upper layer. In this analysis, the resistivities of those regions were oppositely revised, and the fit of the changed soundings to the observed data was examined.
Case1: region X Region X has a high resistivity of more than 100 Ω m. In this case, the sensitivity of TM phase of UZ399 was examined by replacing the region X with a 1 Ω m body in Case1-1, and by replacing a lower part of the region with a1 Ω m body in Case1-2, respectively. Figure 5(b-1) shows the sensitivity of the phase of UZ399 in both cases. In Case1-1, the calculated sounding curve does not fit well between 3–10 Hz. On the other hand, in Case1-2, fit of the calculated sounding curve to observed data between 3–10 Hz is almost the same as that of the best-fit model, and both the sounding curves of Case1-2 and best-fit model can explain the data around 2 Hz. It appears that the observed soundings cannot constrain the resistivity structure of region X at depths deeper than those defined by Case1-2.
Case2: region Y A low resistivity (below 10 Ωm) extends from depths deeper than 1 km beneath UZ398. The sensitivity of TM phase of UZ398 was examined by replacing the region Y with a 100 Ωm body in Case2-1, and by replacing the lower part of the region with a 100 Ω m in Case2-2, respectively.
Figure 5(b-2) shows the sensitivity of the phase of UZ398 in both cases. In Case2-1, the calculated sounding curve does not fit well between 15–3 Hz. In Case2-2, the difference of phase between Case2-2 and best fit model is within the margin of error. It appears that the observed soundings cannot constrain the resistivity structure of region Y at depths deeper than those defined by Case2-2.
The sensitivity tests described above correspond roughly to sensitivities less than 1.3 × 10−5. Therefore, in this study, the model blocks with the sensitivities above 1.3 × 10−5 were regarded as reliable.
2.5 2-D resistivity structure
3.1 Comprehensive features of the resistivity structure
Figure 6(b) shows the interpretation of the resistivity structure. The obtained resistivity structure is composed of 4 layers: the high resistivity surface (greater than 1000 Ω m, I in the figure), the intermediate second layer (20—several hundreds Ω m, II), the low resistivity third layer (less than 20 Ω m, III), and the relatively high resistivity layer beneath the third layer (IV).
We interpret the first layer as consisting of undersaturated lava and pyroclastic flow deposits. This interpretation is supported by the findings of Mogi et al. (1995), who used existing geological survey data to map the distribution of lava flows on Unzen volcano. Furthermore, Komori et al. (2010) pointed out that undersaturated pyroclastic flow deposits have a resistivity over 1000 Ω m by comparison between DC resistivity survey and resistivity measurements on the drillcore samples at the USDP-1 site on Unzen volcano; which is consistent with the conceptual model presented in this study.
The upper part of the intermediate second layer has a resistivity of several hundreds Ω m. It is present below the undersaturated lava and pyroclastic flow deposits, and also emerges on the surface of their northern and southern edges. Its emergence on the surface corresponds to the location of the cold springs, as shown in Fig. 6(b) (Research group of the groundwater for agricultural use, 1986). Komori et al. (2010), in their study of the USDP-1 core, found that the pyroclastic and mudflow deposits that comprise the host rock demonstrated resistivities on the order of several hundred Ω m when saturated with low-salinity (several tens of Ω m) pore water, which is equivalent to the groundwater salinity of Unzen. On this basis, we conclude there is a water saturated aquifer extending downward through the several hundred Ω m region, and that the cold water springs are a manifestation of groundwater discharge in this region.
The low resistivity third layer less than 20 Ω m overlays the relatively high resistivity fourth layer. Yano et al. (1989) found that the effective porosities decrease to less than a few percent at the 2–3 km depth, using the drillcores obtained from volcanic and geothermal areas in Japan. This suggests that formations deeper than the depth can hold little water because of a lack of pores. Therefore, the relatively high resistivities deeper than 2 km below sea level (b.s.l.) are considered to be due to a lack of interstitial water in the bulk formation. It is estimated that the aquifer extends from the second layer through the third layer.
3.2 Resistivity of the deeper aquifer
Basically, the resistivity of the water-saturated aquifer is decreased with depth, and the low resistivity third layer extends downward to 2 km b.s.l. Decreasing resistivities are considered to be due to the increase of fluid salinity and/or rock alteration (e.g., Keller and Rapolla, 1974; Revil et al., 2002). On the other hand, regarding the deeper region of the summit area, the region with a resistivity of 20–80 Ω m extends upward to 0.5 km b.s.l., as indicated by R in Fig. 6(b). Further, this region is surrounded by the extremely low resistivity region less than 3 Ω m (C1 and C2 in Fig. 6(b)).
The resistivity structure described in the preceding paragraph is typical for an active volcano (e.g., Usu volcano (Ogawa et al., 1998; Matsushima et al., 2001); Galung-gung Volcano (Wannamaker et al., 2004); Kusatsu-shirane volcano (Nurhasan et al., 2006); Asama volcano (Aizawa et al., 2008); Aso volcano (Kanda et al., 2008); Rotokawa geothermal field (Heise et al., 2008)). In general, such an extremely low resistivity is interpreted as low permeability clay due to hydrothermal alteration (e.g., Ogawa et al., 1998; Revil et al., 2002); it is believed that low permeability clay behaves as a sealing zone, and that high temperature fluids are maintained and circulate within the relatively high resistivity region (e.g., Bjornsson et al., 1986; Ussher et al., 2000). The relatively high resistivity of the fluid-bearing zone is considered to be due to undersaturation by a gas phase, and/or the breakdown of conductive smectite by high temperature conditions (Pytte and Reynolds, 1989).
In Unzen volcano, a temperature of 180°C was estimated at the bottom of the borehole USDP-4 from temperature logging and fluid inclusion studies (Nakada et al., 2005). Furthermore, geodetic surveys found the pressure source during the 1990–1995 eruption at a depth of about 1.5–3 km beneath the summit (Geodetic Survey Group, Joint Observation by National Universities, 1991; Ishihara, 1993; Hendrasto et al., 1997; Kohno et al., 2008). These facts suggest that the condition of higher temperature is maintained by the shallowly-emplaced dikes inside the region. Therefore, a typical hydrothermal system may be present in the deeper part of the aquifer beneath Unzen volcano, which would explain the absence of a high conductance region at the summit noted by Srigutomo et al. (2008).
Fujimitsu et al. (2008) performed numerical simulations to investigate the hydrothermal system at whole Shimabara Peninsula, by assuming the heat source in the western deeper part of the Peninsula. Their work does not consider the heat source beneath the summit area of Unzen volcano, because of the assumed small contribution from the pressure source to crustal deformation during eruption. In contrast to their assumption, the hydrothermal system inferred in the present study may make a non-negligible contribution to the heat and mass transfer of the whole magmatic system of the Shimabara Peninsula.
This study provides the spatially detailed look at the 2-D resistivity structure of Unzen volcano in southeast Japan by AMT and MT surveys, considering the regional dimensionality of the area. Unzen volcano is shown to consist of 4 resistivity layers. The high resistivity first layer is considered to be undersaturated lava and pyroclastic flow deposits. A water-saturated aquifer is inferred to extend from the intermediate second layer to the low resistivity third layer. Within the deeper part of the summit area, the data show a region of resistivity on the order of 20–80 ohm-m, surrounded by an extremely low resistivity region of less than 3 ohm-m. Although similar features are typical for active volcanoes, such the resistivity structure has not previously been known to exist at Unzen volcano. By analogy with other active volcanic systems, we hypothesize this low resistivity region results from the existence of a hydrothermal system comprising high-temperature volcanic fluids beneath the summit area. If so, the hypothesized hydrothermal system could make a non-negligible contribution to the heat and mass transfer of the regional magmatic system of the Shimabara Peninsula. As a result of the potential regional importance of such a system, we recommend additional investigations to characterize and more clearly delineate this intriguing feature.
We thank H. Shimizu for arranging observation schedule, and Nittetsu Mining Consultants Co., Ltd. and Geospatial Information Authority of Japan for providing the geomagnetic data at Kagoshima and Sawauchi. We thank N. Os-himan and R. Yoshimura for their valuable discussion, and J. P. Fairley for improving our manuscript. The manuscript was critically reviewed by two anonymous reviewers. We are grateful for the editorial support of M. Uyeshima. This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 19310116 and No. 23310120, T. Kagiyama) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. Some figures were made using the GMT program (Wessel and Smith, 1998).
- Aizawa, K., Y. Ogawa, T. Hashimoto, T. Koyama, W. Kanda, Y. Yamaya, M. Mishina, and T. Kagiyama, Shallow resistivity structure of Asama Volcano and its implications for magma ascent process in the 2004 eruption, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 173, 165–177, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.016, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bibby, H. M., T. G. Caldwell, and C. Brown, Determinable and non-determinable parameters of galvanic distortion in magne-totellurics, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 915–930, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02779.x, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bjornsson, A., G. P. Hersir, and G. Björnsson, The Hengill high-temperature area, S.W. Iceland: Regional geophysical survey, Geotherm. Resour. Counc. Trans., 10, 205–210, 1986.Google Scholar
- Cagniard, L., Basic theory of the magnetotelluric method of geophysical prospecting, Geophysics, 18, 605–645, 1953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caldwell, T. G., H. M. Bibby, and C. Brown, The magnetotelluric phase tensor, Geophys. J. Int., 158, 457–469, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02281.x, 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chida, N., Late Quaternary tectonic movements in central Kyushu district, Southwest Japan, with special reference to the active faults distributed in the Quaternary volcanic area, Ann. Rep. Fac. Educ, Iwate Univ., 39, 97–135, 1979.Google Scholar
- Fujimitsu, Y, S. Ehara, R. Oki, and R. Kanou, Numerical model of the hydrothermal system beneath Unzen Volcano, Japan, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 175, 35–44, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gamble, T. D., W. M. Goubau, and J. Clarke, Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference, Geophysics, 44, 53–68, doi:10.1190/1.1440923, 1979.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geodetic Survey Group, Joint Observation by National Universities, Ground deformation of Unzen Volcano accompanied by the volcanic activity, Observational Studies on Unzen Volcano Regarding the Prediction of Lava Effusion, 29–42, 1991.Google Scholar
- Hashimoto, T., Self-potential changes and subsurface hydrothermal activity accompanying the 1900–1995 eruption of Unzen volcano, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 966–993, 1997.Google Scholar
- Hashimoto, T. and Y. Tanaka, A large self-potential anomaly on Unzen Volcano, Shimabara Peninsula, Kyushu island, Japan, Geophys. Lett. Res.,22, 191–194, 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heise, W., T. G. Caldwell, H. M. Bibby, and S. C. Bannister, Three-dimensional modelling of magnetotelluric data from the Rotokawa geothermal field, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 740–750, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hendrasto, M., T. Eto, F. Kimata, T. Matsushima, and K. Ishihara, Magma transport at Mt. Unzen associated with the 1990–1995 activity inferred from leveling data, Ann. Disas. Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ., 40(B-1), 61–72, 1997.Google Scholar
- Hoshizumi, H., K. Uto, and K. Watanabe, Geology and eruptive history of Unzen volcano, Shimabara Peninsula, Kyushu, SW Japan, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 89(1–4), 81–94, doi:10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00125-5, 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoshizumi, H., K. Uto, A. Matsumoto, S. Xu, and K. Oguri, Geology of Unzen volcano and core stratigraphy of the flank drillings, Extended Abstract of International Unzen Workshop, 4–7, 2002.Google Scholar
- Ikeda, R., T. Kajiwara, K. Omura, and S. Hickman, Physical rock properties in and around a conduit zone by well-logging in the Unzen Scientific Drilling Project, Japan, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 175, 13–19, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.03.036, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishihara, K., Continuous magma supply inferred from discharge rate of magma and ground-deformation rate at Mt. Unzen, Japan, Ann. Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., 36(B1), 219–230, 1993.Google Scholar
- Jiracek, G. R., Near-surface and topographic distortions in electromagnetic induction, Surv. Geophys., 11, 162–203, 1990.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kagiyama, T., H. Utada, and T. Yamamoto, Magma ascent beneath Unzen Volcano, SW Japan, deduced from the electrical resistivity structure, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 89, 35–42, doi:10.1016/S0377-0273(98)00120-6, 1999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanda, W., On a deep transient electromagnetic sounding-measurement and modeling, Ph.D Thesis, The University of Tokyo, Japan, 1997.Google Scholar
- Kanda, W., Y. Tanaka, M. Utsugi, S. Takakura, T. Hashimoto, and H. Inoue, A preparation zone for volcanic explosions beneath Naka-dake crater, Aso volcano, as inferred from magnetotelluric surveys, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 178, 32–45, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.022, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keller, G. V. and A. Rapolla, Electrical prospecting methods in volcanic and geothermal environments, in Physical Volcanology, edited by L. Civetta, P. Gasparini, G. Luongo, and A. Rapolla, pp. 133–166, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1974.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kohno, Y., T. Matsushima, and H. Shimizu, Pressure sources beneath Unzen Volcano inferred from leveling and GPS data, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 175, 100–109, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.03.022, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Komori, S., T. Kagiyama, H. Hoshizumi, S. Takakura, and M. Mimura, Vertical mapping of hydrothermal fluids and alteration from bulk conductivity: Simple interpretation on the USDP-1 site, Unzen Volcano, SW Japan, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 198, 339–347, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.09.019, 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsushima, N., H. Oshima, Y. Ogawa, S. Takakura, H. Satoh, M. Utsugi, and Y. Nishida, Magma prospecting in Usu volcano, Hokkaido, Japan, using magnetotelluric soundings, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 109, 263–277, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mogi, T., Y. Tanaka, T. Morikawa, K. Kusakabe, M. Tanahashi, T. Nakatsuka, K. Tanaka, and H. Utada, Subsurface structure of Unzen-Fugen and Mayu-yama volcano inferred from airborne electromagnetic method and magnetic survey, Bull. Volcanol. Soc. Jpn., 40, 263–276, 1995.Google Scholar
- Nakada, S., K. Uto, S. Sakuma, J. C. Eichelberger, and H. Shiimizu, Scientific results of conduit drilling in the Unzen Scientific Drilling Project (USDP), Science Drilling, no. 1, 18–22, doi:10.2204/iodp.sd.1.03.2005, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nurhasan, Y. Ogawa, N. Ujihara, S. B. Tank, Y. Honkura, S. Onizawa, T. Mori, and M. Makino, Two electrical conductors beneath Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, Japan, imaged by audiomagnetotellurics, and their implications for the hydrothermal system, Earth Planets Space, 58, 1053–1059, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa, Y. and T. Uchida, A two-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion assuming Gaussian static shift, Geophys. J. Int., 126, 69–76, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05267.x, 1996.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa, Y., N. Matsushima, H. Oshima, S. Takakura, M. Utsugi, K. Hirano, M. Igarashi, and T. Doi, A resistivity cross-section of Usu volcano, Hokkaido, Japan, by audiomagnetotellurics soundings, Earth Planets Space, 50, 339–346, 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohta, K., A study of hot springs on the Shimabara Peninsula, The Science Reports of the Shimabara Volcano Observatory, the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, 8, 1–33, 1973.Google Scholar
- Pytte, A. M. and R. C. Reynolds, The Thermal Transformation of Smectite to Illite, in Thermal History of Sedimentary Basins: Methods and Case Histories, 319 pp., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
- Research group of the groundwater for agricultural use, Groundwater of Japan, 1043 pp., Tikyusha, Japan, 1986.Google Scholar
- Revil, A., D. Hermitte, E. Spangenberg, and J. J. Cochemé, Electrical properties of zeolitized volcaniclastic materials, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B8), doi:10.1029/2001JB000599, 2002.Google Scholar
- Schwalenberg, K., V. Rath, and V. Haak, Sensitivity studies applied to a two-dimensional resistivity model from the Central Andes, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 673–686, 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, F. and K. Bahr, Practical Magnetotellurics, 254 pp., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srigutomo, W., T. Kagiyama, W. Kanda, H. Munekane, T. Hashimoto, Y. Tanaka, H. Utada, and M. Utsugi, Resistivity structure of Unzen Volcano derived from time domain electromagnetic (TDEM) survey, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 175, 231–240, doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.03.033, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi, H., K. Kazahaya, H. Shinohara, and T. Nakamura, Pathways for escape of magmatic carbon dioxide to soil air at Unzen Volcano, SW Japan, Radiocarbon, 46, 491–496, 2004.Google Scholar
- Umakoshi, K., H. Shimizu, and N. Matsuwo, Magma ascent path in the 1990–1994 eruption of Fugendake, Unzen volcano, as inferred from precisely determined hypocentral distribution, Bull. Volcanol. Soc. Jpn., 39, 223–235, 1994.Google Scholar
- Ussher, G., C. Harvey, R. Johnstone, and E. Anderson, Understanding resistivities observed in Geothermal Systems, in Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan, 2000.Google Scholar
- Vozoff, K., The magnetotelluric method, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, edited by M. N. Nabighian, 972 pp., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, USA, 1991.Google Scholar
- Wannamaker, P. E., J. A. Stodt, and L. Rijof, Two-dimensional topographic responses in magnetotellurics modeled using finite elements, Geophysics, 51, 2131–2144, 1986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wannamaker, P. E., I. Raharjo, J. N. Moore, and R. Allis, Magnetotelluric resistivity section and physical implications through the Telaga Bodas magmatic geothermal system, Indonesia, Geotherm. Resour. Counc. Trans., 28, 369–371, 2004.Google Scholar
- Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released, Eos Trans. AGU, 79(47), 579, 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yano, Y., Y. Suda, and S. Tamanyu, Well data compiled from Japanese nation-wide geothermal surveys, part 1 core sample data—physical properties, geology, age, chemical composition—, Rep. Geol. Surv. Jpn., 271, 832 pp., 1989.Google Scholar