 Letter
 Open Access
 Published:
Remarks on the Iapetus’ bulge and ridge
Earth, Planets and Space volume 65, pages 929–934 (2013)
Abstract
Iapetus is a medium sized icy satellite of Saturn. It has two spectacular features: the equatorial ridge (ER) and the abnormally large flattening. The flattening is usually explained in terms of large nonhydrostatic fossil equatorial bulge (EB) supported by a thick lithosphere. Here we show, building on the principle of isostasy, that EB and ER could be a result of low density roots underlying the lithosphere below the equator. The low density matter formed the layer over the core of the satellite. Such situation was unstable. The instability led to origin of axially symmetric plumes that formed equatorial bulge and equatorial ridge. So, we explain both: EB and ER in the frame of one hypothesis.
1. Introduction
Iapetus is a mediumsized icy satellite (MIS) of Saturn with two spectacular features: the geologically old equatorial ridge (ER) rising above the equatorial bulge (EB)— Fig. 1. The topographic map of elevation of Iapetus confirms that ER is rising above EB—see e.g. figure 2 in Giese et al. (2008). The origin of both features still remains an enigma, nevertheless a few different hypotheses were presented. Some of them are supported by numerical models.
The interiors of MIS behave like viscous liquid in geological time scale, therefore the gravity and the centrifugal force give them a hydrostatic shape, i.e. an oblate ellipsoid (approximately a sphere with an equatorial bulge— EB) with flattening depending on period of rotation T_{ r } (flattening decreases if T_{ r } increases). Iapetu’ flattening is equal to 0.046 and it corresponds T_{ r } = 16 hours although the present T_{ r } is 79.33 days. The initial T_{ r } was probably a few hours but tidal forces slowed the rotation down establishing synchronous rotation, i.e. T_{ r } = T_{orbital}. The time of despinning t_{desp} is proportional to a^{−6} (a is the distance from Saturn) and depends also on the dissipation factor Q. Q is high for rigid and elastic bodies and low for viscous, e.g. partially melted ones. Assuming typical Q = 100 one obtains t_{desp} ≈ 240 Gyr, which is longer than the age of Iapetus! This shows that Q was several orders of magnitude lower for a long time. However, the large flattening indicates the opposite, i.e. a thick and rigid lithosphere that could support the nonhydrostatic shape for billions of years.
These two facts are difficult to reconcile, although (CastilloRogez et al., 2007, 2009) found that they could be explained if the accretion of Iapetus had been completed shortly (3.5–4 Myr) after the formation of CAI (i.e. CalciumAluminium Inclusions in chondrites). More advanced model of Robuchon et al. (2010) further reduces the range of possible time of accretion and indicates that special Burgess rheology is necessary.
Other explanations of the origin of ER are also proposed:

1.
Exogenic origin. ER is the build up of infalling material from a ring or disk of the orbiting material (Ip, 2006; Levison et al., 2011; Walsh et al., 2011; Dombard et al., 2012). Walsh et al. (2011) present mechanical simulations of the ridge growth from an infalling ring of debris. Dombard et al. (2012) consider formation of ER from a subsatellite created in a giant impact. According to them, the impact’s ejecta formed the subsatellite. The tidal interaction between the bodies of the system eventually leads to origin of the ridge.

2.
Contraction of Iapetus. Sandwell and Schubert (2010) have proposed the model that does not require high initial spin rate or the short lived radioactive isotopes (SLRI). Initially Iapetus is a slightly oblate spheroid with the porosity higher than 10%. Radioactive heating by longlived isotopes warms the interior to about 200 K, at which point the interior becomes ductile and compacts by 10%, while the 120 kmthick external shell remains solid. The shell deforms to match the reduced volume of the interior. The deformation occurs along the equator, probably as a result of a thinner shell below the equator. To maintain this nonequilibrium shape, the thickness of the shell must exceed 120 km.

3.
Thermal convection inside Iapetus driven by a postaccretion heating and shortliving radioactive isotopes (Czechowski and LeliwaKopystynski, 2005, 2008).
In the present paper we follow some suggestions of Czechowski and LeliwaKopystyński (2008), i.e. we try to explain the Iapetus shape and existence of ER without assuming a large nonhydrostatic equatorial bulge. Instead of purely thermal convection we propose gravitational differentiation followed by convection driven by difference of the density.
2. Isostasy and Scale of Differentiation
Let us note that the considered here Cassini data concern the geometric shape only (e.g. Giese et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2007; Thomas, 2010). The comparison of this shape with the shape of equipotential surface, i.e. the geoid, is necessary to prove that the flattening is nonhydrostatic. Most of terrestrial mountains are in isostatic equilibrium, i.e. they are underlain by ‘root’ formed from low density matter. The gravity acting on the elevated parts is compensated by buoyancy force acting on the roots. The isostatic equilibrium is a result of the fluidlike properties of the rocks in the Earth’s mantle.
The rheology of icy satellites is similar to terrestrial rocks although for different range of temperature and pressure. The uppermost layer (’lithosphere’) is elastic for small deformation and brittle for large deformations. It means that mountains on the surface could exist for billions of year. The medium below the lithosphere is also solid but for very slow geologic processes it behaves like a viscous fluid.
The volume percentage of silicate component in Iapetus is substantially below 60%. It means that rheological properties of its interior are determined by the icy component (Roscoe, 1952; Schubert et al., 1986). Theoretical and experimental results indicate the following formulae for the viscosity of the satellite interior:
where η_{ x } is a constant, σ is the second invariant of the deviatoric stress tensor, i is the power law index (i = 1 corresponds to Newtonian fluid), E is the activation energy of the dominant mechanism of deformation, and R = 8.314 [J K ^{−}1 mole^{−1}] is the universal gas constant (Forni et al., 1991; Goldsby and Kohlstedt, 1997; Durham et al., 1998; McKinnon, 1998). Parameters η_{ x }, E and i depend on many factors; e.g. size of ice crystal, content of gases, size of mineral grains etc (see also: Christensen, 1984; Dumoulin et al., 1999). The exact values of these parameters are not of special importance for our hypothesis. The main conclusion is that the interior of Iapetus behaves (or behaved during origin of ER) like a fluid. It means that the isostasy is (or was) valid also for Iapetus and EB is some sort of 700 km wide rise underlain by lowdensity roots—Fig. 2.
The low density roots are a result of gravitational differentiation of the satellite’s matter. Initially, the matter was a mixture of silicates, ices (of H_{2}O and other volatiles) and organic matter (e.g. Cruikshank et al., 2008) of average density ρ_{av} = 1083 kg m^{−3}. The melting leads to separation of denser silicates (we assume here that ρ_{sil} = 3510 kg m^{−3}) from ices ρ_{ice} = 940 kg m ^{−3}. If EB and the roots are built mainly of the ices, then the isostasy requires:
where h is the height above the reference sphere, w is depth of the roots and Δρ = ρ_{av} — ρ_{ice} is 143 kg m^{−3}. So, w/h = ρ_{ice}/Δρ ≈ 7, i.e. the roots are 7 times thicker than the height of EB. At the equator h = 12 km, so there w = 7 × 12 = 84 km. Of course, w decreases with increasing latitude. Under ER (that is elevated about 18 km above EB) the roots are as deep as 210 km. The total volume of EB and the roots must be at least 24% of Iapetus volume (EB—3%, and the roots—21%). So, at least 24% of Iapetus must have been a subject to differentiation.
3. Model of Thermal History and Differentiation
Differentiation starts when the temperature exceeds the melting temperature of the ice. Calculations (e.g. CastilloRogez et al., 2007) indicate that temperature in the substantial part of Iapetus (30–50%) was high enough for melting. However their calculations do not include the role of convection. Czechowski (2012) develops the model based on the finite difference method combined with parameterized model of convection. It includes solid state convection, melting, convection in molten region and differentiation. The heating from the decay of the shortlived and the longlived radioactive isotopes are included as well as the heat of accretion. The model has 3 basic parameters: (i) t_{ini} time from formation of CAI to beginning of accretion, (ii) t_{acr} duration of accretion, (iii) η_{0} viscosity of the satellite interior at the temperature of melting (but before melting).
The full description of the model is given in Czechowski (2012). We present a few results of this model calculated for Iapetus. Figure 3(A) and (B) give thermal and melting history of the first 300 My of Iapetus for the following values of the parameters: t_{ini} = 0.4 My, t_{acr} = 1 My, η_{0} = 10^{12} Pa s. Panel A presents isotherms in Kelvin, panel B presents region where the melting temperature is reached and melting is started. Isolines give fraction of the latent heat of melting supplied to the matter (i.e. 1 means full melting). Note substantial difference between temperature distribution and melting distribution. Panel C presents radius of the molten region versus time for t_{acr} = 1 My, η_{0} = 10^{12} Pa s, and for a few different values of t_{ini} = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 My. Our considerations above indicate that at least 24% of Iapetus must be melted. It corresponds to the radius: r_{mel} = (0.24)^{1/3}R_{sat} = 0.62R_{sat}. Figure 3(C) indicates that such r_{mel} is possible for t _{ini} in the range 0.4–0.6 My.
4. Molten Region and the Coriolis Force
The melting leads to gravitational differentiation. After differentiation, the silicates form the central core, while the liquid forms a molten layer around the core. The thermal convection operates in the molten region. This convection is not a solid state convection where Prandtl number Pr = η/κ = O(10^{20}) but convection in liquid with Pr = O(10). Such convection is sensitive to the Coriolis force:
where ω is the angular velocity of the satellite rotation, and v is the velocity vector of the fluid. The direction and magnitude of F_{Cor} depend on the vectors v and ω and consequently on the latitude. This leads to the latitude dependent pattern of convective flow and to latitude dependent heat transport (cooling). The ratio of Coriolis force to viscous force is of the order of (Czechowski, 2012):
where s is the spatial scale of the velocity changes. Of course, s must be smaller than the size of molten region. Substituting ω = 9.17 × 10^{−7} rad s^{−1} (present angular velocity of Iapetus), ρ = 1000 kg m^{−3}, η = 10^{−3} Pa s, s = 10^{4} m, we get O(10^{8}). The Coriolis force is much larger than the viscous force in the molten region. Consequently, one can expect latitude dependent flow.
5. The Model of the Overturn
After differentiation and freezing of the molten region, the silicates form the core while ices form a layer around the core—Fig. 2(B). It is an unstable situation, because low density ice (ρ_{ice}) underlies the matter of higher density (ρ_{av}). It results in the overturn (e.g. Grasset and Sotin, 1996). The proper system of equations describing the process is first introduced in geodynamics by Czechowski (1984). More details of equations are given in Czechowski (1993). The buoyancy resulting from the difference of density Δρ is the main driving force. The dimensionless equations of motion and transport are:
where p is the pressure, v is the velocity field, Z is the dimensionless fraction of the low density matter (0 < Z < 1). The Ra denotes a dimensionless group analogous to the Rayleigh number in thermal convection. Ra is defined as follow:
where η is the viscosity [Pa s] and κ [m^{2} s^{−1}] is the thermal diffusivity of the satellite’s interior. L. Czechowski developed the 3D numerical model of the overturn and performed calculations described below. Four panels in Fig. 4 present consecutive phases of the motion for Ra = 200000 and for free of stress upper and lower boundary conditions. Initially, the low density matter is concentrated in a spherical layer. This layer is slightly thicker below the equatorial region according to formula 0.00001R_{Sat} sin(l) where l is the latitude. It simulates the role of latitude dependent Coriolis force. Although the disturbance is minimal the resulting motion is almost perfectly axially symmetric. The spherical layer forms a symmetric plume (B). The plume reaches the surface and forms the equatorial bulge (C and D). In some places the plume could deform and penetrate the lithosphere forming the equatorial ridge.
After the overturn the present stable state was established. Let us note that axial symmetry of the flow is a consequence of latitude dependent thickness of the ice layer. In the absence of this factor the uprising matter would form several small separate plumes. It is analogous to thermal convection when initial pattern consists of small downward currents (e.g. Robuchon et al, 2010).
The thermal convection evolves to the steady state (e.g. Czechowski and LeliwaKopystyński, 2005). For moderate values of the Rayleigh number the steady state often forms twocell pattern consisting of two toruslike cells with a common region of upward motion (below the equator) and two regions of downward motion (below the polar regions). The process of displacement of the ice layer is too short for similar evolution. When the whole ice concentrates close to the surface, the stability is restored and the motion stops. Then the isostatic vertical motion forms the EB (density of the upper layer around the equator is lower than the density in the polar regions).
The substantial redistribution of mass inside the satellite changes its moments of inertia and consequently its rotation axis. However in the case of the considered overturn the redistribution was axially symmetric and the rotation axis kept its direction.
There are a few advantages of our hypothesis. It explains both: EB and ER in the frame of one hypothesis. The lithosphere is not treated as an ideal layer that can support large (and large scale) nonhydrostatic load for billions of years. The lithosphere could be a realistic one (e.g. fractured by large impacts during HBE). Note, that strength of the intack rock is not a crucial parameter in the basic theory of thrust faulting (e.g. Watts, 2001, pp. 253–271; Turcotte and Schubert, 2002, pp. 343–350). Usually the medium contains many preexisting faults. Under the tectonic stresses those preexisting zones of weakness are activated. The effective strength of the rock layer depends mostly on the coefficient of friction and on weight of the rock layer. Let us note also, that our hypothesis does not require any special reological properties of the interior of Iapetus (compare e.g. Robuchon etal., 2010).
All hypotheses of the origin of ER require the material building the equatorial ridge is of different composition than the average of the satellite. Endogenic (e.g. volcanic) origins assume differentiation of the primitive matter. It means that material of ER is enriched in volatiles. The hypotheses assuming origin of ER from debris put into orbit require enrichment of ER in nonvolatiles as a result of heating by impacts. So, the bulk composition of ER could indicate way of origin. Unfortunately most of the surface of Iapetus is covered by material that probably is different than material of underlying layer. In our hypothesis most of the roots of EB could be covered by the crust of primitive composition (see Fig. 2).
Why the excess flattening and the equatorial ridge are found on the Iapetus only? Let us consider the situation of other MIS of Saturn. Iapetus is a specific satellite for many reasons (e.g. Mosqueira and Estrada, 2005; Giese et al., 2008). It is the most distant of all other MIS of Saturn. It accreted in other part of nebula, so it could include more volatiles. Moreover, the uniform model of all MIS of Saturn developed by (Czechowski 2006, 2009) indicates problems of including Iapetus. Our hypothesis allows also for other explanations. Czechowski (2012) indicates that partial differentiation is possible only for small range of parameters of the model. For low t_{ini} usually the whole celestial body is differentiated. For large t_{ini} there are not melting and no differentiation at all. For both cases densities of the crust in the equatorial region and polar region would the same, so formation of EB and ER would be not possible. It is also possible that ER is not unique. Some structures on other satellites could be analogous to ER (Czechowski and LeliwaKopystyński, 2005).
We hope that Cassini mission will provide data about gravity of Iapetus necessary to discriminate between hypotheses of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic flattening.
Acknowledgments. This work was partially supported by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science (grant 4036/B/H03/2010/39) and National Science Centre (grant 2011/01/B/ST10/06653). Computer resources of Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modeling (ICM) of Warsaw University are also used in the research.
References
CastilloRogez, J., D. L. Matson, C. Sotin, T. V. Johnson, J. I. Lunine, and P. C. Thomas, Iapetu’ geophysics: Rotation rate, shape, and equatorial ridge, Icarus, 190, 179–203, 2007.
CastilloRogez, J., T. V. Johnson, M. H. Lee, N. J. Turner, D. L. Matson, and J. Lunine,^{26} Al decay: Heat production and a revised age for Iapetus, Icarus, 204, 658–662, 2009.
Christensen, U., Convection with pressure and temperaturedependent nonNewtonian rheology, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 77,343–84,1984.
Cruikshank, D. P. et al., Hydrocarbons on Saturn’s satellites Iapetus and Phoebe, Icarus, 193, 334–343, 2008.
Czechowski, L., The numerical model of the Earth’s mantle convection with gravitational differentiation, Acta Geophys. Pol., XXIX(3), 207–215, 1984.
Czechowski, L., Theoretical approach to mantle convection, in Dynamics of the Earth’s Evolution, edited by R. Teisseyre, L. Czechowski, and J. LeliwaKopystyński, pp. 161–271, PWNElsevier Sc. Pub., Amsterdam, 1993.
Czechowski, L., Parameterized model of convection driven by tidal and radiogenic heating, Adv. Space Res., 38,788–793, 2006.
Czechowski, L., Uniform parameterized theory of convection in medium sized icy satellites of Saturn, Acta Geophys., 57(2), 548–566, 2009.
Czechowski, L., Thermal history and differentiation of Rhea, Acta Geophys., 60(4), 1192–1212, 2012.
Czechowski, L. and J. LeliwaKopystyński, Convection driven by tidal and radiogenic heating in medium size icy satellites, Planet. Space Sci., 53, 749–769, 2005.
Czechowski, L. and J. LeliwaKopystyński, The Iapetu’s ridge: Possible explanations of its origin, Adv. Space Res., 42, 61–69, 2008.
Dombard, A. J., F. Andrew, A. F. Cheng, W. B. McKinnon, and J. P. Kay, Delayed formation of the equatorial ridge on Iapetus from a subsatellite created in a giant impact, J. Geophys. Res., 117, E03002, doi:10.1029/2011je004010, 2012.
Dumoulin, C., M.P. Doin, and L. Fleitout, Heat transport in stagnant lid convection with temperature and pressuredependent Newtonian or nonNewtonian rheology, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 12,759–12,777, 1999.
Durham, W. B., S. H. Kirby, and L. A. Stern, Rheology of planetary ices, in Solar System Ices, edited by Schmitt, B., C. de Bergh, and M. Festou, pp. 63–78, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherland, 1998.
Forni, O., A. Coradini, and C. Federico, Convection and lithospheric strength in Dione, an icy satellite of Saturn, Icarus, 94, 232–245, 1991.
Giese, B., T. Denk, G. Neukum, T. Roatsch, P. Helfenstein, P. C. Thomas, E. P. Turtle, A. McEwen, and C. C. Porco, The topography of Iapetu’ leading side, Icarus, 193, 359–371, 2008.
Goldsby, D. L. and D. L. Kohlstedt, Grain boundary sliding in finegrained IceI, Scr. Mater, 37, 1399–1405, 1997.
Grasset, O. and C. Sotin, The cooling rate of a liquid shell in Titan’s interior, Icarus, 123, 101–112, 1996.
Ip, W.H., On a ring origin of the equatorial ridge of Iapetus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16203, doi:10.1029/2005GL025386, 2006.
Levison, H. F, K. J. Walsh, A. C. Barr, and L. Dones, Ridge formation and despinning of Iapetus via an impactgenerated satellite, Icarus, 214, 773–778, 2011.
McKinnon, W. B., Geodynamics of icy satellites, in Solar System Ices, edited by Schmitt, B., C. de Bergh, and M. Festou, pp. 525–550, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.
Mosqueira, I. and P. R. Estrada, On the origin of the Saturnian satellite system: Did Iapetus form insitu?, Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVI, 1951.pdf, 2005.
Porco, C. C. and 34 colleagues, Cassini Imaging Science: Initial Results on Phoebe and Iapetus, Science, 307, 1237–1242, 2005.
Robuchon, G., G. Choblet, G. Tobie, O. Cadek, C. Sotin, and O. Grassem, Coupling of thermal evolution and despinning of early Iapetus, Icarus, 207, 959–971, 2010.
Roscoe, R., The viscosity of suspensions of rigid spheres, British J. Appl. Phys., 3, 267–269, 1952.
Sandwell, D. and G. Schubert, A contraction model for the flattening and equatorial ridge of Iapetus, Icarus, 210, 817–822, 2010.
Schubert, G., T. Spohn, and R. T. Reynolds, Thermal histories, compositions and internal structures of the moons of the solar system, in Satellites, edited by Burns, J. A. and M. S. Matthews, pp. 224–292, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1986.
Thomas, P. C, Sizes, shapes, and derived properties of the Saturnian satellites afterthe Cassini nominal mission, Icarus, 208, 395–401, 2010.
Thomas, P. C. and 14 colleagues, Shapes of the Saturnian ice satellites and their significance, Icarus, 190, 573–584, 2007.
Turcotte, D. L. and G. Schubert, Geodynamics, 343–350, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2002.
Watts, A. B., Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere, pp. 253–271, Cambridge Univ. Press., Cambridge, U.K., 2001.
Walsh, K. J., H. F Levison, D. C. Richardson, and S. R. Schwartz, Building the Ridge of Iapetus: Modeling an InFalling Ring. EPSC Abstracts Vol. 6, EPSCDPS201115271, EPSCDPS Joint Meeting, 2011. (http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSCDPS2011/EPSCDPS201115271.pdf)
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science (grant 4036/B/H03/2010/39) and National Science Centre (grant 2011/01/B/ST10/06653). Computer resources of Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modeling (ICM) of Warsaw University are also used in the research.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Czechowski, L., LeliwaKopystynski, J. Remarks on the Iapetus’ bulge and ridge. Earth Planet Sp 65, 929–934 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.12.008
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2012.12.008
Key words
 Iapetus
 satellite
 shape
 satellites
 surface
 tectonics