Open Access

Optical properties of analogs of Titan’s aerosols produced by dusty plasma

  • E. Hadamcik1Email author,
  • J.-B. Renard2,
  • A. Mahjoub1,
  • T. Gautier1,
  • N. Carrasco1,
  • G. Cernogora1 and
  • C. Szopa1
Earth, Planets and Space201365:15

https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2013.05.019

Received: 31 October 2012

Accepted: 30 May 2013

Published: 24 October 2013

Abstract

Analogs of Titan’s aerosols are produced in the laboratory as grains in a gas mixture, or as layers on a substrate. This production procedure enables the methane-nitrogen mixture composition to be changed. The aim of this paper is to understand the variations observed on the linear polarization of the scattered light as a function of the production conditions. The influence of the concentration of methane injected in the plasma will be discussed and compared with the previous work of Hadamcik et al. (2009a). The diameter of the grains are measured by SEM-FEG images. The decrease of absorption with increasing wavelength, measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry on layers, is observed for a decreasing initial methane ratio and analyzed in terms of an increasing ‘amine’ content in the materials. The phase function parameters of the linear polarization of the scattered light are discussed in terms of the diameters of the aggregates and of the constituent grains, and the variation of the refractive indices (mainly absorption). The polarization is found to be highly correlated with the constituent grain size. Finally, the experimental results are compared to polarization measurements from space of the Titan’s atmosphere.

Key words

Light scatteringpolarizationrefractive indicestholinsTitanaerosol

1. Introduction

Titan’s atmosphere is mainly composed of nitrogen N2 and methane CH4. The CH4/N2 ratio varies with altitude. Energetic particles from Saturn’s magnetosphere and photochemical reactions dissociate N2 and CH4. The subsequent chemistry produces solid aerosols in the upper atmosphere which are widespread all around Titan through the atmospheric general circulation, giving the characteristic yellow color to the satellite.

Some physical properties of these aerosols have been deduced from the solar light scattered by the particles and its linear polarization. The observations have been performed by different space probes: Pioneer 11, Voyager 2 and Huygens (Tomasko and Smith, 1982; West et al., 1983; Tomasko et al., 2005). From a comparison between observations and numerical simulations of the particles and the light they scatter, fractal cluster-cluster aggregates with 3000 to 4500 constituent grains of 80-nm mean diameter seem to best describe Titan’s aerosols structure (Tomasko et al., (2008), (2009). The input parameters for the simulations (e.g. refractive indices) are obtained by measurements on analogs called tholins, which are produced in the laboratory by photochemical reactions or plasma discharges (Khare et al., 1984; Imanaka et al., 2004; Mahjoub et al., 2012; Sciamma-O’Brien et al., 2012).

The aim of this paper is to study the influence of the methane content of the plasma discharge on the linear polarization of the light scattered by tholins produced by the PAMPRE set-up (described in detail in Szopa et al., 2006).

This work completes an initial study carried out by Hadamcik et al. (2009a) on this type of tholins. The experiment produces tholins in the gas phase as dust particles, or as thin films on substrates. The linear polarization P of the light scattered by the dust particles is measured with the PROGRA2 instrument (see Renard et al., 2002, for further description). P depends on the geometry of observations, which is expressed by the phase angle á (the angle between the direction of the incident light and the line of sight of the detector, as seen from the dust particle), on the morphology and size distribution of the particles. P also depends on the light wavelength, λ, by the size parameter dependence (X = πd/λ, d is the diameter). It was first defined for spherical particles in the Mie theory. For irregular particles, an effective diameter is defined as the diameter of the sphere with an equivalent volume. The real and imaginary refractive indices n(λ) and k(λ), reflect the chemical composition of the materials. In Hadamcik et al. (2009a), the influence of k on scattered light polarization was tentatively interpreted through k(λ) values in the visible range taken from the literature with tholins other than those produced by the PAMPRE set-up.

Since Hadamcik et al. (2009a), new samples have been produced allowing the variations of the tholins’ properties to be characterized more precisely, as a function of the injected methane percentage (hereafter, CH4 ratio), such as the sizes and size distributions of the particles. Furthermore, the refractive indices in the 340–1000 nm range were measured on proper PAMPRE samples (Mahjoub et al., 2012), enabling the polarization results to be interpreted. The evolution of the chemical composition of the material according to the initial methane amount was studied by infrared absorption spectroscopy giving an insight into the change in albedo of the materials. Finally, the variation of the linear polarization, P, as a function of the different characteristics of tholins, is presented, and P is compared with the results obtained by the different space missions.

2. Production of Tholins by the PAMPRE Set-Up

Tholins are produced in the PAMPRE experiment, a CCP (Capacitively Coupled Plasma) radio frequency discharge at 13.6 MHz in a N2 and CH4 gas mixture, which is described in detail in Szopa et al. (2006) and Sciamma-O’Brien et al. (2010). The pressure is 0.9 hPa for all the experimental conditions presented here.

The discharge induces the formation of ions, atoms and radicals by the dissociation of methane CH4 and nitrogen N2 molecules by electronic collisions. These reactive species recombine, forming heavy gas species and tholins. The discharge can work in CWC (Continuous Working Conditions) for hours, or in a pulsed mode in order to produce tholins with a different reduced discharge duration.

The plasma is confined by a metallic grid and surrounded by a glass vessel where the tholins are collected and finally stored in microvials (Fig. 1). For film deposition, the substrates are placed on the grounded electrode. The samples are analyzed ex-situ. Films are used to measure the refractive indices and to characterize the materials composition by infrared spectroscopy. The light scattering is studied on tholins’ grains. According to Quirico et al. (2008), the materials in layers and tholins in the present work are considered to be made of the same materials. Indeed, similar patterns were found in the mid-infrared spectrum for films and thin layers of tholins produced in the PAMPRE set-up, with 1%, 2% and 10% initial CH4 ratios. The CH4/N2 ratio between 1% and 10% influence is emphasised in the present work.
Fig. 1.

Tholins produced by the PAMPRE instrument. (a) Glass vessel coated by tholins (b). Vials filled with different tholins showing a clearer brown color for the tholins when the CH4 ratio increases. The change from dark to clear may be the result of larger grains, or of a lower absorption of the bulk materials in the visible range.

3. Morphology and Size of the Dust Grains (SEM Analysis)

Hadamcik et al. (2009a) have presented a first study of the morphology of the grains obtained from SEM-FEG images. The grains are quasi-spherical. Their surface is not completely smooth. Some grains are broken and show radial structures corresponding to the surface irregularities, which fill up each grain suggesting that the grains grow radially. Some aggregates appear on the images, with just touching grains or with sintered ones. The aggregation may occur in the discharge or when the grains stick to the glass vessel or inside the microvials (Fig. 1). In the present paper, the word ‘grain’ is used for the individual grains (often called monomers in other papers) and the association of grains are referred to as particles or aggregates.

For each sample, numerous images are taken and the size distribution of the grains are measured. In the following, the size is defined as the diameter of the grains. Several thousand grains are necessary to obtain a good statistics. The size distributions are fitted by a Gaussian function, the size at maximum is called the average size and the half-width at half-maximum is indicated. The average size and size distribution depends on the pulse duration (Fig. 2) and on the CH4 ratio (Fig. 3). The average size increases with the increase of the plasma duration up to a steady-state maximum, depending on the CH4 ratio (Fig. 2). For durations larger than tens of seconds, the size distribution does not change anymore and reaches the CWC: 150 s for 2% CH4 ratio and 300 s for 10% CH4 ratio. The average size in CWC is plotted as a function of CH4 ratios (Fig. 3). It can be fitted by a polynomial function, and presents a minimum for 4–5% CH4 ratios.
Fig. 2.

Comparison of the average size variation vs plasma duration between 2% and 10% ratios. Error bars are the half width of the Gaussian size distribution fits.

Fig. 3.

Average size of tholins with different CH4 ratios produced in CWC conditions. Error bars are the half width of the Gaussian size distribution fits.

4. Refractive Indices Measurements

The light scattering experiments are performed at two wavelengths: green light at 543.5 nm (G) and red light at 632.8 nm (R) (see below Sections 6.1 and 6.6). The optical indices, n and k, of the various samples are therefore needed for these two wavelengths.

The variation of the optical indices as a function of the methane amount has been published in Mahjoub et al. (2012). As is also shown in Sciamma-O’Brien et al. (2012), n and k decrease when the wavelength increases: the n and k values are expected to be smaller for the red light. Figure 4 presents the extracted values of the refractive indices, n and k, as a function of the CH4 ratio for both wavelengths. For both G and R, n increases significantly from about 1.5 to 1.6 with the CH4 ratio. The deviation between n G and n R is smaller than 0.02 for all CH4 ratios. The imaginary index k varies drastically from about 5 × 10−2 to about 1 × 10−2 in the 1–2% CH4 concentration range, and from 1 × 10−2 to 5 × 10−3 in the 2–10% CH4 concentration range. The ratio k G /k R is slightly smaller for the 1% CH4 sample (~1.25) than for the other concentrations (~1.5). The influence of these parameters on the light scattering and polarization are correlated and depends also on the geometrical characteristics of the particles.
Fig. 4.

Variations of n(λ) and k(λ) as a function of the CH4 ratio for 543.5 nm and 632.8 nm.

The chemical composition of tholins changes with the CH4 ratio, as shown by elemental analysis (Sciamma-O’Brien et al., 2010). This change can be a clue for understanding the evolution of the refractive indices with the CH4 ratio. Mid-infrared spectroscopy is therefore used to further characterize some molecular bands in the materials.

5. Mid-Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy

Mid-infrared absorption spectroscopy was used to partially interpret the variation of color and absorption in terms of chemical composition. The evolution of linear absorption coefficients ϵ (in cm−1, i.e. absorbance normalized per thickness-unit) in the range 2.8 μm−4 μm (3500 cm−1–2500 cm−1) for tholins samples produced at different CH4 ratios were studied in Gautier et al. (2012). In this spectral region, two groups of absorption bands are identified as being due to amine function—NH2 and possibly—NH— NH, NH2 (near 3200 cm−1). The aliphatic carbon bands— CH2—and—CH3 (between 2800 cm−1 and 2900 cm−1) are superimposed. These data are here further treated with a focus on the amine and aliphatic contributions. The linear absorption coefficients obtained for different CH4 ratios are plotted on the 2700–3700 cm−1 wavenumber range on Fig. 5(a).
Fig. 5.

Mid-infrared spectrum for different CH4 ratios. (a) 2700–3700 cm−1 wave number range. (b) Magnification of the 2700–3100 cm−1 region after subtraction of the base-line. ϵ = near absorption coefficients.

The intensity maxima of the aliphatic and the amine bands are seen to depend on the CH4 ratio. To further quantify these variations, the amine bands are directly considered, whereas the aliphatic bands are corrected from the amine contribution (Fig. 5(b)).

The variation of the two main amine and the three main aliphatic maxima are represented in Fig. 6 as a function of the CH4 ratio. The ‘amine’ pattern decreases by about a factor of 5 when the CH4 ratio increases and the aliphatic stretching bands of the CH2 and CH3 chemical groups increases by about a factor of 7–8. When the CH4 ratio increases, the material is enriched in aliphatic signatures, whereas the amine content decreases. The absorption in the visible domain may be mainly correlated to the amine absorption bands (Mahjoub et al., 2012). Due to this amine varying content, the imaginary refractive index k (λ) in the visible range decreases when the CH4 ratio increases.
Fig. 6.

Variations of ϵ = linear absorption coefficient for the main bands: ‘amine’ black markers and ‘aliphatic’ open markers.

Gautier et al. (2012) show that the aliphatic signature at 2900 cm−1 is in general agreement with a feature observed by VIMS (Rannou et al., 2010), and they compare the other bands to the VIMS data.

The absorption by particles in the visible wavelength range, represented numerically by the imaginary refractive index, is mainly due to the chemical composition. The structure of aggregates and the size of the constituent grains influence also the scattered light and its linear polarization.

6. Light Scattering on Lifted Particles

6.1 PROGRA2-vis instrument and experimental method

The properties (size, refractive indices) studied in the previous sections are parameters which influence the intensity and polarization of the light scattered by the particles. The particles are introduced in a vial and lifted by an air draught. The particles float freely for a few seconds and then progressively fall. This is studied by the PROGRA2-vis instrument (a detailed description of the instrument and the procedure is given in Hadamcik et al., 2009b, 2011). The light sources are randomly polarized lasers at 543.5 nm and 632.8 nm, with a beam diameter of about 2 mm. Optical fibers from the lasers are fixed on the vial, which can rotate to change the phase angle α. Two cameras measure the polarized intensities (parallel and perpendicular to the scattering plane). Their resolution corresponds to 20 μm at the object. The field of view is about 2 cm. Hundreds of images are used to obtain the polarization at each phase angle, for each pixel or by integration of the polarized intensities on the whole images. The polarization, P, is calculated from the difference divided by the sum of the two polarized intensities, respectively perpendicular and parallel to the scattering plane:
(1)
To build polarization maps, it is necessary to center the images. On the maps the projected surface of the particles is measured and a diameter calculated by the equivalent circle area. Images containing strong multiple scattering effects arising from particles too close to each another are rejected.

The particles in the field of view are aggregates (Hadamcik et al., 2009a). They are generated when the samples are lifted. They are inhomogeneous, made of small aggregates of sintered grains and of individual grains by contact.

The material in the aggregates is sparse. Their size is measured on the polarization maps. The size distribution of the lifted particles can be generally fitted by a Gaussian function. The average size is usually between 50 μm and 100 μm with particles between 20 μm and 1 mm. If the size distribution of the particles cannot be fitted by a Gaussian function, the polarization results are not considered.

First, P is determined for the whole sample, by integration of the polarized intensities on the whole set of particles and parameters of the phase curves are measured. P can also be studied as a function of the size of the particles in the 20–500 μm range. The image of the particles on the camera corresponds to the projection of the field section, with a sin(α) coefficient. Therefore, the spatial resolution of the particles’ images decreases when α decreases. For α ≤ 30°, it becomes impossible to measure the size distribution of the particles. For each size range, and phase angle, the polarized intensities are added and P calculated using Eq. (1). Phase curves are produced for each size range.

6.2 Polarization phase curves

Examples of polarization phase curves are given in Fig. 7 at 632.8 nm, and for three CH4 ratios produced under CWC conditions. They are typical of irregular large particles as compared with the wavelength with a maximum polarization Pmax at a phase angle αmax in the range 90°–100°, and a negative branch at small phase angles with a minimum polarization Pmin at a phase angle αmin. The sign of the polarization changes at the so-called inversion angle α0. Based on Fig. 7, the differences in the parameters on the phase curves seem to be related to the different CH4 ratios, which are themselves related to the physical properties of the particles, mainly the size of their grains (Section 3). I.e., Pmax decreases and Pmin is more negative when the constituent grain size increases. For experimental reasons associated with experimental set-up constraints, the minimum polarization Pmin, if αmin is smaller than 15°, is difficult to measure, and only trends can be deduced from the measurements. The maximum polarization Pmax is the more sensitive to the particles’ properties and the easier to measure.
Fig. 7.

Polarization vs phase angle for 3 different CH4 ratios.

6.3 Influence of the size of the grains on the negative branch

Figure 8 presents Pmin and the inversion angle α0 as a function of the average size of the constituent grains for all the tholins produced with 2%, 5–6% and 10% CH4 ratios for which data are available in the negative branch. For some CH4 ratio conditions, the size distribution is broad (Hadamcik et al., 2009a) and, for example, for the 2% CH4 ratio under CWC and mainly for the 10% CH4 ratio, an important number of grains have diameters of the order of, or larger than, the wavelength, inducing some deeper negative branch (Mie scattering) extending on larger phase angles (also seen in Petrova et al., 2004). A deeper negative branch and an increase of the inversion angle are observed for tholins composed of the largest grains. Moreover, an increase of n (λ) and a decrease of k (λ) from a 1% to 10% CH4 ratio induce also a deeper negative branch. Zubko et al. (2009) found similar results by numerical simulations. The inversion angle α0 seems to be limited to values smaller than 30° for absorbing materials (e.g. 2% CH4 ratio) and reaches 50° for more transparent ones (e.g. 10% CH4 ratio).
Fig. 8.

Pmin and α0 vs average size of the constituent grains for different CH4 ratios and production conditions. Trends are indicated by a linear fit for each CH4 ratio (5% and 6% represented by the same symbols).

These results can be compared with space observations. From outside the atmosphere, the negative polarization on the phase curves is small, with an important scatter of the data (West et al., 1983). From DISR measurements, Tomasko et al. (2009) built a single-scattering polarization phase curve in green light, from a model of fractal cluster-cluster aggregates of 4300 grains with an elemental grain size of 80-nm-diameter mean size. They took into account the radiative transfer in the atmosphere. Pmin is about −2%, which is close to the values found with the experiment for grains with an average diameter smaller than 100 nm (Fig. 8(a)). The inversion angle α0 from the Pioneer 11 (Tomasko and Smith, 1982) and DISR/Huygens (Tomasko et al., 2009) seems to be smaller than 10?, which again indicates a grain diameter smaller than 90 nm (Fig. 8(b)). In order to achieve a more accurate comparison with observations, it is necessary to consider the maximum polarization.

6.4 Influence of the size of aggregates on the positive branch

During the experiment, a few seconds after each air draught, the large aggregates fall to the bottom of the vial and are no more in the laser beam. An about uniform faint beam is observed on the screen due to scattering by particles smaller than 10 μm (smaller than the camera’s resolution). Measurements of the scattered light is possible for a few seconds, and the polarization phase curve can be retrieved. This specific treatment for particles smaller than 10 μm is detailed in Hadamcik et al. (2011). P in the positive branch is generally larger for these micrometer-sized aggregates than for the same sample with an average aggregate size between 50 μm and 100 μm (Hadamcik et al., 2009a) as, for example, for the phase curves obtained for the 5% CH4 ratio sample presented in Fig. 9 (discussed on the wavelength influence in Subsection 6.6).
Fig. 9.

Comparison of the phase curves for small and large aggregates produced under the same conditions of 5% CH4.

The polarization is calculated for each size range (diameter ≥ 20 μm) of the aggregates and the variation of Pmax is presented in Fig. 10 for red light. When the size of the particles increases, Pmax increases up to a maximum for all the samples.
Fig. 10.

Pmax vs diameter ≥ 20 μm of the aggregates (for samples produced at different initial CH4 ratios and plasma durations: (1) 2%, 10 s; (2) 2%, 50 s; (3) 10%, 40 s; (4) 5%, CWC; (5) 2%, CWC; (6) 10%, CWC.

6.5 Influence of the size of the grains on Pmax

The size of the constituent grains is also an important parameter. As was seen in Section 3, the size of the grains depends on the plasma duration in the pulsed mode, and on the CH4 ratio in the CWC mode. The maximum polarization Pmax increases when the grain size decreases for the two wavelengths (Fig. 11). It was first studied for the 2% CH4 ratio at the same wavelength with different plasma durations (Fig. 11, black symbols) and for all the tholins produced under various conditions (open symbols). As was seen in Section 4, the refractive indices depend on the CH4 ratios, but their influence on the maximum polarization seems to be small compared with the influence of the equivalent diameter of the grains (smaller than, or about equal to the wavelength).
Fig. 11.

Pmax vs size of the grains for a size distribution of the aggregates with an average between 50 μm and 100 μm in two wavelengths. Black symbols for 2% CH4, open symbols for all other ratios. Fits are for all the ratios. Space results extrapolated to R = 632.8 nm and G = 543.5 nm for a supposed grain size of 80 nm for comparison. Updated from Hadamcik et al. (2009a).

If the polarization values close to maximum, as deduced from the observations made onboard the space probes, are extrapolated to the PROGRA2 experiment wavelength values, the average equivalent diameter of the constituent grains have to be about 80 nm (Fig. 11 and Table 1).
Table 1.

Comparison between laboratory and space measurements (extrapolated to R = 632.8 nm and G = 543.5 nm). The average diameter of the grains in the aggregates is 75 nm. Values updated from Hadamcik et al. (2009a). Measurements for the small aggregates with 2% CH4.

 

Pmax(G)%

Pmax(R)%

Laboratory

  

Aggregates ≥ 20 μm

53 ± 2

38 ± 2

Aggregates ≤ 10 μm

54 ± 3

55 ± 3

Space observations

  

Integrated from outside

≈49

≈41

Upward from inside (DISR)

≈51

≈54

6.6 Influence of the wavelength on Pmax

The positive polarization and its maximum Pmax change with a change of the incident wavelength (Figs. 9 and 11). For large aggregates, the positive polarization decreases when the wavelength increases. For aggregates with a diameter smaller than 10 μm, the opposite behavior occurs with an increase of the positive polarization.

The size parameter depends on d/λ: an increase of λ is equivalent to a decrease of the size. The refractive indices are also dependent on the wavelength (Section 4). These different parameters will be discussed to disentangle their respective influence. When λ decreases from 632.8 nm to 543.5 nm, it is equivalent to multiplying the sizes by about 1.16. When the size parameter of the large aggregates increases, Pmax increases (Fig. 10) by 1.5% on average for sizes in the 50–100 μm range. When the size parameter of the grains increases, Pmax decreases (Fig. 11), the variation is smaller for large grains (1.4% on average for grains with a 80-nm diameter to 1.1% for grains with a 400-nm diameter). As a consequence, Pmax increases slightly, or is constant, when the wavelength decreases for large aggregates. For small aggregates (micrometer sized), numerical simulations suggest an increase of Pmax when the aggregate and constituent grain sizes decrease, if n and k are in the range found for tholins (Petrova et al., 2004). As a consequence, the decrease of the size parameter from green to red can explain the increase of positive polarization for aggregates smaller than 10 μm with the increase of wavelength. This behavior is different for larger aggregates (Fig. 9).

The polarization depends also on the refractive indices. When λ decreases, n(λ) and k(λ) increases. Numerical models are limited in the size of the particles to equivalent diameters of some micrometers: they are used in the present paper to give trends. When n(λ) increases from 1.5 to 1.9, Pmax decreases for aggregates with an equivalent diameter smaller than about 10 μm (Petrova et al., 2004) and a constant absorption k. For a constant value of n (λ), when k (λ) increases, Pmax increases. Zubko et al. (2009) aggregates’ size parameter is in the 5 to 30 range (equivalent particle size in the 1 to 6 μm range), they consider the variation of Pmax as a function of ‘k’ with a fixed n at 1.5. For k ≤ 0.05, corresponding to tholins, the increase of Pmax with increasing k is very important for the largest aggregates. In that case, Pmax (543.5) is higher than Pmax (632.8), as observed for the tholins for large aggregates, but it keeps the same value or slightly decreases for the smallest ones. The variation of Pmax seems to be dominated by the absorption for the large aggregates.

Internal interactions depolarize the light, as is well observed for transparent particles with small k(λ) values (Hadamcik et al., 2009c); it is also found in numerical simulations on small aggregates (Kimura et al., 2003; Petrova et al., 2004). As the size of the aggregate increases, more light is absorbed. For sufficiently large relatively absorbing particles, the emergent light is mainly scattered by the external grains and the polarization has a maximum value due to the absence of depolarization by multiple scattering, e.g. in green light (Hadamcik et al., 2009a).

Similar conclusions can be deduced for the grains’ size from the PROGRA2 experiment and from the space observations (Tomasko et al., 2009). The polarization values obtained for the green light is about the same for large and small aggregates. They are similar when measured from outside the atmosphere by integrating the fluxes (mainly sensitive to particles in the upper atmosphere) and from inside the atmosphere by the DISR/Huygens experiment looking upward (Table 1). In red light, the maximum polarization values are smaller for large aggregates than for small ones (more internal interactions due to the smaller absorption). Similarly, the external observations of Titan’s atmosphere from Pioneer 11 and Voyager 2 space probes give smaller values because of multiple scattering in the atmosphere, compared with measurements carried out inside the atmosphere looking upward by the DISR, when extrapolated to the wavelength used in the experiment. The integration over the whole atmosphere increases the depolarization by multiple scattering for larger wavelengths (Hadamcik et al., 2009a).

The influence of the wavelength on the maximum polarization is an important factor to consider for a comparison with space observations. However, the quantitative effect on Pmax is small as compared with the grain size influence (Fig. 11).

6.7 Conclusion on the influence of the CH4 ratio

The minimum polarization, Pmin, the maximum polarization, Pmax, and the inversion angle, α0, for the different samples have been found to mainly depend on the size of the constituent grains. However, the samples produced with various methane ratios show different average grain sizes (Fig. 3).

In Fig. 12, the variation of Pmax is presented as a function of the CH4 ratio, such as the variation of the average grain sizes. A maximum value of Pmax is observed for ratios between 4% and 6% CH4. And, indeed, the behavior of the positive polarization is anti-correlated to the variation of the size of the grains as a function of the CH4 ratio.
Fig. 12.

Pmax (left vertical axis) and average grain size (right axis) vs CH4 initial.

7. Summary and Conclusion

Tholins optical properties have been studied emphasizing their variation as a function of the CH4/N2 ratio with the PAMPRE set-up. SEM analysis has enabled the constituent grain-size distribution to be measured for each sample. A minimum size is obtained for CH4/N2 ratios between 4% and 5%. The linear polarization phase curves are dominated by the variation in the size of the constituent grains. An anti-correlation is observed between the grain-size variation and the maximum polarization, Pmax. The negative branch is also dependent on the CH4/N2 ratio by the grain-size dependence. An initial investigation has been conducted and future investigations are needed for low phase angles because of the critical signal-to-noise ratio values in this region. Pmin, α0 and Pmax values for grain sizes smaller than, or equal to, 90-nm diameters are similar to those found by the different space missions (when the values are extrapolated to the same wavelengths). The large aggregates values correspond to values integrated over the whole satellite atmosphere, as measured by Pioneer 11 and Voyager 2, and the values observed by DISR/Huygens looking upward to values obtained for aggregates in the micrometer-size range.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

EH would like to thank H. Kimura and the CPS for organizing the Cosmic Dust workshop and for their help, allowing her to participate. The authors thank S. Borensztajn (Univ. Paris-Sorbonne, UPR 15) for the SEM-FEG images. CNES is acknowledged for funding the PROGRA2 experiment. Financial support for A. M. post-doc (ANR-09-JCJC-0038 contract).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UPMC (U. P. & M. Curie, Sorbonne Universités), Université Versailles St-Quentin, CNRS/INSU, LATMOS-IPSL
(2)
LPC2E, CNRS

References

  1. Gautier, T., N. Carrasco, A. Mahjoub, S. Vinatier, A. Giufiani, C. Szopa, C. M. Anderson, J. J. Correia, P. Dumas, and G. Cernogora, Mid- and far-infrared absorption spectroscopy of Titan’s aerosols analogues, Icarus, 220, 320–327, 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hadamcik, E., J.-B. Renard, G. Alcouffe, G. Cernogora, A. C. Levasseur-Regourd, and C. Szopa, Laboratory light-scattering measurements with Titan’s aerosols analogues produced by a dusty plasma, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 1631–1641, 2009a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hadamcik, E., J.-B. Renard, A. C. Levasseur-Regourd, and J. C. Worms, Laboratory measurements of the light scattered by clouds of solid particles by imaging technique, in Light Scattering Rev 4, Single Light Scattering and Radiative Transfer, edited by A. Kokhanovsky, 40 pp., Springer-Praxis, Berlin, 2009b.Google Scholar
  4. Hadamcik, E., J.-B. Renard, A. C. Levasseur-Regourd, J. Lasue, G. Al-couffe, and M. Francis, Light scattering by agglomerates: Interconnecting size and absorption effects (PROGRA2 experiment), J. Quant. Spec-trosc. Radiat. Transfer, 110, 1755–1770, 2009c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadamcik, E., J.-B. Renard, A. C. Levasseur-Regourd, and J. Lasue, Laboratory measurements of light scattered by clouds and layers of solid particles using an imaging technique, in Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Special Detection Technique (Polarimetry) and Remote Sensing, edited by M. I. Mishchenko, Y. S. Yatskiv, V. K. Rosenbush, and G. Videen, 40 pp., NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, Springer, Yalta, Ukraine 20 September–1 October 2010, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Imanaka, H., B. N. Khare, J. E. Elsila, E. L. O. Bakes, C. P. McKay, D. P. Cruiskshank, S. Sugita, T. Matsui, and R. N. Zare, Laboratory experiments of Titan tholin formed in cold plasma at various pressures: Implications for nitrogen-containing polycyclic aromatics compounds in Titan haze, Icarus, 168, 344–366, 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Khare, B. N., K. Sagan, E. T. Arakawa, F. Suits, T. A. Callcott, and M. W. Williams, Optical constants of organic tholins produced in a simulated Titanian atmosphere: From soft X-ray to microwave frequencies, Icarus, 60, 127–137, 1984.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kimura, H., L. Kolokolova, and I. Mann, Optical properties of cometary dust. Constraints from numerical studies on light scattering by aggregate particles, Astron. Astrophys., 407, L5–L8, 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahjoub, A., N. Carrasco, P.-R. Dahoo, T. Gautier, C. Szopa, and G. Cernogora, Influence of methane concentration on the optical indices of Titan’s aerosols analogues, Icarus, 221, 670–677, 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Petrova, E., V. P. Tishkovets, and K. Jockers, Polarization of light scattered by solar system bodies and the aggregate model of dust particles, Sol. Syst. Res., 38, 309–324, 2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Quirico, E., G. Montagnac, V. Lees, P. F. McMillan, C. Szopa, G. Cernogora, J. N. Rouzaud, P. Simon, J. M. Bernard, P. Coll, N. Fray, R. D. Minard, F. Raulin, B. Reynard, and B. Schmitt, New experimental constraints on the composition and structure of tholins, Icarus, 198, 218–231, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Rannou, P., T. Cours, S. Le Mouélic, S. Rodriguez, C. Sotin, P. Drossart, and R. Brown, Titan haze distribution and optical properties retrieved from recent observations, Icarus, 208, 850–867, 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Renard, J.-B., J. C. Worms, T. Lemaire, E. Hadamcik, and N. Huret, Lifght scattering by dust particles in microgravity: Polarization and brightness imaging with the new version of the PROGRA2 instrument, Appl. Opt., 41, 609–618, 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sciamma-O’Brien, E., N. Carrasco, C. Szopa, A. Buch, and G. Cernogora, Titan’s atmosphere: An optimal gas mixture for aerosol production?, Icarus, 209, 704–714, 2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sciamma-O’Brien, E., P.-R. Dahoo, E. Hadamcik, N. Carrasco, E. Quirico, C. Szopa, and G. Cernogora, Optical constants from 370 nm to 900 nm of tholins produced in a low pressure RF plasma discharge, Icarus, 218, 356–363, 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Szopa, C., G. Cernogora, L. Boufendi, J. J. Correia, and P. Coll, PAMPRE a dusty plasma experiment for Titan’s tholins production and study, Planet. Space Sci., 54, 394–404, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tomasko, M. G. and P. H. Smith, Photometry and polarimetry of Titan: Pioneer 11 observations and their implications for aerosol properties, Icarus, 51, 65–95, 1982.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tomasko, M. G., B. Archinal, T. Becker, B. Bézard, M. Bushroe, M. Combes, D. Cook, A. Coustenis, C. de Bergh, and 30 coauthors, Rain, winds and haze during the Huygens probe’s descent to Titan’s surface, Nature, 438, 765–778, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tomasko, M. G., L. Doose, S. Engel, L. E. Dafoe, R. West, and M. Lem-mon, A model of Titan’s aerosols based on measurements made inside the atmosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 56, 669–707, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tomasko, M. G., L. Doose, L. E. Dafoe, and C. See, Limits on the size of aerosols from measurements of linear polarization in Titan’s atmosphere, Icarus, 204, 271–283, 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. West, R. A., H. Hart, K. E. Simmons, C. W. Hord, L. W. Esposito, A. L. Lane, R. B. Pomphrey, D. L. Coffeen, and M. Sato, Voyager 2 pho-topolarimeter observations of Titan, J. Geophys. Res., 88, A118699–A118708, 1983.Google Scholar
  22. Zubko, E., H. Kimura, Y. Shkuratov, K. Muinonen, T. Yamamoto, H. Okamoto, and G. Videen, Effect of absorption on light scattering by agglomerated debris particles, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 110, 1741–1749, 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Societyof Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2013