Open Access

Narrowband frequency-drift structures in solar type IV bursts

  • Yukio Nishimura1,
  • Takayuki Ono1,
  • Fuminori Tsuchiya2,
  • Hiroaki Misawa2,
  • Atsushi Kumamoto1,
  • Yuto Katoh1,
  • Satoshi Masuda3 and
  • Yoshizumi Miyoshi3
Earth, Planets and Space201365:6501201555

Received: 18 February 2013

Accepted: 13 September 2013

Published: 6 December 2013


We have established the Zao Solar Radiospectrograph (ZSR), a new solar radio observation system, at the Zao observatory of Tohoku University, Japan. We observed narrowband fine structures with type IV bursts with ZSR on 2 and 3 November 2008. The observed fine structures are similar to fiber bursts in terms of the drift rates and the existence of emission and absorption stripes. Statistical analysis of the drift rates, however, shows that the observed fine structures are different from the ordinary fiber bursts as regards the sense and the magnitude of their drift rates. First, the observed drift rates include both positive and negative rates, whereas ordinary fiber bursts are usually characterized by negative drift rates. Second, the absolute values of the observed drift rates are tens of MHz s−1, whereas the typical drift rate of fiber bursts at 325 MHz is approximately −9 MHz s−1. In addition, all fine structures analyzed have narrow emission bands of less than 17 MHz. We also show that the observed narrowband emission features with drift rates of approximately 40 MHz s−1 can be interpreted as the propagation of whistler-mode waves, which is the same process as that underlying fiber bursts.

Key words

Sunradiotype IV burstfiber burstfine structure

1. Introduction

Solar type IV bursts are intense radio phenomena that follow solar flares. They have wideband continuous spectra that extend from meter into decimeter wavelengths (e.g., Wild et al., 1963). Following their discovery by Elgarøy (1959), many observations of type IV bursts have revealed that they are accompanied by several kinds of fine structure. One of the most prominent fine-structure in type IV bursts are fiber bursts. They were first detected by Young et al. (1961). They are usually referred to as ‘intermediate drift bursts’ (IMDs). Detection of the same kind of burst has also been reported by Thompson and Maxwell (1962), Slottje (1972), Aurass et al. (1987), and many others. Recently, observations in the decimeter and microwave range have been made by many authors. For example, Benz and Mann (1998) investigated fiber bursts in the frequency range of 1–3 GHz. Chernov et al. (2001) and Fernandes et al. (2003) reported observational results with high resolution at frequencies above 1 GHz. The main characteristics of fiber bursts are as follows: (i) their drift rate is usually negative, (ii) the drift/frequency ratio, ǀ(d f/dt)/ f ǀ, is on the order of 0.04–−0.1 s−1, (iii) their instantaneous bandwidth is approximately 2% of the emission frequency (Benz and Mann, 1998), and (iv) they are accompanied a paralleldrift absorption band in the background continuum radiation (e.g., Chernov, 2006). Kuijpers (1975) proposed an emission mechanism for fiber bursts consisting of the interaction of a Langmuir and a whistler-mode wave. This produces a left-handed polarized ordinary (L-O) mode wave that can escape from the emission region. According to this theory, the drift rate of the emission frequency is interpreted by the group velocity of the whistler-mode waves. The proposed mechanism is generally accepted, although it has also attracted some criticism (e.g., Bernold and Treumann, 1983). Recently, Aurass et al. (2005) showed the validity of this process for estimating magnetic-field strength with fiber bursts. Previous studies have also proposed another emission mechanism which involves Alfvén velocity as the speed of the motion of emission source (e.g., Treumann et al., 1990; Kuznetsov, 2006; Karlický et al., 2013). Observations and the theoretical background of fiber bursts are reviewed by Chernov (2006).

Many radio spectrometers for observations of solar radio bursts have been operated in the meter-wave range, such as Phoenix in Switzerland (Benz et al., 1991), Brazilian Solar Spectroscope (BSS) in Brazil (Sawant et al., 2001), Hiraiso Radio Spectrograph (HiRAS) in Japan (Kondo et al., 1995), and Culgoora in Australia (Prestage et al., 1994). Since the resolution of these wide-band spectrometers is often limited to a time resolution of 0.1 s and a frequency resolution of 1 MHz, it is not sufficient to investigate the fine-structure details of radio bursts such as fiber bursts, which have approximately 1 MHz of instantaneous bandwidth at a frequency near 300 MHz. There are radiospectrographs with higher time resolution of milliseconds (e.g., Fu et al., 1995; Jiřička and Karlický, 2008; Dąbrowski et al., 2011), which have revealed a new class of fine structures of radio bursts (e.g., Magdalenić et al., 2006). However, the time resolution is still not adequate in the meter wavelength range, especially for metric type IV bursts. In addition, the frequency resolution in those observations with high-time resolution has still remained up to 1 MHz. Higher-resolution observations and more detailed analyses are required to understand of fine-structured radio bursts, as well as particle and wave dynamics in the solar corona.

In this regard, we established new spectral observations in the range of 315–332 MHz at an extremely high resolution of 100 kHz and 10 ms. The details of the instrumentation are described in Section 2, the statistical characteristics of the observed fine structures are covered in Section 3 and our interpretation is presented in Section 4. Section 5 gives conclusions of the present study.

2. Instrumentation

A new instrumentation for the observations of solar radio emission in the meter-wave range, the Zao Solar Ra-diospectrograph (ZSR), was established in June 2008 at the Zao observatory (latitude: 38°06′, longitude: 140°32′ E, altitude: 685 m) of Planetary Plasma and Atmospheric Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Japan. The observation system is based on system for observation of Jovian synchrotron radiation by Watanabe et al. (2005). The ZSR system is fed by a 4 × 2 stacked 27-element cross-Yagi antenna manufactured by Creative Design Corp., covering a frequency range around 327 MHz. The antenna effective area is about 20 m2, with a half-power beam width of about 8°. The antenna has a typical altazimuth mount and follows the Sun continuously.

The receiver system consists of an antenna, a front-end equipped with a low-noise amplifier (LNA) unit and a hybrid amplifier, and a back-end with units of a power combiner, a spectrum analyzer, and a personal computer (PC), as shown in Fig. 1(a). The LNA unit amplifies the input signal with an extremely low level of noise and selects the relevant radio-frequency bandwidth. It has +40 dB gain in the frequency range between 317 MHz and 337 MHz. The details of the front-end are shown in Fig. 1(b). In this study, both the attenuation level in the programmable attenuator and the phase delay of the programmable phase shifter are set to zero. The hybrid amplifier amplifies the incoming signal using a gain of +23.3 dB. It is used to compensate the back-end for the power loss caused by the coaxial cable. Finally, the signals are fed into the spectrum analyzer (HP 8558B, manufactured by Hewlett Packard), which receives the signal at frequencies from 315 to 332 MHz at 100 sweeps s−1. The frequency range of the spectrum analyzer is determined with the performance of the antenna and front-end. Information about the amplitude and frequency of the signals are displayed on a Cathode Ray Tube screen, and also transferred as DC voltage signals to the PC’s 8-bit A/D board, which receives 510 samples per sweep. Samples are averaged in thirds, so that the entire spectral range (315–332 MHz) is divided into 170 channels with a resolution bandwidth of 100 kHz each. The converted digital data are stored hourly in binary mode.
Fig. 1.

Schematics of the ZSR. (a) Receiver system. (b) Low noise amplifier (LNA).

In addition to the work by Watanabe et al. (2005), we installed the back-end for spectral observation and the revised antenna control system, and the signal-transmission line was modified to increase the system gain. The ZSR’s observation parameters are listed in Table 1. The ZSR has a resolution bandwidth of 100 kHz and a time resolution of 10 ms. The minimum detection sensitivity is 4.3 SFU (1 SFU = Solar Flux Unit = 10−22 W m−2 Hz−1).
Table 1.

The ZSR’s observation parameters.



Frequeny range

315–332 MHz

Frequency resolution

100 kHz

Temporal resolution

10 ms


27-element, 8-stack Yagi antenna

Antenna effective area

20 m2

Total system gain

44 dB

Minimum detectable sensitivity

4.3 SFU

3. Observations

On 2 and 3 November 2008, groups of type IV bursts were observed after a B5.7-class flare occurred in the active region AR 11007. The full view of this event is shown in Fig. 2. The B5.7-class flare started at 20:12 UT on 2 November 2008, and an A5.0 class flare started at 03:04 UT on 3 November 2008. Both have been confirmed on the basis of an observed GOES-10 light curve. Groups of radio bursts were observed at 21:27–22:30 UT, 23:02–23:14 UT on 2 November, and 03:11–03:15 UT on 3 November. Figure 3(a) shows examples of observed fine structures in type IV bursts. Several drifting stripes characterized by positive frequency drifts are confirmed in this dynamic spectrum. The drift rate of the stripe that starts at 23:09:12.4 UT is 69.2 MHz s−1. The total bandwidth of the stripe is approximately 10 MHz. Some stripes also accompany the absorption on the low-frequency side, which is similar to that associated with fiber bursts. For reference, in Fig. 3(b) we plot the dynamic spectrum of this event with a reduced resolution of 1 MHz and 0.1 s to demonstrate that it is difficult to distinguish the drifting stripes confirmed in Fig. 3(a). This result shows that the resolution generally employed in the previous studies (e.g., Benz et al., 1991) is not sufficient to detect such narrowband drifting stripes and underscores validity of our 100 kHz and 10 ms high-resolution observations.
Fig. 2.

Overview of the 2 and 3 November 2008 events. Dynamic spectra obtained with (top) Hiraiso Radio Spectrograph (HiRAS) and (middle) the ZSR. (bottom) Light curve of 1–8 Å X-ray flux observed by the GOES-10 satellite.

Fig. 3.

(a) Dynamic spectrum obtained 23:09:12–13 UT on 2 November 2008. Some narrowband drifting stripes characterized by both positive and negative drift rates are confirmed. (b) Same time span as in panel (a), but with a reduced resolution of 1 MHz and 0.1 s.

Figure 4 shows the number of events with start and end frequencies within the observation’s frequency range. Because it is difficult to discuss events characterized by start or end frequencies outside the observed frequency range, we excluded those events. The histogram is binned into 10 MHz s−1 bins of the observed drift rate. The drift rate of each event is derived using least-squares minimization. This result offers the several insights. Fine-structure events with a drift rate of a few tens of MHz s−1 occur most frequently, and the number of events with positive drift rates is larger than that of the equivalent events characterized by negative drift rates.
Fig. 4.

Histogram of the observed drift rate of fine structures. Solid line: Number distribution of the events with positive frequency drift; dashed line: Equivalent distribution with negative frequency drift.

4. Discussion

Narrowband emission features with intermediate drift rates observed during this event exhibit some characteristics that are different from typical fiber bursts in type IV bursts.
  • About 75 % of events show positive drift rates.

  • The distribution of the drift rate has a peak in the range of 20–40 MHz s−1, and only 2.6 % of events have the drift rates of approximately −9 MHz s−1, a typical value for fiber bursts.

In the physics of solar radio emissions, various emission mechanisms have been studied such as gyro-synchrotron, bremsstrahlung, and plasma emissions. In the observed frequency range, plasma emissions have been mainly considered (e.g., Iwai et al., 2013). In the plasma emission theory, the frequency drift of emission features can be explained by (i) non-thermal electron beams, which are common in type III bursts (e.g., Suzuki and Dulk, 1985), or (ii) whistler-mode waves, thought to be the origin of fiber bursts (e.g., Kuijpers, 1975). Therefore, positive drift rates are interpreted as downward motions of the either emission source. In the following sections, we discuss the applicability of these two ideas in the context of the observed level of fine structure from the point of the amplitude of the drift rates.

4.1 Non-thermal electron beams

The observed drift rate of emissions can be explained by the radial motion of a wave source in the corona. If radio emissions are generated by wave-wave coupling processes of Langmuir waves excited by non-thermal beam electrons, the emission frequency is determined by the local plasma frequency and thus the drift rate should be related to the speed of beam electrons. Assuming radiation at the fundamental of plasma frequency, the speed v is represented by
where r is the distance from the solar surface Ne is electron density (e.g., Chernov et al., 2008). The energy of an electron beam with a speed corresponding to 40 MHz s−1 is approximately 900 eV in the region with a plasma frequency of 325 MHz, applying 10 times the Baumbach-Allen model to the electron-density model in the corona
where r is the radius of the Sun. Now we will examine whether this velocity of the emission source is non-thermal in the corona (e.g., Aschwanden, 2004).

It is well known that the temperature in the corona after the start of a solar flare often reaches about 10 MK (e.g., Fernandes et al., 2012). Thus, the derived electron energy is at a comparable level to that of the flare related plasma, which seems too small to be a non-thermal electron beam generating radio emission. Therefore, we conclude that fine-structure events with a drift rate of a few tens of MHz s−1 are not caused by non-thermal electron beams. It should be noted that the magnetic field lines along which the emission sources move are assumed to be completely perpendicular to the solar surface. If the magnetic lines are oblique to the radial direction, the speed of the motion of the wave source corresponding to the observed drift rate can be larger than the estimated value. We do not rule out non-thermal electron beams moving along oblique magnetic field lines as a possible wave source of the event with a drift rate of a few tens of MHz s−1

On the other hand, events characterized by the higher drift rates, especially above 100 MHz s−1 which corresponds to about 7.6 keV of the energy of electrons, seem to have their origin in such an electron beam because they can have the higher speed and be an non-thermal electron beam.

4.2 Whistler-mode waves

Equation (1) represents the relation between the speed of the motion of an emission source and the frequency drift rate of radio waves. Here we consider a wave-wave coupling process between Langmuir waves and whistler-mode waves in the corona. In this coupling process, radio emissions are generated at the frequency close to the plasma frequency. In a case that the emission source where this coupling process occurs moves radially in coronal plasma, where the local plasma frequency varies radially, the emission frequency varies in time. Assuming that the observed radio bursts are related to whistler-mode waves, the speed of the motion of the emission source is equal to the group velocity of whistler-mode wave packets. Therefore, in the whistler-mode wave framework, v in Eq. (1) can be replaced by the group velocity of whistler-mode waves vg. In the quasi-longitudinal case, vg is represented by
where c is the speed of light, ωce is electron cyclotron frequency, ωp is plasma frequency, x = ω/ωce is the ratio of emission frequency and electron cyclotron frequency (Kuijpers, 1975). The calculation results of the speed at the region where the plasma frequency are equal to 325 MHz and ωp/ωce = 10 is shown in Fig. 5 and it shows that the maximum velocity at the observed region is about 0.065 c. By using Eqs. (1) and (2), the frequency drift rate corresponding to speed of 0.065 c is derived as 39.04 MHz s−1. This is approximately the same as the observed drift rates.
Fig. 5.

The group velocity of whistler-mode waves in the coronal region with a plasma frequency of 325 MHz.

In addition to whistler-mode waves, Alfvén velocity has also been proposed as the speed of the wave source motion for the mechanism of frequency drift emissions. Here we evaluate Alfvén velocity for the agent generating fiber bursts (e.g., Treumann et al., 1990). The Alfvén velocity va is represented by
$$v_{\text{A}} = \frac{B}{{\sqrt {\mu _0 n_{\text{i}} m_{\text{i}} } }},$$
where B is the strength of magnetic field, μ0 is the magnetic permeability, ni and mi are the number density and mass of ions. We use the electron density in the observed coronal region for ni = 1.30 × 109 cm−3 and the proton mass for mi. If the 40 MHz s−1 drift rate is assumed to be explained by Alfvén velocity, the magnetic field strength should be approximately 300 G in the observed coronal region. The magnetic field strength is estimated to be 12 G by the model of Dulk and McLean (1978) in the region of the plasma frequency of 325 MHz. Since the derived magnetic field is too large for the plausible source region at 0.12 RS from the surface of the sun, it is difficult to explain the observed drift speed as Alfvén velocity.
Next, we study the coupling condition of the plasma waves for radio emission through the interaction of a Lang-muir and a whistler-mode waves to an L-O mode wave (hereafter we denote this process as L + wT). In a cold plasma, the dispersion relation of waves is described by the Appleton-Hartree equation,
where , and θ is the wave-propagation angle with respect to the background magnetic field.
Figure 6 shows the dispersion relation calculated for ωp/ωce = 10 and fp = ωp/2π = 325 MHz, which is derived from 10 times the Baumbach-Allen model for the coronal electron density and the Dulk and Mclean model for the coronal magnetic field strength (Dulk and McLean, 1978). With this result and the conservation law of
where k is the wave number, we can find the wave number fulfill the coupling conditions of Eqs. (6) and (7) for the frequency of ωw = 0.25 ωce based on the discussion on Fig. 5 and ωl = ωp. The absolute values of the wave number become kL = 6.28 m−1 and kT = 2.35 m−1, where a propagation angle of the L-O wave is 0°. These solutions are indicated by arrows onto branches in Fig. 6. This shows that the three-wave coupling of L + wT can take place with whistler-mode waves of the frequency of ωw = 0.25
Fig. 6.

Calculated wave-dispersion relation based on the Appleton-Hartree equation for ωp/ωce = 10, fp = ωp/2p = 325 MHz and θ = 0°. The solid line shows L-O mode wave, the dotted line does Langmuir wave, and the dashed line does whistler-mode wave. The arrows on the graph indicate the solution of the non-linear three-wave interaction, L + wT, for whistler-mode waves of 0.25ωce.

It is demonstrated that whistler-mode waves with a group velocity corresponding to the observed drift rate of order 40 MHz s−1, which is not typical for the fiber bursts, can exist and that the observed drift emission can be generated by whistler-mode waves. In this study, the frequency of whistler-mode waves of 0.25 ωce at which the group velocity is maximal is taken account, whereas the frequency of whistler-mode waves was assumed approximately 0.1 ωce in previous studies of fiber bursts (e.g., Chernov et al., 2008). This is the main reason why the fine structures with a drift rate of a few tens of MHz s−1 is explained by the same mechanism of typical fiber bursts which have approximate −9 MHz s−1 in the observed frequency range.

In the present study, we assumed that whistler-mode waves are excited by energetic electrons generated in the associated flare. Here we consider the plasma environment in the coronal region. In the observed coronal region where the plasma frequency is around 325 MHz, the ratio of the plasma frequency to the cyclotron frequency, ωp/ωce is estimated to be 10. This condition is similar to the plasma environment in the terrestrial magnetosphere, where whistler-mode waves are generated under the presence of energetic electrons of a few to tens of keV having anisotropic velocity distribution (e.g., Kennel and Petschek, 1966). Since keV electrons should be ubiquitous in the coronal region after flare, we can expect the generation of whistler-mode waves at the frequency range around 0.25 ωce assumed in the present study.

Events that exhibit faster drift rates than about 100 MHz s−1, on the other hand, cannot be explained by the whistler-mode waves. They are assumed to be generated by nonthermal electron beams as well as type III bursts. The characteristic drift rate that divides the two generation mechanisms discussed above is not clear from the histogram in Fig. 4.

5. Conclusion

To investigate fine-structure details of solar type IV bursts, we established a new radio observation system at the Zao observatory of Tohoku University. Narrowband fine structures that are difficult to detect based on observations with typical spectral resolutions were observed in type IV bursts on 2 and 3 November 2008. Statistical analysis of the drift rate shows that they are different from ordinary fiber bursts in both sense and magnitude. First, the observed drift rates exhibit both positive and negative rates, whereas ordinary fiber bursts usually have negative drift rates. Second, the absolute values of the observed drift rates are tens of MHz s−1, while the typical drift rate of fiber bursts at 325 MHz is approximately −9 MHz s−1 (e.g., Benz and Mann, 1998). In addition, the all analyzed fine structures have narrow emission bands of less than 17 MHz. The observed narrowband emissions features with drift rates of a few tens of MHz s−1 at 325 MHz can be interpreted by the generation process of fiber bursts (Kuijpers, 1975); i.e., the emission features are thought to be caused by whistlermode waves propagating in the corona. These observed narrowband events are difficult to detect with the traditional resolution of 1 MHz and 0.1 s. These results imply that the higher resolution used in the present study is necessary to investigate fine structures accompanying type IV bursts.

Based on the observations using ZSR, only one event was detected, which consists of the radio burst with narrowband fine structure. The number of events is too small to discuss their occurrence rate. In addition, the ZSR’s frequency range is too narrow to survey their association with other radio bursts in different frequency range and the variance of the coronal loop structures and the distribution of energetic electrons obtained through imaging observations such as with Hinode, STEREO, SDO, and the Nobeyama Radio Heliograph. This problem can be overcome with new wide-band and high-resolution observations of solar radio bursts, such as obtained with IPRT/AMATERAS (Iwai et al., 2012).



The ZSR instrumentation is supported by the Planetary Plasma and Atmosphere Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University. The author wishes to thank Drs. Maki Akioka and Tetsuro Kondou who provided radio spectra observed at HiRAS. This work was carried out as part of a joint research program with the Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory at Nagoya University. This work was also supported by the Global COE (Center of Excellence) program, ‘Global Education and Research Center for Earth and Planetary Dynamics’, at Tohoku University (Principal Investigator: Prof. Eiji Ohtani)

Authors’ Affiliations

Space and Terrestrial Plasma Physics Laboratory, Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Planetary Plasma and Atmospheric Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan


  1. Aschwanden, M. J., Physics of the Solar Corona. An Introduction, 842 pp, Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester (UK), 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Aurass, H., G. P. Chernov, M. Karlický, J. Kurths, and G. Mann, On a sequence of remarkable fine structures in the type IV burst of 24 April, 1985, Sol. Phys., 112, 347–357, 1987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Aurass, H., G. Rausche, G. Mann, and A. Hofmann, Fiber bursts as 3D coronal magnetic field probe in postflare loops, Astron. Astrophys., 435, 1137–1148, 2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz, A. O. and G. Mann, Intermediate drift bursts and the coronal magnetic field, Astron. Astrophys., 333, 1034–1042, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Benz, A. O., M. Güdel, H. Isliker, S. Miszkowicz, and W. Stehling, A broadband spectrometer for decimetric and microwave radio bursts: first results, Sol. Phys., 133, 385–393, 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernold, T. E. X. and R. A. Treumann, The fiber fine structure during solar type IV radio bursts: observations and theory of radiation in presence of localized whistler turblence, Astrophys. J., 264, 677–688, 1983.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chernov, G. P., Solar radio bursts with drifting stripes in emission and absorption, Space Sci. Rev., 127, 195–326, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chernov, G. P., L. V. Yasnov, Y. Yan, and Q. Fu, On the zebra structure in the frequency range near 3GHz, Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 525–536, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chernov, G. P., Y. Yan, Q. Fu, C. Tan, and S. Wang, Unusual zebra patterns in the decimeter wave band, Sol. Phys., 250, 115–131, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dąbrowski, B. P., P. Rudawy, and M. Karlický, Millisecond radio spikes in the decimetric band, Sol. Phys., 273, 377–392, 2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dulk, G. A. and D. J. McLean, Coronal magnetic fields, Sol. Phys., 57, 279–295, 1978.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Elgarøy, Ø., Frequency drift and fine structure of 200 Mc/s solar bursts, in URSI Symp. 1: Paris Symp. on Radio Astron., edited by R. N. Barcewell, 248 pp, Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA, 1959.Google Scholar
  13. Fernandes, F. C. R., V. Krishan, M. C. Andrade, J. R. Cecatto, D. C. Freitas, and H. S. Sawant, High resolution studies of intermediate drift bursts, Adv. Space Res., 32, 2545–2550, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandes, F. C. R., J. A. S. S. Dutra, R. D. Cunha da Silva, and H. S. Sawant, Flaring loop parameters estimated from solar decimeter type U-like and type J-like fine structures, Adv. Space Res., 49, 1607–1614, 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu, Q., Z. Qin, H. Ji, and L. Pei, A broadband spectrometer for decimeter and microwave radio bursts, Sol. Phys., 160, 97–103, 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwai, K., F. Tsuchiya, A. Morioka, and H. Misawa, IPRT/AMATERAS: A new metric spectrum observation system for solar radio bursts, Sol. Phys., 277, 447–457, 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwai, K., S. Masuda, Y. Miyoshi, F. Tsuchiya, A. Morioka, and H. Misawa, Peak flux distributions of solar radio type-I bursts from highly resolved spectral observations, Astrophys. J. Lett., 768, L2, 2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiřička, K. and M. Karlický, Narrowband pulsating decimetric structure observed by the New Ondřejov solar radio spectrograph, Sol. Phys., 253, 95–101, 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlický, M., H. Mèszárosová, and P. Jelínek, Radio fiber bursts and fast magnetoacoustic wave trains, Astron. Astrophys., 550, A1, 2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennel, C. F. and H. E. Petschek, Limit on stably trapped particle fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 1–28, 1966.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kondo, T., T. Isobe, S. Igi, S. Watari, and M. Tokumaru, The Hiraiso Radio Spectrograph (HiRAS) for monitoring solar radio bursts, J. Commun. Res. Lab., 42, 111–119, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Kuijpers, J., Generation of intermediate drift bursts in solar type IV radio continua through coupling of whstlers and Langmuir waves, Sol. Phys., 44, 173–193, 1975.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuznetsov, A. A., Generation of intermediate drift bursts by magnetohy-drodynamic waves in the solar corona, Sol. Phys., 237, 153–171, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Magdalenić, J., B. Vršnak, P. Zlobec, A. Hillaris, and M. Messerotti, Classification and properties of supershort solar radio bursts, Astrophys. J., 642, L77, 2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Prestage, N. P., R. G. Luckhurst, B. R. Paterson, C. S. Bevins, and C. G. Yuile, A new radiospectrograph at culgoora, Sol. Phys., 150, 393–396, 1994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sawant, H. S., K. R. Subramanian, C. Faria, F. C. R. Fernandes, J. H. A. Sobral, J. R. Cecatto, R. R. Rosa, V. O. Vats, J. A. C. F. Neri, E. M. B. Alonso, F. P. V. Mesquita, V. A. Portezani, and A. R. F. Martinon, Brazilian solar spectroscope (BSS), Sol. Phys., 200, 167–176, 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Slottje, C., Peculiar absorption and emission microstructures in the type IV solar radio outburst of March 2, 1970, Sol. Phys., 25, 210–231, 1972.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Suzuki, S. and G. A. Dulk, Bursts of type III and type V, in Solar Radio-physics: Studies of Emission from the Sun at Metre Wavelengths, edited by D. J. Mclean and N. R. Labrum, Canbridge Univ. Press, Cambridge & New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, A. R. and A. Maxwell, Spectral observations of solar radio bursts. III. Continuum bursts, Astrophys. J., 136, 546–573, 1962.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Treumann, R. A., M. Güdel, and A. O. Benz, Alfvén wave solitons and solar intermediate drift bursts, Astron. Astrophys., 236, 242–249, 1990.Google Scholar
  31. Watanabe, T., H. Misawa, F. Tsuchiya, Y. Miyoshi, T. Abe, and A. Morioka, Development of the observation system for the Jovian synchrotron radiation using an aperture synthesis array, Tohoku Geophys. J., 37, 1–90, 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Wild, J. P., S. F. Smerd, and A. A. Weiss, Solar bursts, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 291–366, 1963.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Young, C. W., C. L. Spencer, G. E. Moreton, and J. A. Roberts, A preliminary study of the dynamic spectra of solar radio bursts in the frequency range 500–950 Mc/s, Astrophys. J., 133, 243–264, 1961.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2013