- Open Access
GPS and in situ Swarm observations of the equatorial plasma density irregularities in the topside ionosphere
© The Author(s) 2016
- Received: 31 December 2015
- Accepted: 14 June 2016
- Published: 15 July 2016
Here we study the global distribution of the plasma density irregularities in the topside ionosphere by using the concurrent GPS and Langmuir probe measurements onboard the Swarm satellites. We analyze 18 months (from August 2014 till January 2016) of data from Swarm A and B satellites that flew at 460 and 510 km altitude, respectively. To identify the occurrence of the ionospheric irregularities, we have analyzed behavior of two indices ROTI and RODI based on the change rate of total electron content and electron density, respectively. The obtained results demonstrate a high degree of similarities in the occurrence pattern of the seasonal and longitudinal distribution of the topside ionospheric irregularities derived from both types of the satellite observations. Among the seasons with good data coverage, the maximal occurrence rates for the post-sunset equatorial irregularities reached 35–50 % for the September 2014 and March 2015 equinoxes and only 10–15 % for the June 2015 solstice. For the equinox seasons the intense plasma density irregularities were more frequently observed in the Atlantic sector, for the December solstice in the South American–Atlantic sector. The highest occurrence rates for the post-midnight irregularities were observed in African longitudinal sector during the September 2014 equinox and June 2015 solstice. The observed differences in SWA and SWB results could be explained by the longitude/LT separation between satellites, as SWB crossed the same post-sunset sector increasingly later than the SWA did.
- Plasma irregularities
- Topside ionosphere
- Langmuir probe
After recent reentry of the C/NOFS satellite on November 28, 2015, the Swarm becomes the only one satellite mission providing the in situ measurements of the ionospheric plasma density for altitudes below 550 km. For many decades, in situ plasma probe measurements represent the very important data source for ionosphere research, development and validation of the empirical ionospheric models. Special attention focuses on the plasma density irregularities occurring in the topside ionosphere (above the ionospheric F2 peak), as only in situ measurements onboard low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellites can be used to study the global distribution of these ionospheric irregularities, their climatology, occurrence probability and other characteristics without taking into account the sparsity of the ground-based facilities and their operational limitation.
Statistical distribution of the plasma density irregularities using the in situ measurements has been studied for many years (e.g., Basu et al. 1980; Aggson et al. 1996; Burke et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2014). However, in the conditions of the decrease or lack of the actual in situ data it is important to consider additional information on the properties of the plasma density irregularities, derived from other instruments onboard LEO satellite. Thus, a new method for the ionospheric irregularities detection was successfully implemented using the high-resolution magnetic field measurements onboard the CHAMP satellite (Stolle et al. 2006; Lühr et al. 2014). Later, Zakharenkova and Astafyeva (2015) proposed an “additional” use of the precise orbit determination (POD) GPS measurements onboard a single LEO satellite, CHAMP, for multi-instrumental analysis of the topside ionospheric irregularities. This GPS POD approach was further successfully developed for multi-satellite use based on an example of quasi-simultaneous Swarm and TerraSAR-X measurements (Zakharenkova et al. 2015). Therefore, potentially we can obtain additional information on the global distribution of the plasma density irregularities in the topside ionosphere using GPS measurements from LEO missions without LP instrument, like GRACE, MetOP, TerraSAR-X, etc.; however, additional cross-validation analysis on the same database is needed.
The present paper focuses on the comparative analysis of the plasma density irregularities detected in the topside ionosphere by two independent techniques—GPS and Langmuir probe (LP) measurements. The Swarm mission gives an opportunity to study similarities and differences between these techniques, as the Swarm satellite payload includes both these instruments. The main advantage of the Swarm mission, as compared to previous magnetic mission CHAMP, is that Swarm is a constellation of three identical satellites. The latter allows comparison of measurements from identical instruments at different altitudes and in different longitudinal sectors. Also, the GPS and LP data from the Swarm mission have higher temporal resolution than that from CHAMP.
The GPS POD and LP measurements onboard Swarm Alpha (A) and Swarm Bravo (B) satellites (named hereafter SWA and SWB, respectively) were processed and analyzed in this study. While choosing the time period for our analysis, we take into account that: (1) the commissioning phase for the final Swarm orbit configuration was finished on May 2014, (2) from July 15, 2014, the Swarm GPS data are released with 1-s resolution. Therefore, our analysis comprises a period of 18 months from August 2014 to January 2016.
As known, the ionospheric irregularities can be characterized by measuring its impact on amplitude and phase of the received GPS signal. Pi et al. (1997) introduced into usage for ground-based GPS observations two GPS-based indices: ROT and ROTI. ROT (rate of TEC change) is the time derivative of TEC and is considered as a measure of the phase fluctuation activity. ROTI (rate of TEC index) represents a standard deviation of the ROT over a selected time interval (Pi et al. 1997). The ROTI characterizes the severity of the GPS phase fluctuations and detects the presence of the ionospheric irregularities, and it measures the irregular structure of the TEC spatial gradient. Today, the ROT/ROTI indices, derived from the ground-based GPS data, are widely used in near real-time services of the space weather monitoring (e.g., SWACI 2016) and in investigations of the ionospheric irregularities occurrence at high- and low-latitude regions (e.g., Aarons and Lin 1999; Ma and Maruyama 2006; Jakowski et al. 2012; Astafyeva et al. 2014; Cherniak et al. 2014; Zakharenkova and Astafyeva 2015).
Recently, Zakharenkova et al. (2015) proposed to apply this ROT/ROTI technique to the topside GPS measurements from the zenith-looking GPS antenna onboard LEO satellite in order to study the appearance of the plasma density irregularities occurrence in the topside ionosphere (above a LEO orbit altitude). The detailed description of this method implementation for the Swarm GPS data is presented in Zakharenkova et al. (2015). There are several steps of the GPS data processing. First, we calculate a relative slant TEC along all lines of sight Swarm-to-GPS from the frequency-differenced GPS phase delay using the well-known algorithms (Hofmann-Wellenhof 2001). Initially, the Swarm GPS data were released with 10-s sampling rate, after July 15, 2014, GPS data are provided with 1-s sampling rate. Here we use Swarm GPS data with 1-s resolution. In order to determine the location of the ROT/ROTI results, we used piercing points through a thin layer at the fixed altitude of 500 and 550 km for SWA and SWB, respectively. The ROT is determined by taking the ratio of the difference between the slant TEC values at two successive times to the time interval (Pi et al. 1997). The ROT values are calculated and then detrended by subtracting of the running average for all line-of-sight with selected cutoff elevation angle over 30°. The ROT is calculated for each visible GPS satellite over a LEO position in units of TECU/min, where 1 TECU = 1016 el/m2. The ROTI represents the standard deviation of the ROT for 15-s interval. In general, the ROT/ROTI technique is a rather simple and straightforward one and it can be promptly transferred to space-borne GPS measurements. However, we should take into account the difference between GPS ROT/ROTI observed on the ground and aboard a fast-moving platform in space. While ground-based ROT can give a rather clear view on moving ionospheric structures/irregularities over a fixed GPS station, satellite-based ROT/ROTI might be a mixing of moving structures and rather stationary ionospheric gradients, e.g., equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA).
In order to make the comparison between GPS and LP Swarm measurements possible and more evidential, we process the Swarm in situ data in a similar way. We used Swarm Ne values with 1-s rate by selection of measurements provided by Probe 1 (Swarm document 2015), then we normalized data to the value of 106 el/cm3. Using the same approach as for the GPS data, we derive estimates of the ROD (rate of density) in units of 106 el/(cm3 min) and ROD index (RODI), based on the standard deviation of the ROD and calculated over 15-s period with sliding window.
We divide the 18-month data into four seasons related to the June/December solstices and March/September equinoxes with solstice/equinox month in the middle and one full month before and 1 month after it. We note that data accumulation even for a 3-month period is not enough to cover all 24 h of local time (LT). The average orbit altitude was ~460 and ~510 km for SWA and SWB, respectively.
In order to demonstrate the application of the ROTI/RODI technique during the conditions of the evening-time EIA, non-distorted by the plasma density irregularities, we consider a case of March 27, 2015. Generally, the EIA develops in the low-latitude region as a double band of enhanced ionization at about ±15° magnetic latitude at forenoon hours and then decays gradually until the midnight. In terms of the ionospheric F2 peak height, the EIA is higher in post-sunset than that of the noontime (e.g., Rishbeth 2000; Yue et al. 2015). This means that during the evening LT the EIA double-peak structure can reach a higher altitude and can be crossed by the Swarm satellites. Obviously, the peak-to-trough difference would be more pronounced in the in situ data than in the topside TEC above an orbit altitude. Figure 3b, e illustrates a typical example of the well-pronounced EIA during evening LT period and quiet geomagnetic conditions, which can be detected by LP and GPS measurements. The calculated ROD and RODI values show very weak signatures of the double-peak structure, and all RODI values along this latitudinal profile were <1 unit. TEC variation, derived by tracking the GPS PRN 17 satellite, also demonstrates the presence of a double-peak structure with less pronounced trough and rather smooth peaks. GPS ROT shows noticeable changes at the TEC peaks location (middle panel of Fig. 3e), but in form and amplitude they are quite different than in the case of the plasma irregularities occurrence (middle panel of Fig. 3d). ROTI reached maximal values of 2–3 units at the peaks’ latitudes, whereas ROTI values outside the peaks are close to zero. Analysis of the data for the evening-time EIA manifestation in GPS ROTI results shows that threshold of 3 TECU/min together with a condition of the multi-peak detection is enough to isolate and exclude the impact of the quiet-time EIA on the plasma density irregularities detection in the TEC data.
It should be noted that the EIA could be significantly amplified and uplifted during a severe geomagnetic storm due to the effects of prompt penetration of magnetospheric electric field and/or disturbance dynamo electric field. To illustrate behavior of the Swarm-derived ROTI/RODI values during such extreme events, we consider a case of the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm, the strongest storm in the current 24th solar cycle. During this storm the significant amplification of the evening-time EIA was registered in the American and Eastern Pacific regions, from ~22 UT of March 17, 2015, to 03 UT of March 18, 2015, in Ne and GPS TEC data of Swarm satellites (Astafyeva et al. 2015). We consider one pass of SWA crossed this sector (longitude of 81°W) at ~01 UT of March 18, 2015. Figure 3c, f presents LP Ne and GPS TEC variations along the SWA pass, respectively. It is clearly seen the EIA intensification with an increase of peak-to-trough difference together with an increase of distance between two peaks. Besides the storm-time EIA development, it is interesting to note an appearance of the small-scale plasma density irregularities, located outside the peak Ne values close to 8°S and 26°N. These small-scale irregularities are much more pronounced in ROD and RODI variations (middle and bottom panels of Fig. 3c) than rather stationary density gradients corresponded to well-developed EIA crests. The signatures of the EIA crests in the RODI values were <1 unit. As shown in Fig. 3f (top panel), the storm-time enhanced EIA is clearly seen in the topside GPS TEC above SWA altitude and the EIA peaks become very distinct with an increase of the peak-to-trough difference. The signatures of both EIA peaks with a specific shape occur in the ROT and ROTI variations (middle and bottom panels of Fig. 3f). Despite the strong amplification of the evening-time EIA, these quasi-stationary EIA crests appeared in ROTI with maximal amplitude of 4–6 units. Taking into account the obtained results of the extreme ROTI values for the EIA manifestation in quiet and disturbed conditions, for further analysis we apply a higher threshold of 5 TECU/min together with a condition of the multi-peak detection to exclude impact of the quasi-stationary EIA double-peak structure on the plasma density irregularities detection in the TEC data. Also all days during geomagnetically disturbed periods were excluded from the analysis.
One can note that for September 2015 solstice the retrieved values of the occurrence rate were also very low (Fig. 4c, left panel). These differences can be understood better if we examine again Fig. 1. The shadow area in Fig. 1 depicts time intervals of 18–06 LT, used here for the occurrence rate estimation. In general, the equatorial plasma bubbles have been regarded as the typical post-sunset phenomena. They are generated by the growth of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability after sunset (Farley et al. 1970), and their occurrence rate has peak values before midnight. This peak located between 21 and 22 LT during the quiet times for all seasons and during the disturbed times for the March and September equinox seasons (Su et al. 2006). The post-midnight equatorial plasma irregularities are relatively rare events; more observations of the post-midnight plasma bubbles and longitudinally broad depletions (trenches) have been reported recently with the C/NOFS satellite (e.g., Burke et al. 2009; Yizengaw et al. 2013). Thus, the temporal interval of 20–23 LT should provide a major contribution to the occurrence rate probability of equatorial irregularities. As shown in Fig. 1, this temporal interval is properly covered by both satellites only for September 2014 and March 2015 equinoxes, as well as the June 2015 and December 2015 solstices. For the September 2015 equinox, the SWA and SWB satellites could not provide enough observations to cover whole post-sunset–midnight period, which can explain rather low values of the occurrence rate. For the December 2014 solstice the SWA and SWB satellites also only partially covered the evening LT sector, but the occurrence rates were rather high and despite the solstice season these estimates were even comparable with those during the March 2015 equinox. During this 3-month period, we have observations for SWA satellite only at 18–20 LT in November 2014 and for SWB—at 18–21 LT in November–beginning of December. Other 1.5–2 months did not provide any observations for the evening LT sector at all. However, these available LT intervals coincide well with the time of sunset and peak of the post-sunset irregularities occurrence, which could be the reason for rather high occurrence rates despite the solstice season. Obviously, 1–2 years of the Swarm mission operation is not enough for a climatology study of the occurrence rate of the equatorial plasma irregularities, as accumulated Swarm database does not allow us to get proper LT coverage for each month and, in fact, a 3-month period can depict the occurrence rate referring mostly to a separate month with better coverage of 18–21 LT period.
Comparison of the occurrence rates for the post-sunset and post-midnight periods (left and right panels of Figs. 4, 5) clearly shows that post-midnight equatorial irregularities are quite rare phenomena. The highest occurrence rates for the post-midnight irregularities were observed in the African longitudinal sector during the September 2014 equinox and June 2015 solstice. Figure 4b (right panel) shows that occurrence rates for the March 2015 equinox were different and much higher at SWB ROTI and RODI values than of SWA ones. As shown in Fig. 1, the SWB values were derived from 00 to 02 LT period during 12 days of February 2015, whereas SWA data for this season consisted of 03–06 LT period in April 2015.
One other important feature from Fig. 4 is that the estimates derived from both ROTI and RODI data for both post-sunset and post-midnight periods from the SWA satellite differ from the corresponding SWB observations. Several factors can contribute to the observed satellite-to-satellite differences. First is an altitude difference of ~50 km between two satellites with possibility that the upper satellite can cross the plasma density irregularities with lesser intensity than the lower satellite. We should also note that both ROTI and RODI values are based on absolute differences and for the cases of generally lower TEC and Ne values at higher orbit altitudes for SWB satellite the derived ROTI and RODI might be lower here comparing with the lower SWA satellite. The second and more important reason is the temporal/longitudinal separation between the satellites. As shown in Fig. 1, SWA satellite flew in the post-sunset sector earlier than SWB and for the most covered seasons (September 2014, March 2015, June 2015 and December 2015) SWA provided more observations for 20–23 LT temporal range. Progressive longitude separation of the satellites becomes more essential for the evening LT sector in February 2015 and reaches more than 1.5 h in LT. This means that SWB satellite appears over the same region up to several hours after SWA and in the case when SWA could be able to cross plasma irregularities near the peak of their occurrence rate, the successive SWB could cross the decaying plasma bubbles and the obtained estimates of the occurrence probability should be lesser for SWB. This difference between SWA and SWB results could be clearly observed while comparing the December 2014 and December 2015 solstices (Fig. 5a, c, right panels), where an increased separation between satellites (from 0.7–1.0 to 2.6–2.9 h) leads to a much smaller values of the occurrence rates derived from the SWB observations.
In this paper, we present first results on the joint comparison of the ionospheric irregularities occurrence detected by two independent instruments onboard the Swarm mission. We analyze dataset consisted of GPS and LP data provided by the Swarm A and Swarm B satellites with 460 and 510 km orbit altitude from August 2014 till January 2016. We made estimation and analysis of the behavior of two indices based on TEC and in situ density derivatives. We found that the obtained ROTI results based on the Swarm GPS measurements are in a very good consistency with the concurrent in situ plasma measurements derived from the LP instrument. Our results demonstrate a high degree of similarities in the occurrence pattern of the seasonal and longitudinal distribution of the topside ionospheric irregularities. Among the seasons with proper data coverage, the maximal occurrence rates for the post-sunset equatorial irregularities reached 35–50 % for the September 2014 and March 2015 equinoxes and minimal values quite below 10–15 % were found for the June 2015 solstice. For the equinox seasons, the intense plasma density irregularities were more frequently observed in the Atlantic sector, for the December solstice in the South American–Atlantic sector. The highest occurrence rates for the post-midnight irregularities were observed in the African longitudinal sector during the September 2014 equinox and June 2015 solstice. The observed differences in the SWA and SWB results could be explained by the longitude/LT separation between satellites, as SWB always crossed the same post-sunset sector much later than the SWA did.
The introduced RODI/ROTI technique can be effectively used for an automatic detection of the plasma density irregularities caused by the equatorial plasma bubbles occurrence, as well as the plasma density gradients caused by the crossing of the quasi-stationary ionospheric structures like peaks of the EIA. One of the undoubted advantages of the LEO ROT/ROTI technique is the fact that while in situ measurements are straightforward and probe the density point-by-point along a LEO position, this LEO-based GPS technique can track simultaneously up to 8–12 different GPS satellites in great spatial volume above a LEO and is able to observe irregularities ahead/behind/aside LEO position and for much longer time than in situ cross section. Therefore, even without a LP instrument a LEO satellite with a GPS receiver can offer additional contribution to study the plasma density irregularities occurrence on a global scale.
IZ designed this study, processed and analyzed the GPS data, and wrote the first draft of the paper. EA and IC processed the Swarm LP observations and contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the results. All co-authors contributed to the revision of the draft manuscript and improvement of the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work is supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program/ERC Grant Agreement No. 307998. We acknowledge the European Space Agency (ESA) for providing the SWARM data (http://earth.esa.int/swarm) and the International GNSS Service for GPS orbit products (ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov). We acknowledge the Jicamarca Radio Observatory for providing the JULIA Radar data through Madrigal Database (jro-db.igp.gob.pe/madrigal/). The Jicamarca Radio Observatory is a facility of the Instituto Geofisico del Peru operated with support from the NSF AGS-1433968 through Cornell University. We thank Stephan Buchert (IRFU) for useful recommendations on the Swarm LP data processing and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This is IPGP contribution 3745.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Aarons J, Lin B (1999) Development of high latitude phase fluctuations during the January 10, April 10–11, and May 15, 1997 magnetic storms. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 61:309–327View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aggson TL, Laakso H, Maynard NC, Pfaff RF (1996) In situ observations of bifurcation of equatorial ionospheric plasma depletions. J Geophys Res 101(A3):5125–5132. doi:10.1029/95JA03837 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astafyeva E, Yasukevich Y, Maksikov A, Zhivetiev I (2014) Geomagnetic storms, super-storms, and their impacts on GPS-based navigation systems. Sp Weather 12:508–525. doi:10.1002/2014SW001072 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astafyeva E, Zakharenkova I, Förster M (2015) Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm: a global multi-instrumental overview. J Geophys Res Sp Phys 120:9023–9037. doi:10.1002/2015JA021629 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Basu S, McClure JP, Basu S, Hanson WB, Aarons J (1980) Coordinated study of equatorial scintillation and in situ and radar observations of nighttime F region irregularities. J Geophys Res 75:5119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burke WJ, Huang CY, Valladares CE, Su S-Y (2004) Longitudinal variability of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP and ROCSAT-1. J Geophys Res 109(A12):A12301. doi:10.1029/2004JA010583 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burke WJ, de La Beaujardière O, Gentile LC, Hunton DE, Pfaff RF, Roddy PA, Su YJ, Wilson GR (2009) C/NOFS observations of plasma density and electric field irregularities at post-midnight local times. Geophys Res Lett 36:L00C09. doi:10.1029/2009GL038879 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cherniak Iu, Krankowski A, Zakharenkova I (2014) Observation of the ionospheric irregularities over the Northern Hemisphere: methodology and service. Radio Sci 49:653–662. doi:10.1002/2014RS005433 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farley DT, Balsley BB, Woodman RF, McClure JP (1970) Equatorial spread F: implications for VHF radar observations. J Geophys Res 75:7199–7216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann-Wellenhof B (2001) Global positioning system: theory and practice. Springer, New YorkView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang C-S, de La Beaujardière O, Roddy PA, Hunton DE, Liu JY, Chen SP (2014) Occurrence probability and amplitude of equatorial ionospheric irregularities associated with plasma bubbles during low and moderate solar activities (2008–2012). J Geophys Res Sp Phys 119:1186–1199. doi:10.1002/2013JA019212 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jakowski N, Béniguel Y, De Franceschi G et al (2012) Monitoring, tracking and forecasting ionospheric perturbations using GNSS techniques. J Sp Weather Sp Clim 2:A22. doi:10.1051/swsc/2012022 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lühr H, Xiong C, Park J, Rauberg J (2014) Systematic study of intermediate-scale structures of equatorial plasma irregularities in the ionosphere based on CHAMP observations. Front Phys 2:1–9. doi:10.3389/fphy.2014.00015 Google Scholar
- Ma G, Maruyama T (2006) A super bubble detected by dense GPS network at east Asian longitudes. Geophys Res Lett 33:L21103. doi:10.1029/2006GL027512 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park J, Noja M, Stolle C, Lühr H (2013) The ionospheric bubble index deduced from magnetic field and plasma observations onboard Swarm. Earth Planets Space 65:1333–1344. doi:10.5047/eps.2013.08.005 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pi X, Mannucci AJ, Lindqwister UJ, Ho CM (1997) Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the worldwide GPS network. Geophys Res Lett 24(18):2283–2286. doi:10.1029/97GL02273 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rishbeth H (2000) The equatorial F-layer: progress and puzzles. Ann Geophys 18:730–739View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stolle C, Lühr H, Rother M, Balasis G (2006) Magnetic signatures of equatorial spread F as observed by the CHAMP satellite. J Geophys Res 111:A02304. doi:10.1029/2005JA011184 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Su S, Liu CH, Ho HH, Chao CK (2006) Distribution characteristics of topside ionospheric density irregularities: equatorial versus midlatitude regions. J Geophys Res 111:A06305. doi:10.1029/2005JA011330 Google Scholar
- SWACI (2016) The Space Weather Application Center Ionosphere. http://www.swaciweb.dlr.de/data-and-products/?no_cache=1&L=1/. Accessed 15 Mar 2016
- Swarm document (2015) Preliminary L1b plasma dataset. http://swarm-wiki.spacecenter.dk/mediawiki-1.21.1/index.php/Preliminary_Level_1b_plasma_dataset. Accessed 25 Dec 2015
- Yizengaw E, Retterer J, Pacheco EE, Roddy P, Groves K, Caton R, Baki P (2013) Postmidnight bubbles and scintillations in the quiet-time June solstice. Geophys Res Lett 40:5592–5597. doi:10.1002/2013GL058307 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yue X, Schreiner WS, Kuo YH, Lei J (2015) Ionosphere equatorial ionization anomaly observed by GPS radio occultations during 2006–2014. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 129:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2015.04.004 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zakharenkova I, Astafyeva E (2015) Topside ionospheric irregularities as seen from multisatellite observations. J Geophys Res Sp Phys 120(1):807–824. doi:10.1002/2014JA020330 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zakharenkova I, Astafyeva E, Cherniak I (2015) Early morning irregularities detected with spaceborne GPS measurements in the topside ionosphere: a multi-satellite case study. J Geophys Res Sp Phys 120(10):8817–8834. doi:10.1002/2015JA021447 View ArticleGoogle Scholar