Strain localization and fabric development in polycrystalline anorthite + melt by water diffusion in an axial deformation experiment

Abstract

We performed two axial deformation experiments on synthetic polycrystalline anorthite samples with a grain size of ~ 3 μm and 5 vol% Si–Al-rich glass at 900 °C, a confining pressure of 1.0 GPa, and a strain rate of 10^−4.8 s⁻¹. One sample was deformed as-is (dry); in the other sample, two half-cut samples (two cores) with 0.15 wt% water at the boundary were put together in the apparatus. The mechanical data for both samples were essentially identical with a yield strength of ~ 700 MPa and strain weakening of ~ 500 MPa by 20% strain. The dry sample appears to have been deformed by distributed fracturing. Meanwhile, the water-added sample shows plastic strain localization in addition to fracturing and reaction products composed of zoisite grains and SiO₂ materials along the boundary between the two sample cores. Infrared spectra of the water-added sample showed dominant water bands of zoisite. The maximum water content was 1500 wt ppm H₂O at the two-core boundary, which is the same as the added amount. The water contents gradually decreased from the boundaries to the sample interior, and the gradient fitted well with the solution of the one-dimensional diffusion equation. The determined diffusion coefficient was 7.4 × 10⁻¹³ m²/s, which agrees with previous data for the grain boundary diffusion of water. The anorthite grains in the water-added sample showed no crystallographic preferred orientation. Textural observations and water diffusion indicate that water promotes the plastic deformation of polycrystalline anorthite by grain-size-sensitive creep as well as simultaneous reactions. We calculated the strain rate evolution controlled by water diffusion in feldspar aggregates surrounded by a water source. We assumed water diffusion in a dry rock mass with variable sizes. Diffused water weakens a rock mass with time under compressive stress. The calculated strain rate decreased from 10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ s⁻¹ with an increase in the rock mass size to which water is supplied from < 1 m to 1 km and an increase in the time of water diffusion from < 1 to ~ 10,000 years. This indicates a decrease in the strain rate in a rock mass with increasing deformation via water diffusion.

Introduction

The deformation of feldspar can control the rheology of the lower-middle crust because of its dominance (e.g., Rutter and Brodie 1988; Kohlstedt et al. 1995; Bürgmann and Dresen 2008). The deformation mechanisms of feldspar and its microstructures have been investigated through analyses of naturally deformed samples (e.g., Olsen and Kohlstedt 1985; Kruhl 1987; Prior and Wheeler 1999; Jiang et al. 2000; Kruse et al. 2001; Menegon et al. 2008; Raimbourg et al. 2008; Fukuda et al. 2012; Fukuda and Okudaira 2013; Getsinger et al. 2013; Menegon et al. 2015 and references therein) and experimental studies (e.g., Tullis and Yund 1987, 1991; Dimanov et al. 1998, 1999, 2000; Heidelbach et al. 2000; Stünitz and Tullis 2001; Rybacki and Dresen 2004; Rybacki et al. 2006, 2008, 2010 and references therein). The flow laws of feldspar were constructed for both dry feldspar and feldspar with water, which reduces the strength of a rock (Dimanov et al. 1999; Rybacki and Dresen 2004; Rybacki et al. 2006).

Many tomographic observations suggest that low seismic velocity zones or electrically high-conductivity zones beneath active faults are related to an enriched distribution of pressurized water (e.g., Ogawa et al. 2001; Okada et al. 2006; Wannamaker et al. 2009; Nakajima et al. 2010; Becken et al. 2011 and references therein). In these zones, it is assumed that water is continuously supplied to rocks, thereby enhancing the strain, strain rate, and reaction mechanisms and causing plastic deformation in regions supplied with water; these regions therefore evolve in both time and space depending on the water supply.

As for the effects of supplied water on rock deformation, several deformation experiments have been conducted on the addition of water into quartz and feldspar as major constituents of the crust (Kronenberg and Tullis 1984; Den Brok and Spiers 1991; Den Brok et al. 1994; Post et al. 1996; Post and Tullis 1998; Stünitz et al. 2003; Vernooij et al. 2006; Chernak et al. 2009). These studies revealed that added water reduces the strengths of samples via the enhancement of dislocation creep, diffusion creep, reaction creep, and/or solution–precipitation creep, which are also associated with the development of microstructures. However, these studies did not focus on or observe the time-dependent development of microstructures or a water distribution.

In this study, we performed water-added deformation experiments on a dry anorthite aggregate and externally added water to a sample during deformation. We accordingly discuss the development of microstructures via water diffusion and reactions under differential stresses. The microstructures are compared with those from an experiment without water. In addition, we analyze the water distribution and discuss the diffusion of water. We also discuss the evolution of the strain rate of a rock mass controlled by water diffusion at various scales and times that are assumed in nature.

Starting material

Polycrystalline anorthite was obtained from anorthite glass powders with a grain size of ~ 3 μm (Fig. 1). These glass powders were sintered and crystallized under vacuum conditions at 1400 °C. Then, polycrystalline samples were obtained with Raman spectra that show clear An lattice bands. The samples contain pores with diameters of up to 5 μm under backscattered electron (BSE) images and exhibit pore volume ratios reaching 10 vol% (Fig. 1a). In addition, glass materials of 5 vol% are included, especially along grain contacts (Fig. 1b). The anorthite grain size traced along the glass materials in the BSE images is ~ 3 μm (equivalent circle diameter). The chemical compositions of the anorthite grains measured using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) are > An95, and the glass materials show dominant SiO₂ (36–40 wt%) and Al₂O₃ contents (55–60 wt%) with a smaller CaO content (2–5 wt%) than the anorthite grains (~ 20 wt% of CaO). The measured composition of the glass materials may include that of any neighboring anorthite grains since the size of the glass materials is < 2 μm, which is smaller than the spatial resolution of EDS analysis. The contents of other components such as sodium and/or potassium are under the detection limit both in the anorthite grains and in the glass materials. The glass materials may have been formed by the evaporation of calcium components and/or from the incongruent melting of anorthite, which forms a solid phase with a calcium feldspar component and a melt phase with a sodium or potassium feldspar component (although it is under the detection limit), during vacuum crystallization at 1400 °C. The broken surfaces of the samples under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) showed cleavage in the anorthite and small pores (Fig. 1c). The aspect ratio of anorthite is ca. 1.5, and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis did not reveal clear crystallographic preferred orientations. An infrared (IR) spectrum of the samples exhibited a weak water absorption band (shown later for the deformed sample), but this band easily disappeared after heating to approximately 100 °C. Therefore, this band must be related to loosely adsorbed atmospheric water.

Fig. 1

Characteristics of sintered polycrystalline anorthite₁₀₀ used as the starting material for the deformation experiments. a BSE image of the thin section. Anorthite grains with a size of 3 μm (light gray) are surrounded by silica- and aluminum-rich glass (dark gray), which are clearly observed in (b). Small (~ 2 μm) and large pores (~ 5 μm) are black. b Enlarged image of the thin section. Glass materials (dark gray) with a 5 vol% developed along the anorthite grain contacts (light gray). c Secondary electron image of a broken surface of the starting material. Representative pores, anorthite grains, and silica- and aluminum-rich glass are indicated

Experiments

Two axial deformation experiments were performed using a Griggs-type deformation apparatus for (1) an as-is (dry) sample core with a diameter of 6.2 mm and a length of 10 mm and (2) a sample with 0.15 wt% distilled water added between two 5-mm-long cores. The water surrounded and penetrated the sample during the deformation experiment. The construction of the assembly is based on Chernak et al. (2009). The assembly is shown in Fig. 2. The sample [and the water in experiment (2)] was enclosed in a Pt jacket, which was mechanically sealed during the process of increasing pressure. The Pt jacket was further enclosed in a Ni jacket. Alumina pistons were placed at the upper and lower parts of the sample. A pressure medium composed of NaCl was set around the sample and the pistons. A graphite heater was separated from the NaCl by two fired (dried) pyrophyllites, which were placed around the inner and outer parts of the heater. NaCl was also placed outside the heater as a pressure medium. A thermocouple of Pt–Pt/Rh13% was protected by an alumina tube and set close to the Ni jacket.

Fig. 2

Schematic diagrams of the whole sample assembly (left) and enlarged inner sample assemblies (right) for the dry and water-added experiments. The water added between the two columns surrounds these columns during the high-pressure and high-temperature experimental conditions

The confining pressure and temperature were carefully raised in the stability field of anorthite and water (Matthews and Goldsmith 1984). The temperature and pressure were raised as follows: from room temperature to 100 °C at 200 MPa, to 200 °C at 400 MPa, to 300 °C at 800 MPa, and finally to 900 °C at 1 GPa. The rate of pressure increase was ca. 100 MPa/h and was achieved via a hand pump. The rate of temperature increase was ca. 50 °C/min. After reaching 1 GPa and 900 °C, an axial compression test was immediately performed with a strain rate of 10^−4.8 s⁻¹ for both experiments. This procedure requires ca. 1 h for the piston movement before deformation to detect the sample hit point (pre-hit). Then, the samples were deformed for 6 h for 32% total strain in the dry experiment and 4 h for 18% total strain in the wet experiment. In the wet experiment, water diffused into the sample within a total time of 5 h. The force and displacement data were converted into differential stress and strain values, respectively, according to changes in the sample diameters, corrections for apparatus distortion, and friction within the sample assembly. The stress resolution of the apparatus has been estimated to be ± 30 MPa in recent papers (Holyoke and Kronenberg 2010; Kido et al. 2016).

The recovered samples were longitudinally cut into halves (i.e., along the axial displacement direction). Thin sections were made from one of those halves for microstructural observations. The other half (ca. 100 μm) was used for IR spectroscopy analyses. The residual sample pieces in these procedures were used to observe broken surfaces via an SEM.

Analytical methods

EBSD measurements

To measure the crystallographic orientation of the anorthite, we used a Hitachi S-3400N scanning electron microscope equipped with an EBSD analyzer provided by HKL Technology. The analyses were performed for highly polished thin sections with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV, a stage current of 1 nA, and a working distance of 18 mm for specimens that were tilted 70°. The EBSD data were analyzed by the HKL Technology Channel 5 software. An index of Kikuchi patterns with a mean angular deviation of < 1° was accepted as orientation data.

IR measurements

The transmitted IR spectra were measured using a Fourier transform IR micro-spectrometer (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Scientific). Mapping measurements using an auto XY-stage were taken for the sample recovered from experiment (2). First, a measurement was taken along the direction of axial compression around the upper and lower sample boundaries with a rectangular aperture of 25 × 50 μm (height × width) and the same step size. Next, a measurement was taken in the direction normal to axial compression apart from the sample boundary with an aperture size of 50 × 25 μm and the same step size. Each spectrum was averaged over 100 scans with a frequency resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ under atmospheric conditions. The background was corrected after each acquisition of 25 spectra. The absorption coefficients for the water absorption bands in the feldspar groups were determined to estimate the water contents following Beran (1987) and Johnson and Rossman (2003), whose methods have been used in, e.g., Dimanov et al. (1998) and Rybacki et al. (2006) for a hot-pressed anorthite aggregate and Fukuda et al. (2012) for natural K-feldspar aggregates. However, in this study, the water contents were calculated from a water-stretching band using the calibration of Paterson (1982), which is independent of the mineral species because the water absorption bands measured in this study include glass and reaction products in addition to anorthite. This calibration approach includes the integral molar absorption coefficient of hydrogen I (ℓ/mol H·cm²) and the mean wavenumber ν_mean with I = 150γ[3780 − ν_mean], where γ is an orientation factor of 1/3 assuming an isotropic OH distribution, any beam direction and no polarization. Our results show that the ν_mean values depend on the type of water among the different minerals. The absorption coefficient units of ℓ/mol H·cm² were converted into ℓ/mol H₂O·cm² through multiplication by 2. The water contents were calculated using the Beer–Lambert law and expressed as wt ppm H₂O using the molar mass of H₂O and the density of either anorthite or zoisite as the reaction product. The mapping results are displayed as color-contoured images of the calculated water contents.

Results

Mechanical data

The mechanical data from the axial compression of the dry and water-added samples were nearly identical within the error of the mechanical resolution of the rig (Kido et al. 2016) (Fig. 3). The total strains for the dry and water-added samples were 32 and 18%, respectively. Assuming elastic strains of ~ 6% in these two experiments, the permanent strains are 26 and 12%, respectively. The apparent elastic moduli for the dry and water-added samples determined from the linear elastic slopes of the stress–strain curves are 20.5 ± 0.5 and 15.8 ± 0.3 GPa, respectively. These values are remarkably lower than the typical values of anorthite aggregate at our experimental condition (1 GPa, 900 °C) (elastic modulus of 93 GPa calculated by Hacker and Abers 2004). However, note that the measured elastic strain using the above-mentioned Griggs-type deformation apparatus includes inelastic deformation of the sample assembly (mainly of the Pb piece; Kido et al. 2016) and elastic deformation of the apparatus. The total time of deformation experiment for the water-added sample at 900 °C was approximately 5 h (1 h for pre-hit and 4 h for deformation), which enabled water to penetrate the sample and the sample to be deformed. The maximum differential stress of the dry sample was 700 MPa at a 6% strain and that of the water-added sample was 9%. Both samples showed similar strain weakening behaviors after reaching the peak differential stresses.

Fig. 3

Stress–strain curve for the dry (solid line) and water-added (dashed line) axial deformation experiments

Microstructural observations

The microstructures of the dry and water-added samples are obviously different. Figures 4 and 5 show optical micrographs of the dry and water-added samples, respectively. Many fractures are locally developed in the dry sample, and the reduction in the differential stress after reaching the yield strength is likely due to the development of these fractures (Fig. 3). This indicates that cataclastic flow is the dominant deformation mechanism for the dry sample.

Fig. 4

Optical image of the deformed dry sample. a Image of the entire sample (cross-polarized light). The compression direction (σ₁) is shown by an arrow. Cataclastic flow is localized, especially at the bottom of the sample. Rectangles denote the locations for enlarged images (b) and (c). b Fractured area (plane-polarized light). c Strain-localized areas (plane-polarized light)

Fig. 5

Optical image of the deformed water-added sample. a Image of the entire sample (cross-polarized light). The compression direction (σ₁) is shown by an arrow. Transparent parts can be seen at the upper and lower sample boundaries, the edge of the sample column, and around the fractures with a width of ca. 200 μm. Bulging can be recognized at the lateral sample boundaries. Rectangles denote the locations for enlarged images (b) and (c). b Bulging part (plane-polarized light). c Sample boundary and upward fracture (cross-polarized light with a gypsum plate). The sample boundary (a few tens of μm) is especially dusty, which is related to the formation of zoisite (Fig. 6)

Meanwhile, in the water-added sample, outward bulging toward the side of the sample column was observed around the upper and lower sample boundaries (Fig. 5a and the enlarged image in Fig. 5b). The vicinities around some of the fractures as well as the sides of the sample column are transparent with a width of ~ 200 μm. Dark-colored materials of ~ 30 μm were detected along the sample boundary (Fig. 5c), where zoisite grains with sizes up to 50 μm were confirmed within a BSE image (Fig. 6a). These zoisite grains are not connected to each other, and each grain exists separately. No compositional changes in either the anorthite grains or the glass were detected. Dark materials exist within and around the zoisite grains within a BSE image. These materials reaching up to 10 μm are sometimes connected (Fig. 6b). The chemical compositions of these materials, which were likely formed from reactions, are principally SiO₂. A pore reduction, which would transmit light under an optical microscope and correspond to transparent domains (Fig. 5), was observed within a BSE image around the sample boundary in the water-added sample (Fig. 6b). The bulging and reduction of pores in the water-added sample indicate that plastic deformation and the anorthite–water reaction were concentrated around the sample boundary. In addition, very small zoisite grains with high aspect ratios were observed on the surfaces of the anorthite grains (Fig. 6c), as reported in Matthews and Goldsmith (1984). Some vermicular-like features are also shown in Fig. 6d. According to Goldsmith (1982) and Matthews and Goldsmith (1984), the stables phases over 1.2 GPa and 900 °C in the CaO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂–H₂O system are zoisite + kyanite + H₂O + melt. These pressure and temperature conditions would be caused by a differential stress plus a confining pressure of 1 GPa. The possible reaction can be written as follows:

$${\text{Anorthite}} + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} \rightleftharpoons {\text{zoisite}} + {\text{kyanite}} + {\text{melt}}$$

(1)

Fig. 6

SEM images of the water-added sample. a BSE image of a polished surface around the upper and lower sample boundaries. The sample boundary is shown as a white dashed line. The grains with a light gray color, a length of ~ 50 μm, and an aspect ratio of ~ 5 are zoisite, which is seen especially around the sample boundaries. b Enlarged image of the thin section. Large SiO₂ materials are shown in dark gray with arrows. They are sometimes segregated, but they are also seen around grain contacts (slightly darker colors), similar to the initial sample (Fig. 1). A reduction of pores is observed, especially around the bulging and transparent portions (see Fig. 5). c, d Secondary electron images of broken surfaces within approximately 200 μm of the sample boundary. Highly elongated grains (lengths of ~ 5 μm and aspect ratios of ~ 5) are developed on the anorthite grains. Vermicular-like features can also be observed in (d)

These minerals were observed during the deformation experiment for An54 and An60 in Stünitz and Tullis (2001). Kyanite grains were not observed in the SEM images, similar to the observations by Matthews and Goldsmith (1984). The melt phase in the above reaction would be associated with SiO₂ materials, which may be amorphous or crystalline (Fig. 6b).

The area fractions of the zoisite grains visible within the BSE images of the sample slab (e.g., Fig. 6a, b) were determined by outlining grains at an interval of 25 μm from the sample boundary (Fig. 7), which corresponds to the step size of the IR spectroscopic measurements. The zoisite fraction is the highest around the boundary (18.3%), decreases toward the inner part of the sample, and almost disappears at a distance of 250 μm from the boundary.

Fig. 7

Fractions of the zoisite grains visible under SEM images. The grains were traced at an interval of 25 μm toward the upper part of the sample (e.g., see Fig. 6)

The strain in the bulging part can be calculated from the initial length of the sample and the width of the bulging section. We used a relatively linear sample segment in Fig. 5, where the deformation appears to have been accommodated only by bulging. The difference between the initial sample length (10.2 mm) and the linear segment in Fig. 5 (9.0 mm) gives the initial length of the bulging part (1.2 mm). The strain calculated from the initial sample length and the linear segment in the deformed sample is consistent with a total permanent strain of 12% in the mechanical data, which also uses the initial sample length (Fig. 3). The length of the bulging part in the deformed sample corresponds to the width (0.7 mm) of the transparent portion around the top and bottom sample core boundaries. The calculated strain in the bulging part determined from the initial length of the bulging segment and the length of the transparent portion in the deformed sample is ca. 40%, which is approximately four times the permanent strain of the sample in the mechanical data (Fig. 3).

EBSD measurements

EBSD measurements were taken for anorthite grains in the water-added sample (Fig. 8). Grains within a distance of 50 μm from the upper and lower sample boundaries were analyzed carefully while avoiding reaction products, which are recognizable within the BSE images. The obtained crystallographic orientations show a random distribution (Fig. 8b).

Fig. 8

EBSD measurement results for anorthite grains in the water-added sample. a Example of point analysis in a BSE image. The measurements were taken within 50 μm of the upper and lower sample boundaries (white dashed lines). b Pole figures for the representative crystallographic planes at an equal-area and lower hemisphere projection. Elongation (i.e., bulging) and shortening directions are denoted as X and Z, respectively

IR measurements

IR mapping measurements were taken for the sample boundaries, including the bulging and the inner portions, from the water-added deformation experiment. The results are shown in Fig. 9. High absorbance values from water-stretching bands are seen around the sample boundaries (Fig. 9b) due to the structural hydroxyl of zoisite with representative frequencies at 3185 cm⁻¹ and shoulder bands at 3275 and 2145 cm⁻¹ (Langer and Lattard 1980). In addition to the zoisite bands, a band near 3540 cm⁻¹ may be due to water in the originally included glass (e.g., Stolper 1982) (Fig. 1b) and is clearly different from bands due to adsorbed atmospheric water. Bands under 1800 cm⁻¹ are due to the structural vibrations of feldspar, which are well in accordance with previous studies (Fukuda et al. 2012), and these bands did not significantly change in the mapped area. The intensities in the water bands of the zoisite gradually decreased from the sample boundaries to the inner part of the sample. The water contents in wt ppm H₂O were calculated via the calibration method of Paterson (1982) with ν_mean = 3220 cm⁻¹ and the density of zoisite (3.35 g/cm³). Since the zoisite grains appear to be three-dimensionally distributed, we used an isotropic orientation factor of γ = 1/3. The calculated water content at the sample boundary is 1500 ppm (the IR spectrum of No. 4 in Fig. 9c), which is notably the same amount of water added to the sample. In the non-deformed area, a broadband can be seen at 2800–3750 cm⁻¹ corresponding to the stretching vibration of fluid H₂O. This band easily disappears by heating to approximately 100 °C; therefore, this band is likely due to adsorbed atmospheric water.

Fig. 9

IR mapping results for the upper and lower sample boundaries of the water-added experiment. a Optical image (cross-polarized light with a gypsum plate). The compression direction (σ₁) is shown by an arrow. The upper and lower sample boundaries are shown as white dashed lines. The IR-mapped area is shown as a gray rectangle. b IR mapping results shown as water contents in zoisite. c Raw IR spectra selected from (b). The numbers correspond to the parts in (b). The IR spectrum for the sample boundary corresponds to the No. 4 spectrum, and the calculated water content was 1500 ppm H₂O

Contrary to the results for the sample boundary, the side of the sample without bulging does not exhibit zoisite bands (Fig. 10). The area ~ 200 μm from the side is transparent and displays many developed cracks (Fig. 10a). In this area, only a broadband with a maximum at 3540 cm⁻¹ and a shoulder of 3280 cm⁻¹ can be seen. The former band could be due to the stretching vibration of water in the glass, and the latter as well as the broadband are likely due to water both in the glass and along the grain boundaries. The increases and decreases in these water-stretching bands correspond to those of the water-bending bands at approximately 1560 cm⁻¹. The band features under 1800 cm⁻¹, except for the water-bending bands, are due to the structural vibrations of anorthite, which are the same as those around the sample boundary (Fig. 9). Unlike the results for the sample boundary, the mapped area did not show a concentration gradient of water. This is likely due to many cracks (Fig. 10a), since water easily moves through cracks. A broadband at 2800–3750 cm⁻¹, which is seen apart from the transparent area, is due to adsorbed water and is similar to the results around the sample boundary (Fig. 9). The water contents calculated with ν_mean = 3350 cm⁻¹ and the density of anorthite (2.75 g/cm³) were 200–1000 ppm H₂O.

Fig. 10

IR mapping results for the side of the sample column of the water-added experiment (i.e., apart from the upper and lower sample boundaries). a Optical image (transmitted light in IR spectroscopy). The compression direction (σ₁) is shown by an arrow. The IR-mapped area is shown as a gray rectangle. b IR mapping results shown as water contents. c Raw IR spectra selected from (b). The numbers correspond to the parts in (b). The maximum water content calculated from the No. 3 spectrum was 1000 ppm H₂O

Diffusion of water

The diffusion coefficient of water in the water-added sample was determined from the gradient of the IR bands around the sample boundary (Fig. 9), which mainly showed water bands in zoisite formed by the reaction between anorthite and water (Eq. 1). The concentration profile of water, which was determined from No. 1–10 and their intermediate data in Fig. 9c, was well fitted to the solution of the one-dimensional diffusion equation as follows (Crank 1975, p. 21):

$$C = C_{0} {\text{erfc}}\left( {\frac{x}{{2\sqrt {Dt} }}} \right) ,$$

(2)

where C is the concentration at a distance x from the sample boundary, C₀ is the maximum concentration, erfc is the complementary error function, t is the time duration, and D is the diffusion coefficient to be determined. The duration was 5 h at 900 °C, which include the time for the pre-hit (1 h) and deformation (4 h). The distance of water diffusion was shortened by compression during the experiment: The distance x from the sample boundary as measured by IR spectroscopy includes a strain of ~ 40% according to microstructural observations (see Microstructural observations section). Therefore, we also calculated the diffusion coefficient at x/0.6. The results are shown in Fig. 11, where the diffusion coefficients calculated with x and x/0.6 are shown as D _x and D_x/0.6, respectively, which were D _x  = 7.4 × 10⁻¹³ m²/s and D_x/0.6 = 2.1 × 10⁻¹² m²/s. These two values are similar, and the true diffusion coefficient would be between the two. The profile of the water concentration is similar to that of the zoisite grains obtained from the BSE image (Fig. 7).

Fig. 11

Determination of the diffusion coefficients in the water-added deformation experiment. The water contents and distance correspond to the water absorption bands in Fig. 9, and the diffusion coefficient is shown as D _x . The diffusion coefficient for the initial sample length without 40% strain (D_x/0.6) is also shown for comparison. The coefficient of determination (R²) is shown

These two diffusion coefficients were compared with those reported previously in an Arrhenius diagram (Fig. 12). Farver and Yund (1995) doped H ¹⁸₂ O into orthoclase aggregates under 100 MPa and 450–800 °C, and they analyzed oxygen isotope profiles through ion microprobe analyses. They reported that the diffusing species at the grain boundaries is molecular water. The diffusion coefficients for volume diffusion in anorthite, orthoclase, and albite reported in Giletti et al. (1978) are also shown for comparison, and they are also similar. The authors of the study of Giletti et al. (1978) doped H ¹⁸₂ O into single crystals and analyzed ¹⁸O profiles similar to the experiments in Farver and Yund (1995). The diffusing species were not clearly documented in Giletti et al. (1978), but they were believed to be molecular water in similar experiments for single orthoclase crystals in Farver and Yund (1990). The diffusion coefficients for grain boundary diffusion are much higher than those for volume diffusion. Our diffusion coefficient determined from the zoisite absorption bands is plotted near the extrapolated line of grain boundary diffusion for orthoclase as reported by Farver and Yund (1995).

Fig. 12

Comparison of the diffusion coefficients of feldspar in an Arrhenius diagram. The values determined in this study with and without 40% strain are shown as black and gray stars, respectively. The values of the volume diffusion and grain boundary diffusion coefficients were taken from Giletti et al. (1978) and Farver and Yund (1995), respectively. An anorthite; Or orthoclase; Ab albite

Discussion

Enhancement and localization of plastic deformation by water

Previous studies that uniformly deformed samples and observed steady states of stress have confirmed that strength reduction can be achieved via added water (e.g., Kronenberg and Tullis 1984; Post and Tullis 1998; Chernak et al. 2009). In contrast, in our water-added experiment, the calculated strain in the bulging part (Fig. 5) was ~ 40%, which is approximately four times the permanent strain of 12% when assuming homogenous deformation in the mechanical data (Fig. 3). The compressive flow strength of a laminated rock composed of two phases is directional (e.g., Ji et al. 2000). For a layer composite with interface planes normal to the compressive axis, those two phases are subjected to equal stresses (and different strain rates; Reuss bound). The higher strain in the bulging part indicates that the strain rate at the same deformation time was four times higher than the bulk sample and that deformation was localized by water diffusion, implying that the effective viscosity (~ stress/strain rate) of the water-diffused part was lower than that of the initial dry part. This would be due to the limited width of the water-diffused part (~ 250 μm both upward and downward in the two cores with total lengths of ~ 9 mm; Fig. 5). In contrast, cataclasis dominated in the dry sample (Fig. 4). The strengths between the dry and wet experiments were not different (Fig. 3). Consequently, the strengths of the bulging and dry parts in the water-added sample were not different, and the measured sample bulk strength may not have been different from that of the dry sample.

In the water-added sample, zoisite grains up to 50 μm are observed as a reaction product (Fig. 6). They separately exist, and each grain is fractured. Therefore, zoisite does not directly contribute to the deformation, as was also documented in Stünitz and Tullis (2001). The SiO₂ domain is partially connected (Fig. 6). According to Spiess et al. (2012), such a domain, which is different from the initial glass with high silica and aluminum contents in our case (Fig. 1), might have been formed by dissolution and precipitation in open spaces. The precipitated grains might have been caused by the reaction in Eq. (1), but they could also have been due to the glass initially included in the sample (Fig. 1). We did not observe a segregation of the glass similar to Dimanov et al. (1998, 2000), who performed axial deformation experiments on homogeneously wet plagioclase aggregates with melt reaching up to 12 vol%. Diffused water, which can cause a reaction in anorthite, is incorporated in the original glass in our sample. The IR spectra for the water-added sample show that the band due to glass has a maximum at 3540 cm⁻¹ around the sample boundary (Fig. 9) and especially the side of the sample column (Fig. 10). The incorporation of water into the melt as well as the inclusion of water along the anorthite grain boundaries contributes to the strength of the sample, although the overall quantitative effect is difficult to estimate in this study. The water contents along the side of the sample column reach up to 1000 ppm H₂O, indicating the presence of saturated water trapped in the glass and along the anorthite grain boundaries.

The profile of the water concentration (Fig. 11) is similar to that of the zoisite distribution (Fig. 7). IR spectra from the upper and lower sample boundaries show that water is dominantly trapped within the zoisite (Fig. 9). Assuming a 2.0 wt% H₂O stoichiometric amount of water in a zoisite crystal structure (e.g., Hurlbut 1969), the representative zoisite area fractions of 18.3% (maximum at 25 μm from the upper and lower sample boundaries), 12.6% (50 μm), 3.5% (75 μm), and 0.9% (200 μm) shown in Fig. 7 can be converted into 3700, 2520, 700, and 180 ppm H₂O, respectively. These converted water contents roughly correspond to the values measured via IR spectroscopy (1500 ppm at the maximum at the sample boundary; Fig. 9). However, fine zoisite grains also develop along the anorthite grain boundaries (Fig. 6c). The quantity of these fine grains would also be high along the sample boundaries, and water would also be trapped in these grains.

The deformation of the feldspar group by reactions involving solution–precipitation creep has been reported for naturally deformed samples under lower-middle crustal conditions (Fitz Gerald and Stünitz 1993; Ree et al. 2005; Menegon et al. 2008; Brander et al. 2012; Fukuda et al. 2012). In such cases, the fluid phase was likely supplied externally. Our study provides information on fabric development and strain localization during the water-introduction process. The anorthite grains in the water-added experiment would have been partially dissolved in the reaction in Eq. (1), which is also indicated by the vermicular features (Fig. 6d). The crystallographic orientation of anorthite was random in the bulging portion, indicating the presence of grain-size-sensitive creep in the anorthite aggregate (Fig. 8). The IR spectra around the bulging part show stretching bands of mainly hydroxyl in the zoisite (Fig. 9). Thus, the localization of plastic deformation is directly related to the diffusion of water into the sample, even though the mechanical data between the dry and water-added experiments may be identical (Fig. 3). Thus, when water is introduced into dry polycrystalline anorthite, its deformation mechanism switches from cataclastic flow to plastic flow due to grain-size-sensitive creep assisted by the reaction and melt, thereby causing strain localization. Melt-assisted grain-size-sensitive creep was also confirmed by Dell’Angelo et al. (1987) for fine-grained granitic aggregates with melt contents of 3–5% via transmission electron microscopy; in those samples, the deformation switched from the dislocation creep of quartz and feldspar with a melt content of < 1%.

Implications for crustal dynamics

The existence of fluid in the crust has been inferred from tomographic studies (e.g., Ogawa et al. 2001; Okada et al. 2006; Wannamaker et al. 2009; Nakajima et al. 2010; Becken et al. 2011 and references therein). The recent studies by Okudaira et al. (2015, 2017) reported fractured plagioclase grains that were likely formed at lower-crustal conditions based on microstructural observations and analyses for naturally deformed gabbroic and anorthositic rocks. They suggested that fracturing and subsequent fluid infiltration are locally possible in the lower crust. Our study demonstrated that the enhancement of plastic deformation in initially dry feldspar could be governed by water diffusion. In the lower-middle crust, water would diffuse into a rock mass through pathways such as fractures, which may be produced mechanically and/or by over-pressurized water (i.e., fluid fissures; Wannamaker et al. 2009), thereby inducing plastic deformation where water is introduced (Fig. 5). Note that this study focuses on the localization and development of plastic deformation by water diffusion under a given stress regime, which could lead to grain-size-sensitive creep accompanied by a reaction. Figure 13 shows a schematic image of the temporal evolution of the water-diffusion-controlled deformation of an initially dry rock mass. Under a compressive stress field, water is supplied to the dry system through fractures at a deformation time t = t₀. Water diffuses into the rock mass simultaneous with the initiation of water-diffusion-controlled deformation, and the rock then deforms with time (t = t₁ and t₂ in Fig. 13). The flow laws for different water contents should essentially describe the corresponding deformation, although previously reported flow laws for feldspar have been experientially determined only for samples with specific water contents or for dry samples (Dimanov et al. 1998, 1999, 2000; Rybacki and Dresen 2004; Rybacki et al. 2006). We estimated the evolution of the strain rate in a rock mass controlled by water diffusion. For one-dimensional deformation, the strain rate is simply written as follows:

$$\dot{\varepsilon } = \frac{{L - L^{{\prime }} }}{{Lt}} ,$$

(3)

where $\dot{\varepsilon }$ is the strain rate, L is the initial width of the dry rock mass into which water is introduced, L′ is the width of the rock mass following plastic deformation under a given deformation time t (denoted as L′₁ and L′₂ at t₁ and t₂, respectively, in Fig. 13). These two widths could vary from microstructural in size (Okudaira et al. 2015, 2017) to geological in scale (Wannamaker et al. 2009). The deformation time is equal to the time that water takes to diffuse into the rock mass. Then, L–L′ can be rewritten as the water diffusion distance x in Eq. (2). This means that plastic deformation begins from the contact between the rock and water to the distance x. The x value at C/C₀ = 0.1 in Eq. (2) is commonly used (i.e., $x = 2.3\sqrt {Dt} = L{-}L^{{\prime }}$) because x mathematically diverges at C/C₀ ≈ 0. This value is realistic for the bulging portion, which was observed under a polarizing optical microscope (Fig. 5) and in the IR spectroscopic measurements (Fig. 9). The strain rate in Eq. (3) is determined by the deformation induced by water diffusion under a given stress. A diffusion coefficient of 10⁻¹³ m²/s was used because it does not significantly change in the temperature conditions of the lower-middle crust from 500 to 800 °C (Farver and Yund 1995) (Fig. 12). Various rock mass scales at which water diffusion occurs can be considered in nature. Therefore, we applied the above approach to rock mass scales from 0.1 m to 1 km as well as over a temporal evolution from 0.1 to 10,000 years.

Fig. 13

Schematic image of water diffusion into a rock mass and the development of water-diffusion-controlled deformation. Profiles of the water concentration, strain, and strain rate (shown by red solid lines) for regions of non-deformed dry rock mass and shortened rock mass by water diffusion (shown by dashed lines) at t = t₁ and t₂. See details in the text

Figure 14 shows the evolution of the strain rate under different scales of the rock mass and temporal evolution. When the width of the initial rock mass is small (e.g., < 1 m), water is introduced to a relatively large part of the rock mass. As a result, the rock mass deforms with a high strain rate on the order of ~ 10⁻¹⁰ s⁻¹ at the early stage of water diffusion. When the rock mass size is larger, the deformable part (i.e., the water diffusion distance with respect to the size of the rock mass) is relatively smaller than that for a smaller rock mass under the same t. In this case, the strain rate becomes lower. For a constant rock mass width, an increase in the time taken for water diffusion allows for larger widths to be deformed, leading to a decrease in the strain rate. In other words, the strain is distributed at long distances in the rock mass at low strain rates. Then, the strain rate changes from 10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ s⁻¹ with an increase in the time span up to 10,000 years (Fig. 14). In the lower-middle crust, where fluid can be supplied to the system, the strain rate can be locally high at the deformable part where water is introduced and decrease with time as the deformed area develops. The calculated strain rate controlled by water diffusion gives reasonable geological values. Based on our experiments, textural observations and analyses, the evolution of the strain rate can provide physical insights on water reservoirs in the lower-middle crust. Thus, in nature, a wide range of strain rates can be possible at various rock scales into which water diffuses.

Fig. 14

Evolution of the strain rate controlled by water diffusion for different rock masses and time scales

Conclusions

We performed deformation experiments on polycrystalline anorthite samples both with and without water. Fractures dominated in the dry experiments, while plastic deformation occurred in the 0.15 wt% water-added experiment and was concentrated within the water-diffused area. Zoisite was formed as the reaction product, and water was incorporated within it. The maximum water content was 1500 wt ppm H₂O, which is consistent with the amount of added water, and the water contents gradually decreased toward the inner part of the sample. The profile of the water concentration gradient fits well with the solution of one-dimensional diffusion. The determined diffusion coefficient was ~ 10⁻¹² m²/s, which agrees with previous data. We calculated the evolution of the plastic deformation strain rate controlled by water diffusion at different rock mass and temporal scales under lower-middle crustal conditions with a representative water diffusion coefficient of 10⁻¹³ m²/s. The calculated water-diffusion-based strain rates were within a geologically reasonable range from 10⁻¹⁰ to 10⁻¹⁵ s⁻¹ at rock mass scales from < 1 m to 1 km with a temporal increase from < 1 year to 10,000 years. This implies that water diffusion likely controls the deformation of the initially dry and strong lower-middle crust.