- Full paper
- Open Access
Initiation of a lightning search using the lightning and airglow camera onboard the Venus orbiter Akatsuki
- Yukihiro Takahashi1Email author,
- Mitsuteru Sato1,
- Masataka Imai1,
- Ralph Lorenz2,
- Yoav Yair3,
- Karen Aplin4,
- Georg Fischer5,
- Masato Nakamura6,
- Nobuaki Ishii6,
- Takumi Abe6, 7,
- Takehiko Satoh6, 7,
- Takeshi Imamura8,
- Chikako Hirose6,
- Makoto Suzuki6,
- George L. Hashimoto9,
- Naru Hirata10,
- Atsushi Yamazaki6, 11,
- Takao M. Sato6,
- Manabu Yamada12,
- Shin-ya Murakami6,
- Yukio Yamamoto6,
- Tetsuya Fukuhara13,
- Kazunori Ogohara14,
- Hiroki Ando15,
- Ko-ichiro Sugiyama16,
- Hiroki Kashimura17 and
- Shoko Ohtsuki18
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 1 July 2017
- Accepted: 14 April 2018
- Published: 25 May 2018
- Lightning and airglow camera
Observations detecting potential lightning flashes on Venus have been attempted for more than 30 years, with both optical and radio wave sensors, and by spacecraft and ground-based telescopes, as reviewed by Takahashi et al. (2008). However, the scientific community has not yet reached a consensus on the existence of lightning on the planet. Among the principal reasons for the ongoing controversy may be the challenges in discriminating natural lightning signatures from transient noise caused by other sources. Receivers onboard spacecraft in the very low frequency (VLF) and high frequency (HF) ranges have recorded transient signals possibly emitted from lightning channels (e.g., Russell 1991; Gurnett et al. 1991, 2001). However, such waves could also have been generated by other sources, such as from spacecraft equipment, discharge from the spacecraft body to the space environment, or space plasma instabilities. Borucki et al. (1981, 1991) investigated data acquired by the Star Tracker on the Pioneer Venus Orbiter, which was designed to detect star light to determine the attitude of the spacecraft but was also expected to be sensitive to optical lightning flashes. However, this sensor also records pulses caused by cosmic rays incident on the detector, and given the sensor's electronics cannot be distinguished from a lightning flash. The authors attempted to identify a statistically significant increase in such pulses during night side disk viewing, but found no meaningful indication of lightning. Gurnett et al. (1991) also examined the statistical distribution of pulse height measured using an HF receiver during the Venus flyby of the Galileo spacecraft and reported nine possible lightning pulses with pulse heights greater than 4 sigma of background. On the other hand, Gurnett et al. (2001) during two Venus flybys of the Cassini spacecraft found no evidence for sferics induced by lightning discharge (whereas the same instrumentation easily detected lightning emissions during a later Earth flyby). Hansell et al. (1995) detected several candidate lightning flashes using a 1.5-m ground-based telescope. The imaging rate of the charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was 18.8 frames/s, which is not sufficiently rapid to take more than one frame for one lightning flash. Therefore, there remains some ambiguity in deciding whether the recorded light spot originated as lightning as cosmic rays or other unknown electrical noise could cause similar apparent features.
Krasnopolsky (1983a, b) observed random flashing during a single 70-s period of observations of the Venera 9 visible airglow spectrometer; the corresponding Venera 10 instrument recorded no such flashes. If the Venera 9 signals indeed corresponded to lightning, they occurred in a region of 5 × 104 km2 with a flashing rate of 0.002 km−2 s−1, a mean flash duration of 0.25 s, and a flash energy of 2 × 107 J in the visible range. Krasnopolsky (2006) reported detection of nitric oxide (NO) in Venus clouds and argued that lightning was the only plausible source of NO in the lower atmosphere (although he noted some uncertainty in relevant reaction rates and did not quantify meteoric production).
Among the best means to distinguish a lightning signature from possible noise is to inspect the light curve (or ‘waveform’) of a lightning flash sampled at a cadence sufficiently high compared to the expected duration of the flash. Such a waveform, whose shape is determined in part by the distribution of light propagation paths through the cloud, can be diagnostic of the depth at which the discharge occurs. On the other hand, a cosmic ray strike on the detector has an instantaneous rise and a decay constant was determined only by the instrumentation electronics.
We selected the oxygen OI-777-nm line for lightning detection, which was expected to be the most prominent emission in a CO2-dominant atmosphere based on laboratory experiments (Borucki et al. 1985). The bandwidth (FWHM) and center wavelength of the LAC OI-777-nm filter were 9.0 and 780.6 nm, respectively. If the spacecraft is 5500 km above Venus surface, the threshold of triggering is approximately 1/20 of the average luminosity of an Earth lightning flash and the instantaneous field of view (FOV) is 1/500 of the whole globe. Here, we assume that approximately 40% of the total optical emission is from the OI-777-nm line according to the photographic spectra in Borucki et al. (1985). However, Krasnopolsky (2006) noted that OI 777 nm is approximately 3% of the total light in the more sensitive photoelectric spectra of Borucki et al. (1996), where the bright continuum dominates: In this case, our detection threshold would be higher, comparable to the average lightning on Earth.
Akatsuki was successfully inserted into orbit surrounding Venus during December 2016, but with a period of ~ 10 days, approximately ~ 8 times longer than the originally intended orbit. LAC can be powered only inside the umbra of Venus because the strong sunlight can cause damage to its detector. Therefore, the frequency of observation opportunities was reduced to 1/8 of that of the original plan. Adding to this decrease in observational frequency, the elongated orbit resulted in a more rapid motion of spacecraft near periapsis where LAC can observe the night side disk at a close distance, meaning that the duration of observation for one revolution was shorter than that of the original. Indeed, most of the observational periods were approximately 20–30 min, while the original plan anticipated sessions a few times longer. Thus, the total observational period per year was reduced to less than 10% of that of the original plan because of the change in the orbital parameters. On the other hand, the successful insertion into orbit around Venus, 5 years later than the original plan, allowed for observations that would otherwise be completely impossible and promises with time to establish significant constraints on lightning activity on Venus.
We chose 300 V as the applied voltage to the APD for regular lightning observations for the time being. Considering the level of dark current, the APD seems to be working properly without serious problems. At this voltage, the sensitivity of LAC is expected to be sufficient to detect an optical lightning flash with an intensity of 0.05 to 0.5 of the average Earth flash at a distance of 5500 km, depending on its spectral distribution. At the longer range of our observations of 12,000 km, the threshold could be as high as 2× that of the average Earth flash.
The lightning search at a nominal high voltage of 300 V was attempted 8 times in the lightning observation mode of LAC with each duration of ~ 10 to 30 min on December 1, 2016. The distance to the Venus surface was in the range of ~ 7500 to 12,300 km, meaning the averaged instant coverage was approximately 1/500 of the whole globe and the threshold of the triggering changed by ~ 1.6 times in this case. There were some triggered events every pass. However, all showed a steep increase within two sampling intervals (< 63 us, meaning they were caused by cosmic ray impact. Thus far, no signature of lightning has been identified. It was confirmed that all 32 pixels for lightning measurement detected cosmic ray events and the triggering logic for all pixels works properly. In addition, if some pixels were exposed to the limb of Venus illuminated by scattered sunlight, they recorded a reasonable light curve. Based on this and the increase in dark currents as the high voltage was ramped up, we consider LAC works overall as expected.
The heights of the cosmic ray pulses are consistent with the triggering level set in the lightning observation mode, implying a normal condition of triggering logic and hardware. All the curves show the same decay period of 1.8 ms, which was expected from the design of the electronic circuit and temperature of the APD. Considering these conditions, the health and performance of LAC are quite sufficient to capture a lightning flash if it were to occur inside the FOV at brightness greater than the threshold of the instrument as designed.
Given that cosmic ray events are triggered at our chosen threshold values and recorded properly, and the dim light near the limb caused triggering by the designed logic and provided saturated signals, the optical and electronic performance of LAC—including its sensitivity—appears to be normal, even after prolonged flight in space. However, it would be desirable to measure the absolute sensitivity from on-orbit observational data on Venus in the future. Among the ideas is to measure the Earth which is the only celestial target sufficiently bright to detect in the lightning observation mode of LAC. Another possibility would be to observe the limb together with the ultraviolet imager (UVI) onboard Akatsuki and compare it to the UVI image whose sensitivity can be calculated from star images.
We expect to continue the lightning search operations for several years. To increase the possibility of capturing events, we plan to concentrate the dusk area of the night side disk where the thunderstorm activity may be higher than at other local times according to experience on Earth. Indeed, 5 of the 8 possible lightning events reported by Hansell et al. (1995) and Krasnopolsky (1983a, b) were found in the dusk region on Venus. We also plan to focus our search for optical transients near candidate volcanos: Volcanic plumes might result in convective activity in clouds, or (as on Earth) there may be discharge within the plume itself. Hashimoto and Imamura (2001) discuss the possibility of volcanic detection using an infrared camera onboard Akatsuki. Russell (1991) reviewed possible lightning sources including active volcanos.
Initial operations of LAC including the operational level of high voltage applied to the APD have been successfully completed. The threshold of optical detection is 0.05–2 times that of the averaged intensity of Earth’s lightning. The performance of LAC seems nominal, as evidenced by the detection and correct recording of cosmic rays and dim luminosity near the limb. Though the duty cycle of the lightning observation time in the present orbit is > 10 times less than that in the originally planned orbit of Akatsuki, continued operation over the coming years will provide a statistically robust dataset.
YT contributed to the entire design of the research and equipment related to the LAC instrument onboard Akatsuki. MS and MI conducted the operation of LAC and data analysis. RL participated in the essential scientific discussion and helped write the manuscript as a native speaker. YY, KA, and GF contributed to the strategy of observation and scientific discussion. MN worked as a project manager on the Akatsuki project, supervising scientific orientation. NI was in charge of satellite development and operations based on the understanding of the scientific purposes, providing advice to the LAC operation. TA, TI, MS, AY, TS, MY, HA: contributed to project management, understanding the scientific target of LAC. TS worked as project scientist on the Akatsuki project, supervising scientific analysis. CH was in charge of orbital design and operation based on an understanding of the scientific purposes. GH, NH, SM, YY, KO, SO: conducted satellite data processing. TF, KS, HK: contributed to satellite payload operation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Akatsuki project activity is supported by the Japan Space Exploration Agency (JAXA). The authors would like to express their thanks to all of the Akatsuki project supporting members in JAXA and universities. In addition, the creative contributions of Meisei Electric Co., Ltd., Nikon Co., and Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. in designing and fabricating the instrumentation are greatly appreciated. RL acknowledges the support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Voluntary Consensus Organization Participating Scientist Program, Grant NNX16AC78G.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors declare that there is no ethical conflict in this study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Borucki WJ, Dyer JW, Thomas GZ, Jordan JC, Comstock DA (1981) Optical search for lightning on Venus. Geophys Res Lett 8:233–236. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL008i003p00233 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borucki WJ, Mc Kenze RL, McKay CP, Duong ND, Boac DS (1985) Spectra of simulated lightning on Venus, Jupiter, and Titan. Icarus 64:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(85)90087-9Medline View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borucki WJ, Dyer JW, Phillips JR, Phan P (1991) Pioneer Venus orbiter search for Venusian lightning. J Geophys Res 96:11033–11043. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA01097 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borucki WJ, McKay CP, Jebens D, Lakkaraju HS, Vanajakshi CT (1996) Spectral irradiance measurements of simulated lightning in planetary atmospheres. Icarus 123(2):336–344View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurnett DA, Kurith WS, Roux A, Gendrin R, Kennel CF, Bolton SJ (1991) Lightning and plasma wave observations from the Galileo flyby of Venus. Science 253:1522–1525. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5027.1522 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurnett DA, Zarka P, Manning R, Kurth WS, Hospodarsky GB, Averkamp TF et al (2001) Non-detection at Venus of high-frequency radio signals characteristic of terrestrial lightning. Nature 409:313–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/35053009 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hansell SA, Wells WK, Hunten DM (1995) Optical detection of lightning on Venus. Icarus 117:345–351View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hashimoto G, Imamura T (2001) Elucidating the rate of volcanism on Venus: detection of lava eruptions using near-infrared observations. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2001.6713 Google Scholar
- Krasnopolsky VA (1983a) Venus spectroscopy in the 3000–8000. A region by Veneras 9 and 10. In: Hunten DM et al (eds) Venus. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 459–483Google Scholar
- Krasnopolsky VA (1983b) Lightnings and nitric oxide on Venus. Planet Space Sci 31:1363–1369View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krasnopolsky VA (2006) A sensitive search for nitric oxide in the lower atmospheres of Venus and Mars: detection on Venus and upper limit for Mars. Icarus 182:80–91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-Invernón FJ, Luque A, Gordillo-Vázquez FJ (2016) Mesospheric optical signatures of possible lightning on Venus. J Geophys Res Space Phys. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022886 Google Scholar
- Russell CT (1991) Venus lightning. Space Sci Rev 55:317–356Google Scholar
- Takahashi T, Yoshida J, Yair Y, Imamura T, Nakamura M (2008) Lightning detection by LAC onboard the Japanese Venus climate orbiter, planet-C. Space Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9400-x Google Scholar
- Yair Y, Takahashi Y, Yaniv R, Ebert U, Goto Y (2009) A study of the possibility of sprites in the atmospheres of other planets. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JE003311 Google Scholar