Skip to main content

Observations of equatorial plasma bubbles using a low-cost 630.0-nm all-sky imager in Ishigaki Island, Japan

Abstract

Here, we introduce a low-cost airglow imaging system developed for observing plasma bubble signatures in 630.0-nm airglow emission from the F region of the ionosphere. The system is composed of a small camera, optical filter, and fish-eye lens, and is operated using free software that automatically records video from the camera. A pilot system was deployed in Ishigaki Island in the southern part of Japan (Lat 24.4, Lon 124.4, Mlat 19.6) and was operated for ~ 1.5 years from 2014 to 2016 corresponding to the recent solar maximum period. The pilot observations demonstrated that it was difficult to identify the plasma bubble signature in the raw image captured every 4 s. However, the quality of the image could be improved by reducing the random noise of instrumental origin through an integration of 30 consecutive raw images obtained in 2 min and further by subtracting the 1-h averaged background image. We compared the deviation images to those from a co-existing airglow imager of OMTIs, which is equipped with a back-illuminated cooled CCD camera with a high quantum efficiency of ~ 90%. It was confirmed that the low-cost airglow imager is capable of imaging the spatial structure of plasma bubbles, including their bifurcating traces. The results of these pilot observations in Ishigaki Island will allow us to distribute the low-cost imager in a wide area and construct a network for monitoring plasma bubbles and their space weather impacts on satellite navigation systems.

Background

Equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) are localized regions in the nighttime equatorial F region of the ionosphere where the plasma density is significantly depleted below the background level (see a review by Kil 2015 and references therein). They are formed near the magnetic equator by the uplift of low-density plasma from the lower F region through the Rayleigh–Taylor-type interchange instability (Woodman and Lahoz 1976). Such density-depleted regions extend along the magnetic field line; thus, EPBs developing toward higher altitude can be observed in the low-latitude region 10–20° away from the magnetic equator (i.e., in the region of equatorial anomaly). EPBs are known to introduce a positioning error in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) such as the Global Positioning System (GPS). This is because the strong depletion of electron density within EPBs modifies the phase and group velocities of the navigation signal traveling through the ionosphere. EPBs have also been recognized as one of the primary sources of GNSS scintillations (e.g., Aaron 1993). That is, the amplitude of the navigation signal received on the ground that has propagated through EPBs often fluctuates. This is primarily due to an interference of radio signals diffracted by plasma density irregularities formed within EPBs (Franke et al. 1984).

As summarized above, the impact of EPBs on the GNSS is clear, indicating the relevance of EPBs in the framework of ionospheric space weather. It is especially desirable to understand the triggering process of EPBs for predicting the space weather effects of EPBs. For this purpose, in the last decade, several numerical simulations have been carried out (see a review by Yokoyama 2017), and it has been suggested that the modulation of electron density in the lower ionosphere, such as large-scale wave structures (e.g., Tsunoda 2015 and references therein) or modulation by upward-propagating gravity waves (e.g., Huang and Kelley 1996), is one plausible factor controlling the generation of EPBs. Carter et al. (2014) demonstrated a capability of predicting the occurrence of EPBs by calculating the linear growth rate of the R–T instability using the Thermosphere–Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIEGCM). More recent study by Shinagawa et al. (2018) succeeded in reproducing the seasonal variation of EPBs by employing a whole atmosphere–ionosphere coupled model GAIA (Ground-to-topside model of Atmosphere and Ionosphere for Aeronomy). However, the day-to-day variabilities in the occurrence of EPBs and its impact on the GNSS are still unpredictable. This implies that we need continuous monitoring of EPBs to mitigate the GNSS positioning error.

Several radio techniques have been used to observe EPBs since the 1960s, such as ionosondes (e.g., Maruyama and Matuura 1984) and radar (Woodman and Lahoz 1976). For instance, the ionosonde has been used to observe EPBs as a spread of the F-region trace, which is called spread-F (e.g., Fejer and Kelley 1980). All-sky measurement of the 630.0 nm airglow intensity, which is proportional to the electron density in the F region of the ionosphere (Sobral et al. 1993), has also been utilized to visualize the 2D structure of EPBs (Weber et al. 1978). Since the late-1990s, the use of all-sky imagers (ASIs) equipped with a cooled CCD camera has enabled us to detect faint oxygen emission from the F-region altitude with a good signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, because back-illuminated cooled CCD cameras have a high quantum efficiency of ~ 90% for incident photons in visible wavelengths (e.g., Shiokawa et al. 1999, 2009). Using observations of oxygen emission at 630.0 nm, several detailed characteristics of EPBs have recently been discovered, for example, their geomagnetically conjugate appearance between northern and southern hemispheres (Otsuka et al. 2002; Shiokawa et al. 2004).

However, the conventional ASIs, utilizing a cooled CCD detector, tend to be large in the total size and expensive; thus, it has still been difficult to visualize the large-scale structure of EPBs by setting up multiple ASIs at multiple stations and constructing a dense network of airglow observations. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a small and cheap ASI system for observing the 630.0-nm airglow signature of EPBs. Similar small and low-cost ASIs have been deployed and installed into several places in the polar region in both hemispheres (Ogawa et al. 2020). Hosokawa et al. (2019) used one of the ASIs at Longyearbyen in Svalbard, Norway and confirmed its capability of detecting faint airglow signatures of polar cap patches whose airglow intensity is a few hundreds of Rayleigh. As a next step, we carried out a pilot observation at low latitudes to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the ASIs for monitoring EPBs.

Experimental arrangement of the pilot observations

For the pilot observation, we developed a low-cost ASI system by assembling a small CCD camera (WAT-910HX of Watec Co. Ltd.), small fish-eye lens (YV2.2X1.4A-SA2 of Fujinon Co. Ltd.), and small-aperture optical filter (Edmund Co. Ltd). The diameter of the optical filter is 25 mm. The center wavelength of the bandpass filter is 632 nm, and the FWHM of the bandwidth is 10 nm, which mainly covers the oxygen emission at 630.0 nm. The major advantage of this ASI system is its low cost; the entire cost including a control PC and a video encoding device is approximately 1000 USD, which is roughly 1–2% of the cost of the conventional cooled CCD ASIs. The other advantage is that the imager is small and simple. Figure 1a shows a picture of the camera, and the size of the imager is roughly 5 cm × 5 cm × 10 cm (weight is ~ 245 g). The imager is directly connected to a Linux PC laptop (Fig. 1c) through the Video/USB interface (PCA-DAV3: Fig. 1b). The video signal from the camera is digitized on the Linux PC using free video-capturing software called Motion. Motion is a configurable program that can process incoming video signals from cameras and save them as static images automatically (detail of the software can be found in https://motion-project.github.io). During the entire period of the pilot observation, we capture all-sky images every 4 s as 8-bit JPEG images, which are, hereafter, called “raw images.”

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of low-cost airglow imager system used for the pilot observations in Ishigaki Island, Japan

The instrumental details of the low-cost airglow imager are documented in Ogawa et al. (2020) including the description of its calibration and performance. However, we briefly describe such information in this section. Ogawa et al. (2020) carried out a calibration experiment using a 76-in. integrating sphere (Labsphere LMS-760) at National Institute of Polar Research (NIPR) of Japan and confirmed that the low-cost ASI has good linearity (target intensity versus count) even though the data from the camera are saved as compressed JPEG images. The average noise level is ± 30 R for the 4.3 s exposure time in 630.0-nm setting, which is used for the current airglow observations of EPBs. Note that this average noise level was calculated when the background luminosity was ~ 600 R. The dynamic range of the ASI is 20–1200 R, which is determined by the 8-bit digitalization of raw count. The upper limit of the dynamic range of 1200 R is sufficient for airglow measurements (obviously insufficient for auroral measurements; thus, we needed to shorten the exposure time for observing aurora).

Derivation of the absolute optical intensity in unit of Rayleigh has been done also using the calibration data obtained at NIPR. The procedure is documented in Hosokawa et al. (2019) which employed the same imager for observing polar cap airglow patches in Longyearbyen (78.1° N, 15.5° E), Norway. When deriving the absolute optical intensity, we estimate the dark count using pixels outside the FOV of the ASI and subtract it from the raw count values. After the subtraction, we convert the raw count to the absolute optical intensity in units of Rayleigh using the sensitivity values (Count R−1 s−1) estimated from the calibration data obtained at NIPR. Since we do not observe background continuum emission at other wavelengths in Ishigaki Island (24.4° N, 124.4° E), we have not subtracted the contribution of background emission. Hence, the derived absolute optical intensity in Rayleigh includes a certain contribution of background continuum emission. However, Hosokawa et al. (2019) pointed out that the offset is ~ 20 R for the cases of airglow observations in the polar cap region.

To carry out the pilot observation, we installed the low-cost airglow imager into an observation site in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan. The magnetic latitude of Ishigaki Island is 19.6° N, which is close to the poleward edge of the equatorial anomaly. The pilot observation was carried out from August 2014 to the end of April 2016, during which we experienced two major disruptions of measurement in 2015. A conventional cooled CCD imager has also been operative in the same place as part of the OMTI network (Shiokawa et al. 1999, 2009). This allows us to compare the quality of the airglow images from these two systems and evaluate the performance of the low-cost airglow imager.

Pilot observations and image processing

On the night of Feb 14, 2015, a series of EPBs was observed in Ishigaki for 7 h from 09 to 19 UT (21 to 28 LT). Figure 2a shows a raw all-sky image from the low-cost imager taken when an EPB was located near the center of the field-of-view. As described in the previous section, the exposure time of this raw image was 4 s, which is much shorter than that used in the ASI of OMTIs (165 s). The equatorward half of the field-of-view was much brighter than that in the poleward half. This is primarily due to the enhanced electron density in the equatorial anomaly located immediately equatorward of Ishigaki Island. The signature of the EPB is seen as a dark, tree-like structure near the center of the image extending poleward from the southern edge of the field-of-view. Although there is an indication of an EPB in the raw image, it is difficult to see their spatial structure in detail because of the limitation in image quality.

Fig. 2
figure2

All-sky 630.0-nm images obtained at 2330 JST on February 14, 2015: a raw all-sky image obtained with an exposure time of 4 s; b average of 20 consecutive images (total integration time of 80 s); c average of 30 consecutive images (total integration time of 120 s); d average of 40 consecutive images (total integration time of 160 s)

One of the problems of the low-cost ASI is the low S/N ratio due to the random shot noise of the non-cooled CCD camera. To remove such unwanted noise in the raw image, we first investigated how the quality of the data is improved by averaging consecutive raw images. Figure 2b–d respectively show the “average images” derived by integrating 20, 30, and 40 consecutive raw images. These respectively correspond to total integration times of 80, 120, and 160 s. It is clearly seen that the contribution of shot noise of instrumental origin is significantly reduced by applying image integration. However, the processed image can be blurred because EPBs move in the zonal direction with a speed of approximately 100 m/s. Thus, we also need to take this blurring effect into account when we determine the best integration time. An average of the absolute optical intensity in the central part of Fig. 2a is 900 R and the standard deviation is 80 R. The absolute optical intensity decreases by ~ 40 R within the EPB near the center of the image in Fig. 2b; thus, the S/N ratio is ~ 0.5 in this case (~ 40 R/80 R). When we integrate 20, 30, and 40 images, the standard deviation does not change so much (44 R, 43 R, and 43 R, respectively). The standard deviation value does not change so much beyond the integration of 30 images. By comparing both the noise reduction and blurring effect by averaging, the integration of 30 raw images, corresponding to an integration time of 2 min, would be appropriate for observations of plasma bubbles with the low-cost ASI. An attached additional movie file, covering the full sequence of the interval, demonstrates that the spatial structures of EPBs, including their bifurcating traces, are clearly recognized in the average image (see Additional file 1).

Although we are able to identify the bifurcating structures of EPBs in the average image, the signature is still faint. This is particularly because the background count is larger than that of the deviation component associated with EPBs (the background intensity of the original raw image is ~ 896 R and the optical intensity decreases by ~ 40 R within the EPB trace near the center of the image). Thus, we applied another image processing to the average image. Figure 3a again shows the 2-min average image, which is the same as that shown in Fig. 2c. Figure 3b shows a background image derived by averaging 900 images (duration of this averaging is 1 h) obtained in an hour surrounding the time of the average image in Fig. 3a. In the 1-h average image, the large-scale structure of the equatorial anomaly, i.e., prominent enhancement in the southern part of the field-of-view, is noticeable. Figure 3c shows the so-called deviation image derived by calculating the “percentage of the average image (Fig. 3a) to the 1-h background image (Fig. 3b)”. Note that the color scale used here ranges from 90 to 110%, where 90% means that the optical intensity decreases by 10% from the background level. In the deviation image, the signature of the EPB is more contrasted and its detailed structure becomes more distinct.

Fig. 3
figure3

Procedure of image processing: a 2-min average all-sky image (same as Fig. 2c); b background image obtained by averaging all the images obtained in the surrounding 1-h interval; c deviation image derived by calculating the “percentage of the 2-min average image (Fig. 3a) to the 1-h background image (Fig. 3b)”; d raw all-sky image from OMTI ASI obtained at the same time in the same place

Now, we compare this deviation image to an image obtained by a conventional cooled CCD imager operating in the same place. Figure 3d shows an image of 630.0-nm airglow from the OMTI ASI, which was taken at the same time in the same place. The exposure time of the OMTI ASI was 165 s, which is slightly longer than the exposure time of the 2-min average image of the low-cost ASI. The quality of the deviation image from the low-cost ASI is almost comparable to the raw image from the OMTI ASI, which implies that the low-cost imager can be used, at least, for monitoring the appearance and development of EPBs.

Statistics of occurrence of EPBs

Figure 4a shows the occurrence distribution of EPBs during the 1.5-year period of pilot observations in Ishigaki. The extraction of EPBs was done by visual inspection. The intervals when at least an EPB was observed within the field-of-view are indicated by the horizontal lines. It is well known that the activity of EPBs is highest in equinoctial months during solar maximum in the Asian longitudinal sector (Kil et al. 2009). The occurrence distribution shown in Fig. 4a is fairly consistent with the results of these previous studies. Namely, the occurrence of EPBs is almost confined in the equinoctial months, which is more clearly seen in the first year of the pilot observation. The occurrence of EPBs is also known to be pronounced in the early evening interval soon after sunset (e.g., Makela et al. 2004). This tendency is also seen in the current statistics, where most EPBs appear immediately after 20 LT, and the occurrence is lower in the post-midnight interval.

Fig. 4
figure4

Occurrence distribution of EPBs detected by the a low-cost airglow imager and b OMTI all-sky imager

The interval of the current statistics corresponds to the recent solar maximum period; thus, relatively many EPBs were observed in the low-altitude region in Ishigaki Island (magnetic latitude of Ishigaki is 19.6° N). As will be introduced in a later part of the paper, we have started routine airglow measurements in Ishigaki with the low-cost ASI since December 2017 following the current pilot observation. However, the occurrence of EPBs is limited because of the significant decrease in solar activity during the present solar minimum.

Figure 4b shows the same statistics of the occurrence of EPBs detected by the OMTI ASI in Ishigaki Island. Similar seasonal and local time dependences are identified. More importantly, most EPBs observed by the OMTI ASI are also detected by the low-cost ASI. The total number of nights, during which both the ASIs were operative and the OMTI ASI detected EPBs, is 32. The Watec ASI detected EPBs during 26 out of 32 nights of simultaneous observations. Hence, the Watec ASI was able to detect ~ 81% EPBs that were seen in the OMTI ASI images. This result again confirms the capability of monitoring the appearance of EPBs using the low-cost ASI. We picked up EPBs from the Watec ASI by visual inspection without looking at the OMTI ASI images obtained at the same time. Hence, in some cases, we were not able to identify weak EPBs near the southern edge of the FOV. This is obviously because of the relatively lower S/N ratio of the Watec ASI as compared to that of the OMTI ASI.

The other important point to note is that EPBs are detected only by the low-cost ASI, for example, those in November 2014. This is directly because the OMTI ASI did not operate in this interval, because the ASI did not operate when the Moon was above the horizon to prevent degradation of the CCD detector. In contrast to the OMTI ASI, the low-cost ASI has always been operated during the nighttime irrespective of the Moon phase. Of course, the low-cost ASI system, especially the CCD detector of the camera, is also affected by the strong illumination from the Moon. However, the camera can be replaced when the detector is significantly degraded, which enables us to use the low-cost ASI for monitoring EPBs all the time even during the full Moon period.

Comparison to scintillation measurements

As mentioned in the previous section, one of the significant space weather impacts of EPBs is their effect on GNSS scintillation. In Ishigaki Island, ENRI has been operating several GNSS receivers, whose sampling rate is 50 Hz, to monitor the effect of the EPBs on the quality of navigation signals received on the ground. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the low-cost ASI data with the simultaneous scintillation measurements at 2337 JST on Feb 14, 2015. The deviation image is shown as a background image showing two EPB traces, one in the middle of the field-of-view and the other near the western horizon. The circles show the direction of the satellites, including 10 GPS satellites and three geosynchronous satellites (reddish ones, 128, 129, and 137). The size of the circles indicates the magnitude of the S4 index, which is a proxy for the amplitude scintillation (e.g., Kintner et al. 2007). At this timing, the size of the circles is clearly larger in the southern half of the field-of-view where the ray-paths of several satellites cross the traces of EPBs. This tendency is clear for PRN1, PRN4, and PRN9, all of which are within the region of depleted airglow caused by the EPBs. This correspondence is consistent with previous observations that demonstrated the amplitude scintillation is directly associated with density irregularities embedded within EPBs (e.g., Kelley et al. 2002). Such a synchronizing behavior of the amplitude scintillation with the passage of EPBs is more clearly seen in an attached additional movie file covering the full sequence of the measurement on this night (see Additional file 2). In Fig. 5, it is found that the observed S4 values tend to be larger near the southern edge of the FOV. This could be because the length of the ray-path of the radio waves passing through EPBs is longer when the satellite is seen near the southern horizon. Such a viewing geometry also affects the level of scintillation as indexed by the magnitude of S4.

Fig. 5
figure5

Simultaneous observations of EPBs with the low-cost ASI and satellite scintillation measurements. The deviation image from the low-cost ASI is shown as a background. The circles give the location of the satellite within the all-sky field-of-view, and the size of the circles indicates the magnitude of the S4 index, which is a proxy for the amplitude scintillation

Figure 6 displays a time-series of the S4 index from the same interval, derived for the signals from each satellite. Figure 6a–c shows the data for PRN 4, 7, and 11 of GPS satellites. Several prominent enhancements in the S4 index took place during the interval, the S4 index sometimes being higher than 1. These green hatched intervals indicate periods of EPB passage detected by the low-cost imager. A one-to-one close relationship is clearly seen between the passages of EPBs and increases in the amplitude scintillation. This comparison implies that the optical data from the low-cost imager can be used to detect at least EPBs that can produce amplitude scintillation, which is of particular importance in monitoring the effect of EPBs on the GNSS.

Fig. 6
figure6

Temporal variation of the S4 index during the sequential passage of EPBs across Ishigaki Island on February 14, 2015. The data from three GPS satellites are shown in the top three panels (ac) and those from three geosynchronous satellites are shown in the bottom three panels (df). The intervals of EPBs detected by the low-cost airglow imager on the ray-path of the signal are highlighted green. The elevation angle of the satellite is overplotted

Figure 6d–f shows the same data from three geosynchronous satellites (MTSAT-1, MTSAT-1R, and GSAT-10). As the locations of these satellites do not move in the field-of-view of the ASI, the temporal variation of the S4 index during the full sequence of this EPB event can be studied. As is common in all the satellite data, the amplitude of the S4 index enhancement during the passages of the EPB was larger in the earlier timings, and the peak value decreased at later local time. This implies that the power of EPB-associated irregularities weakens during the course of the eastward propagation of EPBs. In the post-midnight part of Fig. 6f, for example, 02 to 05 JST, the S4 index did not increase even during the passage of EPBs. This suggests that the large-scale density depletions, such as EPBs, are maintained for a certain interval after small-scale irregularities disappear (Basu et al. 1978).

Monitoring of EPBs in a wide area using low-cost imager

In the previous sections, we have demonstrated that the observations from the low-cost ASI could potentially detect EPBs. If the low-cost ASIs can be deployed in multiple places in the equatorial and low-latitude regions, it would be possible to visualize the large-scale distribution of EPBs and then monitor how they emerge and develop. To evaluate such a capability of large-scale monitoring of EPBs with multiple ASIs, we have conducted a pilot study to map the structure of EPBs by combining data of ASIs in Ishigaki and Tainan. Figure 7a shows the combined image of EPBs at 1355 UT on March 16, 2015. The imager in Tainan is not a low-cost ASI but one equipped with a cooled CCD camera. To reduce the oblique viewing effect, we plot the percentage deviation of the image. The oblique viewing effect equally affects the 2-min average and 1-h average images; thus, the effect of oblique viewing should be reduced in the percentage deviation image.

Fig. 7
figure7

Combination of two all-sky airglow imagers in Ishigaki Island, Japan and Tainan, Taiwan: a combined images from the two stations at 1355 UT on March 16, 2015; b east to west keogram made by combining deviation data from two stations

On this night, several EPBs were observed traversing the field-of-view of the two ASIs from west to east, which is a typical eastward drift of EPBs. At the time of Fig. 7a, three traces of EPBs were identified in the combined image. Figure 7b shows the corresponding keogram along the west–east cross-section at 20 geographic latitude (GLAT), indicating that the several EPBs drifted all the way across the fields-of-view of the two ASIs sequentially. The traces in the keogram are connected seamlessly at the boundary between the fields-of-view of the ASIs. This example demonstrates the capability of large-scale monitoring of EPBs with closely spaced multiple low-cost ASIs.

For the monitoring purpose of EPBs in a broad region, we have started routine observation of EPBs in Ishigaki Island following the feasibility study reported here. In addition to the low-cost ASI in Ishigaki, we also deployed the same low-cost ASIs in Ogimi, Okinawa (26.68 N, 128.15 E), Tainan, Taiwan (22.60 N, 120.10 E) and Chumphon, Thailand (10.72 N, 99.38 E) since early 2018. In the future, by expanding these network observations of the 630.0-nm airglow to a broad region covering East and Southeast Asia, we plan to set up a near-realtime monitoring system of EPBs in the equatorial and low-latitude regions in the Asian sector. For such monitoring observations, we may need to further improve the S/N ratio of images from the low-cost ASIs. Now we are investigating a possibility to use a portable refrigerator as a housing of the ASI for reducing the random noise of instrumental origin. In addition, we are now testing an operation of multiple cameras equipped with the same optical filters in the same place, which could improve the quality of observations by increasing the number of images for the integration process without blurring effect.

Conclusion

In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of observations of EPBs using a small and low-cost all-sky airglow imager. For this purpose, pilot observations using the low-cost imager system were conducted in Ishigaki Island in Japan over ~ 1.5 years from 2014 to 2016. This system consists of a small camera, fisheye lens, and optical filter, and it captures raw all-sky images every 4 s. One of the problems of this low-cost ASI is the low S/N ratio (~ 0.5 in the raw images) due to shot noise from the non-cooled CCD camera. However, by averaging raw images for 2 min and extracting the 1-h average background image from the average image, we succeeded in visualizing the detailed spatial structure of plasma bubbles including the bifurcating traces whose horizontal scale size ranged from 30 to 100 km. By comparing the L-band amplitude scintillation measurements with the low-cost ASI, we demonstrate that the level of amplitude scintillation proxied by the S4 index enhanced significantly during the passage of plasma bubbles across the ray-path of the signal from the satellite. This further confirms that the low-cost ASI is able to monitor the impact of bubbles on the GNSS scintillation. Following the results of the current feasibility study of the low-cost ASI system, we plan to deploy the low-cost ASIs in low-latitude and equatorial Asian countries and establish a network observation for monitoring the generation and development of plasma bubbles and their space weather impacts on the satellite navigation system.

Availability of data and materials

Data of low-cost airglow imager and satellite scintillation measurements from Ishigaki Island during the pilot measurement are available upon request (contact: Keisuke Hosokawa and Susumu Saito). The data of the OMTI ASI in Ishigaki are opened through ISEE, Nagoya University. Details can be found from the PWING Web site at https://www.isee.nagoya-u.ac.jp/dimr/PWING/en. Digital data are available through the ERG Science Center of ISEE, Nagoya University (https://ergsc.isee.nagoya-u.ac.jp/index.shtml.en).

Abbreviations

CCD:

Charge-coupled device

ASI:

All-sky imager

EPBs:

Equatorial plasma bubbles

GAIA:

Ground-to-topside model of atmosphere and ionosphere for aeronomy

GNSS:

Global navigation satellite system

GPS:

Global positioning system

OMTIs:

Optical mesosphere thermosphere imagers

FWHM:

Full-width at half-maximum

ENRI:

Electric Navigation Research Institute

LT:

Local time

UT:

Universal time

JST:

Japan standard time

PRN:

Pseudorandom noise

MTSAT:

Multi-functional transport satellite

TIEGCM:

Thermosphere–ionosphere electrodynamics general circulation model

References

  1. Aarons J (1993) The longitudinal morphology of equatorial F-layer irregularities relevant to their occurrence. Space Sci Rev 63:209–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basu S, Basu S, Aarons J, McClure JP, Cousins MD (1978) On the coexistence of kilometer- and meter-scale irregularities in the nighttime equatorial F region. J Geophys Res 83:4219–4226. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA09p04219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carter BA et al (2014) Geomagnetic control of equatorial plasma bubble activity modeled by the TIEGCM with Kp. Geophys Res Lett 41:5331–5339. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fejer BG, Kelley MC (1980) Ionospheric irregularities. Rev Geophys 18:401–454. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Franke SJ, Liu CH, McClure JP (1984) Interpretation and modeling of quasiperiodic diffraction patterns observed in equatorial VHF scintillation due to plasma bubbles. J Geophys Res 89:10891–10902. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA089iA12p10891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosokawa K, Ogawa Y, Taguchi S (2019) Imaging of polar cap patches with a low-cost airglow camera: pilot observations in Svalbard, Norway. Earth Planets Space 71:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-019-1094-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang C-S, Kelley MC (1996) Nonlinear evolution of equatorial spread F: 2 gravity wave seeding of Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J Geophys Res 101:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelley MC, Makela JJ, Ledvina BM, Kintner PM (2002) Observations of equatorial spread-F from Haleakala, Hawaii. Geophys Res Lett 29:64. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kil H (2015) The morphology of equatorial plasma bubbles—a review. J Astron Space Sci 32:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kil H, Paxton LJ, Oh S-J (2009) Global bubble distribution seen from ROCSAT-1 and its association with the pre-reversal enhancement. J Geophys Res 114:A06307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kintner PM, Ledvina BM, de Paula ER (2007) GPS and ionospheric scintillations. Space Weather 5:S09003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006SW000260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makela JJ, Ledvina BM, Kelley MC, Kintner PM (2004) Analysis of the seasonal variations of equatorial plasma bubble occurrence observed from Haleakala, Hawaii. Ann Geophys 22:3109–3121. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-3109-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maruyama T, Matuura N (1984) Longitudinal variability of annual changes in activity of equatorial spread F and plasma bubbles. J Geophys Res 89:10903–10912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogawa Y, Tanaka Y, Kadokura A, Hosokawa K, Ebihara Y, Motoba T, Gustavsson B, Brändström U, Sato Y, Oyama S, Raita T, Sigernes F, Nozawa S, Shiokawa K, Kosch M, Kauristie K, Hall C, Suzuki S, Miyoshi Y, Gerrard A, Miyaoka H, Fujii R (2020) Development of low-cost multi-wavelength imager system for studies of auroras and airglows. Polar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2019.100501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Otsuka Y, Shiokawa K, Ogawa T, Wilkinson P (2002) Geomagnetic conjugate observations of equatorial airglow depletions. Geophys Res Lett 29:43. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinagawa H, Jin H, Miyoshi Y, Fujiwara H, Yokoyama T, Otsuka Y (2018) Daily and seasonal variations in the linear growth rate of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability in the ionosphere obtained with GAIA. Prog Earth Planet Sci 5:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shiokawa K, Katoh Y, Satoh M, Ejiri MK, Ogawa T, Nakamura T, Tsuda T, Wiens RH (1999) Development of optical mesosphere thermosphere imagers (OMTI). Earth Planets Space 51:887–896. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiokawa K, Otsuka Y, Ogawa T, Wilkinson P (2004) Time evolution of high-altitude plasma bubbles imaged at geomagnetic conjugate points. Ann Geophys 22:3137–3143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiokawa K, Otsuka Y, Ogawa T (2009) Propagation characteristics of nighttime mesospheric and thermospheric waves observed by optical mesosphere thermosphere imagers at middle and low latitudes. Earth Planets Space 61:479–491. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03353165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobral JHA, Takahashi H, Abdu MA, Muralikrishna P, Sahai Y, Zamlutti CJ, de Paula ER, Batista PP (1993) Determination of the quenching rate of the O(1D) by O(3P) from rocket-borne optical (630 nm) and electron density data. J Geophys Res 98(A5):7791–7798. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA01839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsunoda RT (2015) Upwelling: a unit of disturbance in equatorial spread F. Prog Earth Planet Sci 2:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0038-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weber EJ, Buchau J, Eather H, Mende SB (1978) North-south aligned equatorial airglow depletions. J Geophys Res 83:712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodman RF, Lahoz C (1976) Radar observations of F region equatorial irregularities. J Geophys Res 81:5447–5466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokoyama T (2017) A review on the numerical simulation of equatorial plasma bubbles toward scintillation evaluation and forecasting. Prog Earth Planet Sci 4:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-017-0153-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

KH thanks the staff of the National Institute of Polar Research who operated and maintained the system for calibration of optical instruments. KH also thanks H. Takayama for developing the low-cost airglow imager system deployed in Ishigaki Island.

Funding

KH and SS are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (17H02967). YUO and KS are supported by JSPS-Kakenhi (15H05815 and 16H06286).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH designed and conducted the current research and prepared the manuscript. KT analyzed the optical and satellite scintillation data. SS operated the OMTI all-sky camera and satellite scintillation measurements in Ishigaki Island and helped the interpretation of the results. YAO developed and calibrated the low-cost all-sky imager used for the pilot observation. YO and KS operated and maintained the OMTI ASI in Ishigaki Island and discussed the results of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keisuke Hosokawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Movie S1.

Full-sequence all-sky images obtained from the low-cost ASI during 2100 to 2400 JST on February 14, 2015. Left panel shows the raw image obtained with an exposure time of 4 s. Right panel shows the average image obtained by integrating 30 consecutive images.

Additional file 2: Movie S2.

Full-sequence all-sky deviation images from the low-cost ASI during 7 h interval from 2100 JST on February 14, 2015 to 0500 JST on February 15, 2015. The circles indicate the location of the satellite within the all-sky field-of-view, and the size of the circles indicates the magnitude of the S4 index, which is a proxy for the amplitude scintillation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosokawa, K., Takami, K., Saito, S. et al. Observations of equatorial plasma bubbles using a low-cost 630.0-nm all-sky imager in Ishigaki Island, Japan. Earth Planets Space 72, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01187-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ionosphere
  • Plasma bubble
  • Airglow
  • Optical observations
  • Satellite navigation