Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Correction
  • Open Access

Correction to: Which is heterogeneous, stress or strength? An estimation from high-density seismic observations

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 4
Earth, Planets and Space201870:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0778-8

  • Received: 3 January 2018
  • Accepted: 3 January 2018
  • Published:

The original article was published in Earth, Planets and Space 2017 69:144

Correction to: Earth, Planets and Space (2017) 69:144 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0730-3

After publication of this work (Iio et al. 2017), an error was noticed. Figures 10 and 12 were accidentally swapped. This was caused due to a typesetting error.

This is now corrected below (Figs. 10, 12):
Fig. 10
Fig. 10

a Plots of the normalized shear and normal stresses on faults on a three-dimensional Mohr diagram for a grid point (x = 10, y = 9, z = − 2). Pore pressure indicators Pp are calculated as Pp = σn − τ/μ, where μ is assumed as 0.6. Sizes of circles represent the difference of misfits between the fault plane and auxiliary plane (misfitdiff); coloring indicates only data with misfits on the fault plane greater than the error of focal mechanisms, 10°. b Histogram of misfits. c Relationship between azimuths and dip angles of the fault planes. Misfits are also indicated by the sizes and colors of circles. d Relationship between magnitude and misfit. e Histogram of the pore pressure indicator, Pp

Fig. 12
Fig. 12

a Plots of the normalized shear and normal stresses on a three-dimensional Mohr diagram for a grid point (x = 9, y = 6, z = − 2). b Histogram of misfits. c Relationship between azimuths and dip angles of the fault planes. d Relationship between magnitude and misfit. e Histogram of the pore pressure indicator Pp. Other explanations are the same as for Fig. 10

The publisher apologises for these errors.

Notes

Declarations

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Center for Earthquake Prediction, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Japan
(2)
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
(3)
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan
(4)
Home Seismometer, Fukushima, Japan

Reference

  1. Iio Y, Yoneda I, Sawada M, Miura T, Katao H, Takada Y et al (2017) Which is heterogeneous, stress or strength? An estimation from high-density seismic observations. Earth Planets Space 69:144View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement